| 1 | /*------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 2 | * |
| 3 | * equivclass.c |
| 4 | * Routines for managing EquivalenceClasses |
| 5 | * |
| 6 | * See src/backend/optimizer/README for discussion of EquivalenceClasses. |
| 7 | * |
| 8 | * |
| 9 | * Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2019, PostgreSQL Global Development Group |
| 10 | * Portions Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California |
| 11 | * |
| 12 | * IDENTIFICATION |
| 13 | * src/backend/optimizer/path/equivclass.c |
| 14 | * |
| 15 | *------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 16 | */ |
| 17 | #include "postgres.h" |
| 18 | |
| 19 | #include <limits.h> |
| 20 | |
| 21 | #include "access/stratnum.h" |
| 22 | #include "catalog/pg_type.h" |
| 23 | #include "nodes/makefuncs.h" |
| 24 | #include "nodes/nodeFuncs.h" |
| 25 | #include "optimizer/appendinfo.h" |
| 26 | #include "optimizer/clauses.h" |
| 27 | #include "optimizer/optimizer.h" |
| 28 | #include "optimizer/pathnode.h" |
| 29 | #include "optimizer/paths.h" |
| 30 | #include "optimizer/planmain.h" |
| 31 | #include "optimizer/restrictinfo.h" |
| 32 | #include "utils/lsyscache.h" |
| 33 | |
| 34 | |
| 35 | static EquivalenceMember *add_eq_member(EquivalenceClass *ec, |
| 36 | Expr *expr, Relids relids, Relids nullable_relids, |
| 37 | bool is_child, Oid datatype); |
| 38 | static void generate_base_implied_equalities_const(PlannerInfo *root, |
| 39 | EquivalenceClass *ec); |
| 40 | static void generate_base_implied_equalities_no_const(PlannerInfo *root, |
| 41 | EquivalenceClass *ec); |
| 42 | static void generate_base_implied_equalities_broken(PlannerInfo *root, |
| 43 | EquivalenceClass *ec); |
| 44 | static List *generate_join_implied_equalities_normal(PlannerInfo *root, |
| 45 | EquivalenceClass *ec, |
| 46 | Relids join_relids, |
| 47 | Relids outer_relids, |
| 48 | Relids inner_relids); |
| 49 | static List *generate_join_implied_equalities_broken(PlannerInfo *root, |
| 50 | EquivalenceClass *ec, |
| 51 | Relids nominal_join_relids, |
| 52 | Relids outer_relids, |
| 53 | Relids nominal_inner_relids, |
| 54 | RelOptInfo *inner_rel); |
| 55 | static Oid select_equality_operator(EquivalenceClass *ec, |
| 56 | Oid lefttype, Oid righttype); |
| 57 | static RestrictInfo *create_join_clause(PlannerInfo *root, |
| 58 | EquivalenceClass *ec, Oid opno, |
| 59 | EquivalenceMember *leftem, |
| 60 | EquivalenceMember *rightem, |
| 61 | EquivalenceClass *parent_ec); |
| 62 | static bool reconsider_outer_join_clause(PlannerInfo *root, |
| 63 | RestrictInfo *rinfo, |
| 64 | bool outer_on_left); |
| 65 | static bool reconsider_full_join_clause(PlannerInfo *root, |
| 66 | RestrictInfo *rinfo); |
| 67 | |
| 68 | |
| 69 | /* |
| 70 | * process_equivalence |
| 71 | * The given clause has a mergejoinable operator and can be applied without |
| 72 | * any delay by an outer join, so its two sides can be considered equal |
| 73 | * anywhere they are both computable; moreover that equality can be |
| 74 | * extended transitively. Record this knowledge in the EquivalenceClass |
| 75 | * data structure, if applicable. Returns true if successful, false if not |
| 76 | * (in which case caller should treat the clause as ordinary, not an |
| 77 | * equivalence). |
| 78 | * |
| 79 | * In some cases, although we cannot convert a clause into EquivalenceClass |
| 80 | * knowledge, we can still modify it to a more useful form than the original. |
| 81 | * Then, *p_restrictinfo will be replaced by a new RestrictInfo, which is what |
| 82 | * the caller should use for further processing. |
| 83 | * |
| 84 | * If below_outer_join is true, then the clause was found below the nullable |
| 85 | * side of an outer join, so its sides might validly be both NULL rather than |
| 86 | * strictly equal. We can still deduce equalities in such cases, but we take |
| 87 | * care to mark an EquivalenceClass if it came from any such clauses. Also, |
| 88 | * we have to check that both sides are either pseudo-constants or strict |
| 89 | * functions of Vars, else they might not both go to NULL above the outer |
| 90 | * join. (This is the main reason why we need a failure return. It's more |
| 91 | * convenient to check this case here than at the call sites...) |
| 92 | * |
| 93 | * We also reject proposed equivalence clauses if they contain leaky functions |
| 94 | * and have security_level above zero. The EC evaluation rules require us to |
| 95 | * apply certain tests at certain joining levels, and we can't tolerate |
| 96 | * delaying any test on security_level grounds. By rejecting candidate clauses |
| 97 | * that might require security delays, we ensure it's safe to apply an EC |
| 98 | * clause as soon as it's supposed to be applied. |
| 99 | * |
| 100 | * On success return, we have also initialized the clause's left_ec/right_ec |
| 101 | * fields to point to the EquivalenceClass representing it. This saves lookup |
| 102 | * effort later. |
| 103 | * |
| 104 | * Note: constructing merged EquivalenceClasses is a standard UNION-FIND |
| 105 | * problem, for which there exist better data structures than simple lists. |
| 106 | * If this code ever proves to be a bottleneck then it could be sped up --- |
| 107 | * but for now, simple is beautiful. |
| 108 | * |
| 109 | * Note: this is only called during planner startup, not during GEQO |
| 110 | * exploration, so we need not worry about whether we're in the right |
| 111 | * memory context. |
| 112 | */ |
| 113 | bool |
| 114 | process_equivalence(PlannerInfo *root, |
| 115 | RestrictInfo **p_restrictinfo, |
| 116 | bool below_outer_join) |
| 117 | { |
| 118 | RestrictInfo *restrictinfo = *p_restrictinfo; |
| 119 | Expr *clause = restrictinfo->clause; |
| 120 | Oid opno, |
| 121 | collation, |
| 122 | item1_type, |
| 123 | item2_type; |
| 124 | Expr *item1; |
| 125 | Expr *item2; |
| 126 | Relids item1_relids, |
| 127 | item2_relids, |
| 128 | item1_nullable_relids, |
| 129 | item2_nullable_relids; |
| 130 | List *opfamilies; |
| 131 | EquivalenceClass *ec1, |
| 132 | *ec2; |
| 133 | EquivalenceMember *em1, |
| 134 | *em2; |
| 135 | ListCell *lc1; |
| 136 | |
| 137 | /* Should not already be marked as having generated an eclass */ |
| 138 | Assert(restrictinfo->left_ec == NULL); |
| 139 | Assert(restrictinfo->right_ec == NULL); |
| 140 | |
| 141 | /* Reject if it is potentially postponable by security considerations */ |
| 142 | if (restrictinfo->security_level > 0 && !restrictinfo->leakproof) |
| 143 | return false; |
| 144 | |
| 145 | /* Extract info from given clause */ |
| 146 | Assert(is_opclause(clause)); |
| 147 | opno = ((OpExpr *) clause)->opno; |
| 148 | collation = ((OpExpr *) clause)->inputcollid; |
| 149 | item1 = (Expr *) get_leftop(clause); |
| 150 | item2 = (Expr *) get_rightop(clause); |
| 151 | item1_relids = restrictinfo->left_relids; |
| 152 | item2_relids = restrictinfo->right_relids; |
| 153 | |
| 154 | /* |
| 155 | * Ensure both input expressions expose the desired collation (their types |
| 156 | * should be OK already); see comments for canonicalize_ec_expression. |
| 157 | */ |
| 158 | item1 = canonicalize_ec_expression(item1, |
| 159 | exprType((Node *) item1), |
| 160 | collation); |
| 161 | item2 = canonicalize_ec_expression(item2, |
| 162 | exprType((Node *) item2), |
| 163 | collation); |
| 164 | |
| 165 | /* |
| 166 | * Clauses of the form X=X cannot be translated into EquivalenceClasses. |
| 167 | * We'd either end up with a single-entry EC, losing the knowledge that |
| 168 | * the clause was present at all, or else make an EC with duplicate |
| 169 | * entries, causing other issues. |
| 170 | */ |
| 171 | if (equal(item1, item2)) |
| 172 | { |
| 173 | /* |
| 174 | * If the operator is strict, then the clause can be treated as just |
| 175 | * "X IS NOT NULL". (Since we know we are considering a top-level |
| 176 | * qual, we can ignore the difference between FALSE and NULL results.) |
| 177 | * It's worth making the conversion because we'll typically get a much |
| 178 | * better selectivity estimate than we would for X=X. |
| 179 | * |
| 180 | * If the operator is not strict, we can't be sure what it will do |
| 181 | * with NULLs, so don't attempt to optimize it. |
| 182 | */ |
| 183 | set_opfuncid((OpExpr *) clause); |
| 184 | if (func_strict(((OpExpr *) clause)->opfuncid)) |
| 185 | { |
| 186 | NullTest *ntest = makeNode(NullTest); |
| 187 | |
| 188 | ntest->arg = item1; |
| 189 | ntest->nulltesttype = IS_NOT_NULL; |
| 190 | ntest->argisrow = false; /* correct even if composite arg */ |
| 191 | ntest->location = -1; |
| 192 | |
| 193 | *p_restrictinfo = |
| 194 | make_restrictinfo((Expr *) ntest, |
| 195 | restrictinfo->is_pushed_down, |
| 196 | restrictinfo->outerjoin_delayed, |
| 197 | restrictinfo->pseudoconstant, |
| 198 | restrictinfo->security_level, |
| 199 | NULL, |
| 200 | restrictinfo->outer_relids, |
| 201 | restrictinfo->nullable_relids); |
| 202 | } |
| 203 | return false; |
| 204 | } |
| 205 | |
| 206 | /* |
| 207 | * If below outer join, check for strictness, else reject. |
| 208 | */ |
| 209 | if (below_outer_join) |
| 210 | { |
| 211 | if (!bms_is_empty(item1_relids) && |
| 212 | contain_nonstrict_functions((Node *) item1)) |
| 213 | return false; /* LHS is non-strict but not constant */ |
| 214 | if (!bms_is_empty(item2_relids) && |
| 215 | contain_nonstrict_functions((Node *) item2)) |
| 216 | return false; /* RHS is non-strict but not constant */ |
| 217 | } |
| 218 | |
| 219 | /* Calculate nullable-relid sets for each side of the clause */ |
| 220 | item1_nullable_relids = bms_intersect(item1_relids, |
| 221 | restrictinfo->nullable_relids); |
| 222 | item2_nullable_relids = bms_intersect(item2_relids, |
| 223 | restrictinfo->nullable_relids); |
| 224 | |
| 225 | /* |
| 226 | * We use the declared input types of the operator, not exprType() of the |
| 227 | * inputs, as the nominal datatypes for opfamily lookup. This presumes |
| 228 | * that btree operators are always registered with amoplefttype and |
| 229 | * amoprighttype equal to their declared input types. We will need this |
| 230 | * info anyway to build EquivalenceMember nodes, and by extracting it now |
| 231 | * we can use type comparisons to short-circuit some equal() tests. |
| 232 | */ |
| 233 | op_input_types(opno, &item1_type, &item2_type); |
| 234 | |
| 235 | opfamilies = restrictinfo->mergeopfamilies; |
| 236 | |
| 237 | /* |
| 238 | * Sweep through the existing EquivalenceClasses looking for matches to |
| 239 | * item1 and item2. These are the possible outcomes: |
| 240 | * |
| 241 | * 1. We find both in the same EC. The equivalence is already known, so |
| 242 | * there's nothing to do. |
| 243 | * |
| 244 | * 2. We find both in different ECs. Merge the two ECs together. |
| 245 | * |
| 246 | * 3. We find just one. Add the other to its EC. |
| 247 | * |
| 248 | * 4. We find neither. Make a new, two-entry EC. |
| 249 | * |
| 250 | * Note: since all ECs are built through this process or the similar |
| 251 | * search in get_eclass_for_sort_expr(), it's impossible that we'd match |
| 252 | * an item in more than one existing nonvolatile EC. So it's okay to stop |
| 253 | * at the first match. |
| 254 | */ |
| 255 | ec1 = ec2 = NULL; |
| 256 | em1 = em2 = NULL; |
| 257 | foreach(lc1, root->eq_classes) |
| 258 | { |
| 259 | EquivalenceClass *cur_ec = (EquivalenceClass *) lfirst(lc1); |
| 260 | ListCell *lc2; |
| 261 | |
| 262 | /* Never match to a volatile EC */ |
| 263 | if (cur_ec->ec_has_volatile) |
| 264 | continue; |
| 265 | |
| 266 | /* |
| 267 | * The collation has to match; check this first since it's cheaper |
| 268 | * than the opfamily comparison. |
| 269 | */ |
| 270 | if (collation != cur_ec->ec_collation) |
| 271 | continue; |
| 272 | |
| 273 | /* |
| 274 | * A "match" requires matching sets of btree opfamilies. Use of |
| 275 | * equal() for this test has implications discussed in the comments |
| 276 | * for get_mergejoin_opfamilies(). |
| 277 | */ |
| 278 | if (!equal(opfamilies, cur_ec->ec_opfamilies)) |
| 279 | continue; |
| 280 | |
| 281 | foreach(lc2, cur_ec->ec_members) |
| 282 | { |
| 283 | EquivalenceMember *cur_em = (EquivalenceMember *) lfirst(lc2); |
| 284 | |
| 285 | Assert(!cur_em->em_is_child); /* no children yet */ |
| 286 | |
| 287 | /* |
| 288 | * If below an outer join, don't match constants: they're not as |
| 289 | * constant as they look. |
| 290 | */ |
| 291 | if ((below_outer_join || cur_ec->ec_below_outer_join) && |
| 292 | cur_em->em_is_const) |
| 293 | continue; |
| 294 | |
| 295 | if (!ec1 && |
| 296 | item1_type == cur_em->em_datatype && |
| 297 | equal(item1, cur_em->em_expr)) |
| 298 | { |
| 299 | ec1 = cur_ec; |
| 300 | em1 = cur_em; |
| 301 | if (ec2) |
| 302 | break; |
| 303 | } |
| 304 | |
| 305 | if (!ec2 && |
| 306 | item2_type == cur_em->em_datatype && |
| 307 | equal(item2, cur_em->em_expr)) |
| 308 | { |
| 309 | ec2 = cur_ec; |
| 310 | em2 = cur_em; |
| 311 | if (ec1) |
| 312 | break; |
| 313 | } |
| 314 | } |
| 315 | |
| 316 | if (ec1 && ec2) |
| 317 | break; |
| 318 | } |
| 319 | |
| 320 | /* Sweep finished, what did we find? */ |
