| 1 | /*------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 2 | * |
| 3 | * costsize.c |
| 4 | * Routines to compute (and set) relation sizes and path costs |
| 5 | * |
| 6 | * Path costs are measured in arbitrary units established by these basic |
| 7 | * parameters: |
| 8 | * |
| 9 | * seq_page_cost Cost of a sequential page fetch |
| 10 | * random_page_cost Cost of a non-sequential page fetch |
| 11 | * cpu_tuple_cost Cost of typical CPU time to process a tuple |
| 12 | * cpu_index_tuple_cost Cost of typical CPU time to process an index tuple |
| 13 | * cpu_operator_cost Cost of CPU time to execute an operator or function |
| 14 | * parallel_tuple_cost Cost of CPU time to pass a tuple from worker to master backend |
| 15 | * parallel_setup_cost Cost of setting up shared memory for parallelism |
| 16 | * |
| 17 | * We expect that the kernel will typically do some amount of read-ahead |
| 18 | * optimization; this in conjunction with seek costs means that seq_page_cost |
| 19 | * is normally considerably less than random_page_cost. (However, if the |
| 20 | * database is fully cached in RAM, it is reasonable to set them equal.) |
| 21 | * |
| 22 | * We also use a rough estimate "effective_cache_size" of the number of |
| 23 | * disk pages in Postgres + OS-level disk cache. (We can't simply use |
| 24 | * NBuffers for this purpose because that would ignore the effects of |
| 25 | * the kernel's disk cache.) |
| 26 | * |
| 27 | * Obviously, taking constants for these values is an oversimplification, |
| 28 | * but it's tough enough to get any useful estimates even at this level of |
| 29 | * detail. Note that all of these parameters are user-settable, in case |
| 30 | * the default values are drastically off for a particular platform. |
| 31 | * |
| 32 | * seq_page_cost and random_page_cost can also be overridden for an individual |
| 33 | * tablespace, in case some data is on a fast disk and other data is on a slow |
| 34 | * disk. Per-tablespace overrides never apply to temporary work files such as |
| 35 | * an external sort or a materialize node that overflows work_mem. |
| 36 | * |
| 37 | * We compute two separate costs for each path: |
| 38 | * total_cost: total estimated cost to fetch all tuples |
| 39 | * startup_cost: cost that is expended before first tuple is fetched |
| 40 | * In some scenarios, such as when there is a LIMIT or we are implementing |
| 41 | * an EXISTS(...) sub-select, it is not necessary to fetch all tuples of the |
| 42 | * path's result. A caller can estimate the cost of fetching a partial |
| 43 | * result by interpolating between startup_cost and total_cost. In detail: |
| 44 | * actual_cost = startup_cost + |
| 45 | * (total_cost - startup_cost) * tuples_to_fetch / path->rows; |
| 46 | * Note that a base relation's rows count (and, by extension, plan_rows for |
| 47 | * plan nodes below the LIMIT node) are set without regard to any LIMIT, so |
| 48 | * that this equation works properly. (Note: while path->rows is never zero |
| 49 | * for ordinary relations, it is zero for paths for provably-empty relations, |
| 50 | * so beware of division-by-zero.) The LIMIT is applied as a top-level |
| 51 | * plan node. |
| 52 | * |
| 53 | * For largely historical reasons, most of the routines in this module use |
| 54 | * the passed result Path only to store their results (rows, startup_cost and |
| 55 | * total_cost) into. All the input data they need is passed as separate |
| 56 | * parameters, even though much of it could be extracted from the Path. |
| 57 | * An exception is made for the cost_XXXjoin() routines, which expect all |
| 58 | * the other fields of the passed XXXPath to be filled in, and similarly |
| 59 | * cost_index() assumes the passed IndexPath is valid except for its output |
| 60 | * values. |
| 61 | * |
| 62 | * |
| 63 | * Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2019, PostgreSQL Global Development Group |
| 64 | * Portions Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California |
| 65 | * |
| 66 | * IDENTIFICATION |
| 67 | * src/backend/optimizer/path/costsize.c |
| 68 | * |
| 69 | *------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 70 | */ |
| 71 | |
| 72 | #include "postgres.h" |
| 73 | |
| 74 | #include <math.h> |
| 75 | |
| 76 | #include "access/amapi.h" |
| 77 | #include "access/htup_details.h" |
| 78 | #include "access/tsmapi.h" |
| 79 | #include "executor/executor.h" |
| 80 | #include "executor/nodeHash.h" |
| 81 | #include "miscadmin.h" |
| 82 | #include "nodes/makefuncs.h" |
| 83 | #include "nodes/nodeFuncs.h" |
| 84 | #include "optimizer/clauses.h" |
| 85 | #include "optimizer/cost.h" |
| 86 | #include "optimizer/optimizer.h" |
| 87 | #include "optimizer/pathnode.h" |
| 88 | #include "optimizer/paths.h" |
| 89 | #include "optimizer/placeholder.h" |
| 90 | #include "optimizer/plancat.h" |
| 91 | #include "optimizer/planmain.h" |
| 92 | #include "optimizer/restrictinfo.h" |
| 93 | #include "parser/parsetree.h" |
| 94 | #include "utils/lsyscache.h" |
| 95 | #include "utils/selfuncs.h" |
| 96 | #include "utils/spccache.h" |
| 97 | #include "utils/tuplesort.h" |
| 98 | |
| 99 | |
| 100 | #define LOG2(x) (log(x) / 0.693147180559945) |
| 101 | |
| 102 | /* |
| 103 | * Append and MergeAppend nodes are less expensive than some other operations |
| 104 | * which use cpu_tuple_cost; instead of adding a separate GUC, estimate the |
| 105 | * per-tuple cost as cpu_tuple_cost multiplied by this value. |
| 106 | */ |
| 107 | #define APPEND_CPU_COST_MULTIPLIER 0.5 |
| 108 | |
| 109 | |
| 110 | double seq_page_cost = DEFAULT_SEQ_PAGE_COST; |
| 111 | double random_page_cost = DEFAULT_RANDOM_PAGE_COST; |
| 112 | double cpu_tuple_cost = DEFAULT_CPU_TUPLE_COST; |
| 113 | double cpu_index_tuple_cost = DEFAULT_CPU_INDEX_TUPLE_COST; |
| 114 | double cpu_operator_cost = DEFAULT_CPU_OPERATOR_COST; |
| 115 | double parallel_tuple_cost = DEFAULT_PARALLEL_TUPLE_COST; |
| 116 | double parallel_setup_cost = DEFAULT_PARALLEL_SETUP_COST; |
| 117 | |
| 118 | int effective_cache_size = DEFAULT_EFFECTIVE_CACHE_SIZE; |
| 119 | |
| 120 | Cost disable_cost = 1.0e10; |
| 121 | |
| 122 | int max_parallel_workers_per_gather = 2; |
| 123 | |
| 124 | bool enable_seqscan = true; |
| 125 | bool enable_indexscan = true; |
| 126 | bool enable_indexonlyscan = true; |
| 127 | bool enable_bitmapscan = true; |
| 128 | bool enable_tidscan = true; |
| 129 | bool enable_sort = true; |
| 130 | bool enable_hashagg = true; |
| 131 | bool enable_nestloop = true; |
| 132 | bool enable_material = true; |
| 133 | bool enable_mergejoin = true; |
| 134 | bool enable_hashjoin = true; |
