| 1 | // Copyright 2008, Google Inc. |
| 2 | // All rights reserved. |
| 3 | // |
| 4 | // Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without |
| 5 | // modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are |
| 6 | // met: |
| 7 | // |
| 8 | // * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright |
| 9 | // notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. |
| 10 | // * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above |
| 11 | // copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer |
| 12 | // in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the |
| 13 | // distribution. |
| 14 | // * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its |
| 15 | // contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from |
| 16 | // this software without specific prior written permission. |
| 17 | // |
| 18 | // THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS |
| 19 | // "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT |
| 20 | // LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR |
| 21 | // A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT |
| 22 | // OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, |
| 23 | // SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT |
| 24 | // LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, |
| 25 | // DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY |
| 26 | // THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT |
| 27 | // (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE |
| 28 | // OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. |
| 29 | |
| 30 | // Implements class templates NiceMock, NaggyMock, and StrictMock. |
| 31 | // |
| 32 | // Given a mock class MockFoo that is created using Google Mock, |
| 33 | // NiceMock<MockFoo> is a subclass of MockFoo that allows |
| 34 | // uninteresting calls (i.e. calls to mock methods that have no |
| 35 | // EXPECT_CALL specs), NaggyMock<MockFoo> is a subclass of MockFoo |
| 36 | // that prints a warning when an uninteresting call occurs, and |
| 37 | // StrictMock<MockFoo> is a subclass of MockFoo that treats all |
| 38 | // uninteresting calls as errors. |
| 39 | // |
| 40 | // Currently a mock is naggy by default, so MockFoo and |
| 41 | // NaggyMock<MockFoo> behave like the same. However, we will soon |
| 42 | // switch the default behavior of mocks to be nice, as that in general |
| 43 | // leads to more maintainable tests. When that happens, MockFoo will |
| 44 | // stop behaving like NaggyMock<MockFoo> and start behaving like |
| 45 | // NiceMock<MockFoo>. |
| 46 | // |
| 47 | // NiceMock, NaggyMock, and StrictMock "inherit" the constructors of |
| 48 | // their respective base class. Therefore you can write |
| 49 | // NiceMock<MockFoo>(5, "a") to construct a nice mock where MockFoo |
| 50 | // has a constructor that accepts (int, const char*), for example. |
| 51 | // |
| 52 | // A known limitation is that NiceMock<MockFoo>, NaggyMock<MockFoo>, |
| 53 | // and StrictMock<MockFoo> only works for mock methods defined using |
| 54 | // the MOCK_METHOD* family of macros DIRECTLY in the MockFoo class. |
| 55 | // If a mock method is defined in a base class of MockFoo, the "nice" |
| 56 | // or "strict" modifier may not affect it, depending on the compiler. |
| 57 | // In particular, nesting NiceMock, NaggyMock, and StrictMock is NOT |
| 58 | // supported. |
| 59 | |
| 60 | // IWYU pragma: private, include "gmock/gmock.h" |
| 61 | // IWYU pragma: friend gmock/.* |
| 62 | |
| 63 | #ifndef GOOGLEMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_GMOCK_NICE_STRICT_H_ |
| 64 | #define GOOGLEMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_GMOCK_NICE_STRICT_H_ |
| 65 | |
| 66 | #include <cstdint> |
| 67 | #include <type_traits> |
| 68 | |
| 69 | #include "gmock/gmock-spec-builders.h" |
| 70 | #include "gmock/internal/gmock-port.h" |
| 71 | |
| 72 | namespace testing { |
| 73 | template <class MockClass> |
| 74 | class NiceMock; |
| 75 | template <class MockClass> |
| 76 | class NaggyMock; |
| 77 | template <class MockClass> |
| 78 | class StrictMock; |
| 79 | |
| 80 | namespace internal { |
| 81 | template <typename T> |
| 82 | std::true_type StrictnessModifierProbe(const NiceMock<T>&); |
| 83 | template <typename T> |