| 321 | |
| 322 | if (ec1 && ec2) |
| 323 | { |
| 324 | /* If case 1, nothing to do, except add to sources */ |
| 325 | if (ec1 == ec2) |
| 326 | { |
| 327 | ec1->ec_sources = lappend(ec1->ec_sources, restrictinfo); |
| 328 | ec1->ec_below_outer_join |= below_outer_join; |
| 329 | ec1->ec_min_security = Min(ec1->ec_min_security, |
| 330 | restrictinfo->security_level); |
| 331 | ec1->ec_max_security = Max(ec1->ec_max_security, |
| 332 | restrictinfo->security_level); |
| 333 | /* mark the RI as associated with this eclass */ |
| 334 | restrictinfo->left_ec = ec1; |
| 335 | restrictinfo->right_ec = ec1; |
| 336 | /* mark the RI as usable with this pair of EMs */ |
| 337 | restrictinfo->left_em = em1; |
| 338 | restrictinfo->right_em = em2; |
| 339 | return true; |
| 340 | } |
| 341 | |
| 342 | /* |
| 343 | * Case 2: need to merge ec1 and ec2. This should never happen after |
| 344 | * we've built any canonical pathkeys; if it did, those pathkeys might |
| 345 | * be rendered non-canonical by the merge. |
| 346 | */ |
| 347 | if (root->canon_pathkeys != NIL) |
| 348 | elog(ERROR, "too late to merge equivalence classes" ); |
| 349 | |
| 350 | /* |
| 351 | * We add ec2's items to ec1, then set ec2's ec_merged link to point |
| 352 | * to ec1 and remove ec2 from the eq_classes list. We cannot simply |
| 353 | * delete ec2 because that could leave dangling pointers in existing |
| 354 | * PathKeys. We leave it behind with a link so that the merged EC can |
| 355 | * be found. |
| 356 | */ |
| 357 | ec1->ec_members = list_concat(ec1->ec_members, ec2->ec_members); |
| 358 | ec1->ec_sources = list_concat(ec1->ec_sources, ec2->ec_sources); |
| 359 | ec1->ec_derives = list_concat(ec1->ec_derives, ec2->ec_derives); |
| 360 | ec1->ec_relids = bms_join(ec1->ec_relids, ec2->ec_relids); |
| 361 | ec1->ec_has_const |= ec2->ec_has_const; |
| 362 | /* can't need to set has_volatile */ |
| 363 | ec1->ec_below_outer_join |= ec2->ec_below_outer_join; |
| 364 | ec1->ec_min_security = Min(ec1->ec_min_security, |
| 365 | ec2->ec_min_security); |
| 366 | ec1->ec_max_security = Max(ec1->ec_max_security, |
| 367 | ec2->ec_max_security); |
| 368 | ec2->ec_merged = ec1; |
| 369 | root->eq_classes = list_delete_ptr(root->eq_classes, ec2); |
| 370 | /* just to avoid debugging confusion w/ dangling pointers: */ |
| 371 | ec2->ec_members = NIL; |
| 372 | ec2->ec_sources = NIL; |
| 373 | ec2->ec_derives = NIL; |
| 374 | ec2->ec_relids = NULL; |
| 375 | ec1->ec_sources = lappend(ec1->ec_sources, restrictinfo); |
| 376 | ec1->ec_below_outer_join |= below_outer_join; |
| 377 | ec1->ec_min_security = Min(ec1->ec_min_security, |
| 378 | restrictinfo->security_level); |
| 379 | ec1->ec_max_security = Max(ec1->ec_max_security, |
| 380 | restrictinfo->security_level); |
| 381 | /* mark the RI as associated with this eclass */ |
| 382 | restrictinfo->left_ec = ec1; |
| 383 | restrictinfo->right_ec = ec1; |
| 384 | /* mark the RI as usable with this pair of EMs */ |
| 385 | restrictinfo->left_em = em1; |
| 386 | restrictinfo->right_em = em2; |
| 387 | } |
| 388 | else if (ec1) |
| 389 | { |
| 390 | /* Case 3: add item2 to ec1 */ |
| 391 | em2 = add_eq_member(ec1, item2, item2_relids, item2_nullable_relids, |
| 392 | false, item2_type); |
| 393 | ec1->ec_sources = lappend(ec1->ec_sources, restrictinfo); |
| 394 | ec1->ec_below_outer_join |= below_outer_join; |
| 395 | ec1->ec_min_security = Min(ec1->ec_min_security, |
| 396 | restrictinfo->security_level); |
| 397 | ec1->ec_max_security = Max(ec1->ec_max_security, |
| 398 | restrictinfo->security_level); |
| 399 | /* mark the RI as associated with this eclass */ |
| 400 | restrictinfo->left_ec = ec1; |
| 401 | restrictinfo->right_ec = ec1; |
| 402 | /* mark the RI as usable with this pair of EMs */ |
| 403 | restrictinfo->left_em = em1; |
| 404 | restrictinfo->right_em = em2; |
| 405 | } |
| 406 | else if (ec2) |
| 407 | { |
| 408 | /* Case 3: add item1 to ec2 */ |
| 409 | em1 = add_eq_member(ec2, item1, item1_relids, item1_nullable_relids, |
| 410 | false, item1_type); |
| 411 | ec2->ec_sources = lappend(ec2->ec_sources, restrictinfo); |
| 412 | ec2->ec_below_outer_join |= below_outer_join; |
| 413 | ec2->ec_min_security = Min(ec2->ec_min_security, |
| 414 | restrictinfo->security_level); |
| 415 | ec2->ec_max_security = Max(ec2->ec_max_security, |
| 416 | restrictinfo->security_level); |
| 417 | /* mark the RI as associated with this eclass */ |
| 418 | restrictinfo->left_ec = ec2; |
| 419 | restrictinfo->right_ec = ec2; |
| 420 | /* mark the RI as usable with this pair of EMs */ |
| 421 | restrictinfo->left_em = em1; |
| 422 | restrictinfo->right_em = em2; |
| 423 | } |
| 424 | else |
| 425 | { |
| 426 | /* Case 4: make a new, two-entry EC */ |
| 427 | EquivalenceClass *ec = makeNode(EquivalenceClass); |
| 428 | |
| 429 | ec->ec_opfamilies = opfamilies; |
| 430 | ec->ec_collation = collation; |
| 431 | ec->ec_members = NIL; |
| 432 | ec->ec_sources = list_make1(restrictinfo); |
| 433 | ec->ec_derives = NIL; |
| 434 | ec->ec_relids = NULL; |
| 435 | ec->ec_has_const = false; |
| 436 | ec->ec_has_volatile = false; |
| 437 | ec->ec_below_outer_join = below_outer_join; |
| 438 | ec->ec_broken = false; |
| 439 | ec->ec_sortref = 0; |
| 440 | ec->ec_min_security = restrictinfo->security_level; |
| 441 | ec->ec_max_security = restrictinfo->security_level; |
| 442 | ec->ec_merged = NULL; |
| 443 | em1 = add_eq_member(ec, item1, item1_relids, item1_nullable_relids, |
| 444 | false, item1_type); |
| 445 | em2 = add_eq_member(ec, item2, item2_relids, item2_nullable_relids, |
| 446 | false, item2_type); |
| 447 | |
| 448 | root->eq_classes = lappend(root->eq_classes, ec); |
| 449 | |
| 450 | /* mark the RI as associated with this eclass */ |
| 451 | restrictinfo->left_ec = ec; |
| 452 | restrictinfo->right_ec = ec; |
| 453 | /* mark the RI as usable with this pair of EMs */ |
| 454 | restrictinfo->left_em = em1; |
| 455 | restrictinfo->right_em = em2; |
| 456 | } |
| 457 | |
| 458 | return true; |
| 459 | } |
| 460 | |
| 461 | /* |
| 462 | * canonicalize_ec_expression |
| 463 | * |
| 464 | * This function ensures that the expression exposes the expected type and |
| 465 | * collation, so that it will be equal() to other equivalence-class expressions |
| 466 | * that it ought to be equal() to. |
| 467 | * |
| 468 | * The rule for datatypes is that the exposed type should match what it would |
| 469 | * be for an input to an operator of the EC's opfamilies; which is usually |
| 470 | * the declared input type of the operator, but in the case of polymorphic |
| 471 | * operators no relabeling is wanted (compare the behavior of parse_coerce.c). |
| 472 | * Expressions coming in from quals will generally have the right type |
| 473 | * already, but expressions coming from indexkeys may not (because they are |
| 474 | * represented without any explicit relabel in pg_index), and the same problem |
| 475 | * occurs for sort expressions (because the parser is likewise cavalier about |
| 476 | * putting relabels on them). Such cases will be binary-compatible with the |
| 477 | * real operators, so adding a RelabelType is sufficient. |
| 478 | * |
| 479 | * Also, the expression's exposed collation must match the EC's collation. |
| 480 | * This is important because in comparisons like "foo < bar COLLATE baz", |
| 481 | * only one of the expressions has the correct exposed collation as we receive |
| 482 | * it from the parser. Forcing both of them to have it ensures that all |
| 483 | * variant spellings of such a construct behave the same. Again, we can |
| 484 | * stick on a RelabelType to force the right exposed collation. (It might |
| 485 | * work to not label the collation at all in EC members, but this is risky |
| 486 | * since some parts of the system expect exprCollation() to deliver the |
| 487 | * right answer for a sort key.) |
| 488 | * |
| 489 | * Note this code assumes that the expression has already been through |
| 490 | * eval_const_expressions, so there are no CollateExprs and no redundant |
| 491 | * RelabelTypes. |
| 492 | */ |
| 493 | Expr * |
| 494 | canonicalize_ec_expression(Expr *expr, Oid req_type, Oid req_collation) |
| 495 | { |
| 496 | Oid expr_type = exprType((Node *) expr); |
| 497 | |
| 498 | /* |
| 499 | * For a polymorphic-input-type opclass, just keep the same exposed type. |
| 500 | * RECORD opclasses work like polymorphic-type ones for this purpose. |
| 501 | */ |
| 502 | if (IsPolymorphicType(req_type) || req_type == RECORDOID) |
| 503 | req_type = expr_type; |
| 504 | |
| 505 | /* |
| 506 | * No work if the expression exposes the right type/collation already. |
| 507 | */ |
| 508 | if (expr_type != req_type || |
| 509 | exprCollation((Node *) expr) != req_collation) |
| 510 | { |
| 511 | /* |
| 512 | * Strip any existing RelabelType, then add a new one if needed. This |
| 513 | * is to preserve the invariant of no redundant RelabelTypes. |
| 514 | * |
| 515 | * If we have to change the exposed type of the stripped expression, |
| 516 | * set typmod to -1 (since the new type may not have the same typmod |
| 517 | * interpretation). If we only have to change collation, preserve the |
| 518 | * exposed typmod. |
| 519 | */ |
| 520 | while (expr && IsA(expr, RelabelType)) |
| 521 | expr = (Expr *) ((RelabelType *) expr)->arg; |
| 522 | |
| 523 | if (exprType((Node *) expr) != req_type) |
| 524 | expr = (Expr *) makeRelabelType(expr, |
| 525 | req_type, |
| 526 | -1, |
| 527 | req_collation, |
| 528 | COERCE_IMPLICIT_CAST); |
| 529 | else if (exprCollation((Node *) expr) != req_collation) |
| 530 | expr = (Expr *) makeRelabelType(expr, |
| 531 | req_type, |
| 532 | exprTypmod((Node *) expr), |
| 533 | req_collation, |
| 534 | COERCE_IMPLICIT_CAST); |
| 535 | } |
| 536 | |
| 537 | return expr; |
| 538 | } |
| 539 | |
| 540 | /* |
| 541 | * add_eq_member - build a new EquivalenceMember and add it to an EC |
| 542 | */ |
| 543 | static EquivalenceMember * |
| 544 | add_eq_member(EquivalenceClass *ec, Expr *expr, Relids relids, |
| 545 | Relids nullable_relids, bool is_child, Oid datatype) |
| 546 | { |
| 547 | EquivalenceMember *em = makeNode(EquivalenceMember); |
| 548 | |
| 549 | em->em_expr = expr; |
| 550 | em->em_relids = relids; |
| 551 | em->em_nullable_relids = nullable_relids; |
| 552 | em->em_is_const = false; |
| 553 | em->em_is_child = is_child; |
| 554 | em->em_datatype = datatype; |
| 555 | |
| 556 | if (bms_is_empty(relids)) |
| 557 | { |
| 558 | /* |
| 559 | * No Vars, assume it's a pseudoconstant. This is correct for entries |
| 560 | * generated from process_equivalence(), because a WHERE clause can't |
| 561 | * contain aggregates or SRFs, and non-volatility was checked before |
| 562 | * process_equivalence() ever got called. But |
| 563 | * get_eclass_for_sort_expr() has to work harder. We put the tests |
| 564 | * there not here to save cycles in the equivalence case. |
| 565 | */ |
| 566 | Assert(!is_child); |
| 567 | em->em_is_const = true; |
| 568 | ec->ec_has_const = true; |
| 569 | /* it can't affect ec_relids */ |
| 570 | } |
| 571 | else if (!is_child) /* child members don't add to ec_relids */ |
| 572 | { |
| 573 | ec->ec_relids = bms_add_members(ec->ec_relids, relids); |
| 574 | } |
| 575 | ec->ec_members = lappend(ec->ec_members, em); |
| 576 | |
| 577 | return em; |
| 578 | } |
| 579 | |
| 580 | |
| 581 | /* |
| 582 | * get_eclass_for_sort_expr |
| 583 | * Given an expression and opfamily/collation info, find an existing |
| 584 | * equivalence class it is a member of; if none, optionally build a new |
| 585 | * single-member EquivalenceClass for it. |
| 586 | * |
| 587 | * expr is the expression, and nullable_relids is the set of base relids |
| 588 | * that are potentially nullable below it. We actually only care about |
| 589 | * the set of such relids that are used in the expression; but for caller |
| 590 | * convenience, we perform that intersection step here. The caller need |
| 591 | * only be sure that nullable_relids doesn't omit any nullable rels that |
| 592 | * might appear in the expr. |
| 593 | * |
| 594 | * sortref is the SortGroupRef of the originating SortGroupClause, if any, |
| 595 | * or zero if not. (It should never be zero if the expression is volatile!) |
| 596 | * |
| 597 | * If rel is not NULL, it identifies a specific relation we're considering |
| 598 | * a path for, and indicates that child EC members for that relation can be |
| 599 | * considered. Otherwise child members are ignored. (Note: since child EC |
| 600 | * members aren't guaranteed unique, a non-NULL value means that there could |
| 601 | * be more than one EC that matches the expression; if so it's order-dependent |
| 602 | * which one you get. This is annoying but it only happens in corner cases, |
| 603 | * so for now we live with just reporting the first match. See also |
| 604 | * generate_implied_equalities_for_column and match_pathkeys_to_index.) |
| 605 | * |
| 606 | * If create_it is true, we'll build a new EquivalenceClass when there is no |
| 607 | * match. If create_it is false, we just return NULL when no match. |