| 135 | bool enable_gathermerge = true; |
| 136 | bool enable_partitionwise_join = false; |
| 137 | bool enable_partitionwise_aggregate = false; |
| 138 | bool enable_parallel_append = true; |
| 139 | bool enable_parallel_hash = true; |
| 140 | bool enable_partition_pruning = true; |
| 141 | |
| 142 | typedef struct |
| 143 | { |
| 144 | PlannerInfo *root; |
| 145 | QualCost total; |
| 146 | } cost_qual_eval_context; |
| 147 | |
| 148 | static List *extract_nonindex_conditions(List *qual_clauses, List *indexclauses); |
| 149 | static MergeScanSelCache *cached_scansel(PlannerInfo *root, |
| 150 | RestrictInfo *rinfo, |
| 151 | PathKey *pathkey); |
| 152 | static void cost_rescan(PlannerInfo *root, Path *path, |
| 153 | Cost *rescan_startup_cost, Cost *rescan_total_cost); |
| 154 | static bool cost_qual_eval_walker(Node *node, cost_qual_eval_context *context); |
| 155 | static void get_restriction_qual_cost(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *baserel, |
| 156 | ParamPathInfo *param_info, |
| 157 | QualCost *qpqual_cost); |
| 158 | static bool has_indexed_join_quals(NestPath *joinpath); |
| 159 | static double approx_tuple_count(PlannerInfo *root, JoinPath *path, |
| 160 | List *quals); |
| 161 | static double calc_joinrel_size_estimate(PlannerInfo *root, |
| 162 | RelOptInfo *joinrel, |
| 163 | RelOptInfo *outer_rel, |
| 164 | RelOptInfo *inner_rel, |
| 165 | double outer_rows, |
| 166 | double inner_rows, |
| 167 | SpecialJoinInfo *sjinfo, |
| 168 | List *restrictlist); |
| 169 | static Selectivity get_foreign_key_join_selectivity(PlannerInfo *root, |
| 170 | Relids outer_relids, |
| 171 | Relids inner_relids, |
| 172 | SpecialJoinInfo *sjinfo, |
| 173 | List **restrictlist); |
| 174 | static Cost append_nonpartial_cost(List *subpaths, int numpaths, |
| 175 | int parallel_workers); |
| 176 | static void set_rel_width(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel); |
| 177 | static double relation_byte_size(double tuples, int width); |
| 178 | static double page_size(double tuples, int width); |
| 179 | static double get_parallel_divisor(Path *path); |
| 180 | |
| 181 | |
| 182 | /* |
| 183 | * clamp_row_est |
| 184 | * Force a row-count estimate to a sane value. |
| 185 | */ |
| 186 | double |
| 187 | clamp_row_est(double nrows) |
| 188 | { |
| 189 | /* |
| 190 | * Force estimate to be at least one row, to make explain output look |
| 191 | * better and to avoid possible divide-by-zero when interpolating costs. |
| 192 | * Make it an integer, too. |
| 193 | */ |
| 194 | if (nrows <= 1.0) |
| 195 | nrows = 1.0; |
| 196 | else |
| 197 | nrows = rint(nrows); |
| 198 | |
| 199 | return nrows; |
| 200 | } |
| 201 | |
| 202 | |
| 203 | /* |
| 204 | * cost_seqscan |
| 205 | * Determines and returns the cost of scanning a relation sequentially. |
| 206 | * |
| 207 | * 'baserel' is the relation to be scanned |
| 208 | * 'param_info' is the ParamPathInfo if this is a parameterized path, else NULL |
| 209 | */ |
| 210 | void |
| 211 | cost_seqscan(Path *path, PlannerInfo *root, |
| 212 | RelOptInfo *baserel, ParamPathInfo *param_info) |
| 213 | { |
| 214 | Cost startup_cost = 0; |
| 215 | Cost cpu_run_cost; |
| 216 | Cost disk_run_cost; |
| 217 | double spc_seq_page_cost; |
| 218 | QualCost qpqual_cost; |
| 219 | Cost cpu_per_tuple; |
| 220 | |
| 221 | /* Should only be applied to base relations */ |
| 222 | Assert(baserel->relid > 0); |
| 223 | Assert(baserel->rtekind == RTE_RELATION); |
| 224 | |
| 225 | /* Mark the path with the correct row estimate */ |
| 226 | if (param_info) |
| 227 | path->rows = param_info->ppi_rows; |
| 228 | else |
| 229 | path->rows = baserel->rows; |
| 230 | |
| 231 | if (!enable_seqscan) |
| 232 | startup_cost += disable_cost; |
| 233 | |
| 234 | /* fetch estimated page cost for tablespace containing table */ |
| 235 | get_tablespace_page_costs(baserel->reltablespace, |
| 236 | NULL, |
| 237 | &spc_seq_page_cost); |
| 238 | |
| 239 | /* |
| 240 | * disk costs |
| 241 | */ |
| 242 | disk_run_cost = spc_seq_page_cost * baserel->pages; |
| 243 | |
| 244 | /* CPU costs */ |
| 245 | get_restriction_qual_cost(root, baserel, param_info, &qpqual_cost); |
| 246 | |
| 247 | startup_cost += qpqual_cost.startup; |
| 248 | cpu_per_tuple = cpu_tuple_cost + qpqual_cost.per_tuple; |
| 249 | cpu_run_cost = cpu_per_tuple * baserel->tuples; |
| 250 | /* tlist eval costs are paid per output row, not per tuple scanned */ |
| 251 | startup_cost += path->pathtarget->cost.startup; |
| 252 | cpu_run_cost += path->pathtarget->cost.per_tuple * path->rows; |
| 253 | |
| 254 | /* Adjust costing for parallelism, if used. */ |
| 255 | if (path->parallel_workers > 0) |
| 256 | { |
| 257 | double parallel_divisor = get_parallel_divisor(path); |
| 258 | |
| 259 | /* The CPU cost is divided among all the workers. */ |
| 260 | cpu_run_cost /= parallel_divisor; |
| 261 | |
| 262 | /* |
| 263 | * It may be possible to amortize some of the I/O cost, but probably |
| 264 | * not very much, because most operating systems already do aggressive |
| 265 | * prefetching. For now, we assume that the disk run cost can't be |
| 266 | * amortized at all. |
| 267 | */ |
| 268 | |
| 269 | /* |
| 270 | * In the case of a parallel plan, the row count needs to represent |
| 271 | * the number of tuples processed per worker. |
| 272 | */ |
| 273 | path->rows = clamp_row_est(path->rows / parallel_divisor); |
| 274 | } |
| 275 | |
| 276 | path->startup_cost = startup_cost; |
| 277 | path->total_cost = startup_cost + cpu_run_cost + disk_run_cost; |
| 278 | } |
| 279 | |
| 280 | /* |
| 281 | * cost_samplescan |
| 282 | * Determines and returns the cost of scanning a relation using sampling. |
| 283 | * |
| 284 | * 'baserel' is the relation to be scanned |
| 285 | * 'param_info' is the ParamPathInfo if this is a parameterized path, else NULL |
| 286 | */ |
| 287 | void |
| 288 | cost_samplescan(Path *path, PlannerInfo *root, |
| 289 | RelOptInfo *baserel, ParamPathInfo *param_info) |
| 290 | { |
| 291 | Cost startup_cost = 0; |
| 292 | Cost run_cost = 0; |
| 293 | RangeTblEntry *rte; |
| 294 | TableSampleClause *tsc; |
| 295 | TsmRoutine *tsm; |
| 296 | double spc_seq_page_cost, |
| 297 | spc_random_page_cost, |
| 298 | spc_page_cost; |
| 299 | QualCost qpqual_cost; |
| 300 | Cost cpu_per_tuple; |
| 301 | |
| 302 | /* Should only be applied to base relations with tablesample clauses */ |
| 303 | Assert(baserel->relid > 0); |
| 304 | rte = planner_rt_fetch(baserel->relid, root); |
| 305 | Assert(rte->rtekind == RTE_RELATION); |
| 306 | tsc = rte->tablesample; |
| 307 | Assert(tsc != NULL); |
| 308 | tsm = GetTsmRoutine(tsc->tsmhandler); |