| 84 | std::true_type StrictnessModifierProbe(const NaggyMock<T>&); |
| 85 | template <typename T> |
| 86 | std::true_type StrictnessModifierProbe(const StrictMock<T>&); |
| 87 | std::false_type StrictnessModifierProbe(...); |
| 88 | |
| 89 | template <typename T> |
| 90 | constexpr bool HasStrictnessModifier() { |
| 91 | return decltype(StrictnessModifierProbe(std::declval<const T&>()))::value; |
| 92 | } |
| 93 | |
| 94 | // Base classes that register and deregister with testing::Mock to alter the |
| 95 | // default behavior around uninteresting calls. Inheriting from one of these |
| 96 | // classes first and then MockClass ensures the MockClass constructor is run |
| 97 | // after registration, and that the MockClass destructor runs before |
| 98 | // deregistration. This guarantees that MockClass's constructor and destructor |
| 99 | // run with the same level of strictness as its instance methods. |
| 100 | |
| 101 | #if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS && !GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_MINGW && \ |
| 102 | (defined(_MSC_VER) || defined(__clang__)) |
| 103 | // We need to mark these classes with this declspec to ensure that |
| 104 | // the empty base class optimization is performed. |
| 105 | #define GTEST_INTERNAL_EMPTY_BASE_CLASS __declspec(empty_bases) |
| 106 | #else |
| 107 | #define GTEST_INTERNAL_EMPTY_BASE_CLASS |
| 108 | #endif |
| 109 | |
| 110 | template <typename Base> |
| 111 | class NiceMockImpl { |
| 112 | public: |
| 113 | NiceMockImpl() { |
| 114 | ::testing::Mock::AllowUninterestingCalls(mock_obj: reinterpret_cast<uintptr_t>(this)); |
| 115 | } |
| 116 | |
| 117 | ~NiceMockImpl() { |
| 118 | ::testing::Mock::UnregisterCallReaction(mock_obj: reinterpret_cast<uintptr_t>(this)); |
| 119 | } |
| 120 | }; |
| 121 | |
| 122 | template <typename Base> |
| 123 | class NaggyMockImpl { |
| 124 | public: |
| 125 | NaggyMockImpl() { |
| 126 | ::testing::Mock::WarnUninterestingCalls(mock_obj: reinterpret_cast<uintptr_t>(this)); |
| 127 | } |
| 128 | |
| 129 | ~NaggyMockImpl() { |
| 130 | ::testing::Mock::UnregisterCallReaction(mock_obj: reinterpret_cast<uintptr_t>(this)); |
| 131 | } |
| 132 | }; |
| 133 | |
| 134 | template <typename Base> |
| 135 | class StrictMockImpl { |
| 136 | public: |
| 137 | StrictMockImpl() { |
| 138 | ::testing::Mock::FailUninterestingCalls(mock_obj: reinterpret_cast<uintptr_t>(this)); |
| 139 | } |
| 140 | |
| 141 | ~StrictMockImpl() { |
| 142 | ::testing::Mock::UnregisterCallReaction(mock_obj: reinterpret_cast<uintptr_t>(this)); |
| 143 | } |
| 144 | }; |
| 145 | |
| 146 | } // namespace internal |
| 147 | |
| 148 | template <class MockClass> |
| 149 | class GTEST_INTERNAL_EMPTY_BASE_CLASS NiceMock |
| 150 | : private internal::NiceMockImpl<MockClass>, |
| 151 | public MockClass { |
| 152 | public: |
| 153 | static_assert(!internal::HasStrictnessModifier<MockClass>(), |
| 154 | "Can't apply NiceMock to a class hierarchy that already has a " |
| 155 | "strictness modifier. See " |
| 156 | "https://google.github.io/googletest/" |
| 157 | "gmock_cook_book.html#NiceStrictNaggy" ); |
| 158 | NiceMock() : MockClass() { |
| 159 | static_assert(sizeof(*this) == sizeof(MockClass), |
| 160 | "The impl subclass shouldn't introduce any padding" ); |
| 161 | } |
| 162 | |
| 163 | // Ideally, we would inherit base class's constructors through a using |
| 164 | // declaration, which would preserve their visibility. However, many existing |
| 165 | // tests rely on the fact that current implementation reexports protected |
| 166 | // constructors as public. These tests would need to be cleaned up first. |
| 167 | |
| 168 | // Single argument constructor is special-cased so that it can be |
| 169 | // made explicit. |
| 170 | template <typename A> |
| 171 | explicit NiceMock(A&& arg) : MockClass(std::forward<A>(arg)) { |
| 172 | static_assert(sizeof(*this) == sizeof(MockClass), |
| 173 | "The impl subclass shouldn't introduce any padding" ); |
| 174 | } |
| 175 | |
| 176 | template <typename TArg1, typename TArg2, typename... An> |
| 177 | NiceMock(TArg1&& arg1, TArg2&& arg2, An&&... args) |
| 178 | : MockClass(std::forward<TArg1>(arg1), std::forward<TArg2>(arg2), |
| 179 | std::forward<An>(args)...) { |
| 180 | static_assert(sizeof(*this) == sizeof(MockClass), |