| 608 | * |
| 609 | * This can be used safely both before and after EquivalenceClass merging; |
| 610 | * since it never causes merging it does not invalidate any existing ECs |
| 611 | * or PathKeys. However, ECs added after path generation has begun are |
| 612 | * of limited usefulness, so usually it's best to create them beforehand. |
| 613 | * |
| 614 | * Note: opfamilies must be chosen consistently with the way |
| 615 | * process_equivalence() would do; that is, generated from a mergejoinable |
| 616 | * equality operator. Else we might fail to detect valid equivalences, |
| 617 | * generating poor (but not incorrect) plans. |
| 618 | */ |
| 619 | EquivalenceClass * |
| 620 | get_eclass_for_sort_expr(PlannerInfo *root, |
| 621 | Expr *expr, |
| 622 | Relids nullable_relids, |
| 623 | List *opfamilies, |
| 624 | Oid opcintype, |
| 625 | Oid collation, |
| 626 | Index sortref, |
| 627 | Relids rel, |
| 628 | bool create_it) |
| 629 | { |
| 630 | Relids expr_relids; |
| 631 | EquivalenceClass *newec; |
| 632 | EquivalenceMember *newem; |
| 633 | ListCell *lc1; |
| 634 | MemoryContext oldcontext; |
| 635 | |
| 636 | /* |
| 637 | * Ensure the expression exposes the correct type and collation. |
| 638 | */ |
| 639 | expr = canonicalize_ec_expression(expr, opcintype, collation); |
| 640 | |
| 641 | /* |
| 642 | * Get the precise set of nullable relids appearing in the expression. |
| 643 | */ |
| 644 | expr_relids = pull_varnos((Node *) expr); |
| 645 | nullable_relids = bms_intersect(nullable_relids, expr_relids); |
| 646 | |
| 647 | /* |
| 648 | * Scan through the existing EquivalenceClasses for a match |
| 649 | */ |
| 650 | foreach(lc1, root->eq_classes) |
| 651 | { |
| 652 | EquivalenceClass *cur_ec = (EquivalenceClass *) lfirst(lc1); |
| 653 | ListCell *lc2; |
| 654 | |
| 655 | /* |
| 656 | * Never match to a volatile EC, except when we are looking at another |
| 657 | * reference to the same volatile SortGroupClause. |
| 658 | */ |
| 659 | if (cur_ec->ec_has_volatile && |
| 660 | (sortref == 0 || sortref != cur_ec->ec_sortref)) |
| 661 | continue; |
| 662 | |
| 663 | if (collation != cur_ec->ec_collation) |
| 664 | continue; |
| 665 | if (!equal(opfamilies, cur_ec->ec_opfamilies)) |
| 666 | continue; |
| 667 | |
| 668 | foreach(lc2, cur_ec->ec_members) |
| 669 | { |
| 670 | EquivalenceMember *cur_em = (EquivalenceMember *) lfirst(lc2); |
| 671 | |
| 672 | /* |
| 673 | * Ignore child members unless they match the request. |
| 674 | */ |
| 675 | if (cur_em->em_is_child && |
| 676 | !bms_equal(cur_em->em_relids, rel)) |
| 677 | continue; |
| 678 | |
| 679 | /* |
| 680 | * If below an outer join, don't match constants: they're not as |
| 681 | * constant as they look. |
| 682 | */ |
| 683 | if (cur_ec->ec_below_outer_join && |
| 684 | cur_em->em_is_const) |
| 685 | continue; |
| 686 | |
| 687 | if (opcintype == cur_em->em_datatype && |
| 688 | equal(expr, cur_em->em_expr)) |
| 689 | return cur_ec; /* Match! */ |
| 690 | } |
| 691 | } |
| 692 | |
| 693 | /* No match; does caller want a NULL result? */ |
| 694 | if (!create_it) |
| 695 | return NULL; |
| 696 | |
| 697 | /* |
| 698 | * OK, build a new single-member EC |
| 699 | * |
| 700 | * Here, we must be sure that we construct the EC in the right context. |
| 701 | */ |
| 702 | oldcontext = MemoryContextSwitchTo(root->planner_cxt); |
| 703 | |
| 704 | newec = makeNode(EquivalenceClass); |
| 705 | newec->ec_opfamilies = list_copy(opfamilies); |
| 706 | newec->ec_collation = collation; |
| 707 | newec->ec_members = NIL; |
| 708 | newec->ec_sources = NIL; |
| 709 | newec->ec_derives = NIL; |
| 710 | newec->ec_relids = NULL; |
| 711 | newec->ec_has_const = false; |
| 712 | newec->ec_has_volatile = contain_volatile_functions((Node *) expr); |
| 713 | newec->ec_below_outer_join = false; |
| 714 | newec->ec_broken = false; |
| 715 | newec->ec_sortref = sortref; |
| 716 | newec->ec_min_security = UINT_MAX; |
| 717 | newec->ec_max_security = 0; |
| 718 | newec->ec_merged = NULL; |
| 719 | |
| 720 | if (newec->ec_has_volatile && sortref == 0) /* should not happen */ |
| 721 | elog(ERROR, "volatile EquivalenceClass has no sortref" ); |
| 722 | |
| 723 | newem = add_eq_member(newec, copyObject(expr), expr_relids, |
| 724 | nullable_relids, false, opcintype); |
| 725 | |
| 726 | /* |
| 727 | * add_eq_member doesn't check for volatile functions, set-returning |
| 728 | * functions, aggregates, or window functions, but such could appear in |
| 729 | * sort expressions; so we have to check whether its const-marking was |
| 730 | * correct. |
| 731 | */ |
| 732 | if (newec->ec_has_const) |
| 733 | { |
| 734 | if (newec->ec_has_volatile || |
| 735 | expression_returns_set((Node *) expr) || |
| 736 | contain_agg_clause((Node *) expr) || |
| 737 | contain_window_function((Node *) expr)) |
| 738 | { |
| 739 | newec->ec_has_const = false; |
| 740 | newem->em_is_const = false; |
| 741 | } |
| 742 | } |
| 743 | |
| 744 | root->eq_classes = lappend(root->eq_classes, newec); |
| 745 | |
| 746 | MemoryContextSwitchTo(oldcontext); |
| 747 | |
| 748 | return newec; |
| 749 | } |
| 750 | |
| 751 | |
| 752 | /* |
| 753 | * generate_base_implied_equalities |
| 754 | * Generate any restriction clauses that we can deduce from equivalence |
| 755 | * classes. |
| 756 | * |
| 757 | * When an EC contains pseudoconstants, our strategy is to generate |
| 758 | * "member = const1" clauses where const1 is the first constant member, for |
| 759 | * every other member (including other constants). If we are able to do this |
| 760 | * then we don't need any "var = var" comparisons because we've successfully |
| 761 | * constrained all the vars at their points of creation. If we fail to |
| 762 | * generate any of these clauses due to lack of cross-type operators, we fall |
| 763 | * back to the "ec_broken" strategy described below. (XXX if there are |
| 764 | * multiple constants of different types, it's possible that we might succeed |
| 765 | * in forming all the required clauses if we started from a different const |
| 766 | * member; but this seems a sufficiently hokey corner case to not be worth |
| 767 | * spending lots of cycles on.) |
| 768 | * |
| 769 | * For ECs that contain no pseudoconstants, we generate derived clauses |
| 770 | * "member1 = member2" for each pair of members belonging to the same base |
| 771 | * relation (actually, if there are more than two for the same base relation, |
| 772 | * we only need enough clauses to link each to each other). This provides |
| 773 | * the base case for the recursion: each row emitted by a base relation scan |
| 774 | * will constrain all computable members of the EC to be equal. As each |
| 775 | * join path is formed, we'll add additional derived clauses on-the-fly |
| 776 | * to maintain this invariant (see generate_join_implied_equalities). |
| 777 | * |
| 778 | * If the opfamilies used by the EC do not provide complete sets of cross-type |
| 779 | * equality operators, it is possible that we will fail to generate a clause |
| 780 | * that must be generated to maintain the invariant. (An example: given |
| 781 | * "WHERE a.x = b.y AND b.y = a.z", the scheme breaks down if we cannot |
| 782 | * generate "a.x = a.z" as a restriction clause for A.) In this case we mark |
| 783 | * the EC "ec_broken" and fall back to regurgitating its original source |
| 784 | * RestrictInfos at appropriate times. We do not try to retract any derived |
| 785 | * clauses already generated from the broken EC, so the resulting plan could |
| 786 | * be poor due to bad selectivity estimates caused by redundant clauses. But |
| 787 | * the correct solution to that is to fix the opfamilies ... |
| 788 | * |
| 789 | * Equality clauses derived by this function are passed off to |
| 790 | * process_implied_equality (in plan/initsplan.c) to be inserted into the |
| 791 | * restrictinfo datastructures. Note that this must be called after initial |
| 792 | * scanning of the quals and before Path construction begins. |
| 793 | * |
| 794 | * We make no attempt to avoid generating duplicate RestrictInfos here: we |
| 795 | * don't search ec_sources for matches, nor put the created RestrictInfos |
| 796 | * into ec_derives. Doing so would require some slightly ugly changes in |
| 797 | * initsplan.c's API, and there's no real advantage, because the clauses |
| 798 | * generated here can't duplicate anything we will generate for joins anyway. |
| 799 | */ |
| 800 | void |
| 801 | generate_base_implied_equalities(PlannerInfo *root) |
| 802 | { |
| 803 | ListCell *lc; |
| 804 | Index rti; |
| 805 | |
| 806 | foreach(lc, root->eq_classes) |
| 807 | { |
| 808 | EquivalenceClass *ec = (EquivalenceClass *) lfirst(lc); |
| 809 | |
| 810 | Assert(ec->ec_merged == NULL); /* else shouldn't be in list */ |
| 811 | Assert(!ec->ec_broken); /* not yet anyway... */ |
| 812 | |
| 813 | /* Single-member ECs won't generate any deductions */ |
| 814 | if (list_length(ec->ec_members) <= 1) |
| 815 | continue; |
| 816 | |
| 817 | if (ec->ec_has_const) |
| 818 | generate_base_implied_equalities_const(root, ec); |
| 819 | else |
| 820 | generate_base_implied_equalities_no_const(root, ec); |
| 821 | |
| 822 | /* Recover if we failed to generate required derived clauses */ |
| 823 | if (ec->ec_broken) |
| 824 | generate_base_implied_equalities_broken(root, ec); |
| 825 | } |
| 826 | |
| 827 | /* |
| 828 | * This is also a handy place to mark base rels (which should all exist by |
| 829 | * now) with flags showing whether they have pending eclass joins. |
| 830 | */ |
| 831 | for (rti = 1; rti < root->simple_rel_array_size; rti++) |
| 832 | { |
| 833 | RelOptInfo *brel = root->simple_rel_array[rti]; |
| 834 | |
| 835 | if (brel == NULL) |
| 836 | continue; |
| 837 | |
| 838 | brel->has_eclass_joins = has_relevant_eclass_joinclause(root, brel); |
| 839 | } |
| 840 | } |
| 841 | |
| 842 | /* |
| 843 | * generate_base_implied_equalities when EC contains pseudoconstant(s) |
| 844 | */ |
| 845 | static void |
| 846 | generate_base_implied_equalities_const(PlannerInfo *root, |
| 847 | EquivalenceClass *ec) |
| 848 | { |
| 849 | EquivalenceMember *const_em = NULL; |
| 850 | ListCell *lc; |
| 851 | |
| 852 | /* |
| 853 | * In the trivial case where we just had one "var = const" clause, push |
| 854 | * the original clause back into the main planner machinery. There is |
| 855 | * nothing to be gained by doing it differently, and we save the effort to |
| 856 | * re-build and re-analyze an equality clause that will be exactly |
| 857 | * equivalent to the old one. |
| 858 | */ |
| 859 | if (list_length(ec->ec_members) == 2 && |
| 860 | list_length(ec->ec_sources) == 1) |
| 861 | { |
| 862 | RestrictInfo *restrictinfo = (RestrictInfo *) linitial(ec->ec_sources); |
| 863 | |
| 864 | if (bms_membership(restrictinfo->required_relids) != BMS_MULTIPLE) |
| 865 | { |
| 866 | distribute_restrictinfo_to_rels(root, restrictinfo); |
| 867 | return; |
| 868 | } |
| 869 | } |
| 870 | |
| 871 | /* |
| 872 | * Find the constant member to use. We prefer an actual constant to |
| 873 | * pseudo-constants (such as Params), because the constraint exclusion |
| 874 | * machinery might be able to exclude relations on the basis of generated |
| 875 | * "var = const" equalities, but "var = param" won't work for that. |
| 876 | */ |
| 877 | foreach(lc, ec->ec_members) |
| 878 | { |
| 879 | EquivalenceMember *cur_em = (EquivalenceMember *) lfirst(lc); |
| 880 | |
| 881 | if (cur_em->em_is_const) |
| 882 | { |
| 883 | const_em = cur_em; |
| 884 | if (IsA(cur_em->em_expr, Const)) |
| 885 | break; |
| 886 | } |
| 887 | } |
| 888 | Assert(const_em != NULL); |
| 889 | |
| 890 | /* Generate a derived equality against each other member */ |
| 891 | foreach(lc, ec->ec_members) |
| 892 | { |
| 893 | EquivalenceMember *cur_em = (EquivalenceMember *) lfirst(lc); |
| 894 | Oid eq_op; |
| 895 | |
| 896 | Assert(!cur_em->em_is_child); /* no children yet */ |
| 897 | if (cur_em == const_em) |
| 898 | continue; |
| 899 | eq_op = select_equality_operator(ec, |
| 900 | cur_em->em_datatype, |
| 901 | const_em->em_datatype); |
| 902 | if (!OidIsValid(eq_op)) |
| 903 | { |
| 904 | /* failed... */ |
| 905 | ec->ec_broken = true; |
| 906 | break; |
| 907 | } |
| 908 | process_implied_equality(root, eq_op, ec->ec_collation, |
| 909 | cur_em->em_expr, const_em->em_expr, |
| 910 | bms_copy(ec->ec_relids), |
| 911 | bms_union(cur_em->em_nullable_relids, |
| 912 | const_em->em_nullable_relids), |
| 913 | ec->ec_min_security, |
| 914 | ec->ec_below_outer_join, |
| 915 | cur_em->em_is_const); |
| 916 | } |
| 917 | } |
| 918 | |
| 919 | /* |
| 920 | * generate_base_implied_equalities when EC contains no pseudoconstants |
| 921 | */ |
| 922 | static void |
| 923 | generate_base_implied_equalities_no_const(PlannerInfo *root, |
| 924 | EquivalenceClass *ec) |
| 925 | { |
| 926 | EquivalenceMember **prev_ems; |
| 927 | ListCell *lc; |
| 928 | |
| 929 | /* |
| 930 | * We scan the EC members once and track the last-seen member for each |
| 931 | * base relation. When we see another member of the same base relation, |
