| 1 | /*------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 2 | * |
| 3 | * restrictinfo.c |
| 4 | * RestrictInfo node manipulation routines. |
| 5 | * |
| 6 | * Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2019, PostgreSQL Global Development Group |
| 7 | * Portions Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California |
| 8 | * |
| 9 | * |
| 10 | * IDENTIFICATION |
| 11 | * src/backend/optimizer/util/restrictinfo.c |
| 12 | * |
| 13 | *------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 14 | */ |
| 15 | #include "postgres.h" |
| 16 | |
| 17 | #include "nodes/makefuncs.h" |
| 18 | #include "nodes/nodeFuncs.h" |
| 19 | #include "optimizer/clauses.h" |
| 20 | #include "optimizer/optimizer.h" |
| 21 | #include "optimizer/restrictinfo.h" |
| 22 | |
| 23 | |
| 24 | static RestrictInfo *make_restrictinfo_internal(Expr *clause, |
| 25 | Expr *orclause, |
| 26 | bool is_pushed_down, |
| 27 | bool outerjoin_delayed, |
| 28 | bool pseudoconstant, |
| 29 | Index security_level, |
| 30 | Relids required_relids, |
| 31 | Relids outer_relids, |
| 32 | Relids nullable_relids); |
| 33 | static Expr *make_sub_restrictinfos(Expr *clause, |
| 34 | bool is_pushed_down, |
| 35 | bool outerjoin_delayed, |
| 36 | bool pseudoconstant, |
| 37 | Index security_level, |
| 38 | Relids required_relids, |
| 39 | Relids outer_relids, |
| 40 | Relids nullable_relids); |
| 41 | |
| 42 | |
| 43 | /* |
| 44 | * make_restrictinfo |
| 45 | * |
| 46 | * Build a RestrictInfo node containing the given subexpression. |
| 47 | * |
| 48 | * The is_pushed_down, outerjoin_delayed, and pseudoconstant flags for the |
| 49 | * RestrictInfo must be supplied by the caller, as well as the correct values |
| 50 | * for security_level, outer_relids, and nullable_relids. |
| 51 | * required_relids can be NULL, in which case it defaults to the actual clause |
| 52 | * contents (i.e., clause_relids). |
| 53 | * |
| 54 | * We initialize fields that depend only on the given subexpression, leaving |
| 55 | * others that depend on context (or may never be needed at all) to be filled |
| 56 | * later. |
| 57 | */ |
| 58 | RestrictInfo * |
| 59 | make_restrictinfo(Expr *clause, |
| 60 | bool is_pushed_down, |
| 61 | bool outerjoin_delayed, |
| 62 | bool pseudoconstant, |
| 63 | Index security_level, |
| 64 | Relids required_relids, |
| 65 | Relids outer_relids, |
| 66 | Relids nullable_relids) |
| 67 | { |
| 68 | /* |
| 69 | * If it's an OR clause, build a modified copy with RestrictInfos inserted |
| 70 | * above each subclause of the top-level AND/OR structure. |
| 71 | */ |
| 72 | if (is_orclause(clause)) |
| 73 | return (RestrictInfo *) make_sub_restrictinfos(clause, |
| 74 | is_pushed_down, |
| 75 | outerjoin_delayed, |
| 76 | pseudoconstant, |
| 77 | security_level, |
| 78 | required_relids, |
| 79 | outer_relids, |
| 80 | nullable_relids); |
| 81 | |
| 82 | /* Shouldn't be an AND clause, else AND/OR flattening messed up */ |
| 83 | Assert(!is_andclause(clause)); |
| 84 | |
| 85 | return make_restrictinfo_internal(clause, |
| 86 | NULL, |
| 87 | is_pushed_down, |
| 88 | outerjoin_delayed, |
| 89 | pseudoconstant, |
| 90 | security_level, |
| 91 | required_relids, |
| 92 | outer_relids, |
| 93 | nullable_relids); |
| 94 | } |
| 95 | |
| 96 | /* |
| 97 | * make_restrictinfo_internal |
| 98 | * |
| 99 | * Common code for the main entry points and the recursive cases. |
| 100 | */ |