| 309 | |
| 310 | /* Mark the path with the correct row estimate */ |
| 311 | if (param_info) |
| 312 | path->rows = param_info->ppi_rows; |
| 313 | else |
| 314 | path->rows = baserel->rows; |
| 315 | |
| 316 | /* fetch estimated page cost for tablespace containing table */ |
| 317 | get_tablespace_page_costs(baserel->reltablespace, |
| 318 | &spc_random_page_cost, |
| 319 | &spc_seq_page_cost); |
| 320 | |
| 321 | /* if NextSampleBlock is used, assume random access, else sequential */ |
| 322 | spc_page_cost = (tsm->NextSampleBlock != NULL) ? |
| 323 | spc_random_page_cost : spc_seq_page_cost; |
| 324 | |
| 325 | /* |
| 326 | * disk costs (recall that baserel->pages has already been set to the |
| 327 | * number of pages the sampling method will visit) |
| 328 | */ |
| 329 | run_cost += spc_page_cost * baserel->pages; |
| 330 | |
| 331 | /* |
| 332 | * CPU costs (recall that baserel->tuples has already been set to the |
| 333 | * number of tuples the sampling method will select). Note that we ignore |
| 334 | * execution cost of the TABLESAMPLE parameter expressions; they will be |
| 335 | * evaluated only once per scan, and in most usages they'll likely be |
| 336 | * simple constants anyway. We also don't charge anything for the |
| 337 | * calculations the sampling method might do internally. |
| 338 | */ |
| 339 | get_restriction_qual_cost(root, baserel, param_info, &qpqual_cost); |
| 340 | |
| 341 | startup_cost += qpqual_cost.startup; |
| 342 | cpu_per_tuple = cpu_tuple_cost + qpqual_cost.per_tuple; |
| 343 | run_cost += cpu_per_tuple * baserel->tuples; |
| 344 | /* tlist eval costs are paid per output row, not per tuple scanned */ |
| 345 | startup_cost += path->pathtarget->cost.startup; |
| 346 | run_cost += path->pathtarget->cost.per_tuple * path->rows; |
| 347 | |
| 348 | path->startup_cost = startup_cost; |
| 349 | path->total_cost = startup_cost + run_cost; |
| 350 | } |
| 351 | |
| 352 | /* |
| 353 | * cost_gather |
| 354 | * Determines and returns the cost of gather path. |
| 355 | * |
| 356 | * 'rel' is the relation to be operated upon |
| 357 | * 'param_info' is the ParamPathInfo if this is a parameterized path, else NULL |
| 358 | * 'rows' may be used to point to a row estimate; if non-NULL, it overrides |
| 359 | * both 'rel' and 'param_info'. This is useful when the path doesn't exactly |
| 360 | * correspond to any particular RelOptInfo. |
| 361 | */ |
| 362 | void |
| 363 | cost_gather(GatherPath *path, PlannerInfo *root, |
| 364 | RelOptInfo *rel, ParamPathInfo *param_info, |
| 365 | double *rows) |
| 366 | { |
| 367 | Cost startup_cost = 0; |
| 368 | Cost run_cost = 0; |
| 369 | |
| 370 | /* Mark the path with the correct row estimate */ |
| 371 | if (rows) |
| 372 | path->path.rows = *rows; |
| 373 | else if (param_info) |
| 374 | path->path.rows = param_info->ppi_rows; |
| 375 | else |
| 376 | path->path.rows = rel->rows; |
| 377 | |
| 378 | startup_cost = path->subpath->startup_cost; |
| 379 | |
| 380 | run_cost = path->subpath->total_cost - path->subpath->startup_cost; |
| 381 | |
| 382 | /* Parallel setup and communication cost. */ |
| 383 | startup_cost += parallel_setup_cost; |
| 384 | run_cost += parallel_tuple_cost * path->path.rows; |
| 385 | |
| 386 | path->path.startup_cost = startup_cost; |
| 387 | path->path.total_cost = (startup_cost + run_cost); |
| 388 | } |
| 389 | |
| 390 | /* |
| 391 | * cost_gather_merge |
| 392 | * Determines and returns the cost of gather merge path. |
| 393 | * |
| 394 | * GatherMerge merges several pre-sorted input streams, using a heap that at |
| 395 | * any given instant holds the next tuple from each stream. If there are N |
| 396 | * streams, we need about N*log2(N) tuple comparisons to construct the heap at |
| 397 | * startup, and then for each output tuple, about log2(N) comparisons to |
| 398 | * replace the top heap entry with the next tuple from the same stream. |
| 399 | */ |
| 400 | void |
| 401 | cost_gather_merge(GatherMergePath *path, PlannerInfo *root, |
| 402 | RelOptInfo *rel, ParamPathInfo *param_info, |
| 403 | Cost input_startup_cost, Cost input_total_cost, |
| 404 | double *rows) |
| 405 | { |
| 406 | Cost startup_cost = 0; |
| 407 | Cost run_cost = 0; |
| 408 | Cost comparison_cost; |
| 409 | double N; |
| 410 | double logN; |
| 411 | |
| 412 | /* Mark the path with the correct row estimate */ |
| 413 | if (rows) |
| 414 | path->path.rows = *rows; |
| 415 | else if (param_info) |
| 416 | path->path.rows = param_info->ppi_rows; |
| 417 | else |
| 418 | path->path.rows = rel->rows; |
| 419 | |
| 420 | if (!enable_gathermerge) |
| 421 | startup_cost += disable_cost; |
| 422 | |
| 423 | /* |
| 424 | * Add one to the number of workers to account for the leader. This might |
| 425 | * be overgenerous since the leader will do less work than other workers |
| 426 | * in typical cases, but we'll go with it for now. |
| 427 | */ |
| 428 | Assert(path->num_workers > 0); |
| 429 | N = (double) path->num_workers + 1; |
| 430 | logN = LOG2(N); |
| 431 | |
| 432 | /* Assumed cost per tuple comparison */ |
| 433 | comparison_cost = 2.0 * cpu_operator_cost; |
| 434 | |
| 435 | /* Heap creation cost */ |
| 436 | startup_cost += comparison_cost * N * logN; |
| 437 | |
| 438 | /* Per-tuple heap maintenance cost */ |
| 439 | run_cost += path->path.rows * comparison_cost * logN; |
| 440 | |
| 441 | /* small cost for heap management, like cost_merge_append */ |
| 442 | run_cost += cpu_operator_cost * path->path.rows; |
| 443 | |
| 444 | /* |
| 445 | * Parallel setup and communication cost. Since Gather Merge, unlike |
| 446 | * Gather, requires us to block until a tuple is available from every |
| 447 | * worker, we bump the IPC cost up a little bit as compared with Gather. |
| 448 | * For lack of a better idea, charge an extra 5%. |
| 449 | */ |
| 450 | startup_cost += parallel_setup_cost; |
| 451 | run_cost += parallel_tuple_cost * path->path.rows * 1.05; |
| 452 | |
| 453 | path->path.startup_cost = startup_cost + input_startup_cost; |
| 454 | path->path.total_cost = (startup_cost + run_cost + input_total_cost); |
| 455 | } |
| 456 | |
| 457 | /* |
| 458 | * cost_index |
| 459 | * Determines and returns the cost of scanning a relation using an index. |
| 460 | * |
| 461 | * 'path' describes the indexscan under consideration, and is complete |
| 462 | * except for the fields to be set by this routine |
| 463 | * 'loop_count' is the number of repetitions of the indexscan to factor into |
| 464 | * estimates of caching behavior |
| 465 | * |
| 466 | * In addition to rows, startup_cost and total_cost, cost_index() sets the |
