1 | /*------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
2 | * |
3 | * geo_selfuncs.c |
4 | * Selectivity routines registered in the operator catalog in the |
5 | * "oprrest" and "oprjoin" attributes. |
6 | * |
7 | * Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2019, PostgreSQL Global Development Group |
8 | * Portions Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California |
9 | * |
10 | * |
11 | * IDENTIFICATION |
12 | * src/backend/utils/adt/geo_selfuncs.c |
13 | * |
14 | * XXX These are totally bogus. Perhaps someone will make them do |
15 | * something reasonable, someday. |
16 | * |
17 | *------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
18 | */ |
19 | #include "postgres.h" |
20 | |
21 | #include "utils/builtins.h" |
22 | #include "utils/geo_decls.h" |
23 | |
24 | |
25 | /* |
26 | * Selectivity functions for geometric operators. These are bogus -- unless |
27 | * we know the actual key distribution in the index, we can't make a good |
28 | * prediction of the selectivity of these operators. |
29 | * |
30 | * Note: the values used here may look unreasonably small. Perhaps they |
31 | * are. For now, we want to make sure that the optimizer will make use |
32 | * of a geometric index if one is available, so the selectivity had better |
33 | * be fairly small. |
34 | * |
35 | * In general, GiST needs to search multiple subtrees in order to guarantee |
36 | * that all occurrences of the same key have been found. Because of this, |
37 | * the estimated cost for scanning the index ought to be higher than the |
38 | * output selectivity would indicate. gistcostestimate(), over in selfuncs.c, |
39 | * ought to be adjusted accordingly --- but until we can generate somewhat |
40 | * realistic numbers here, it hardly matters... |
41 | */ |
42 | |
43 | |
44 | /* |
45 | * Selectivity for operators that depend on area, such as "overlap". |
46 | */ |
47 | |
48 | Datum |
49 | areasel(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) |
50 | { |
51 | PG_RETURN_FLOAT8(0.005); |
52 | } |
53 | |
54 | Datum |
55 | areajoinsel(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) |
56 | { |
57 | PG_RETURN_FLOAT8(0.005); |
58 | } |
59 | |
60 | /* |
61 | * positionsel |
62 | * |
63 | * How likely is a box to be strictly left of (right of, above, below) |
64 | * a given box? |
65 | */ |
66 | |
67 | Datum |
68 | positionsel(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) |
69 | { |
70 | PG_RETURN_FLOAT8(0.1); |
71 | } |
72 | |
73 | Datum |
74 | positionjoinsel(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) |
75 | { |
76 | PG_RETURN_FLOAT8(0.1); |
77 | } |
78 | |
79 | /* |
80 | * contsel -- How likely is a box to contain (be contained by) a given box? |
81 | * |
82 | * This is a tighter constraint than "overlap", so produce a smaller |
83 | * estimate than areasel does. |
84 | */ |
85 | |
86 | Datum |
87 | contsel(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) |
88 | { |
89 | PG_RETURN_FLOAT8(0.001); |
90 | } |
91 | |
92 | Datum |
93 | contjoinsel(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) |
94 | { |
95 | PG_RETURN_FLOAT8(0.001); |
96 | } |
97 | |