| 181 | "The impl subclass shouldn't introduce any padding" ); |
| 182 | } |
| 183 | |
| 184 | private: |
| 185 | NiceMock(const NiceMock&) = delete; |
| 186 | NiceMock& operator=(const NiceMock&) = delete; |
| 187 | }; |
| 188 | |
| 189 | template <class MockClass> |
| 190 | class GTEST_INTERNAL_EMPTY_BASE_CLASS NaggyMock |
| 191 | : private internal::NaggyMockImpl<MockClass>, |
| 192 | public MockClass { |
| 193 | static_assert(!internal::HasStrictnessModifier<MockClass>(), |
| 194 | "Can't apply NaggyMock to a class hierarchy that already has a " |
| 195 | "strictness modifier. See " |
| 196 | "https://google.github.io/googletest/" |
| 197 | "gmock_cook_book.html#NiceStrictNaggy" ); |
| 198 | |
| 199 | public: |
| 200 | NaggyMock() : MockClass() { |
| 201 | static_assert(sizeof(*this) == sizeof(MockClass), |
| 202 | "The impl subclass shouldn't introduce any padding" ); |
| 203 | } |
| 204 | |
| 205 | // Ideally, we would inherit base class's constructors through a using |
| 206 | // declaration, which would preserve their visibility. However, many existing |
| 207 | // tests rely on the fact that current implementation reexports protected |
| 208 | // constructors as public. These tests would need to be cleaned up first. |
| 209 | |
| 210 | // Single argument constructor is special-cased so that it can be |
| 211 | // made explicit. |
| 212 | template <typename A> |
| 213 | explicit NaggyMock(A&& arg) : MockClass(std::forward<A>(arg)) { |
| 214 | static_assert(sizeof(*this) == sizeof(MockClass), |
| 215 | "The impl subclass shouldn't introduce any padding" ); |
| 216 | } |
| 217 | |
| 218 | template <typename TArg1, typename TArg2, typename... An> |
| 219 | NaggyMock(TArg1&& arg1, TArg2&& arg2, An&&... args) |
| 220 | : MockClass(std::forward<TArg1>(arg1), std::forward<TArg2>(arg2), |
| 221 | std::forward<An>(args)...) { |
| 222 | static_assert(sizeof(*this) == sizeof(MockClass), |
| 223 | "The impl subclass shouldn't introduce any padding" ); |
| 224 | } |
| 225 | |
| 226 | private: |
| 227 | NaggyMock(const NaggyMock&) = delete; |
| 228 | NaggyMock& operator=(const NaggyMock&) = delete; |
| 229 | }; |
| 230 | |
| 231 | template <class MockClass> |
| 232 | class GTEST_INTERNAL_EMPTY_BASE_CLASS StrictMock |
| 233 | : private internal::StrictMockImpl<MockClass>, |
| 234 | public MockClass { |
| 235 | public: |
| 236 | static_assert( |
| 237 | !internal::HasStrictnessModifier<MockClass>(), |
| 238 | "Can't apply StrictMock to a class hierarchy that already has a " |
| 239 | "strictness modifier. See " |
| 240 | "https://google.github.io/googletest/" |
| 241 | "gmock_cook_book.html#NiceStrictNaggy" ); |
| 242 | StrictMock() : MockClass() { |
| 243 | static_assert(sizeof(*this) == sizeof(MockClass), |
| 244 | "The impl subclass shouldn't introduce any padding" ); |
| 245 | } |
| 246 | |
| 247 | // Ideally, we would inherit base class's constructors through a using |
| 248 | // declaration, which would preserve their visibility. However, many existing |
| 249 | // tests rely on the fact that current implementation reexports protected |
| 250 | // constructors as public. These tests would need to be cleaned up first. |
| 251 | |
| 252 | // Single argument constructor is special-cased so that it can be |
| 253 | // made explicit. |
| 254 | template <typename A> |
| 255 | explicit StrictMock(A&& arg) : MockClass(std::forward<A>(arg)) { |
| 256 | static_assert(sizeof(*this) == sizeof(MockClass), |
| 257 | "The impl subclass shouldn't introduce any padding" ); |
| 258 | } |
| 259 | |
| 260 | template <typename TArg1, typename TArg2, typename... An> |
| 261 | StrictMock(TArg1&& arg1, TArg2&& arg2, An&&... args) |
| 262 | : MockClass(std::forward<TArg1>(arg1), std::forward<TArg2>(arg2), |
| 263 | std::forward<An>(args)...) { |
| 264 | static_assert(sizeof(*this) == sizeof(MockClass), |
| 265 | "The impl subclass shouldn't introduce any padding" ); |
| 266 | } |
| 267 | |
| 268 | private: |
| 269 | StrictMock(const StrictMock&) = delete; |
| 270 | StrictMock& operator=(const StrictMock&) = delete; |
| 271 | }; |
| 272 | |
| 273 | #undef GTEST_INTERNAL_EMPTY_BASE_CLASS |
| 274 | |
| 275 | } // namespace testing |
| 276 | |
| 277 | #endif // GOOGLEMOCK_INCLUDE_GMOCK_GMOCK_NICE_STRICT_H_ |
| 278 | |