| 101 | static RestrictInfo * |
| 102 | make_restrictinfo_internal(Expr *clause, |
| 103 | Expr *orclause, |
| 104 | bool is_pushed_down, |
| 105 | bool outerjoin_delayed, |
| 106 | bool pseudoconstant, |
| 107 | Index security_level, |
| 108 | Relids required_relids, |
| 109 | Relids outer_relids, |
| 110 | Relids nullable_relids) |
| 111 | { |
| 112 | RestrictInfo *restrictinfo = makeNode(RestrictInfo); |
| 113 | |
| 114 | restrictinfo->clause = clause; |
| 115 | restrictinfo->orclause = orclause; |
| 116 | restrictinfo->is_pushed_down = is_pushed_down; |
| 117 | restrictinfo->outerjoin_delayed = outerjoin_delayed; |
| 118 | restrictinfo->pseudoconstant = pseudoconstant; |
| 119 | restrictinfo->can_join = false; /* may get set below */ |
| 120 | restrictinfo->security_level = security_level; |
| 121 | restrictinfo->outer_relids = outer_relids; |
| 122 | restrictinfo->nullable_relids = nullable_relids; |
| 123 | |
| 124 | /* |
| 125 | * If it's potentially delayable by lower-level security quals, figure out |
| 126 | * whether it's leakproof. We can skip testing this for level-zero quals, |
| 127 | * since they would never get delayed on security grounds anyway. |
| 128 | */ |
| 129 | if (security_level > 0) |
| 130 | restrictinfo->leakproof = !contain_leaked_vars((Node *) clause); |
| 131 | else |
| 132 | restrictinfo->leakproof = false; /* really, "don't know" */ |
| 133 | |
| 134 | /* |
| 135 | * If it's a binary opclause, set up left/right relids info. In any case |
| 136 | * set up the total clause relids info. |
| 137 | */ |
| 138 | if (is_opclause(clause) && list_length(((OpExpr *) clause)->args) == 2) |
| 139 | { |
| 140 | restrictinfo->left_relids = pull_varnos(get_leftop(clause)); |
| 141 | restrictinfo->right_relids = pull_varnos(get_rightop(clause)); |
| 142 | |
| 143 | restrictinfo->clause_relids = bms_union(restrictinfo->left_relids, |
| 144 | restrictinfo->right_relids); |
| 145 | |
| 146 | /* |
| 147 | * Does it look like a normal join clause, i.e., a binary operator |
| 148 | * relating expressions that come from distinct relations? If so we |
| 149 | * might be able to use it in a join algorithm. Note that this is a |
| 150 | * purely syntactic test that is made regardless of context. |
| 151 | */ |
| 152 | if (!bms_is_empty(restrictinfo->left_relids) && |
| 153 | !bms_is_empty(restrictinfo->right_relids) && |
| 154 | !bms_overlap(restrictinfo->left_relids, |
| 155 | restrictinfo->right_relids)) |
| 156 | { |
| 157 | restrictinfo->can_join = true; |
| 158 | /* pseudoconstant should certainly not be true */ |
| 159 | Assert(!restrictinfo->pseudoconstant); |
| 160 | } |
| 161 | } |
| 162 | else |
| 163 | { |
| 164 | /* Not a binary opclause, so mark left/right relid sets as empty */ |
| 165 | restrictinfo->left_relids = NULL; |
| 166 | restrictinfo->right_relids = NULL; |
| 167 | /* and get the total relid set the hard way */ |
| 168 | restrictinfo->clause_relids = pull_varnos((Node *) clause); |
| 169 | } |
| 170 | |
| 171 | /* required_relids defaults to clause_relids */ |
| 172 | if (required_relids != NULL) |
| 173 | restrictinfo->required_relids = required_relids; |
| 174 | else |
| 175 | restrictinfo->required_relids = restrictinfo->clause_relids; |
| 176 | |
| 177 | /* |
| 178 | * Fill in all the cacheable fields with "not yet set" markers. None of |
| 179 | * these will be computed until/unless needed. Note in particular that we |