| 467 | * path's indextotalcost and indexselectivity fields. These values will be |
| 468 | * needed if the IndexPath is used in a BitmapIndexScan. |
| 469 | * |
| 470 | * NOTE: path->indexquals must contain only clauses usable as index |
| 471 | * restrictions. Any additional quals evaluated as qpquals may reduce the |
| 472 | * number of returned tuples, but they won't reduce the number of tuples |
| 473 | * we have to fetch from the table, so they don't reduce the scan cost. |
| 474 | */ |
| 475 | void |
| 476 | cost_index(IndexPath *path, PlannerInfo *root, double loop_count, |
| 477 | bool partial_path) |
| 478 | { |
| 479 | IndexOptInfo *index = path->indexinfo; |
| 480 | RelOptInfo *baserel = index->rel; |
| 481 | bool indexonly = (path->path.pathtype == T_IndexOnlyScan); |
| 482 | amcostestimate_function amcostestimate; |
| 483 | List *qpquals; |
| 484 | Cost startup_cost = 0; |
| 485 | Cost run_cost = 0; |
| 486 | Cost cpu_run_cost = 0; |
| 487 | Cost indexStartupCost; |
| 488 | Cost indexTotalCost; |
| 489 | Selectivity indexSelectivity; |
| 490 | double indexCorrelation, |
| 491 | csquared; |
| 492 | double spc_seq_page_cost, |
| 493 | spc_random_page_cost; |
| 494 | Cost min_IO_cost, |
| 495 | max_IO_cost; |
| 496 | QualCost qpqual_cost; |
| 497 | Cost cpu_per_tuple; |
| 498 | double tuples_fetched; |
| 499 | double pages_fetched; |
| 500 | double rand_heap_pages; |
| 501 | double index_pages; |
| 502 | |
| 503 | /* Should only be applied to base relations */ |
| 504 | Assert(IsA(baserel, RelOptInfo) && |
| 505 | IsA(index, IndexOptInfo)); |
| 506 | Assert(baserel->relid > 0); |
| 507 | Assert(baserel->rtekind == RTE_RELATION); |
| 508 | |
| 509 | /* |
| 510 | * Mark the path with the correct row estimate, and identify which quals |
| 511 | * will need to be enforced as qpquals. We need not check any quals that |
| 512 | * are implied by the index's predicate, so we can use indrestrictinfo not |
| 513 | * baserestrictinfo as the list of relevant restriction clauses for the |
| 514 | * rel. |
| 515 | */ |
| 516 | if (path->path.param_info) |
| 517 | { |
| 518 | path->path.rows = path->path.param_info->ppi_rows; |
| 519 | /* qpquals come from the rel's restriction clauses and ppi_clauses */ |
| 520 | qpquals = list_concat(extract_nonindex_conditions(path->indexinfo->indrestrictinfo, |
| 521 | path->indexclauses), |
| 522 | extract_nonindex_conditions(path->path.param_info->ppi_clauses, |
| 523 | path->indexclauses)); |
| 524 | } |
| 525 | else |
| 526 | { |
| 527 | path->path.rows = baserel->rows; |
| 528 | /* qpquals come from just the rel's restriction clauses */ |
| 529 | qpquals = extract_nonindex_conditions(path->indexinfo->indrestrictinfo, |
| 530 | path->indexclauses); |
| 531 | } |
| 532 | |
| 533 | if (!enable_indexscan) |
| 534 | startup_cost += disable_cost; |
| 535 | /* we don't need to check enable_indexonlyscan; indxpath.c does that */ |
| 536 | |
| 537 | /* |
| 538 | * Call index-access-method-specific code to estimate the processing cost |
| 539 | * for scanning the index, as well as the selectivity of the index (ie, |
| 540 | * the fraction of main-table tuples we will have to retrieve) and its |
| 541 | * correlation to the main-table tuple order. We need a cast here because |
| 542 | * pathnodes.h uses a weak function type to avoid including amapi.h. |
| 543 | */ |
| 544 | amcostestimate = (amcostestimate_function) index->amcostestimate; |
| 545 | amcostestimate(root, path, loop_count, |
| 546 | &indexStartupCost, &indexTotalCost, |
| 547 | &indexSelectivity, &indexCorrelation, |
| 548 | &index_pages); |
| 549 | |
| 550 | /* |
| 551 | * Save amcostestimate's results for possible use in bitmap scan planning. |
| 552 | * We don't bother to save indexStartupCost or indexCorrelation, because a |
| 553 | * bitmap scan doesn't care about either. |
| 554 | */ |
| 555 | path->indextotalcost = indexTotalCost; |
| 556 | path->indexselectivity = indexSelectivity; |
| 557 | |
| 558 | /* all costs for touching index itself included here */ |
| 559 | startup_cost += indexStartupCost; |
| 560 | run_cost += indexTotalCost - indexStartupCost; |
| 561 | |
| 562 | /* estimate number of main-table tuples fetched */ |
| 563 | tuples_fetched = clamp_row_est(indexSelectivity * baserel->tuples); |
| 564 | |
| 565 | /* fetch estimated page costs for tablespace containing table */ |
| 566 | get_tablespace_page_costs(baserel->reltablespace, |
| 567 | &spc_random_page_cost, |
| 568 | &spc_seq_page_cost); |
| 569 | |
| 570 | /*---------- |
| 571 | * Estimate number of main-table pages fetched, and compute I/O cost. |
| 572 | * |
| 573 | * When the index ordering is uncorrelated with the table ordering, |
| 574 | * we use an approximation proposed by Mackert and Lohman (see |
| 575 | * index_pages_fetched() for details) to compute the number of pages |
| 576 | * fetched, and then charge spc_random_page_cost per page fetched. |
| 577 | * |
| 578 | * When the index ordering is exactly correlated with the table ordering |
| 579 | * (just after a CLUSTER, for example), the number of pages fetched should |
| 580 | * be exactly selectivity * table_size. What's more, all but the first |
| 581 | * will be sequential fetches, not the random fetches that occur in the |
| 582 | * uncorrelated case. So if the number of pages is more than 1, we |
| 583 | * ought to charge |
| 584 | * spc_random_page_cost + (pages_fetched - 1) * spc_seq_page_cost |
| 585 | * For partially-correlated indexes, we ought to charge somewhere between |
| 586 | * these two estimates. We currently interpolate linearly between the |
| 587 | * estimates based on the correlation squared (XXX is that appropriate?). |
| 588 | * |
| 589 | * If it's an index-only scan, then we will not need to fetch any heap |
| 590 | * pages for which the visibility map shows all tuples are visible. |
| 591 | * Hence, reduce the estimated number of heap fetches accordingly. |
| 592 | * We use the measured fraction of the entire heap that is all-visible, |
| 593 | * which might not be particularly relevant to the subset of the heap |
| 594 | * that this query will fetch; but it's not clear how to do better. |
| 595 | *---------- |
| 596 | */ |
| 597 | if (loop_count > 1) |
| 598 | { |
| 599 | /* |
| 600 | * For repeated indexscans, the appropriate estimate for the |
| 601 | * uncorrelated case is to scale up the number of tuples fetched in |
| 602 | * the Mackert and Lohman formula by the number of scans, so that we |
| 603 | * estimate the number of pages fetched by all the scans; then |
| 604 | * pro-rate the costs for one scan. In this case we assume all the |
| 605 | * fetches are random accesses. |