| 932 | * we generate "prev_em = cur_em". This results in the minimum number of |
| 933 | * derived clauses, but it's possible that it will fail when a different |
| 934 | * ordering would succeed. XXX FIXME: use a UNION-FIND algorithm similar |
| 935 | * to the way we build merged ECs. (Use a list-of-lists for each rel.) |
| 936 | */ |
| 937 | prev_ems = (EquivalenceMember **) |
| 938 | palloc0(root->simple_rel_array_size * sizeof(EquivalenceMember *)); |
| 939 | |
| 940 | foreach(lc, ec->ec_members) |
| 941 | { |
| 942 | EquivalenceMember *cur_em = (EquivalenceMember *) lfirst(lc); |
| 943 | int relid; |
| 944 | |
| 945 | Assert(!cur_em->em_is_child); /* no children yet */ |
| 946 | if (!bms_get_singleton_member(cur_em->em_relids, &relid)) |
| 947 | continue; |
| 948 | Assert(relid < root->simple_rel_array_size); |
| 949 | |
| 950 | if (prev_ems[relid] != NULL) |
| 951 | { |
| 952 | EquivalenceMember *prev_em = prev_ems[relid]; |
| 953 | Oid eq_op; |
| 954 | |
| 955 | eq_op = select_equality_operator(ec, |
| 956 | prev_em->em_datatype, |
| 957 | cur_em->em_datatype); |
| 958 | if (!OidIsValid(eq_op)) |
| 959 | { |
| 960 | /* failed... */ |
| 961 | ec->ec_broken = true; |
| 962 | break; |
| 963 | } |
| 964 | process_implied_equality(root, eq_op, ec->ec_collation, |
| 965 | prev_em->em_expr, cur_em->em_expr, |
| 966 | bms_copy(ec->ec_relids), |
| 967 | bms_union(prev_em->em_nullable_relids, |
| 968 | cur_em->em_nullable_relids), |
| 969 | ec->ec_min_security, |
| 970 | ec->ec_below_outer_join, |
| 971 | false); |
| 972 | } |
| 973 | prev_ems[relid] = cur_em; |
| 974 | } |
| 975 | |
| 976 | pfree(prev_ems); |
| 977 | |
| 978 | /* |
| 979 | * We also have to make sure that all the Vars used in the member clauses |
| 980 | * will be available at any join node we might try to reference them at. |
| 981 | * For the moment we force all the Vars to be available at all join nodes |
| 982 | * for this eclass. Perhaps this could be improved by doing some |
| 983 | * pre-analysis of which members we prefer to join, but it's no worse than |
| 984 | * what happened in the pre-8.3 code. |
| 985 | */ |
| 986 | foreach(lc, ec->ec_members) |
| 987 | { |
| 988 | EquivalenceMember *cur_em = (EquivalenceMember *) lfirst(lc); |
| 989 | List *vars = pull_var_clause((Node *) cur_em->em_expr, |
| 990 | PVC_RECURSE_AGGREGATES | |
| 991 | PVC_RECURSE_WINDOWFUNCS | |
| 992 | PVC_INCLUDE_PLACEHOLDERS); |
| 993 | |
| 994 | add_vars_to_targetlist(root, vars, ec->ec_relids, false); |
| 995 | list_free(vars); |
| 996 | } |
| 997 | } |
| 998 | |
| 999 | /* |
| 1000 | * generate_base_implied_equalities cleanup after failure |
| 1001 | * |
| 1002 | * What we must do here is push any zero- or one-relation source RestrictInfos |
| 1003 | * of the EC back into the main restrictinfo datastructures. Multi-relation |
| 1004 | * clauses will be regurgitated later by generate_join_implied_equalities(). |
| 1005 | * (We do it this way to maintain continuity with the case that ec_broken |
| 1006 | * becomes set only after we've gone up a join level or two.) However, for |
| 1007 | * an EC that contains constants, we can adopt a simpler strategy and just |
| 1008 | * throw back all the source RestrictInfos immediately; that works because |
| 1009 | * we know that such an EC can't become broken later. (This rule justifies |
| 1010 | * ignoring ec_has_const ECs in generate_join_implied_equalities, even when |
| 1011 | * they are broken.) |
| 1012 | */ |
| 1013 | static void |
| 1014 | generate_base_implied_equalities_broken(PlannerInfo *root, |
| 1015 | EquivalenceClass *ec) |
| 1016 | { |
| 1017 | ListCell *lc; |
| 1018 | |
| 1019 | foreach(lc, ec->ec_sources) |
| 1020 | { |
| 1021 | RestrictInfo *restrictinfo = (RestrictInfo *) lfirst(lc); |
| 1022 | |
| 1023 | if (ec->ec_has_const || |
| 1024 | bms_membership(restrictinfo->required_relids) != BMS_MULTIPLE) |
| 1025 | distribute_restrictinfo_to_rels(root, restrictinfo); |
| 1026 | } |
| 1027 | } |
| 1028 | |
| 1029 | |
| 1030 | /* |
| 1031 | * generate_join_implied_equalities |
| 1032 | * Generate any join clauses that we can deduce from equivalence classes. |
| 1033 | * |
| 1034 | * At a join node, we must enforce restriction clauses sufficient to ensure |
| 1035 | * that all equivalence-class members computable at that node are equal. |
| 1036 | * Since the set of clauses to enforce can vary depending on which subset |
| 1037 | * relations are the inputs, we have to compute this afresh for each join |
| 1038 | * relation pair. Hence a fresh List of RestrictInfo nodes is built and |
| 1039 | * passed back on each call. |
| 1040 | * |
| 1041 | * In addition to its use at join nodes, this can be applied to generate |
| 1042 | * eclass-based join clauses for use in a parameterized scan of a base rel. |
| 1043 | * The reason for the asymmetry of specifying the inner rel as a RelOptInfo |
| 1044 | * and the outer rel by Relids is that this usage occurs before we have |
| 1045 | * built any join RelOptInfos. |
| 1046 | * |
| 1047 | * An annoying special case for parameterized scans is that the inner rel can |
| 1048 | * be an appendrel child (an "other rel"). In this case we must generate |
| 1049 | * appropriate clauses using child EC members. add_child_rel_equivalences |
| 1050 | * must already have been done for the child rel. |
| 1051 | * |
| 1052 | * The results are sufficient for use in merge, hash, and plain nestloop join |
| 1053 | * methods. We do not worry here about selecting clauses that are optimal |
| 1054 | * for use in a parameterized indexscan. indxpath.c makes its own selections |
| 1055 | * of clauses to use, and if the ones we pick here are redundant with those, |
| 1056 | * the extras will be eliminated at createplan time, using the parent_ec |
| 1057 | * markers that we provide (see is_redundant_derived_clause()). |
| 1058 | * |
| 1059 | * Because the same join clauses are likely to be needed multiple times as |
| 1060 | * we consider different join paths, we avoid generating multiple copies: |
| 1061 | * whenever we select a particular pair of EquivalenceMembers to join, |
| 1062 | * we check to see if the pair matches any original clause (in ec_sources) |
| 1063 | * or previously-built clause (in ec_derives). This saves memory and allows |
| 1064 | * re-use of information cached in RestrictInfos. |
| 1065 | * |
| 1066 | * join_relids should always equal bms_union(outer_relids, inner_rel->relids). |
| 1067 | * We could simplify this function's API by computing it internally, but in |
| 1068 | * most current uses, the caller has the value at hand anyway. |
| 1069 | */ |
| 1070 | List * |
| 1071 | generate_join_implied_equalities(PlannerInfo *root, |
| 1072 | Relids join_relids, |
| 1073 | Relids outer_relids, |
| 1074 | RelOptInfo *inner_rel) |
| 1075 | { |
| 1076 | return generate_join_implied_equalities_for_ecs(root, |
| 1077 | root->eq_classes, |
| 1078 | join_relids, |
| 1079 | outer_relids, |
| 1080 | inner_rel); |
| 1081 | } |
| 1082 | |
| 1083 | /* |
| 1084 | * generate_join_implied_equalities_for_ecs |
| 1085 | * As above, but consider only the listed ECs. |
| 1086 | */ |
| 1087 | List * |
| 1088 | generate_join_implied_equalities_for_ecs(PlannerInfo *root, |
| 1089 | List *eclasses, |
| 1090 | Relids join_relids, |
| 1091 | Relids outer_relids, |
| 1092 | RelOptInfo *inner_rel) |
| 1093 | { |
| 1094 | List *result = NIL; |
| 1095 | Relids inner_relids = inner_rel->relids; |
| 1096 | Relids nominal_inner_relids; |
| 1097 | Relids nominal_join_relids; |
| 1098 | ListCell *lc; |
| 1099 | |
| 1100 | /* If inner rel is a child, extra setup work is needed */ |
| 1101 | if (IS_OTHER_REL(inner_rel)) |
| 1102 | { |
| 1103 | Assert(!bms_is_empty(inner_rel->top_parent_relids)); |
| 1104 | |
| 1105 | /* Fetch relid set for the topmost parent rel */ |
| 1106 | nominal_inner_relids = inner_rel->top_parent_relids; |
| 1107 | /* ECs will be marked with the parent's relid, not the child's */ |
| 1108 | nominal_join_relids = bms_union(outer_relids, nominal_inner_relids); |
| 1109 | } |
| 1110 | else |
| 1111 | { |
| 1112 | nominal_inner_relids = inner_relids; |
| 1113 | nominal_join_relids = join_relids; |
| 1114 | } |
| 1115 | |
| 1116 | foreach(lc, eclasses) |
| 1117 | { |
| 1118 | EquivalenceClass *ec = (EquivalenceClass *) lfirst(lc); |
| 1119 | List *sublist = NIL; |
| 1120 | |
| 1121 | /* ECs containing consts do not need any further enforcement */ |
| 1122 | if (ec->ec_has_const) |
| 1123 | continue; |
| 1124 | |
| 1125 | /* Single-member ECs won't generate any deductions */ |
| 1126 | if (list_length(ec->ec_members) <= 1) |
| 1127 | continue; |
| 1128 | |
| 1129 | /* We can quickly ignore any that don't overlap the join, too */ |
| 1130 | if (!bms_overlap(ec->ec_relids, nominal_join_relids)) |
| 1131 | continue; |
| 1132 | |
| 1133 | if (!ec->ec_broken) |
| 1134 | sublist = generate_join_implied_equalities_normal(root, |
| 1135 | ec, |
| 1136 | join_relids, |
| 1137 | outer_relids, |
| 1138 | inner_relids); |
| 1139 | |
| 1140 | /* Recover if we failed to generate required derived clauses */ |
| 1141 | if (ec->ec_broken) |
| 1142 | sublist = generate_join_implied_equalities_broken(root, |
| 1143 | ec, |
| 1144 | nominal_join_relids, |
| 1145 | outer_relids, |
| 1146 | nominal_inner_relids, |
| 1147 | inner_rel); |
| 1148 | |
| 1149 | result = list_concat(result, sublist); |
| 1150 | } |
| 1151 | |
| 1152 | return result; |
| 1153 | } |
| 1154 | |
| 1155 | /* |
| 1156 | * generate_join_implied_equalities for a still-valid EC |
| 1157 | */ |
| 1158 | static List * |
| 1159 | generate_join_implied_equalities_normal(PlannerInfo *root, |
| 1160 | EquivalenceClass *ec, |
| 1161 | Relids join_relids, |
| 1162 | Relids outer_relids, |
| 1163 | Relids inner_relids) |
| 1164 | { |
| 1165 | List *result = NIL; |
| 1166 | List *new_members = NIL; |
| 1167 | List *outer_members = NIL; |
| 1168 | List *inner_members = NIL; |
| 1169 | ListCell *lc1; |
| 1170 | |
| 1171 | /* |
| 1172 | * First, scan the EC to identify member values that are computable at the |
| 1173 | * outer rel, at the inner rel, or at this relation but not in either |
| 1174 | * input rel. The outer-rel members should already be enforced equal, |
| 1175 | * likewise for the inner-rel members. We'll need to create clauses to |
| 1176 | * enforce that any newly computable members are all equal to each other |
| 1177 | * as well as to at least one input member, plus enforce at least one |
| 1178 | * outer-rel member equal to at least one inner-rel member. |
| 1179 | */ |
| 1180 | foreach(lc1, ec->ec_members) |
| 1181 | { |
| 1182 | EquivalenceMember *cur_em = (EquivalenceMember *) lfirst(lc1); |
| 1183 | |
| 1184 | /* |
| 1185 | * We don't need to check explicitly for child EC members. This test |
| 1186 | * against join_relids will cause them to be ignored except when |
| 1187 | * considering a child inner rel, which is what we want. |
| 1188 | */ |
| 1189 | if (!bms_is_subset(cur_em->em_relids, join_relids)) |
| 1190 | continue; /* not computable yet, or wrong child */ |
| 1191 | |
| 1192 | if (bms_is_subset(cur_em->em_relids, outer_relids)) |
| 1193 | outer_members = lappend(outer_members, cur_em); |
| 1194 | else if (bms_is_subset(cur_em->em_relids, inner_relids)) |
| 1195 | inner_members = lappend(inner_members, cur_em); |
| 1196 | else |
| 1197 | new_members = lappend(new_members, cur_em); |
| 1198 | } |
| 1199 | |
| 1200 | /* |
| 1201 | * First, select the joinclause if needed. We can equate any one outer |
| 1202 | * member to any one inner member, but we have to find a datatype |
| 1203 | * combination for which an opfamily member operator exists. If we have |
| 1204 | * choices, we prefer simple Var members (possibly with RelabelType) since |
| 1205 | * these are (a) cheapest to compute at runtime and (b) most likely to |
| 1206 | * have useful statistics. Also, prefer operators that are also |
| 1207 | * hashjoinable. |
| 1208 | */ |
| 1209 | if (outer_members && inner_members) |
| 1210 | { |
| 1211 | EquivalenceMember *best_outer_em = NULL; |
| 1212 | EquivalenceMember *best_inner_em = NULL; |
| 1213 | Oid best_eq_op = InvalidOid; |
| 1214 | int best_score = -1; |
| 1215 | RestrictInfo *rinfo; |
| 1216 | |
| 1217 | foreach(lc1, outer_members) |
| 1218 | { |
| 1219 | EquivalenceMember *outer_em = (EquivalenceMember *) lfirst(lc1); |
| 1220 | ListCell *lc2; |
| 1221 | |
| 1222 | foreach(lc2, inner_members) |
| 1223 | { |
| 1224 | EquivalenceMember *inner_em = (EquivalenceMember *) lfirst(lc2); |
| 1225 | Oid eq_op; |
| 1226 | int score; |
| 1227 | |
| 1228 | eq_op = select_equality_operator(ec, |
| 1229 | outer_em->em_datatype, |
| 1230 | inner_em->em_datatype); |
| 1231 | if (!OidIsValid(eq_op)) |
| 1232 | continue; |
| 1233 | score = 0; |
| 1234 | if (IsA(outer_em->em_expr, Var) || |
| 1235 | (IsA(outer_em->em_expr, RelabelType) && |
| 1236 | IsA(((RelabelType *) outer_em->em_expr)->arg, Var))) |
| 1237 | score++; |
| 1238 | if (IsA(inner_em->em_expr, Var) || |
| 1239 | (IsA(inner_em->em_expr, RelabelType) && |
| 1240 | IsA(((RelabelType *) inner_em->em_expr)->arg, Var))) |
| 1241 | score++; |