| 180 | * don't mark a binary opclause as mergejoinable or hashjoinable here; |
| 181 | * that happens only if it appears in the right context (top level of a |
| 182 | * joinclause list). |
| 183 | */ |
| 184 | restrictinfo->parent_ec = NULL; |
| 185 | |
| 186 | restrictinfo->eval_cost.startup = -1; |
| 187 | restrictinfo->norm_selec = -1; |
| 188 | restrictinfo->outer_selec = -1; |
| 189 | |
| 190 | restrictinfo->mergeopfamilies = NIL; |
| 191 | |
| 192 | restrictinfo->left_ec = NULL; |
| 193 | restrictinfo->right_ec = NULL; |
| 194 | restrictinfo->left_em = NULL; |
| 195 | restrictinfo->right_em = NULL; |
| 196 | restrictinfo->scansel_cache = NIL; |
| 197 | |
| 198 | restrictinfo->outer_is_left = false; |
| 199 | |
| 200 | restrictinfo->hashjoinoperator = InvalidOid; |
| 201 | |
| 202 | restrictinfo->left_bucketsize = -1; |
| 203 | restrictinfo->right_bucketsize = -1; |
| 204 | restrictinfo->left_mcvfreq = -1; |
| 205 | restrictinfo->right_mcvfreq = -1; |
| 206 | |
| 207 | return restrictinfo; |
| 208 | } |
| 209 | |
| 210 | /* |
| 211 | * Recursively insert sub-RestrictInfo nodes into a boolean expression. |
| 212 | * |
| 213 | * We put RestrictInfos above simple (non-AND/OR) clauses and above |
| 214 | * sub-OR clauses, but not above sub-AND clauses, because there's no need. |
| 215 | * This may seem odd but it is closely related to the fact that we use |
| 216 | * implicit-AND lists at top level of RestrictInfo lists. Only ORs and |
| 217 | * simple clauses are valid RestrictInfos. |
| 218 | * |
| 219 | * The same is_pushed_down, outerjoin_delayed, and pseudoconstant flag |
| 220 | * values can be applied to all RestrictInfo nodes in the result. Likewise |
| 221 | * for security_level, outer_relids, and nullable_relids. |
| 222 | * |
| 223 | * The given required_relids are attached to our top-level output, |
| 224 | * but any OR-clause constituents are allowed to default to just the |
| 225 | * contained rels. |
| 226 | */ |
| 227 | static Expr * |
| 228 | make_sub_restrictinfos(Expr *clause, |
| 229 | bool is_pushed_down, |
| 230 | bool outerjoin_delayed, |
| 231 | bool pseudoconstant, |
| 232 | Index security_level, |
| 233 | Relids required_relids, |
| 234 | Relids outer_relids, |
| 235 | Relids nullable_relids) |
| 236 | { |
| 237 | if (is_orclause(clause)) |
| 238 | { |
| 239 | List *orlist = NIL; |
| 240 | ListCell *temp; |
| 241 | |
| 242 | foreach(temp, ((BoolExpr *) clause)->args) |
| 243 | orlist = lappend(orlist, |
| 244 | make_sub_restrictinfos(lfirst(temp), |
| 245 | is_pushed_down, |
| 246 | outerjoin_delayed, |
| 247 | pseudoconstant, |
| 248 | security_level, |
| 249 | NULL, |
| 250 | outer_relids, |
| 251 | nullable_relids)); |
| 252 | return (Expr *) make_restrictinfo_internal(clause, |
| 253 | make_orclause(orlist), |
| 254 | is_pushed_down, |
| 255 | outerjoin_delayed, |
| 256 | pseudoconstant, |
| 257 | security_level, |
| 258 | required_relids, |
| 259 | outer_relids, |
| 260 | nullable_relids); |
| 261 | } |
| 262 | else if (is_andclause(clause)) |
| 263 | { |
| 264 | List *andlist = NIL; |
| 265 | ListCell *temp; |
| 266 | |
| 267 | foreach(temp, ((BoolExpr *) clause)->args) |
| 268 | andlist = lappend(andlist, |
| 269 | make_sub_restrictinfos(lfirst(temp), |
| 270 | is_pushed_down, |
| 271 | outerjoin_delayed, |
| 272 | pseudoconstant, |
| 273 | security_level, |
| 274 | required_relids, |
| 275 | outer_relids, |
| 276 | nullable_relids)); |