| 606 | */ |
| 607 | pages_fetched = index_pages_fetched(tuples_fetched * loop_count, |
| 608 | baserel->pages, |
| 609 | (double) index->pages, |
| 610 | root); |
| 611 | |
| 612 | if (indexonly) |
| 613 | pages_fetched = ceil(pages_fetched * (1.0 - baserel->allvisfrac)); |
| 614 | |
| 615 | rand_heap_pages = pages_fetched; |
| 616 | |
| 617 | max_IO_cost = (pages_fetched * spc_random_page_cost) / loop_count; |
| 618 | |
| 619 | /* |
| 620 | * In the perfectly correlated case, the number of pages touched by |
| 621 | * each scan is selectivity * table_size, and we can use the Mackert |
| 622 | * and Lohman formula at the page level to estimate how much work is |
| 623 | * saved by caching across scans. We still assume all the fetches are |
| 624 | * random, though, which is an overestimate that's hard to correct for |
| 625 | * without double-counting the cache effects. (But in most cases |
| 626 | * where such a plan is actually interesting, only one page would get |
| 627 | * fetched per scan anyway, so it shouldn't matter much.) |
| 628 | */ |
| 629 | pages_fetched = ceil(indexSelectivity * (double) baserel->pages); |
| 630 | |
| 631 | pages_fetched = index_pages_fetched(pages_fetched * loop_count, |
| 632 | baserel->pages, |
| 633 | (double) index->pages, |
| 634 | root); |
| 635 | |
| 636 | if (indexonly) |
| 637 | pages_fetched = ceil(pages_fetched * (1.0 - baserel->allvisfrac)); |
| 638 | |
| 639 | min_IO_cost = (pages_fetched * spc_random_page_cost) / loop_count; |
| 640 | } |
| 641 | else |
| 642 | { |
| 643 | /* |
| 644 | * Normal case: apply the Mackert and Lohman formula, and then |
| 645 | * interpolate between that and the correlation-derived result. |
| 646 | */ |
| 647 | pages_fetched = index_pages_fetched(tuples_fetched, |
| 648 | baserel->pages, |
| 649 | (double) index->pages, |
| 650 | root); |
| 651 | |
| 652 | if (indexonly) |
| 653 | pages_fetched = ceil(pages_fetched * (1.0 - baserel->allvisfrac)); |
| 654 | |
| 655 | rand_heap_pages = pages_fetched; |
| 656 | |
| 657 | /* max_IO_cost is for the perfectly uncorrelated case (csquared=0) */ |
| 658 | max_IO_cost = pages_fetched * spc_random_page_cost; |
| 659 | |
| 660 | /* min_IO_cost is for the perfectly correlated case (csquared=1) */ |
| 661 | pages_fetched = ceil(indexSelectivity * (double) baserel->pages); |
| 662 | |
| 663 | if (indexonly) |
| 664 | pages_fetched = ceil(pages_fetched * (1.0 - baserel->allvisfrac)); |
| 665 | |
| 666 | if (pages_fetched > 0) |
| 667 | { |
| 668 | min_IO_cost = spc_random_page_cost; |
| 669 | if (pages_fetched > 1) |
| 670 | min_IO_cost += (pages_fetched - 1) * spc_seq_page_cost; |
| 671 | } |
| 672 | else |
| 673 | min_IO_cost = 0; |
| 674 | } |
| 675 | |
| 676 | if (partial_path) |
| 677 | { |
| 678 | /* |
| 679 | * For index only scans compute workers based on number of index pages |
| 680 | * fetched; the number of heap pages we fetch might be so small as to |
| 681 | * effectively rule out parallelism, which we don't want to do. |
| 682 | */ |
| 683 | if (indexonly) |
| 684 | rand_heap_pages = -1; |
| 685 | |
| 686 | /* |
| 687 | * Estimate the number of parallel workers required to scan index. Use |
| 688 | * the number of heap pages computed considering heap fetches won't be |
| 689 | * sequential as for parallel scans the pages are accessed in random |
| 690 | * order. |
| 691 | */ |
| 692 | path->path.parallel_workers = compute_parallel_worker(baserel, |
| 693 | rand_heap_pages, |
| 694 | index_pages, |
| 695 | max_parallel_workers_per_gather); |
| 696 | |
| 697 | /* |
| 698 | * Fall out if workers can't be assigned for parallel scan, because in |
| 699 | * such a case this path will be rejected. So there is no benefit in |
| 700 | * doing extra computation. |
| 701 | */ |
| 702 | if (path->path.parallel_workers <= 0) |
| 703 | return; |
| 704 | |
| 705 | path->path.parallel_aware = true; |
| 706 | } |
| 707 | |
| 708 | /* |
| 709 | * Now interpolate based on estimated index order correlation to get total |
| 710 | * disk I/O cost for main table accesses. |
| 711 | */ |
| 712 | csquared = indexCorrelation * indexCorrelation; |
| 713 | |
| 714 | run_cost += max_IO_cost + csquared * (min_IO_cost - max_IO_cost); |
| 715 | |
| 716 | /* |
| 717 | * Estimate CPU costs per tuple. |
| 718 | * |
| 719 | * What we want here is cpu_tuple_cost plus the evaluation costs of any |
| 720 | * qual clauses that we have to evaluate as qpquals. |
| 721 | */ |
| 722 | cost_qual_eval(&qpqual_cost, qpquals, root); |
| 723 | |
| 724 | startup_cost += qpqual_cost.startup; |
| 725 | cpu_per_tuple = cpu_tuple_cost + qpqual_cost.per_tuple; |
| 726 | |
| 727 | cpu_run_cost += cpu_per_tuple * tuples_fetched; |
| 728 | |
| 729 | /* tlist eval costs are paid per output row, not per tuple scanned */ |
| 730 | startup_cost += path->path.pathtarget->cost.startup; |
| 731 | cpu_run_cost += path->path.pathtarget->cost.per_tuple * path->path.rows; |
| 732 | |
| 733 | /* Adjust costing for parallelism, if used. */ |
| 734 | if (path->path.parallel_workers > 0) |
| 735 | { |
| 736 | double parallel_divisor = get_parallel_divisor(&path->path); |
| 737 | |
| 738 | path->path.rows = clamp_row_est(path->path.rows / parallel_divisor); |
| 739 | |
| 740 | /* The CPU cost is divided among all the workers. */ |
| 741 | cpu_run_cost /= parallel_divisor; |
| 742 | } |
| 743 | |
| 744 | run_cost += cpu_run_cost; |
| 745 | |
| 746 | path->path.startup_cost = startup_cost; |
| 747 | path->path.total_cost = startup_cost + run_cost; |
| 748 | } |
| 749 | |
| 750 | /* |
| 751 | * extract_nonindex_conditions |
| 752 | * |
| 753 | * Given a list of quals to be enforced in an indexscan, extract the ones that |
| 754 | * will have to be applied as qpquals (ie, the index machinery won't handle |
| 755 | * them). Here we detect only whether a qual clause is directly redundant |
| 756 | * with some indexclause. If the index path is chosen for use, createplan.c |
| 757 | * will try a bit harder to get rid of redundant qual conditions; specifically |
| 758 | * it will see if quals can be proven to be implied by the indexquals. But |
| 759 | * it does not seem worth the cycles to try to factor that in at this stage, |
| 760 | * since we're only trying to estimate qual eval costs. Otherwise this must |
| 761 | * match the logic in create_indexscan_plan(). |
| 762 | * |
| 763 | * qual_clauses, and the result, are lists of RestrictInfos. |
| 764 | * indexclauses is a list of IndexClauses. |
| 765 | */ |
| 766 | static List * |
| 767 | (List *qual_clauses, List *indexclauses) |
| 768 | { |
| 769 | List *result = NIL; |
| 770 | ListCell *lc; |
| 771 | |