| 1242 | if (op_hashjoinable(eq_op, |
| 1243 | exprType((Node *) outer_em->em_expr))) |
| 1244 | score++; |
| 1245 | if (score > best_score) |
| 1246 | { |
| 1247 | best_outer_em = outer_em; |
| 1248 | best_inner_em = inner_em; |
| 1249 | best_eq_op = eq_op; |
| 1250 | best_score = score; |
| 1251 | if (best_score == 3) |
| 1252 | break; /* no need to look further */ |
| 1253 | } |
| 1254 | } |
| 1255 | if (best_score == 3) |
| 1256 | break; /* no need to look further */ |
| 1257 | } |
| 1258 | if (best_score < 0) |
| 1259 | { |
| 1260 | /* failed... */ |
| 1261 | ec->ec_broken = true; |
| 1262 | return NIL; |
| 1263 | } |
| 1264 | |
| 1265 | /* |
| 1266 | * Create clause, setting parent_ec to mark it as redundant with other |
| 1267 | * joinclauses |
| 1268 | */ |
| 1269 | rinfo = create_join_clause(root, ec, best_eq_op, |
| 1270 | best_outer_em, best_inner_em, |
| 1271 | ec); |
| 1272 | |
| 1273 | result = lappend(result, rinfo); |
| 1274 | } |
| 1275 | |
| 1276 | /* |
| 1277 | * Now deal with building restrictions for any expressions that involve |
| 1278 | * Vars from both sides of the join. We have to equate all of these to |
| 1279 | * each other as well as to at least one old member (if any). |
| 1280 | * |
| 1281 | * XXX as in generate_base_implied_equalities_no_const, we could be a lot |
| 1282 | * smarter here to avoid unnecessary failures in cross-type situations. |
| 1283 | * For now, use the same left-to-right method used there. |
| 1284 | */ |
| 1285 | if (new_members) |
| 1286 | { |
| 1287 | List *old_members = list_concat(outer_members, inner_members); |
| 1288 | EquivalenceMember *prev_em = NULL; |
| 1289 | RestrictInfo *rinfo; |
| 1290 | |
| 1291 | /* For now, arbitrarily take the first old_member as the one to use */ |
| 1292 | if (old_members) |
| 1293 | new_members = lappend(new_members, linitial(old_members)); |
| 1294 | |
| 1295 | foreach(lc1, new_members) |
| 1296 | { |
| 1297 | EquivalenceMember *cur_em = (EquivalenceMember *) lfirst(lc1); |
| 1298 | |
| 1299 | if (prev_em != NULL) |
| 1300 | { |
| 1301 | Oid eq_op; |
| 1302 | |
| 1303 | eq_op = select_equality_operator(ec, |
| 1304 | prev_em->em_datatype, |
| 1305 | cur_em->em_datatype); |
| 1306 | if (!OidIsValid(eq_op)) |
| 1307 | { |
| 1308 | /* failed... */ |
| 1309 | ec->ec_broken = true; |
| 1310 | return NIL; |
| 1311 | } |
| 1312 | /* do NOT set parent_ec, this qual is not redundant! */ |
| 1313 | rinfo = create_join_clause(root, ec, eq_op, |
| 1314 | prev_em, cur_em, |
| 1315 | NULL); |
| 1316 | |
| 1317 | result = lappend(result, rinfo); |
| 1318 | } |
| 1319 | prev_em = cur_em; |
| 1320 | } |
| 1321 | } |
| 1322 | |
| 1323 | return result; |
| 1324 | } |
| 1325 | |
| 1326 | /* |
| 1327 | * generate_join_implied_equalities cleanup after failure |
| 1328 | * |
| 1329 | * Return any original RestrictInfos that are enforceable at this join. |
| 1330 | * |
| 1331 | * In the case of a child inner relation, we have to translate the |
| 1332 | * original RestrictInfos from parent to child Vars. |
| 1333 | */ |
| 1334 | static List * |
| 1335 | generate_join_implied_equalities_broken(PlannerInfo *root, |
| 1336 | EquivalenceClass *ec, |
| 1337 | Relids nominal_join_relids, |
| 1338 | Relids outer_relids, |
| 1339 | Relids nominal_inner_relids, |
| 1340 | RelOptInfo *inner_rel) |
| 1341 | { |
| 1342 | List *result = NIL; |
| 1343 | ListCell *lc; |
| 1344 | |
| 1345 | foreach(lc, ec->ec_sources) |
| 1346 | { |
| 1347 | RestrictInfo *restrictinfo = (RestrictInfo *) lfirst(lc); |
| 1348 | Relids clause_relids = restrictinfo->required_relids; |
| 1349 | |
| 1350 | if (bms_is_subset(clause_relids, nominal_join_relids) && |
| 1351 | !bms_is_subset(clause_relids, outer_relids) && |
| 1352 | !bms_is_subset(clause_relids, nominal_inner_relids)) |
| 1353 | result = lappend(result, restrictinfo); |
| 1354 | } |
| 1355 | |
| 1356 | /* |
| 1357 | * If we have to translate, just brute-force apply adjust_appendrel_attrs |
| 1358 | * to all the RestrictInfos at once. This will result in returning |
| 1359 | * RestrictInfos that are not listed in ec_derives, but there shouldn't be |
| 1360 | * any duplication, and it's a sufficiently narrow corner case that we |
| 1361 | * shouldn't sweat too much over it anyway. |
| 1362 | * |
| 1363 | * Since inner_rel might be an indirect descendant of the baserel |
| 1364 | * mentioned in the ec_sources clauses, we have to be prepared to apply |
| 1365 | * multiple levels of Var translation. |
| 1366 | */ |
| 1367 | if (IS_OTHER_REL(inner_rel) && result != NIL) |
| 1368 | result = (List *) adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(root, |
| 1369 | (Node *) result, |
| 1370 | inner_rel->relids, |
| 1371 | inner_rel->top_parent_relids); |
| 1372 | |
| 1373 | return result; |
| 1374 | } |
| 1375 | |
| 1376 | |
| 1377 | /* |
| 1378 | * select_equality_operator |
| 1379 | * Select a suitable equality operator for comparing two EC members |
| 1380 | * |
| 1381 | * Returns InvalidOid if no operator can be found for this datatype combination |
| 1382 | */ |
| 1383 | static Oid |
| 1384 | select_equality_operator(EquivalenceClass *ec, Oid lefttype, Oid righttype) |
| 1385 | { |
| 1386 | ListCell *lc; |
| 1387 | |
| 1388 | foreach(lc, ec->ec_opfamilies) |
| 1389 | { |
| 1390 | Oid opfamily = lfirst_oid(lc); |
| 1391 | Oid opno; |
| 1392 | |
| 1393 | opno = get_opfamily_member(opfamily, lefttype, righttype, |
| 1394 | BTEqualStrategyNumber); |
| 1395 | if (!OidIsValid(opno)) |
| 1396 | continue; |
| 1397 | /* If no barrier quals in query, don't worry about leaky operators */ |
| 1398 | if (ec->ec_max_security == 0) |
| 1399 | return opno; |
| 1400 | /* Otherwise, insist that selected operators be leakproof */ |
| 1401 | if (get_func_leakproof(get_opcode(opno))) |
| 1402 | return opno; |
| 1403 | } |
| 1404 | return InvalidOid; |
| 1405 | } |
| 1406 | |
| 1407 | |
| 1408 | /* |
| 1409 | * create_join_clause |
| 1410 | * Find or make a RestrictInfo comparing the two given EC members |
| 1411 | * with the given operator. |
| 1412 | * |
| 1413 | * parent_ec is either equal to ec (if the clause is a potentially-redundant |
| 1414 | * join clause) or NULL (if not). We have to treat this as part of the |
| 1415 | * match requirements --- it's possible that a clause comparing the same two |
| 1416 | * EMs is a join clause in one join path and a restriction clause in another. |
| 1417 | */ |
| 1418 | static RestrictInfo * |
| 1419 | create_join_clause(PlannerInfo *root, |
| 1420 | EquivalenceClass *ec, Oid opno, |
| 1421 | EquivalenceMember *leftem, |
| 1422 | EquivalenceMember *rightem, |
| 1423 | EquivalenceClass *parent_ec) |
| 1424 | { |
| 1425 | RestrictInfo *rinfo; |
| 1426 | ListCell *lc; |
| 1427 | MemoryContext oldcontext; |
| 1428 | |
| 1429 | /* |
| 1430 | * Search to see if we already built a RestrictInfo for this pair of |
| 1431 | * EquivalenceMembers. We can use either original source clauses or |
| 1432 | * previously-derived clauses. The check on opno is probably redundant, |
| 1433 | * but be safe ... |
| 1434 | */ |
| 1435 | foreach(lc, ec->ec_sources) |
| 1436 | { |
| 1437 | rinfo = (RestrictInfo *) lfirst(lc); |
| 1438 | if (rinfo->left_em == leftem && |
| 1439 | rinfo->right_em == rightem && |
| 1440 | rinfo->parent_ec == parent_ec && |
| 1441 | opno == ((OpExpr *) rinfo->clause)->opno) |
| 1442 | return rinfo; |
| 1443 | } |
| 1444 | |
| 1445 | foreach(lc, ec->ec_derives) |
| 1446 | { |
| 1447 | rinfo = (RestrictInfo *) lfirst(lc); |
| 1448 | if (rinfo->left_em == leftem && |
| 1449 | rinfo->right_em == rightem && |
| 1450 | rinfo->parent_ec == parent_ec && |
| 1451 | opno == ((OpExpr *) rinfo->clause)->opno) |
| 1452 | return rinfo; |
| 1453 | } |
| 1454 | |
| 1455 | /* |
| 1456 | * Not there, so build it, in planner context so we can re-use it. (Not |
| 1457 | * important in normal planning, but definitely so in GEQO.) |
| 1458 | */ |
| 1459 | oldcontext = MemoryContextSwitchTo(root->planner_cxt); |
| 1460 | |
| 1461 | rinfo = build_implied_join_equality(opno, |
| 1462 | ec->ec_collation, |
| 1463 | leftem->em_expr, |
| 1464 | rightem->em_expr, |
| 1465 | bms_union(leftem->em_relids, |
| 1466 | rightem->em_relids), |
| 1467 | bms_union(leftem->em_nullable_relids, |
| 1468 | rightem->em_nullable_relids), |
| 1469 | ec->ec_min_security); |
| 1470 | |
| 1471 | /* Mark the clause as redundant, or not */ |
| 1472 | rinfo->parent_ec = parent_ec; |
| 1473 | |
| 1474 | /* |
| 1475 | * We know the correct values for left_ec/right_ec, ie this particular EC, |
| 1476 | * so we can just set them directly instead of forcing another lookup. |
| 1477 | */ |
| 1478 | rinfo->left_ec = ec; |
| 1479 | rinfo->right_ec = ec; |
| 1480 | |
| 1481 | /* Mark it as usable with these EMs */ |
| 1482 | rinfo->left_em = leftem; |
| 1483 | rinfo->right_em = rightem; |
| 1484 | /* and save it for possible re-use */ |
| 1485 | ec->ec_derives = lappend(ec->ec_derives, rinfo); |
| 1486 | |
| 1487 | MemoryContextSwitchTo(oldcontext); |
| 1488 | |
| 1489 | return rinfo; |
| 1490 | } |
| 1491 | |
| 1492 | |
| 1493 | /* |
| 1494 | * reconsider_outer_join_clauses |
| 1495 | * Re-examine any outer-join clauses that were set aside by |
| 1496 | * distribute_qual_to_rels(), and see if we can derive any |
| 1497 | * EquivalenceClasses from them. Then, if they were not made |
| 1498 | * redundant, push them out into the regular join-clause lists. |
| 1499 | * |
| 1500 | * When we have mergejoinable clauses A = B that are outer-join clauses, |
| 1501 | * we can't blindly combine them with other clauses A = C to deduce B = C, |
| 1502 | * since in fact the "equality" A = B won't necessarily hold above the |
| 1503 | * outer join (one of the variables might be NULL instead). Nonetheless |
| 1504 | * there are cases where we can add qual clauses using transitivity. |
| 1505 | * |
| 1506 | * One case that we look for here is an outer-join clause OUTERVAR = INNERVAR |
| 1507 | * for which there is also an equivalence clause OUTERVAR = CONSTANT. |
| 1508 | * It is safe and useful to push a clause INNERVAR = CONSTANT into the |
| 1509 | * evaluation of the inner (nullable) relation, because any inner rows not |
| 1510 | * meeting this condition will not contribute to the outer-join result anyway. |
| 1511 | * (Any outer rows they could join to will be eliminated by the pushed-down |
| 1512 | * equivalence clause.) |
| 1513 | * |
| 1514 | * Note that the above rule does not work for full outer joins; nor is it |
| 1515 | * very interesting to consider cases where the generated equivalence clause |
| 1516 | * would involve relations outside the outer join, since such clauses couldn't |
| 1517 | * be pushed into the inner side's scan anyway. So the restriction to |
| 1518 | * outervar = pseudoconstant is not really giving up anything. |
| 1519 | * |
| 1520 | * For full-join cases, we can only do something useful if it's a FULL JOIN |
| 1521 | * USING and a merged column has an equivalence MERGEDVAR = CONSTANT. |
| 1522 | * By the time it gets here, the merged column will look like |
| 1523 | * COALESCE(LEFTVAR, RIGHTVAR) |
| 1524 | * and we will have a full-join clause LEFTVAR = RIGHTVAR that we can match |
| 1525 | * the COALESCE expression to. In this situation we can push LEFTVAR = CONSTANT |
| 1526 | * and RIGHTVAR = CONSTANT into the input relations, since any rows not |
| 1527 | * meeting these conditions cannot contribute to the join result. |
| 1528 | * |
| 1529 | * Again, there isn't any traction to be gained by trying to deal with |
| 1530 | * clauses comparing a mergedvar to a non-pseudoconstant. So we can make |
| 1531 | * use of the EquivalenceClasses to search for matching variables that were |
| 1532 | * equivalenced to constants. The interesting outer-join clauses were |
| 1533 | * accumulated for us by distribute_qual_to_rels. |
| 1534 | * |
| 1535 | * When we find one of these cases, we implement the changes we want by |
| 1536 | * generating a new equivalence clause INNERVAR = CONSTANT (or LEFTVAR, etc) |
| 1537 | * and pushing it into the EquivalenceClass structures. This is because we |
| 1538 | * may already know that INNERVAR is equivalenced to some other var(s), and |
| 1539 | * we'd like the constant to propagate to them too. Note that it would be |
| 1540 | * unsafe to merge any existing EC for INNERVAR with the OUTERVAR's EC --- |
| 1541 | * that could result in propagating constant restrictions from |
| 1542 | * INNERVAR to OUTERVAR, which would be very wrong. |
| 1543 | * |
| 1544 | * It's possible that the INNERVAR is also an OUTERVAR for some other |
| 1545 | * outer-join clause, in which case the process can be repeated. So we repeat |
| 1546 | * looping over the lists of clauses until no further deductions can be made. |
| 1547 | * Whenever we do make a deduction, we remove the generating clause from the |
| 1548 | * lists, since we don't want to make the same deduction twice. |
| 1549 | * |
| 1550 | * If we don't find any match for a set-aside outer join clause, we must |
| 1551 | * throw it back into the regular joinclause processing by passing it to |
| 1552 | * distribute_restrictinfo_to_rels(). If we do generate a derived clause, |