| 277 | return make_andclause(andlist); |
| 278 | } |
| 279 | else |
| 280 | return (Expr *) make_restrictinfo_internal(clause, |
| 281 | NULL, |
| 282 | is_pushed_down, |
| 283 | outerjoin_delayed, |
| 284 | pseudoconstant, |
| 285 | security_level, |
| 286 | required_relids, |
| 287 | outer_relids, |
| 288 | nullable_relids); |
| 289 | } |
| 290 | |
| 291 | /* |
| 292 | * commute_restrictinfo |
| 293 | * |
| 294 | * Given a RestrictInfo containing a binary opclause, produce a RestrictInfo |
| 295 | * representing the commutation of that clause. The caller must pass the |
| 296 | * OID of the commutator operator (which it's presumably looked up, else |
| 297 | * it would not know this is valid). |
| 298 | * |
| 299 | * Beware that the result shares sub-structure with the given RestrictInfo. |
| 300 | * That's okay for the intended usage with derived index quals, but might |
| 301 | * be hazardous if the source is subject to change. Also notice that we |
| 302 | * assume without checking that the commutator op is a member of the same |
| 303 | * btree and hash opclasses as the original op. |
| 304 | */ |
| 305 | RestrictInfo * |
| 306 | commute_restrictinfo(RestrictInfo *rinfo, Oid comm_op) |
| 307 | { |
| 308 | RestrictInfo *result; |
| 309 | OpExpr *newclause; |
| 310 | OpExpr *clause = castNode(OpExpr, rinfo->clause); |
| 311 | |
| 312 | Assert(list_length(clause->args) == 2); |
| 313 | |
| 314 | /* flat-copy all the fields of clause ... */ |
| 315 | newclause = makeNode(OpExpr); |
| 316 | memcpy(newclause, clause, sizeof(OpExpr)); |
| 317 | |
| 318 | /* ... and adjust those we need to change to commute it */ |
| 319 | newclause->opno = comm_op; |
| 320 | newclause->opfuncid = InvalidOid; |
| 321 | newclause->args = list_make2(lsecond(clause->args), |
| 322 | linitial(clause->args)); |
| 323 | |
| 324 | /* likewise, flat-copy all the fields of rinfo ... */ |
| 325 | result = makeNode(RestrictInfo); |
| 326 | memcpy(result, rinfo, sizeof(RestrictInfo)); |
| 327 | |
| 328 | /* |
| 329 | * ... and adjust those we need to change. Note in particular that we can |
| 330 | * preserve any cached selectivity or cost estimates, since those ought to |
| 331 | * be the same for the new clause. Likewise we can keep the source's |
| 332 | * parent_ec. |
| 333 | */ |
| 334 | result->clause = (Expr *) newclause; |
| 335 | result->left_relids = rinfo->right_relids; |
| 336 | result->right_relids = rinfo->left_relids; |
| 337 | Assert(result->orclause == NULL); |
| 338 | result->left_ec = rinfo->right_ec; |
| 339 | result->right_ec = rinfo->left_ec; |
| 340 | result->left_em = rinfo->right_em; |
| 341 | result->right_em = rinfo->left_em; |
| 342 | result->scansel_cache = NIL; /* not worth updating this */ |
| 343 | if (rinfo->hashjoinoperator == clause->opno) |
| 344 | result->hashjoinoperator = comm_op; |
| 345 | else |
| 346 | result->hashjoinoperator = InvalidOid; |
| 347 | result->left_bucketsize = rinfo->right_bucketsize; |
| 348 | result->right_bucketsize = rinfo->left_bucketsize; |
| 349 | result->left_mcvfreq = rinfo->right_mcvfreq; |
| 350 | result->right_mcvfreq = rinfo->left_mcvfreq; |
| 351 | |
| 352 | return result; |
| 353 | } |
| 354 | |
| 355 | /* |
| 356 | * restriction_is_or_clause |
| 357 | * |
| 358 | * Returns t iff the restrictinfo node contains an 'or' clause. |
| 359 | */ |
| 360 | bool |
| 361 | restriction_is_or_clause(RestrictInfo *restrictinfo) |
| 362 | { |