| 772 | foreach(lc, qual_clauses) |
| 773 | { |
| 774 | RestrictInfo *rinfo = lfirst_node(RestrictInfo, lc); |
| 775 | |
| 776 | if (rinfo->pseudoconstant) |
| 777 | continue; /* we may drop pseudoconstants here */ |
| 778 | if (is_redundant_with_indexclauses(rinfo, indexclauses)) |
| 779 | continue; /* dup or derived from same EquivalenceClass */ |
| 780 | /* ... skip the predicate proof attempt createplan.c will try ... */ |
| 781 | result = lappend(result, rinfo); |
| 782 | } |
| 783 | return result; |
| 784 | } |
| 785 | |
| 786 | /* |
| 787 | * index_pages_fetched |
| 788 | * Estimate the number of pages actually fetched after accounting for |
| 789 | * cache effects. |
| 790 | * |
| 791 | * We use an approximation proposed by Mackert and Lohman, "Index Scans |
| 792 | * Using a Finite LRU Buffer: A Validated I/O Model", ACM Transactions |
| 793 | * on Database Systems, Vol. 14, No. 3, September 1989, Pages 401-424. |
| 794 | * The Mackert and Lohman approximation is that the number of pages |
| 795 | * fetched is |
| 796 | * PF = |
| 797 | * min(2TNs/(2T+Ns), T) when T <= b |
| 798 | * 2TNs/(2T+Ns) when T > b and Ns <= 2Tb/(2T-b) |
| 799 | * b + (Ns - 2Tb/(2T-b))*(T-b)/T when T > b and Ns > 2Tb/(2T-b) |
| 800 | * where |
| 801 | * T = # pages in table |
| 802 | * N = # tuples in table |
| 803 | * s = selectivity = fraction of table to be scanned |
| 804 | * b = # buffer pages available (we include kernel space here) |
| 805 | * |
| 806 | * We assume that effective_cache_size is the total number of buffer pages |
| 807 | * available for the whole query, and pro-rate that space across all the |
| 808 | * tables in the query and the index currently under consideration. (This |
| 809 | * ignores space needed for other indexes used by the query, but since we |
| 810 | * don't know which indexes will get used, we can't estimate that very well; |
| 811 | * and in any case counting all the tables may well be an overestimate, since |
| 812 | * depending on the join plan not all the tables may be scanned concurrently.) |
| 813 | * |
| 814 | * The product Ns is the number of tuples fetched; we pass in that |
| 815 | * product rather than calculating it here. "pages" is the number of pages |
| 816 | * in the object under consideration (either an index or a table). |
| 817 | * "index_pages" is the amount to add to the total table space, which was |
| 818 | * computed for us by make_one_rel. |
| 819 | * |
| 820 | * Caller is expected to have ensured that tuples_fetched is greater than zero |
| 821 | * and rounded to integer (see clamp_row_est). The result will likewise be |
| 822 | * greater than zero and integral. |
| 823 | */ |
| 824 | double |
| 825 | index_pages_fetched(double tuples_fetched, BlockNumber pages, |
| 826 | double index_pages, PlannerInfo *root) |
| 827 | { |
| 828 | double pages_fetched; |
| 829 | double total_pages; |
| 830 | double T, |
| 831 | b; |
| 832 | |
| 833 | /* T is # pages in table, but don't allow it to be zero */ |
| 834 | T = (pages > 1) ? (double) pages : 1.0; |
| 835 | |
| 836 | /* Compute number of pages assumed to be competing for cache space */ |
| 837 | total_pages = root->total_table_pages + index_pages; |
| 838 | total_pages = Max(total_pages, 1.0); |
| 839 | Assert(T <= total_pages); |
| 840 | |
| 841 | /* b is pro-rated share of effective_cache_size */ |
| 842 | b = (double) effective_cache_size * T / total_pages; |
| 843 | |
| 844 | /* force it positive and integral */ |
| 845 | if (b <= 1.0) |
| 846 | b = 1.0; |
| 847 | else |
| 848 | b = ceil(b); |
| 849 | |
| 850 | /* This part is the Mackert and Lohman formula */ |
| 851 | if (T <= b) |
| 852 | { |
| 853 | pages_fetched = |
| 854 | (2.0 * T * tuples_fetched) / (2.0 * T + tuples_fetched); |
| 855 | if (pages_fetched >= T) |
| 856 | pages_fetched = T; |
| 857 | else |
| 858 | pages_fetched = ceil(pages_fetched); |
| 859 | } |
| 860 | else |
| 861 | { |
| 862 | double lim; |
| 863 | |
| 864 | lim = (2.0 * T * b) / (2.0 * T - b); |
| 865 | if (tuples_fetched <= lim) |
| 866 | { |
| 867 | pages_fetched = |
| 868 | (2.0 * T * tuples_fetched) / (2.0 * T + tuples_fetched); |
| 869 | } |
| 870 | else |
| 871 | { |
| 872 | pages_fetched = |
| 873 | b + (tuples_fetched - lim) * (T - b) / T; |
| 874 | } |
| 875 | pages_fetched = ceil(pages_fetched); |
| 876 | } |
| 877 | return pages_fetched; |
| 878 | } |
| 879 | |
| 880 | /* |
| 881 | * get_indexpath_pages |
| 882 | * Determine the total size of the indexes used in a bitmap index path. |
| 883 | * |
| 884 | * Note: if the same index is used more than once in a bitmap tree, we will |
| 885 | * count it multiple times, which perhaps is the wrong thing ... but it's |
| 886 | * not completely clear, and detecting duplicates is difficult, so ignore it |
| 887 | * for now. |
| 888 | */ |
| 889 | static double |
| 890 | get_indexpath_pages(Path *bitmapqual) |
| 891 | { |
| 892 | double result = 0; |
| 893 | ListCell *l; |
| 894 | |
| 895 | if (IsA(bitmapqual, BitmapAndPath)) |
| 896 | { |
| 897 | BitmapAndPath *apath = (BitmapAndPath *) bitmapqual; |
| 898 | |
| 899 | foreach(l, apath->bitmapquals) |
| 900 | { |
| 901 | result += get_indexpath_pages((Path *) lfirst(l)); |
| 902 | } |
| 903 | } |
| 904 | else if (IsA(bitmapqual, BitmapOrPath)) |
| 905 | { |
| 906 | BitmapOrPath *opath = (BitmapOrPath *) bitmapqual; |
| 907 | |
| 908 | foreach(l, opath->bitmapquals) |
| 909 | { |
| 910 | result += get_indexpath_pages((Path *) lfirst(l)); |
| 911 | } |
| 912 | } |
| 913 | else if (IsA(bitmapqual, IndexPath)) |
| 914 | { |
| 915 | IndexPath *ipath = (IndexPath *) bitmapqual; |
| 916 | |
| 917 | result = (double) ipath->indexinfo->pages; |
| 918 | } |
| 919 | else |
| 920 | elog(ERROR, "unrecognized node type: %d" , nodeTag(bitmapqual)); |
| 921 | |
| 922 | return result; |
| 923 | } |
| 924 | |
| 925 | /* |
| 926 | * cost_bitmap_heap_scan |
| 927 | * Determines and returns the cost of scanning a relation using a bitmap |
| 928 | * index-then-heap plan. |
| 929 | * |
| 930 | * 'baserel' is the relation to be scanned |
| 931 | * 'param_info' is the ParamPathInfo if this is a parameterized path, else NULL |
| 932 | * 'bitmapqual' is a tree of IndexPaths, BitmapAndPaths, and BitmapOrPaths |
| 933 | * 'loop_count' is the number of repetitions of the indexscan to factor into |
| 934 | * estimates of caching behavior |
| 935 | * |
| 936 | * Note: the component IndexPaths in bitmapqual should have been costed |
| 937 | * using the same loop_count. |
| 938 | */ |
| 939 | void |
| 940 | cost_bitmap_heap_scan(Path *path, PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *baserel, |
| 941 | ParamPathInfo *param_info, |