| 1553 | * however, the outer-join clause is redundant. We still throw it back, |
| 1554 | * because otherwise the join will be seen as a clauseless join and avoided |
| 1555 | * during join order searching; but we mark it as redundant to keep from |
| 1556 | * messing up the joinrel's size estimate. (This behavior means that the |
| 1557 | * API for this routine is uselessly complex: we could have just put all |
| 1558 | * the clauses into the regular processing initially. We keep it because |
| 1559 | * someday we might want to do something else, such as inserting "dummy" |
| 1560 | * joinclauses instead of real ones.) |
| 1561 | * |
| 1562 | * Outer join clauses that are marked outerjoin_delayed are special: this |
| 1563 | * condition means that one or both VARs might go to null due to a lower |
| 1564 | * outer join. We can still push a constant through the clause, but only |
| 1565 | * if its operator is strict; and we *have to* throw the clause back into |
| 1566 | * regular joinclause processing. By keeping the strict join clause, |
| 1567 | * we ensure that any null-extended rows that are mistakenly generated due |
| 1568 | * to suppressing rows not matching the constant will be rejected at the |
| 1569 | * upper outer join. (This doesn't work for full-join clauses.) |
| 1570 | */ |
| 1571 | void |
| 1572 | reconsider_outer_join_clauses(PlannerInfo *root) |
| 1573 | { |
| 1574 | bool found; |
| 1575 | ListCell *cell; |
| 1576 | ListCell *prev; |
| 1577 | ListCell *next; |
| 1578 | |
| 1579 | /* Outer loop repeats until we find no more deductions */ |
| 1580 | do |
| 1581 | { |
| 1582 | found = false; |
| 1583 | |
| 1584 | /* Process the LEFT JOIN clauses */ |
| 1585 | prev = NULL; |
| 1586 | for (cell = list_head(root->left_join_clauses); cell; cell = next) |
| 1587 | { |
| 1588 | RestrictInfo *rinfo = (RestrictInfo *) lfirst(cell); |
| 1589 | |
| 1590 | next = lnext(cell); |
| 1591 | if (reconsider_outer_join_clause(root, rinfo, true)) |
| 1592 | { |
| 1593 | found = true; |
| 1594 | /* remove it from the list */ |
| 1595 | root->left_join_clauses = |
| 1596 | list_delete_cell(root->left_join_clauses, cell, prev); |
| 1597 | /* we throw it back anyway (see notes above) */ |
| 1598 | /* but the thrown-back clause has no extra selectivity */ |
| 1599 | rinfo->norm_selec = 2.0; |
| 1600 | rinfo->outer_selec = 1.0; |
| 1601 | distribute_restrictinfo_to_rels(root, rinfo); |
| 1602 | } |
| 1603 | else |
| 1604 | prev = cell; |
| 1605 | } |
| 1606 | |
| 1607 | /* Process the RIGHT JOIN clauses */ |
| 1608 | prev = NULL; |
| 1609 | for (cell = list_head(root->right_join_clauses); cell; cell = next) |
| 1610 | { |
| 1611 | RestrictInfo *rinfo = (RestrictInfo *) lfirst(cell); |
| 1612 | |
| 1613 | next = lnext(cell); |
| 1614 | if (reconsider_outer_join_clause(root, rinfo, false)) |
| 1615 | { |
| 1616 | found = true; |
| 1617 | /* remove it from the list */ |
| 1618 | root->right_join_clauses = |
| 1619 | list_delete_cell(root->right_join_clauses, cell, prev); |
| 1620 | /* we throw it back anyway (see notes above) */ |
| 1621 | /* but the thrown-back clause has no extra selectivity */ |
| 1622 | rinfo->norm_selec = 2.0; |
| 1623 | rinfo->outer_selec = 1.0; |
| 1624 | distribute_restrictinfo_to_rels(root, rinfo); |
| 1625 | } |
| 1626 | else |
| 1627 | prev = cell; |
| 1628 | } |
| 1629 | |
| 1630 | /* Process the FULL JOIN clauses */ |
| 1631 | prev = NULL; |
| 1632 | for (cell = list_head(root->full_join_clauses); cell; cell = next) |
| 1633 | { |
| 1634 | RestrictInfo *rinfo = (RestrictInfo *) lfirst(cell); |
| 1635 | |
| 1636 | next = lnext(cell); |
| 1637 | if (reconsider_full_join_clause(root, rinfo)) |
| 1638 | { |
| 1639 | found = true; |
| 1640 | /* remove it from the list */ |
| 1641 | root->full_join_clauses = |
| 1642 | list_delete_cell(root->full_join_clauses, cell, prev); |
| 1643 | /* we throw it back anyway (see notes above) */ |
| 1644 | /* but the thrown-back clause has no extra selectivity */ |
| 1645 | rinfo->norm_selec = 2.0; |
| 1646 | rinfo->outer_selec = 1.0; |
| 1647 | distribute_restrictinfo_to_rels(root, rinfo); |
| 1648 | } |
| 1649 | else |
| 1650 | prev = cell; |
| 1651 | } |
| 1652 | } while (found); |
| 1653 | |
| 1654 | /* Now, any remaining clauses have to be thrown back */ |
| 1655 | foreach(cell, root->left_join_clauses) |
| 1656 | { |
| 1657 | RestrictInfo *rinfo = (RestrictInfo *) lfirst(cell); |
| 1658 | |
| 1659 | distribute_restrictinfo_to_rels(root, rinfo); |
| 1660 | } |
| 1661 | foreach(cell, root->right_join_clauses) |
| 1662 | { |
| 1663 | RestrictInfo *rinfo = (RestrictInfo *) lfirst(cell); |
| 1664 | |
| 1665 | distribute_restrictinfo_to_rels(root, rinfo); |
| 1666 | } |
| 1667 | foreach(cell, root->full_join_clauses) |
| 1668 | { |
| 1669 | RestrictInfo *rinfo = (RestrictInfo *) lfirst(cell); |
| 1670 | |
| 1671 | distribute_restrictinfo_to_rels(root, rinfo); |
| 1672 | } |
| 1673 | } |
| 1674 | |
| 1675 | /* |
| 1676 | * reconsider_outer_join_clauses for a single LEFT/RIGHT JOIN clause |
| 1677 | * |
| 1678 | * Returns true if we were able to propagate a constant through the clause. |
| 1679 | */ |
| 1680 | static bool |
| 1681 | reconsider_outer_join_clause(PlannerInfo *root, RestrictInfo *rinfo, |
| 1682 | bool outer_on_left) |
| 1683 | { |
| 1684 | Expr *outervar, |
| 1685 | *innervar; |
| 1686 | Oid opno, |
| 1687 | collation, |
| 1688 | left_type, |
| 1689 | right_type, |
| 1690 | inner_datatype; |
| 1691 | Relids inner_relids, |
| 1692 | inner_nullable_relids; |
| 1693 | ListCell *lc1; |
| 1694 | |
| 1695 | Assert(is_opclause(rinfo->clause)); |
| 1696 | opno = ((OpExpr *) rinfo->clause)->opno; |
| 1697 | collation = ((OpExpr *) rinfo->clause)->inputcollid; |
| 1698 | |
| 1699 | /* If clause is outerjoin_delayed, operator must be strict */ |
| 1700 | if (rinfo->outerjoin_delayed && !op_strict(opno)) |
| 1701 | return false; |
| 1702 | |
| 1703 | /* Extract needed info from the clause */ |
| 1704 | op_input_types(opno, &left_type, &right_type); |
| 1705 | if (outer_on_left) |
| 1706 | { |
| 1707 | outervar = (Expr *) get_leftop(rinfo->clause); |
| 1708 | innervar = (Expr *) get_rightop(rinfo->clause); |
| 1709 | inner_datatype = right_type; |
| 1710 | inner_relids = rinfo->right_relids; |
| 1711 | } |
| 1712 | else |
| 1713 | { |
| 1714 | outervar = (Expr *) get_rightop(rinfo->clause); |
| 1715 | innervar = (Expr *) get_leftop(rinfo->clause); |
| 1716 | inner_datatype = left_type; |
| 1717 | inner_relids = rinfo->left_relids; |
| 1718 | } |
| 1719 | inner_nullable_relids = bms_intersect(inner_relids, |
| 1720 | rinfo->nullable_relids); |
| 1721 | |
| 1722 | /* Scan EquivalenceClasses for a match to outervar */ |
| 1723 | foreach(lc1, root->eq_classes) |
| 1724 | { |
| 1725 | EquivalenceClass *cur_ec = (EquivalenceClass *) lfirst(lc1); |
| 1726 | bool match; |
| 1727 | ListCell *lc2; |
| 1728 | |
| 1729 | /* Ignore EC unless it contains pseudoconstants */ |
| 1730 | if (!cur_ec->ec_has_const) |
| 1731 | continue; |
| 1732 | /* Never match to a volatile EC */ |
| 1733 | if (cur_ec->ec_has_volatile) |
| 1734 | continue; |
| 1735 | /* It has to match the outer-join clause as to semantics, too */ |
| 1736 | if (collation != cur_ec->ec_collation) |
| 1737 | continue; |
| 1738 | if (!equal(rinfo->mergeopfamilies, cur_ec->ec_opfamilies)) |
| 1739 | continue; |
| 1740 | /* Does it contain a match to outervar? */ |
| 1741 | match = false; |
| 1742 | foreach(lc2, cur_ec->ec_members) |
| 1743 | { |
| 1744 | EquivalenceMember *cur_em = (EquivalenceMember *) lfirst(lc2); |
| 1745 | |
| 1746 | Assert(!cur_em->em_is_child); /* no children yet */ |
| 1747 | if (equal(outervar, cur_em->em_expr)) |
| 1748 | { |
| 1749 | match = true; |
| 1750 | break; |
| 1751 | } |
| 1752 | } |
| 1753 | if (!match) |
| 1754 | continue; /* no match, so ignore this EC */ |
| 1755 | |
| 1756 | /* |
| 1757 | * Yes it does! Try to generate a clause INNERVAR = CONSTANT for each |
| 1758 | * CONSTANT in the EC. Note that we must succeed with at least one |
| 1759 | * constant before we can decide to throw away the outer-join clause. |
| 1760 | */ |
| 1761 | match = false; |
| 1762 | foreach(lc2, cur_ec->ec_members) |
| 1763 | { |
| 1764 | EquivalenceMember *cur_em = (EquivalenceMember *) lfirst(lc2); |
| 1765 | Oid eq_op; |
| 1766 | RestrictInfo *newrinfo; |
| 1767 | |
| 1768 | if (!cur_em->em_is_const) |
| 1769 | continue; /* ignore non-const members */ |
| 1770 | eq_op = select_equality_operator(cur_ec, |
| 1771 | inner_datatype, |
| 1772 | cur_em->em_datatype); |
| 1773 | if (!OidIsValid(eq_op)) |
| 1774 | continue; /* can't generate equality */ |
| 1775 | newrinfo = build_implied_join_equality(eq_op, |
| 1776 | cur_ec->ec_collation, |
| 1777 | innervar, |
| 1778 | cur_em->em_expr, |
| 1779 | bms_copy(inner_relids), |
| 1780 | bms_copy(inner_nullable_relids), |
| 1781 | cur_ec->ec_min_security); |
| 1782 | if (process_equivalence(root, &newrinfo, true)) |
| 1783 | match = true; |
| 1784 | } |
| 1785 | |
| 1786 | /* |
| 1787 | * If we were able to equate INNERVAR to any constant, report success. |
| 1788 | * Otherwise, fall out of the search loop, since we know the OUTERVAR |
| 1789 | * appears in at most one EC. |
| 1790 | */ |
| 1791 | if (match) |
| 1792 | return true; |
| 1793 | else |
| 1794 | break; |
| 1795 | } |
| 1796 | |
| 1797 | return false; /* failed to make any deduction */ |
| 1798 | } |
| 1799 | |
| 1800 | /* |
| 1801 | * reconsider_outer_join_clauses for a single FULL JOIN clause |
| 1802 | * |
| 1803 | * Returns true if we were able to propagate a constant through the clause. |
| 1804 | */ |
| 1805 | static bool |
| 1806 | reconsider_full_join_clause(PlannerInfo *root, RestrictInfo *rinfo) |
| 1807 | { |
| 1808 | Expr *leftvar; |
| 1809 | Expr *rightvar; |
| 1810 | Oid opno, |
| 1811 | collation, |
| 1812 | left_type, |
| 1813 | right_type; |
| 1814 | Relids left_relids, |
| 1815 | right_relids, |
| 1816 | left_nullable_relids, |
| 1817 | right_nullable_relids; |
| 1818 | ListCell *lc1; |
| 1819 | |
| 1820 | /* Can't use an outerjoin_delayed clause here */ |
| 1821 | if (rinfo->outerjoin_delayed) |
| 1822 | return false; |
| 1823 | |
| 1824 | /* Extract needed info from the clause */ |
| 1825 | Assert(is_opclause(rinfo->clause)); |
| 1826 | opno = ((OpExpr *) rinfo->clause)->opno; |
| 1827 | collation = ((OpExpr *) rinfo->clause)->inputcollid; |
| 1828 | op_input_types(opno, &left_type, &right_type); |
| 1829 | leftvar = (Expr *) get_leftop(rinfo->clause); |
| 1830 | rightvar = (Expr *) get_rightop(rinfo->clause); |
| 1831 | left_relids = rinfo->left_relids; |
| 1832 | right_relids = rinfo->right_relids; |
| 1833 | left_nullable_relids = bms_intersect(left_relids, |
| 1834 | rinfo->nullable_relids); |
| 1835 | right_nullable_relids = bms_intersect(right_relids, |
| 1836 | rinfo->nullable_relids); |
| 1837 | |
| 1838 | foreach(lc1, root->eq_classes) |
| 1839 | { |
| 1840 | EquivalenceClass *cur_ec = (EquivalenceClass *) lfirst(lc1); |
| 1841 | EquivalenceMember *coal_em = NULL; |
| 1842 | bool match; |
| 1843 | bool matchleft; |
| 1844 | bool matchright; |
| 1845 | ListCell *lc2; |
| 1846 | |
| 1847 | /* Ignore EC unless it contains pseudoconstants */ |
| 1848 | if (!cur_ec->ec_has_const) |
| 1849 | continue; |
| 1850 | /* Never match to a volatile EC */ |
| 1851 | if (cur_ec->ec_has_volatile) |
| 1852 | continue; |
| 1853 | /* It has to match the outer-join clause as to semantics, too */ |
| 1854 | if (collation != cur_ec->ec_collation) |
| 1855 | continue; |
| 1856 | if (!equal(rinfo->mergeopfamilies, cur_ec->ec_opfamilies)) |
| 1857 | continue; |
| 1858 | |
| 1859 | /* |
| 1860 | * Does it contain a COALESCE(leftvar, rightvar) construct? |
| 1861 | * |
| 1862 | * We can assume the COALESCE() inputs are in the same order as the |
| 1863 | * join clause, since both were automatically generated in the cases |
| 1864 | * we care about. |
| 1865 | * |
| 1866 | * XXX currently this may fail to match in cross-type cases because |
| 1867 | * the COALESCE will contain typecast operations while the join clause |
| 1868 | * may not (if there is a cross-type mergejoin operator available for |
| 1869 | * the two column types). Is it OK to strip implicit coercions from |
| 1870 | * the COALESCE arguments? |
| 1871 | */ |
| 1872 | match = false; |
| 1873 | foreach(lc2, cur_ec->ec_members) |
| 1874 | { |
| 1875 | coal_em = (EquivalenceMember *) lfirst(lc2); |
| 1876 | Assert(!coal_em->em_is_child); /* no children yet */ |
| 1877 | if (IsA(coal_em->em_expr, CoalesceExpr)) |
| 1878 | { |
| 1879 | CoalesceExpr *cexpr = (CoalesceExpr *) coal_em->em_expr; |
| 1880 | Node *cfirst; |
| 1881 | Node *csecond; |
| 1882 | |
| 1883 | if (list_length(cexpr->args) != 2) |
| 1884 | continue; |
| 1885 | cfirst = (Node *) linitial(cexpr->args); |
| 1886 | csecond = (Node *) lsecond(cexpr->args); |
| 1887 | |
| 1888 | if (equal(leftvar, cfirst) && equal(rightvar, csecond)) |
| 1889 | { |
| 1890 | match = true; |
| 1891 | break; |
| 1892 | } |
| 1893 | } |
| 1894 | } |
| 1895 | if (!match) |
| 1896 | continue; /* no match, so ignore this EC */ |