| 363 | if (restrictinfo->orclause != NULL) |
| 364 | return true; |
| 365 | else |
| 366 | return false; |
| 367 | } |
| 368 | |
| 369 | /* |
| 370 | * restriction_is_securely_promotable |
| 371 | * |
| 372 | * Returns true if it's okay to evaluate this clause "early", that is before |
| 373 | * other restriction clauses attached to the specified relation. |
| 374 | */ |
| 375 | bool |
| 376 | restriction_is_securely_promotable(RestrictInfo *restrictinfo, |
| 377 | RelOptInfo *rel) |
| 378 | { |
| 379 | /* |
| 380 | * It's okay if there are no baserestrictinfo clauses for the rel that |
| 381 | * would need to go before this one, *or* if this one is leakproof. |
| 382 | */ |
| 383 | if (restrictinfo->security_level <= rel->baserestrict_min_security || |
| 384 | restrictinfo->leakproof) |
| 385 | return true; |
| 386 | else |
| 387 | return false; |
| 388 | } |
| 389 | |
| 390 | /* |
| 391 | * get_actual_clauses |
| 392 | * |
| 393 | * Returns a list containing the bare clauses from 'restrictinfo_list'. |
| 394 | * |
| 395 | * This is only to be used in cases where none of the RestrictInfos can |
| 396 | * be pseudoconstant clauses (for instance, it's OK on indexqual lists). |
| 397 | */ |
| 398 | List * |
| 399 | get_actual_clauses(List *restrictinfo_list) |
| 400 | { |
| 401 | List *result = NIL; |
| 402 | ListCell *l; |
| 403 | |
| 404 | foreach(l, restrictinfo_list) |
| 405 | { |
| 406 | RestrictInfo *rinfo = lfirst_node(RestrictInfo, l); |
| 407 | |
| 408 | Assert(!rinfo->pseudoconstant); |
| 409 | |
| 410 | result = lappend(result, rinfo->clause); |
| 411 | } |
| 412 | return result; |
| 413 | } |
| 414 | |
| 415 | /* |
| 416 | * extract_actual_clauses |
| 417 | * |
| 418 | * Extract bare clauses from 'restrictinfo_list', returning either the |
| 419 | * regular ones or the pseudoconstant ones per 'pseudoconstant'. |
| 420 | */ |
| 421 | List * |
| 422 | (List *restrictinfo_list, |
| 423 | bool pseudoconstant) |
| 424 | { |
| 425 | List *result = NIL; |
| 426 | ListCell *l; |
| 427 | |
| 428 | foreach(l, restrictinfo_list) |
| 429 | { |
| 430 | RestrictInfo *rinfo = lfirst_node(RestrictInfo, l); |
| 431 | |
| 432 | if (rinfo->pseudoconstant == pseudoconstant) |
| 433 | result = lappend(result, rinfo->clause); |
| 434 | } |
| 435 | return result; |
| 436 | } |
| 437 | |
| 438 | /* |
| 439 | * extract_actual_join_clauses |
| 440 | * |
| 441 | * Extract bare clauses from 'restrictinfo_list', separating those that |
| 442 | * semantically match the join level from those that were pushed down. |
| 443 | * Pseudoconstant clauses are excluded from the results. |
| 444 | * |
| 445 | * This is only used at outer joins, since for plain joins we don't care |
| 446 | * about pushed-down-ness. |
| 447 | */ |
| 448 | void |
| 449 | (List *restrictinfo_list, |
| 450 | Relids joinrelids, |
| 451 | List **joinquals, |
| 452 | List **otherquals) |
| 453 | { |
| 454 | ListCell *l; |
| 455 | |
| 456 | *joinquals = NIL; |
| 457 | *otherquals = NIL; |
| 458 | |
| 459 | foreach(l, restrictinfo_list) |
| 460 | { |
| 461 | RestrictInfo *rinfo = lfirst_node(RestrictInfo, l); |
| 462 | |
| 463 | if (RINFO_IS_PUSHED_DOWN(rinfo, joinrelids)) |
| 464 | { |
| 465 | if (!rinfo->pseudoconstant) |
| 466 | *otherquals = lappend(*otherquals, rinfo->clause); |
| 467 | } |
| 468 | else |
| 469 | { |
| 470 | /* joinquals shouldn't have been marked pseudoconstant */ |
| 471 | Assert(!rinfo->pseudoconstant); |