| 942 | Path *bitmapqual, double loop_count) |
| 943 | { |
| 944 | Cost startup_cost = 0; |
| 945 | Cost run_cost = 0; |
| 946 | Cost indexTotalCost; |
| 947 | QualCost qpqual_cost; |
| 948 | Cost cpu_per_tuple; |
| 949 | Cost cost_per_page; |
| 950 | Cost cpu_run_cost; |
| 951 | double tuples_fetched; |
| 952 | double pages_fetched; |
| 953 | double spc_seq_page_cost, |
| 954 | spc_random_page_cost; |
| 955 | double T; |
| 956 | |
| 957 | /* Should only be applied to base relations */ |
| 958 | Assert(IsA(baserel, RelOptInfo)); |
| 959 | Assert(baserel->relid > 0); |
| 960 | Assert(baserel->rtekind == RTE_RELATION); |
| 961 | |
| 962 | /* Mark the path with the correct row estimate */ |
| 963 | if (param_info) |
| 964 | path->rows = param_info->ppi_rows; |
| 965 | else |
| 966 | path->rows = baserel->rows; |
| 967 | |
| 968 | if (!enable_bitmapscan) |
| 969 | startup_cost += disable_cost; |
| 970 | |
| 971 | pages_fetched = compute_bitmap_pages(root, baserel, bitmapqual, |
| 972 | loop_count, &indexTotalCost, |
| 973 | &tuples_fetched); |
| 974 | |
| 975 | startup_cost += indexTotalCost; |
| 976 | T = (baserel->pages > 1) ? (double) baserel->pages : 1.0; |
| 977 | |
| 978 | /* Fetch estimated page costs for tablespace containing table. */ |
| 979 | get_tablespace_page_costs(baserel->reltablespace, |
| 980 | &spc_random_page_cost, |
| 981 | &spc_seq_page_cost); |
| 982 | |
| 983 | /* |
| 984 | * For small numbers of pages we should charge spc_random_page_cost |
| 985 | * apiece, while if nearly all the table's pages are being read, it's more |
| 986 | * appropriate to charge spc_seq_page_cost apiece. The effect is |
| 987 | * nonlinear, too. For lack of a better idea, interpolate like this to |
| 988 | * determine the cost per page. |
| 989 | */ |
| 990 | if (pages_fetched >= 2.0) |
| 991 | cost_per_page = spc_random_page_cost - |
| 992 | (spc_random_page_cost - spc_seq_page_cost) |
| 993 | * sqrt(pages_fetched / T); |
| 994 | else |
| 995 | cost_per_page = spc_random_page_cost; |
| 996 | |
| 997 | run_cost += pages_fetched * cost_per_page; |
| 998 | |
| 999 | /* |
| 1000 | * Estimate CPU costs per tuple. |
| 1001 | * |
| 1002 | * Often the indexquals don't need to be rechecked at each tuple ... but |
| 1003 | * not always, especially not if there are enough tuples involved that the |
| 1004 | * bitmaps become lossy. For the moment, just assume they will be |
| 1005 | * rechecked always. This means we charge the full freight for all the |
| 1006 | * scan clauses. |
| 1007 | */ |
| 1008 | get_restriction_qual_cost(root, baserel, param_info, &qpqual_cost); |
| 1009 | |
| 1010 | startup_cost += qpqual_cost.startup; |
| 1011 | cpu_per_tuple = cpu_tuple_cost + qpqual_cost.per_tuple; |
| 1012 | cpu_run_cost = cpu_per_tuple * tuples_fetched; |
| 1013 | |
| 1014 | /* Adjust costing for parallelism, if used. */ |
| 1015 | if (path->parallel_workers > 0) |
| 1016 | { |
| 1017 | double parallel_divisor = get_parallel_divisor(path); |
| 1018 | |
| 1019 | /* The CPU cost is divided among all the workers. */ |
| 1020 | cpu_run_cost /= parallel_divisor; |
| 1021 | |
| 1022 | path->rows = clamp_row_est(path->rows / parallel_divisor); |
| 1023 | } |
| 1024 | |
| 1025 | |
| 1026 | run_cost += cpu_run_cost; |
| 1027 | |
| 1028 | /* tlist eval costs are paid per output row, not per tuple scanned */ |
| 1029 | startup_cost += path->pathtarget->cost.startup; |
| 1030 | run_cost += path->pathtarget->cost.per_tuple * path->rows; |
| 1031 | |
| 1032 | path->startup_cost = startup_cost; |
| 1033 | path->total_cost = startup_cost + run_cost; |
| 1034 | } |
| 1035 | |
| 1036 | /* |
| 1037 | * cost_bitmap_tree_node |
| 1038 | * Extract cost and selectivity from a bitmap tree node (index/and/or) |
| 1039 | */ |
| 1040 | void |
| 1041 | cost_bitmap_tree_node(Path *path, Cost *cost, Selectivity *selec) |
| 1042 | { |
| 1043 | if (IsA(path, IndexPath)) |
| 1044 | { |
| 1045 | *cost = ((IndexPath *) path)->indextotalcost; |
| 1046 | *selec = ((IndexPath *) path)->indexselectivity; |
| 1047 | |
| 1048 | /* |
| 1049 | * Charge a small amount per retrieved tuple to reflect the costs of |
| 1050 | * manipulating the bitmap. This is mostly to make sure that a bitmap |
| 1051 | * scan doesn't look to be the same cost as an indexscan to retrieve a |
| 1052 | * single tuple. |
| 1053 | */ |
| 1054 | *cost += 0.1 * cpu_operator_cost * path->rows; |
| 1055 | } |
| 1056 | else if (IsA(path, BitmapAndPath)) |
| 1057 | { |
| 1058 | *cost = path->total_cost; |
| 1059 | *selec = ((BitmapAndPath *) path)->bitmapselectivity; |
| 1060 | } |
| 1061 | else if (IsA(path, BitmapOrPath)) |
| 1062 | { |
| 1063 | *cost = path->total_cost; |
| 1064 | *selec = ((BitmapOrPath *) path)->bitmapselectivity; |
| 1065 | } |
| 1066 | else |
| 1067 | { |
| 1068 | elog(ERROR, "unrecognized node type: %d" , nodeTag(path)); |
| 1069 | *cost = *selec = 0; /* keep compiler quiet */ |
| 1070 | } |
| 1071 | } |
| 1072 | |
| 1073 | /* |
| 1074 | * cost_bitmap_and_node |
| 1075 | * Estimate the cost of a BitmapAnd node |
| 1076 | * |
| 1077 | * Note that this considers only the costs of index scanning and bitmap |
| 1078 | * creation, not the eventual heap access. In that sense the object isn't |
| 1079 | * truly a Path, but it has enough path-like properties (costs in particular) |
| 1080 | * to warrant treating it as one. We don't bother to set the path rows field, |
| 1081 | * however. |
| 1082 | */ |
| 1083 | void |
| 1084 | cost_bitmap_and_node(BitmapAndPath *path, PlannerInfo *root) |
| 1085 | { |
| 1086 | Cost totalCost; |
| 1087 | Selectivity selec; |
| 1088 | ListCell *l; |
| 1089 | |
| 1090 | /* |
| 1091 | * We estimate AND selectivity on the assumption that the inputs are |
| 1092 | * independent. This is probably often wrong, but we don't have the info |
| 1093 | * to do better. |
| 1094 | * |
| 1095 | * The runtime cost of the BitmapAnd itself is estimated at 100x |
| 1096 | * cpu_operator_cost for each tbm_intersect needed. Probably too small, |
| 1097 | * definitely too simplistic? |
| 1098 | */ |
| 1099 | totalCost = 0.0; |
| 1100 | selec = 1.0; |
| 1101 | foreach(l, path->bitmapquals) |
| 1102 | { |
| 1103 | Path *subpath = (Path *) lfirst(l); |
| 1104 | Cost subCost; |
| 1105 | Selectivity subselec; |
| 1106 | |
| 1107 | cost_bitmap_tree_node(subpath, &subCost, &subselec); |
| 1108 | |
| 1109 | selec *= subselec; |
| 1110 | |
| 1111 | totalCost += subCost; |
| 1112 | if (l != list_head(path->bitmapquals)) |
| 1113 | totalCost += 100.0 * cpu_operator_cost; |
| 1114 | } |
| 1115 | path->bitmapselectivity = selec; |
| 1116 | path->path.rows = 0; /* per above, not used */ |