| 1897 | |
| 1898 | /* |
| 1899 | * Yes it does! Try to generate clauses LEFTVAR = CONSTANT and |
| 1900 | * RIGHTVAR = CONSTANT for each CONSTANT in the EC. Note that we must |
| 1901 | * succeed with at least one constant for each var before we can |
| 1902 | * decide to throw away the outer-join clause. |
| 1903 | */ |
| 1904 | matchleft = matchright = false; |
| 1905 | foreach(lc2, cur_ec->ec_members) |
| 1906 | { |
| 1907 | EquivalenceMember *cur_em = (EquivalenceMember *) lfirst(lc2); |
| 1908 | Oid eq_op; |
| 1909 | RestrictInfo *newrinfo; |
| 1910 | |
| 1911 | if (!cur_em->em_is_const) |
| 1912 | continue; /* ignore non-const members */ |
| 1913 | eq_op = select_equality_operator(cur_ec, |
| 1914 | left_type, |
| 1915 | cur_em->em_datatype); |
| 1916 | if (OidIsValid(eq_op)) |
| 1917 | { |
| 1918 | newrinfo = build_implied_join_equality(eq_op, |
| 1919 | cur_ec->ec_collation, |
| 1920 | leftvar, |
| 1921 | cur_em->em_expr, |
| 1922 | bms_copy(left_relids), |
| 1923 | bms_copy(left_nullable_relids), |
| 1924 | cur_ec->ec_min_security); |
| 1925 | if (process_equivalence(root, &newrinfo, true)) |
| 1926 | matchleft = true; |
| 1927 | } |
| 1928 | eq_op = select_equality_operator(cur_ec, |
| 1929 | right_type, |
| 1930 | cur_em->em_datatype); |
| 1931 | if (OidIsValid(eq_op)) |
| 1932 | { |
| 1933 | newrinfo = build_implied_join_equality(eq_op, |
| 1934 | cur_ec->ec_collation, |
| 1935 | rightvar, |
| 1936 | cur_em->em_expr, |
| 1937 | bms_copy(right_relids), |
| 1938 | bms_copy(right_nullable_relids), |
| 1939 | cur_ec->ec_min_security); |
| 1940 | if (process_equivalence(root, &newrinfo, true)) |
| 1941 | matchright = true; |
| 1942 | } |
| 1943 | } |
| 1944 | |
| 1945 | /* |
| 1946 | * If we were able to equate both vars to constants, we're done, and |
| 1947 | * we can throw away the full-join clause as redundant. Moreover, we |
| 1948 | * can remove the COALESCE entry from the EC, since the added |
| 1949 | * restrictions ensure it will always have the expected value. (We |
| 1950 | * don't bother trying to update ec_relids or ec_sources.) |
| 1951 | */ |
| 1952 | if (matchleft && matchright) |
| 1953 | { |
| 1954 | cur_ec->ec_members = list_delete_ptr(cur_ec->ec_members, coal_em); |
| 1955 | return true; |
| 1956 | } |
| 1957 | |
| 1958 | /* |
| 1959 | * Otherwise, fall out of the search loop, since we know the COALESCE |
| 1960 | * appears in at most one EC (XXX might stop being true if we allow |
| 1961 | * stripping of coercions above?) |
| 1962 | */ |
| 1963 | break; |
| 1964 | } |
| 1965 | |
| 1966 | return false; /* failed to make any deduction */ |
| 1967 | } |
| 1968 | |
| 1969 | |
| 1970 | /* |
| 1971 | * exprs_known_equal |
| 1972 | * Detect whether two expressions are known equal due to equivalence |
| 1973 | * relationships. |
| 1974 | * |
| 1975 | * Actually, this only shows that the expressions are equal according |
| 1976 | * to some opfamily's notion of equality --- but we only use it for |
| 1977 | * selectivity estimation, so a fuzzy idea of equality is OK. |
| 1978 | * |
| 1979 | * Note: does not bother to check for "equal(item1, item2)"; caller must |
| 1980 | * check that case if it's possible to pass identical items. |
| 1981 | */ |
| 1982 | bool |
| 1983 | exprs_known_equal(PlannerInfo *root, Node *item1, Node *item2) |
| 1984 | { |
| 1985 | ListCell *lc1; |
| 1986 | |
| 1987 | foreach(lc1, root->eq_classes) |
| 1988 | { |
| 1989 | EquivalenceClass *ec = (EquivalenceClass *) lfirst(lc1); |
| 1990 | bool item1member = false; |
| 1991 | bool item2member = false; |
| 1992 | ListCell *lc2; |
| 1993 | |
| 1994 | /* Never match to a volatile EC */ |
| 1995 | if (ec->ec_has_volatile) |
| 1996 | continue; |
| 1997 | |
| 1998 | foreach(lc2, ec->ec_members) |
| 1999 | { |
| 2000 | EquivalenceMember *em = (EquivalenceMember *) lfirst(lc2); |
| 2001 | |
| 2002 | if (em->em_is_child) |
| 2003 | continue; /* ignore children here */ |
| 2004 | if (equal(item1, em->em_expr)) |
| 2005 | item1member = true; |
| 2006 | else if (equal(item2, em->em_expr)) |
| 2007 | item2member = true; |
| 2008 | /* Exit as soon as equality is proven */ |
| 2009 | if (item1member && item2member) |
| 2010 | return true; |
| 2011 | } |
| 2012 | } |
| 2013 | return false; |
| 2014 | } |
| 2015 | |
| 2016 | |
| 2017 | /* |
| 2018 | * match_eclasses_to_foreign_key_col |
| 2019 | * See whether a foreign key column match is proven by any eclass. |
| 2020 | * |
| 2021 | * If the referenced and referencing Vars of the fkey's colno'th column are |
| 2022 | * known equal due to any eclass, return that eclass; otherwise return NULL. |
| 2023 | * (In principle there might be more than one matching eclass if multiple |
| 2024 | * collations are involved, but since collation doesn't matter for equality, |
| 2025 | * we ignore that fine point here.) This is much like exprs_known_equal, |
| 2026 | * except that we insist on the comparison operator matching the eclass, so |
| 2027 | * that the result is definite not approximate. |
| 2028 | */ |
| 2029 | EquivalenceClass * |
| 2030 | match_eclasses_to_foreign_key_col(PlannerInfo *root, |
| 2031 | ForeignKeyOptInfo *fkinfo, |
| 2032 | int colno) |
| 2033 | { |
| 2034 | Index var1varno = fkinfo->con_relid; |
| 2035 | AttrNumber var1attno = fkinfo->conkey[colno]; |
| 2036 | Index var2varno = fkinfo->ref_relid; |
| 2037 | AttrNumber var2attno = fkinfo->confkey[colno]; |
| 2038 | Oid eqop = fkinfo->conpfeqop[colno]; |
| 2039 | List *opfamilies = NIL; /* compute only if needed */ |
| 2040 | ListCell *lc1; |
| 2041 | |
| 2042 | foreach(lc1, root->eq_classes) |
| 2043 | { |
| 2044 | EquivalenceClass *ec = (EquivalenceClass *) lfirst(lc1); |
| 2045 | bool item1member = false; |
| 2046 | bool item2member = false; |
| 2047 | ListCell *lc2; |
| 2048 | |
| 2049 | /* Never match to a volatile EC */ |
| 2050 | if (ec->ec_has_volatile) |
| 2051 | continue; |
| 2052 | /* Note: it seems okay to match to "broken" eclasses here */ |
| 2053 | |
| 2054 | /* |
| 2055 | * If eclass visibly doesn't have members for both rels, there's no |
| 2056 | * need to grovel through the members. |
| 2057 | */ |
| 2058 | if (!bms_is_member(var1varno, ec->ec_relids) || |
| 2059 | !bms_is_member(var2varno, ec->ec_relids)) |
| 2060 | continue; |
| 2061 | |
| 2062 | foreach(lc2, ec->ec_members) |
| 2063 | { |
| 2064 | EquivalenceMember *em = (EquivalenceMember *) lfirst(lc2); |
| 2065 | Var *var; |
| 2066 | |
| 2067 | if (em->em_is_child) |
| 2068 | continue; /* ignore children here */ |
| 2069 | |
| 2070 | /* EM must be a Var, possibly with RelabelType */ |
| 2071 | var = (Var *) em->em_expr; |
| 2072 | while (var && IsA(var, RelabelType)) |
| 2073 | var = (Var *) ((RelabelType *) var)->arg; |
| 2074 | if (!(var && IsA(var, Var))) |
| 2075 | continue; |
| 2076 | |
| 2077 | /* Match? */ |
| 2078 | if (var->varno == var1varno && var->varattno == var1attno) |
| 2079 | item1member = true; |
| 2080 | else if (var->varno == var2varno && var->varattno == var2attno) |
| 2081 | item2member = true; |
| 2082 | |
| 2083 | /* Have we found both PK and FK column in this EC? */ |
| 2084 | if (item1member && item2member) |
| 2085 | { |
| 2086 | /* |
| 2087 | * Succeed if eqop matches EC's opfamilies. We could test |
| 2088 | * this before scanning the members, but it's probably cheaper |
| 2089 | * to test for member matches first. |
| 2090 | */ |
| 2091 | if (opfamilies == NIL) /* compute if we didn't already */ |
| 2092 | opfamilies = get_mergejoin_opfamilies(eqop); |
| 2093 | if (equal(opfamilies, ec->ec_opfamilies)) |
| 2094 | return ec; |
| 2095 | /* Otherwise, done with this EC, move on to the next */ |
| 2096 | break; |
| 2097 | } |
| 2098 | } |
| 2099 | } |
| 2100 | return NULL; |
| 2101 | } |
| 2102 | |
| 2103 | |
| 2104 | /* |
| 2105 | * add_child_rel_equivalences |
| 2106 | * Search for EC members that reference the parent_rel, and |
| 2107 | * add transformed members referencing the child_rel. |
| 2108 | * |
| 2109 | * Note that this function won't be called at all unless we have at least some |
| 2110 | * reason to believe that the EC members it generates will be useful. |
| 2111 | * |
| 2112 | * parent_rel and child_rel could be derived from appinfo, but since the |
| 2113 | * caller has already computed them, we might as well just pass them in. |
| 2114 | */ |
| 2115 | void |
| 2116 | add_child_rel_equivalences(PlannerInfo *root, |
| 2117 | AppendRelInfo *appinfo, |
| 2118 | RelOptInfo *parent_rel, |
| 2119 | RelOptInfo *child_rel) |
| 2120 | { |
| 2121 | ListCell *lc1; |
| 2122 | |
| 2123 | foreach(lc1, root->eq_classes) |
| 2124 | { |
| 2125 | EquivalenceClass *cur_ec = (EquivalenceClass *) lfirst(lc1); |
| 2126 | ListCell *lc2; |
| 2127 | |
| 2128 | /* |
| 2129 | * If this EC contains a volatile expression, then generating child |
| 2130 | * EMs would be downright dangerous, so skip it. We rely on a |
| 2131 | * volatile EC having only one EM. |
| 2132 | */ |
| 2133 | if (cur_ec->ec_has_volatile) |
| 2134 | continue; |
| 2135 | |
| 2136 | /* |
| 2137 | * No point in searching if child's topmost parent rel is not |
| 2138 | * mentioned in eclass. |
| 2139 | */ |
| 2140 | if (!bms_is_subset(child_rel->top_parent_relids, cur_ec->ec_relids)) |
| 2141 | continue; |
| 2142 | |
| 2143 | foreach(lc2, cur_ec->ec_members) |
| 2144 | { |
| 2145 | EquivalenceMember *cur_em = (EquivalenceMember *) lfirst(lc2); |
| 2146 | |
| 2147 | if (cur_em->em_is_const) |
| 2148 | continue; /* ignore consts here */ |
| 2149 | |
| 2150 | /* |
| 2151 | * We consider only original EC members here, not |
| 2152 | * already-transformed child members. Otherwise, if some original |
| 2153 | * member expression references more than one appendrel, we'd get |
| 2154 | * an O(N^2) explosion of useless derived expressions for |
| 2155 | * combinations of children. |
| 2156 | */ |
| 2157 | if (cur_em->em_is_child) |
| 2158 | continue; /* ignore children here */ |
| 2159 | |
| 2160 | /* Does this member reference child's topmost parent rel? */ |
| 2161 | if (bms_overlap(cur_em->em_relids, child_rel->top_parent_relids)) |
| 2162 | { |
| 2163 | /* Yes, generate transformed child version */ |
| 2164 | Expr *child_expr; |
| 2165 | Relids new_relids; |
| 2166 | Relids new_nullable_relids; |
| 2167 | |
| 2168 | if (parent_rel->reloptkind == RELOPT_BASEREL) |
| 2169 | { |
| 2170 | /* Simple single-level transformation */ |
| 2171 | child_expr = (Expr *) |
| 2172 | adjust_appendrel_attrs(root, |
| 2173 | (Node *) cur_em->em_expr, |
| 2174 | 1, &appinfo); |
| 2175 | } |
| 2176 | else |
| 2177 | { |
| 2178 | /* Must do multi-level transformation */ |
| 2179 | child_expr = (Expr *) |
| 2180 | adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(root, |
| 2181 | (Node *) cur_em->em_expr, |
| 2182 | child_rel->relids, |
| 2183 | child_rel->top_parent_relids); |
| 2184 | } |
| 2185 | |
| 2186 | /* |
| 2187 | * Transform em_relids to match. Note we do *not* do |
| 2188 | * pull_varnos(child_expr) here, as for example the |
| 2189 | * transformation might have substituted a constant, but we |
| 2190 | * don't want the child member to be marked as constant. |
| 2191 | */ |
| 2192 | new_relids = bms_difference(cur_em->em_relids, |
| 2193 | child_rel->top_parent_relids); |
| 2194 | new_relids = bms_add_members(new_relids, child_rel->relids); |
| 2195 | |
| 2196 | /* |
| 2197 | * And likewise for nullable_relids. Note this code assumes |
| 2198 | * parent and child relids are singletons. |
| 2199 | */ |
| 2200 | new_nullable_relids = cur_em->em_nullable_relids; |
| 2201 | if (bms_overlap(new_nullable_relids, |
| 2202 | child_rel->top_parent_relids)) |
| 2203 | { |
| 2204 | new_nullable_relids = bms_difference(new_nullable_relids, |
| 2205 | child_rel->top_parent_relids); |
| 2206 | new_nullable_relids = bms_add_members(new_nullable_relids, |
| 2207 | child_rel->relids); |
| 2208 | } |
| 2209 | |
| 2210 | (void) add_eq_member(cur_ec, child_expr, |
| 2211 | new_relids, new_nullable_relids, |
| 2212 | true, cur_em->em_datatype); |
| 2213 | } |
| 2214 | } |
| 2215 | } |
| 2216 | } |
| 2217 | |
| 2218 | |
| 2219 | /* |
| 2220 | * generate_implied_equalities_for_column |
| 2221 | * Create EC-derived joinclauses usable with a specific column. |
| 2222 | * |
| 2223 | * This is used by indxpath.c to extract potentially indexable joinclauses |
| 2224 | * from ECs, and can be used by foreign data wrappers for similar purposes. |
| 2225 | * We assume that only expressions in Vars of a single table are of interest, |
| 2226 | * but the caller provides a callback function to identify exactly which |
| 2227 | * such expressions it would like to know about. |
| 2228 | * |
| 2229 | * We assume that any given table/index column could appear in only one EC. |
| 2230 | * (This should be true in all but the most pathological cases, and if it |
| 2231 | * isn't, we stop on the first match anyway.) Therefore, what we return |
| 2232 | * is a redundant list of clauses equating the table/index column to each of |
| 2233 | * the other-relation values it is known to be equal to. Any one of |
| 2234 | * these clauses can be used to create a parameterized path, and there |