| 472 | *joinquals = lappend(*joinquals, rinfo->clause); |
| 473 | } |
| 474 | } |
| 475 | } |
| 476 | |
| 477 | |
| 478 | /* |
| 479 | * join_clause_is_movable_to |
| 480 | * Test whether a join clause is a safe candidate for parameterization |
| 481 | * of a scan on the specified base relation. |
| 482 | * |
| 483 | * A movable join clause is one that can safely be evaluated at a rel below |
| 484 | * its normal semantic level (ie, its required_relids), if the values of |
| 485 | * variables that it would need from other rels are provided. |
| 486 | * |
| 487 | * We insist that the clause actually reference the target relation; this |
| 488 | * prevents undesirable movement of degenerate join clauses, and ensures |
| 489 | * that there is a unique place that a clause can be moved down to. |
| 490 | * |
| 491 | * We cannot move an outer-join clause into the non-nullable side of its |
| 492 | * outer join, as that would change the results (rows would be suppressed |
| 493 | * rather than being null-extended). |
| 494 | * |
| 495 | * Also there must not be an outer join below the clause that would null the |
| 496 | * Vars coming from the target relation. Otherwise the clause might give |
| 497 | * results different from what it would give at its normal semantic level. |
| 498 | * |
| 499 | * Also, the join clause must not use any relations that have LATERAL |
| 500 | * references to the target relation, since we could not put such rels on |
| 501 | * the outer side of a nestloop with the target relation. |
| 502 | */ |
| 503 | bool |
| 504 | join_clause_is_movable_to(RestrictInfo *rinfo, RelOptInfo *baserel) |
| 505 | { |
| 506 | /* Clause must physically reference target rel */ |
| 507 | if (!bms_is_member(baserel->relid, rinfo->clause_relids)) |
| 508 | return false; |
| 509 | |
| 510 | /* Cannot move an outer-join clause into the join's outer side */ |
| 511 | if (bms_is_member(baserel->relid, rinfo->outer_relids)) |
| 512 | return false; |
| 513 | |
| 514 | /* Target rel must not be nullable below the clause */ |
| 515 | if (bms_is_member(baserel->relid, rinfo->nullable_relids)) |
| 516 | return false; |
| 517 | |
| 518 | /* Clause must not use any rels with LATERAL references to this rel */ |
| 519 | if (bms_overlap(baserel->lateral_referencers, rinfo->clause_relids)) |
| 520 | return false; |
| 521 | |
| 522 | return true; |
| 523 | } |
| 524 | |
| 525 | /* |
| 526 | * join_clause_is_movable_into |
| 527 | * Test whether a join clause is movable and can be evaluated within |
| 528 | * the current join context. |
| 529 | * |
| 530 | * currentrelids: the relids of the proposed evaluation location |
| 531 | * current_and_outer: the union of currentrelids and the required_outer |
| 532 | * relids (parameterization's outer relations) |
| 533 | * |
| 534 | * The API would be a bit clearer if we passed the current relids and the |
| 535 | * outer relids separately and did bms_union internally; but since most |
| 536 | * callers need to apply this function to multiple clauses, we make the |
| 537 | * caller perform the union. |
| 538 | * |
| 539 | * Obviously, the clause must only refer to Vars available from the current |
| 540 | * relation plus the outer rels. We also check that it does reference at |
| 541 | * least one current Var, ensuring that the clause will be pushed down to |
| 542 | * a unique place in a parameterized join tree. And we check that we're |
