1 | // Licensed to the .NET Foundation under one or more agreements. |
2 | // The .NET Foundation licenses this file to you under the MIT license. |
3 | // See the LICENSE file in the project root for more information. |
4 | |
5 | /*============================================================ |
6 | ** |
7 | ** Source : test.c |
8 | ** |
9 | ** Purpose: Test for InterlockedCompareExchange() function |
10 | ** |
11 | ** |
12 | **=========================================================*/ |
13 | |
14 | /* This test is FINISHED. Note: The biggest feature of this function is that |
15 | it locks the value before it increments it -- in order to make it so only |
16 | one thread can access it. But, I really don't have a great test to make |
17 | sure it's thread safe. Any ideas? |
18 | */ |
19 | |
20 | #include <palsuite.h> |
21 | |
22 | #define START_VALUE 0 |
23 | #define SECOND_VALUE 5 |
24 | #define THIRD_VALUE 10 |
25 | |
26 | int __cdecl main(int argc, char *argv[]) { |
27 | |
28 | int BaseVariableToManipulate = START_VALUE; |
29 | int ValueToExchange = SECOND_VALUE; |
30 | int TempValue; |
31 | int TheReturn; |
32 | |
33 | /* |
34 | * Initialize the PAL and return FAILURE if this fails |
35 | */ |
36 | |
37 | if(0 != (PAL_Initialize(argc, argv))) |
38 | { |
39 | return FAIL; |
40 | } |
41 | |
42 | /* Compare START_VALUE with BaseVariableToManipulate, they're equal, |
43 | so exchange |
44 | */ |
45 | |
46 | TheReturn = InterlockedCompareExchange( |
47 | &BaseVariableToManipulate, /* Destination */ |
48 | ValueToExchange, /* Exchange value */ |
49 | START_VALUE); /* Compare value */ |
50 | |
51 | /* Exchanged, these should be equal now */ |
52 | if(BaseVariableToManipulate != ValueToExchange) |
53 | { |
54 | Fail("ERROR: A successful compare and exchange should have occurred, " |
55 | "making the variable have the value of %d, as opposed to the " |
56 | "current value of %d." , |
57 | ValueToExchange,BaseVariableToManipulate); |
58 | } |
59 | |
60 | /* Check to make sure it returns the original number which |
61 | 'BaseVariableToManipulate' was set to. |
62 | */ |
63 | if(TheReturn != START_VALUE) |
64 | { |
65 | Fail("ERROR: The return value after the first exchange should be the " |
66 | "former value of the variable, which was %d, but it is now %d." , |
67 | START_VALUE,TheReturn); |
68 | } |
69 | |
70 | |
71 | |
72 | ValueToExchange = THIRD_VALUE; /* Give this a new value */ |
73 | TempValue = BaseVariableToManipulate; /* Note value of Base */ |
74 | |
75 | /* |
76 | Do an exchange where 'BaseVariableToManipulate' doesn't |
77 | match -- therefore the exchange shouldn't happen. |
78 | So, it should end up the same as the 'TempValue' we saved. |
79 | */ |
80 | |
81 | InterlockedCompareExchange(&BaseVariableToManipulate, |
82 | ValueToExchange, |
83 | START_VALUE); |
84 | |
85 | if(BaseVariableToManipulate != TempValue) |
86 | { |
87 | Fail("ERROR: An attempted exchange should have failed due to " |
88 | "the compare failing. But, it seems to have succeeded. The " |
89 | "value should be %d but is %d in this case." , |
90 | TempValue,BaseVariableToManipulate); |
91 | } |
92 | |
93 | PAL_Terminate(); |
94 | return PASS; |
95 | } |
96 | |
97 | |
98 | |
99 | |
100 | |
101 | |