| 2235 | * is no value in using more than one. (But it *is* worthwhile to create |
| 2236 | * a separate parameterized path for each one, since that leads to different |
| 2237 | * join orders.) |
| 2238 | * |
| 2239 | * The caller can pass a Relids set of rels we aren't interested in joining |
| 2240 | * to, so as to save the work of creating useless clauses. |
| 2241 | */ |
| 2242 | List * |
| 2243 | generate_implied_equalities_for_column(PlannerInfo *root, |
| 2244 | RelOptInfo *rel, |
| 2245 | ec_matches_callback_type callback, |
| 2246 | void *callback_arg, |
| 2247 | Relids prohibited_rels) |
| 2248 | { |
| 2249 | List *result = NIL; |
| 2250 | bool is_child_rel = (rel->reloptkind == RELOPT_OTHER_MEMBER_REL); |
| 2251 | Relids parent_relids; |
| 2252 | ListCell *lc1; |
| 2253 | |
| 2254 | /* Indexes are available only on base or "other" member relations. */ |
| 2255 | Assert(IS_SIMPLE_REL(rel)); |
| 2256 | |
| 2257 | /* If it's a child rel, we'll need to know what its parent(s) are */ |
| 2258 | if (is_child_rel) |
| 2259 | parent_relids = find_childrel_parents(root, rel); |
| 2260 | else |
| 2261 | parent_relids = NULL; /* not used, but keep compiler quiet */ |
| 2262 | |
| 2263 | foreach(lc1, root->eq_classes) |
| 2264 | { |
| 2265 | EquivalenceClass *cur_ec = (EquivalenceClass *) lfirst(lc1); |
| 2266 | EquivalenceMember *cur_em; |
| 2267 | ListCell *lc2; |
| 2268 | |
| 2269 | /* |
| 2270 | * Won't generate joinclauses if const or single-member (the latter |
| 2271 | * test covers the volatile case too) |
| 2272 | */ |
| 2273 | if (cur_ec->ec_has_const || list_length(cur_ec->ec_members) <= 1) |
| 2274 | continue; |
| 2275 | |
| 2276 | /* |
| 2277 | * No point in searching if rel not mentioned in eclass (but we can't |
| 2278 | * tell that for a child rel). |
| 2279 | */ |
| 2280 | if (!is_child_rel && |
| 2281 | !bms_is_subset(rel->relids, cur_ec->ec_relids)) |
| 2282 | continue; |
| 2283 | |
| 2284 | /* |
| 2285 | * Scan members, looking for a match to the target column. Note that |
| 2286 | * child EC members are considered, but only when they belong to the |
| 2287 | * target relation. (Unlike regular members, the same expression |
| 2288 | * could be a child member of more than one EC. Therefore, it's |
| 2289 | * potentially order-dependent which EC a child relation's target |
| 2290 | * column gets matched to. This is annoying but it only happens in |
| 2291 | * corner cases, so for now we live with just reporting the first |
| 2292 | * match. See also get_eclass_for_sort_expr.) |
| 2293 | */ |
| 2294 | cur_em = NULL; |
| 2295 | foreach(lc2, cur_ec->ec_members) |
| 2296 | { |
| 2297 | cur_em = (EquivalenceMember *) lfirst(lc2); |
| 2298 | if (bms_equal(cur_em->em_relids, rel->relids) && |
| 2299 | callback(root, rel, cur_ec, cur_em, callback_arg)) |
| 2300 | break; |
| 2301 | cur_em = NULL; |
| 2302 | } |
| 2303 | |
| 2304 | if (!cur_em) |
| 2305 | continue; |
| 2306 | |
| 2307 | /* |
| 2308 | * Found our match. Scan the other EC members and attempt to generate |
| 2309 | * joinclauses. |
| 2310 | */ |
| 2311 | foreach(lc2, cur_ec->ec_members) |
| 2312 | { |
| 2313 | EquivalenceMember *other_em = (EquivalenceMember *) lfirst(lc2); |
| 2314 | Oid eq_op; |
| 2315 | RestrictInfo *rinfo; |
| 2316 | |
| 2317 | if (other_em->em_is_child) |
| 2318 | continue; /* ignore children here */ |
| 2319 | |
| 2320 | /* Make sure it'll be a join to a different rel */ |
| 2321 | if (other_em == cur_em || |
| 2322 | bms_overlap(other_em->em_relids, rel->relids)) |
| 2323 | continue; |
| 2324 | |
| 2325 | /* Forget it if caller doesn't want joins to this rel */ |
| 2326 | if (bms_overlap(other_em->em_relids, prohibited_rels)) |
| 2327 | continue; |
| 2328 | |
| 2329 | /* |
| 2330 | * Also, if this is a child rel, avoid generating a useless join |
| 2331 | * to its parent rel(s). |
| 2332 | */ |
| 2333 | if (is_child_rel && |
| 2334 | bms_overlap(parent_relids, other_em->em_relids)) |
| 2335 | continue; |
| 2336 | |
| 2337 | eq_op = select_equality_operator(cur_ec, |
| 2338 | cur_em->em_datatype, |
| 2339 | other_em->em_datatype); |
| 2340 | if (!OidIsValid(eq_op)) |
| 2341 | continue; |
| 2342 | |
| 2343 | /* set parent_ec to mark as redundant with other joinclauses */ |
| 2344 | rinfo = create_join_clause(root, cur_ec, eq_op, |
| 2345 | cur_em, other_em, |
| 2346 | cur_ec); |
| 2347 | |
| 2348 | result = lappend(result, rinfo); |
| 2349 | } |
| 2350 | |
| 2351 | /* |
| 2352 | * If somehow we failed to create any join clauses, we might as well |
| 2353 | * keep scanning the ECs for another match. But if we did make any, |
| 2354 | * we're done, because we don't want to return non-redundant clauses. |
| 2355 | */ |
| 2356 | if (result) |
| 2357 | break; |
| 2358 | } |
| 2359 | |
| 2360 | return result; |
| 2361 | } |
| 2362 | |
| 2363 | /* |
| 2364 | * have_relevant_eclass_joinclause |
| 2365 | * Detect whether there is an EquivalenceClass that could produce |
| 2366 | * a joinclause involving the two given relations. |
| 2367 | * |
| 2368 | * This is essentially a very cut-down version of |
| 2369 | * generate_join_implied_equalities(). Note it's OK to occasionally say "yes" |
| 2370 | * incorrectly. Hence we don't bother with details like whether the lack of a |
| 2371 | * cross-type operator might prevent the clause from actually being generated. |
| 2372 | */ |
| 2373 | bool |
| 2374 | have_relevant_eclass_joinclause(PlannerInfo *root, |
| 2375 | RelOptInfo *rel1, RelOptInfo *rel2) |
| 2376 | { |
| 2377 | ListCell *lc1; |
| 2378 | |
| 2379 | foreach(lc1, root->eq_classes) |
| 2380 | { |
| 2381 | EquivalenceClass *ec = (EquivalenceClass *) lfirst(lc1); |
| 2382 | |
| 2383 | /* |
| 2384 | * Won't generate joinclauses if single-member (this test covers the |
| 2385 | * volatile case too) |
| 2386 | */ |
| 2387 | if (list_length(ec->ec_members) <= 1) |
| 2388 | continue; |
| 2389 | |
| 2390 | /* |
| 2391 | * We do not need to examine the individual members of the EC, because |
| 2392 | * all that we care about is whether each rel overlaps the relids of |
| 2393 | * at least one member, and a test on ec_relids is sufficient to prove |
| 2394 | * that. (As with have_relevant_joinclause(), it is not necessary |
| 2395 | * that the EC be able to form a joinclause relating exactly the two |
| 2396 | * given rels, only that it be able to form a joinclause mentioning |
| 2397 | * both, and this will surely be true if both of them overlap |
| 2398 | * ec_relids.) |
| 2399 | * |
| 2400 | * Note we don't test ec_broken; if we did, we'd need a separate code |
| 2401 | * path to look through ec_sources. Checking the membership anyway is |
| 2402 | * OK as a possibly-overoptimistic heuristic. |
| 2403 | * |
| 2404 | * We don't test ec_has_const either, even though a const eclass won't |
| 2405 | * generate real join clauses. This is because if we had "WHERE a.x = |
| 2406 | * b.y and a.x = 42", it is worth considering a join between a and b, |
| 2407 | * since the join result is likely to be small even though it'll end |
| 2408 | * up being an unqualified nestloop. |
| 2409 | */ |
| 2410 | if (bms_overlap(rel1->relids, ec->ec_relids) && |
| 2411 | bms_overlap(rel2->relids, ec->ec_relids)) |
| 2412 | return true; |
| 2413 | } |
| 2414 | |
| 2415 | return false; |
| 2416 | } |
| 2417 | |
| 2418 | |
| 2419 | /* |
| 2420 | * has_relevant_eclass_joinclause |
| 2421 | * Detect whether there is an EquivalenceClass that could produce |
| 2422 | * a joinclause involving the given relation and anything else. |
| 2423 | * |
| 2424 | * This is the same as have_relevant_eclass_joinclause with the other rel |
| 2425 | * implicitly defined as "everything else in the query". |
| 2426 | */ |
| 2427 | bool |
| 2428 | has_relevant_eclass_joinclause(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel1) |
| 2429 | { |
| 2430 | ListCell *lc1; |
| 2431 | |
| 2432 | foreach(lc1, root->eq_classes) |
| 2433 | { |
| 2434 | EquivalenceClass *ec = (EquivalenceClass *) lfirst(lc1); |
| 2435 | |
| 2436 | /* |
| 2437 | * Won't generate joinclauses if single-member (this test covers the |
| 2438 | * volatile case too) |
| 2439 | */ |
| 2440 | if (list_length(ec->ec_members) <= 1) |
| 2441 | continue; |
| 2442 | |
| 2443 | /* |
| 2444 | * Per the comment in have_relevant_eclass_joinclause, it's sufficient |
| 2445 | * to find an EC that mentions both this rel and some other rel. |
| 2446 | */ |
| 2447 | if (bms_overlap(rel1->relids, ec->ec_relids) && |
| 2448 | !bms_is_subset(ec->ec_relids, rel1->relids)) |
| 2449 | return true; |
| 2450 | } |
| 2451 | |
| 2452 | return false; |
| 2453 | } |
| 2454 | |
| 2455 | |
| 2456 | /* |
| 2457 | * eclass_useful_for_merging |
| 2458 | * Detect whether the EC could produce any mergejoinable join clauses |
| 2459 | * against the specified relation. |
| 2460 | * |
| 2461 | * This is just a heuristic test and doesn't have to be exact; it's better |
| 2462 | * to say "yes" incorrectly than "no". Hence we don't bother with details |
| 2463 | * like whether the lack of a cross-type operator might prevent the clause |
| 2464 | * from actually being generated. |
| 2465 | */ |
| 2466 | bool |
| 2467 | eclass_useful_for_merging(PlannerInfo *root, |
| 2468 | EquivalenceClass *eclass, |
| 2469 | RelOptInfo *rel) |
| 2470 | { |
| 2471 | Relids relids; |
| 2472 | ListCell *lc; |
| 2473 | |
| 2474 | Assert(!eclass->ec_merged); |
| 2475 | |
| 2476 | /* |
| 2477 | * Won't generate joinclauses if const or single-member (the latter test |
| 2478 | * covers the volatile case too) |
| 2479 | */ |
| 2480 | if (eclass->ec_has_const || list_length(eclass->ec_members) <= 1) |
| 2481 | return false; |
| 2482 | |
| 2483 | /* |
| 2484 | * Note we don't test ec_broken; if we did, we'd need a separate code path |
| 2485 | * to look through ec_sources. Checking the members anyway is OK as a |
| 2486 | * possibly-overoptimistic heuristic. |
| 2487 | */ |
| 2488 | |
| 2489 | /* If specified rel is a child, we must consider the topmost parent rel */ |
| 2490 | if (IS_OTHER_REL(rel)) |
| 2491 | { |
| 2492 | Assert(!bms_is_empty(rel->top_parent_relids)); |
| 2493 | relids = rel->top_parent_relids; |
| 2494 | } |
| 2495 | else |
| 2496 | relids = rel->relids; |
| 2497 | |
| 2498 | /* If rel already includes all members of eclass, no point in searching */ |
| 2499 | if (bms_is_subset(eclass->ec_relids, relids)) |
| 2500 | return false; |
| 2501 | |
| 2502 | /* To join, we need a member not in the given rel */ |
| 2503 | foreach(lc, eclass->ec_members) |
| 2504 | { |
| 2505 | EquivalenceMember *cur_em = (EquivalenceMember *) lfirst(lc); |
| 2506 | |
| 2507 | if (cur_em->em_is_child) |
| 2508 | continue; /* ignore children here */ |
| 2509 | |
| 2510 | if (!bms_overlap(cur_em->em_relids, relids)) |
| 2511 | return true; |
| 2512 | } |
| 2513 | |
| 2514 | return false; |
| 2515 | } |
| 2516 | |
| 2517 | |
| 2518 | /* |
| 2519 | * is_redundant_derived_clause |
| 2520 | * Test whether rinfo is derived from same EC as any clause in clauselist; |
| 2521 | * if so, it can be presumed to represent a condition that's redundant |
| 2522 | * with that member of the list. |
| 2523 | */ |
| 2524 | bool |
| 2525 | is_redundant_derived_clause(RestrictInfo *rinfo, List *clauselist) |
| 2526 | { |
| 2527 | EquivalenceClass *parent_ec = rinfo->parent_ec; |
| 2528 | ListCell *lc; |
| 2529 | |
| 2530 | /* Fail if it's not a potentially-redundant clause from some EC */ |
| 2531 | if (parent_ec == NULL) |
| 2532 | return false; |
| 2533 | |
| 2534 | foreach(lc, clauselist) |
| 2535 | { |
| 2536 | RestrictInfo *otherrinfo = (RestrictInfo *) lfirst(lc); |
| 2537 | |
| 2538 | if (otherrinfo->parent_ec == parent_ec) |
| 2539 | return true; |
| 2540 | } |
| 2541 | |
| 2542 | return false; |
| 2543 | } |
| 2544 | |
| 2545 | /* |
| 2546 | * is_redundant_with_indexclauses |
| 2547 | * Test whether rinfo is redundant with any clause in the IndexClause |
| 2548 | * list. Here, for convenience, we test both simple identity and |
| 2549 | * whether it is derived from the same EC as any member of the list. |
| 2550 | */ |
| 2551 | bool |
| 2552 | is_redundant_with_indexclauses(RestrictInfo *rinfo, List *indexclauses) |
| 2553 | { |
| 2554 | EquivalenceClass *parent_ec = rinfo->parent_ec; |
| 2555 | ListCell *lc; |
| 2556 | |
| 2557 | foreach(lc, indexclauses) |
| 2558 | { |
| 2559 | IndexClause *iclause = lfirst_node(IndexClause, lc); |
| 2560 | RestrictInfo *otherrinfo = iclause->rinfo; |
| 2561 | |
| 2562 | /* If indexclause is lossy, it won't enforce the condition exactly */ |
| 2563 | if (iclause->lossy) |
| 2564 | continue; |
| 2565 | |
| 2566 | /* Match if it's same clause (pointer equality should be enough) */ |
| 2567 | if (rinfo == otherrinfo) |
| 2568 | return true; |
| 2569 | /* Match if derived from same EC */ |
| 2570 | if (parent_ec && otherrinfo->parent_ec == parent_ec) |
| 2571 | return true; |
| 2572 | |
| 2573 | /* |
| 2574 | * No need to look at the derived clauses in iclause->indexquals; they |
| 2575 | * couldn't match if the parent clause didn't. |
| 2576 | */ |
| 2577 | } |
| 2578 | |
| 2579 | return false; |
| 2580 | } |
| 2581 | |