| 543 | * not pushing the clause into its outer-join outer side, nor down into |
| 544 | * a lower outer join's inner side. |
| 545 | * |
| 546 | * The check about pushing a clause down into a lower outer join's inner side |
| 547 | * is only approximate; it sometimes returns "false" when actually it would |
| 548 | * be safe to use the clause here because we're still above the outer join |
| 549 | * in question. This is okay as long as the answers at different join levels |
| 550 | * are consistent: it just means we might sometimes fail to push a clause as |
| 551 | * far down as it could safely be pushed. It's unclear whether it would be |
| 552 | * worthwhile to do this more precisely. (But if it's ever fixed to be |
| 553 | * exactly accurate, there's an Assert in get_joinrel_parampathinfo() that |
| 554 | * should be re-enabled.) |
| 555 | * |
| 556 | * There's no check here equivalent to join_clause_is_movable_to's test on |
| 557 | * lateral_referencers. We assume the caller wouldn't be inquiring unless |
| 558 | * it'd verified that the proposed outer rels don't have lateral references |
| 559 | * to the current rel(s). (If we are considering join paths with the outer |
| 560 | * rels on the outside and the current rels on the inside, then this should |
| 561 | * have been checked at the outset of such consideration; see join_is_legal |
| 562 | * and the path parameterization checks in joinpath.c.) On the other hand, |
| 563 | * in join_clause_is_movable_to we are asking whether the clause could be |
| 564 | * moved for some valid set of outer rels, so we don't have the benefit of |
| 565 | * relying on prior checks for lateral-reference validity. |
| 566 | * |
| 567 | * Note: if this returns true, it means that the clause could be moved to |
| 568 | * this join relation, but that doesn't mean that this is the lowest join |
| 569 | * it could be moved to. Caller may need to make additional calls to verify |
| 570 | * that this doesn't succeed on either of the inputs of a proposed join. |
| 571 | * |
| 572 | * Note: get_joinrel_parampathinfo depends on the fact that if |
| 573 | * current_and_outer is NULL, this function will always return false |
| 574 | * (since one or the other of the first two tests must fail). |
| 575 | */ |
| 576 | bool |
| 577 | join_clause_is_movable_into(RestrictInfo *rinfo, |
| 578 | Relids currentrelids, |
| 579 | Relids current_and_outer) |
| 580 | { |
| 581 | /* Clause must be evaluable given available context */ |
| 582 | if (!bms_is_subset(rinfo->clause_relids, current_and_outer)) |
| 583 | return false; |
| 584 | |
| 585 | /* Clause must physically reference at least one target rel */ |
| 586 | if (!bms_overlap(currentrelids, rinfo->clause_relids)) |
| 587 | return false; |
| 588 | |
| 589 | /* Cannot move an outer-join clause into the join's outer side */ |
| 590 | if (bms_overlap(currentrelids, rinfo->outer_relids)) |
| 591 | return false; |
| 592 | |
| 593 | /* |
| 594 | * Target rel(s) must not be nullable below the clause. This is |
| 595 | * approximate, in the safe direction, because the current join might be |
| 596 | * above the join where the nulling would happen, in which case the clause |
| 597 | * would work correctly here. But we don't have enough info to be sure. |
| 598 | */ |
| 599 | if (bms_overlap(currentrelids, rinfo->nullable_relids)) |
| 600 | return false; |
| 601 | |
| 602 | return true; |
| 603 | } |
| 604 | |