| 1117 | path->path.startup_cost = totalCost; |
| 1118 | path->path.total_cost = totalCost; |
| 1119 | } |
| 1120 | |
| 1121 | /* |
| 1122 | * cost_bitmap_or_node |
| 1123 | * Estimate the cost of a BitmapOr node |
| 1124 | * |
| 1125 | * See comments for cost_bitmap_and_node. |
| 1126 | */ |
| 1127 | void |
| 1128 | cost_bitmap_or_node(BitmapOrPath *path, PlannerInfo *root) |
| 1129 | { |
| 1130 | Cost totalCost; |
| 1131 | Selectivity selec; |
| 1132 | ListCell *l; |
| 1133 | |
| 1134 | /* |
| 1135 | * We estimate OR selectivity on the assumption that the inputs are |
| 1136 | * non-overlapping, since that's often the case in "x IN (list)" type |
| 1137 | * situations. Of course, we clamp to 1.0 at the end. |
| 1138 | * |
| 1139 | * The runtime cost of the BitmapOr itself is estimated at 100x |
| 1140 | * cpu_operator_cost for each tbm_union needed. Probably too small, |
| 1141 | * definitely too simplistic? We are aware that the tbm_unions are |
| 1142 | * optimized out when the inputs are BitmapIndexScans. |
| 1143 | */ |
| 1144 | totalCost = 0.0; |
| 1145 | selec = 0.0; |
| 1146 | foreach(l, path->bitmapquals) |
| 1147 | { |
| 1148 | Path *subpath = (Path *) lfirst(l); |
| 1149 | Cost subCost; |
| 1150 | Selectivity subselec; |
| 1151 | |
| 1152 | cost_bitmap_tree_node(subpath, &subCost, &subselec); |
| 1153 | |
| 1154 | selec += subselec; |
| 1155 | |
| 1156 | totalCost += subCost; |
| 1157 | if (l != list_head(path->bitmapquals) && |
| 1158 | !IsA(subpath, IndexPath)) |
| 1159 | totalCost += 100.0 * cpu_operator_cost; |
| 1160 | } |
| 1161 | path->bitmapselectivity = Min(selec, 1.0); |
| 1162 | path->path.rows = 0; /* per above, not used */ |
| 1163 | path->path.startup_cost = totalCost; |
| 1164 | path->path.total_cost = totalCost; |
| 1165 | } |
| 1166 | |
| 1167 | /* |
| 1168 | * cost_tidscan |
| 1169 | * Determines and returns the cost of scanning a relation using TIDs. |
| 1170 | * |
| 1171 | * 'baserel' is the relation to be scanned |
| 1172 | * 'tidquals' is the list of TID-checkable quals |
| 1173 | * 'param_info' is the ParamPathInfo if this is a parameterized path, else NULL |
| 1174 | */ |
| 1175 | void |
| 1176 | cost_tidscan(Path *path, PlannerInfo *root, |
| 1177 | RelOptInfo *baserel, List *tidquals, ParamPathInfo *param_info) |
| 1178 | { |
| 1179 | Cost startup_cost = 0; |
| 1180 | Cost run_cost = 0; |
| 1181 | bool isCurrentOf = false; |
| 1182 | QualCost qpqual_cost; |
| 1183 | Cost cpu_per_tuple; |
| 1184 | QualCost tid_qual_cost; |
| 1185 | int ntuples; |
| 1186 | ListCell *l; |
| 1187 | double spc_random_page_cost; |
| 1188 | |
| 1189 | /* Should only be applied to base relations */ |
| 1190 | Assert(baserel->relid > 0); |
| 1191 | Assert(baserel->rtekind == RTE_RELATION); |
| 1192 | |
| 1193 | /* Mark the path with the correct row estimate */ |
| 1194 | if (param_info) |
| 1195 | path->rows = param_info->ppi_rows; |
| 1196 | else |
| 1197 | path->rows = baserel->rows; |
| 1198 | |
| 1199 | /* Count how many tuples we expect to retrieve */ |
| 1200 | ntuples = 0; |
| 1201 | foreach(l, tidquals) |
| 1202 | { |
| 1203 | RestrictInfo *rinfo = lfirst_node(RestrictInfo, l); |
| 1204 | Expr *qual = rinfo->clause; |
| 1205 | |
| 1206 | if (IsA(qual, ScalarArrayOpExpr)) |
| 1207 | { |
| 1208 | /* Each element of the array yields 1 tuple */ |
| 1209 | ScalarArrayOpExpr *saop = (ScalarArrayOpExpr *) qual; |
| 1210 | Node *arraynode = (Node *) lsecond(saop->args); |
| 1211 | |
| 1212 | ntuples += estimate_array_length(arraynode); |
| 1213 | } |
| 1214 | else if (IsA(qual, CurrentOfExpr)) |
| 1215 | { |
| 1216 | /* CURRENT OF yields 1 tuple */ |
| 1217 | isCurrentOf = true; |
| 1218 | ntuples++; |
| 1219 | } |
| 1220 | else |
| 1221 | { |
| 1222 | /* It's just CTID = something, count 1 tuple */ |
| 1223 | ntuples++; |
| 1224 | } |
| 1225 | } |
| 1226 | |
| 1227 | /* |
| 1228 | * We must force TID scan for WHERE CURRENT OF, because only nodeTidscan.c |
| 1229 | * understands how to do it correctly. Therefore, honor enable_tidscan |
| 1230 | * only when CURRENT OF isn't present. Also note that cost_qual_eval |
| 1231 | * counts a CurrentOfExpr as having startup cost disable_cost, which we |
| 1232 | * subtract off here; that's to prevent other plan types such as seqscan |
| 1233 | * from winning. |
| 1234 | */ |
| 1235 | if (isCurrentOf) |
| 1236 | { |
| 1237 | Assert(baserel->baserestrictcost.startup >= disable_cost); |
| 1238 | startup_cost -= disable_cost; |
| 1239 | } |
| 1240 | else if (!enable_tidscan) |
| 1241 | startup_cost += disable_cost; |
| 1242 | |
| 1243 | /* |
| 1244 | * The TID qual expressions will be computed once, any other baserestrict |
| 1245 | * quals once per retrieved tuple. |
| 1246 | */ |
| 1247 | cost_qual_eval(&tid_qual_cost, tidquals, root); |
| 1248 | |
| 1249 | /* fetch estimated page cost for tablespace containing table */ |
| 1250 | get_tablespace_page_costs(baserel->reltablespace, |
| 1251 | &spc_random_page_cost, |
| 1252 | NULL); |
| 1253 | |
| 1254 | /* disk costs --- assume each tuple on a different page */ |
| 1255 | run_cost += spc_random_page_cost * ntuples; |
| 1256 | |
| 1257 | /* Add scanning CPU costs */ |
| 1258 | get_restriction_qual_cost(root, baserel, param_info, &qpqual_cost); |
| 1259 | |
| 1260 | /* XXX currently we assume TID quals are a subset of qpquals */ |
| 1261 | startup_cost += qpqual_cost.startup + tid_qual_cost.per_tuple; |
| 1262 | cpu_per_tuple = cpu_tuple_cost + qpqual_cost.per_tuple - |
| 1263 | tid_qual_cost.per_tuple; |
| 1264 | run_cost += cpu_per_tuple * ntuples; |
| 1265 | |
| 1266 | /* tlist eval costs are paid per output row, not per tuple scanned */ |
| 1267 | startup_cost += path->pathtarget->cost.startup; |
| 1268 | run_cost += path->pathtarget->cost.per_tuple * path->rows; |
| 1269 | |
| 1270 | path->startup_cost = startup_cost; |
| 1271 | path->total_cost = startup_cost + run_cost; |
| 1272 | } |
| 1273 | |
| 1274 | /* |
| 1275 | * cost_subqueryscan |
| 1276 | * Determines and returns the cost of scanning a subquery RTE. |
| 1277 | * |
| 1278 | * 'baserel' is the relation to be scanned |
| 1279 | * 'param_info' is the ParamPathInfo if this is a parameterized path, else NULL |
| 1280 | */ |
| 1281 | void |
| 1282 | cost_subqueryscan(SubqueryScanPath *path, PlannerInfo *root, |
| 1283 | RelOptInfo *baserel, ParamPathInfo *param_info) |
| 1284 | { |
| 1285 | Cost startup_cost; |
| 1286 | Cost run_cost; |
| 1287 | QualCost qpqual_cost; |
| 1288 | Cost cpu_per_tuple; |
| 1289 | |
| 1290 | /* Should only be applied to base relations that are subqueries */ |
| 1291 | Assert(baserel->relid > 0); |
| 1292 | Assert(baserel->rtekind == RTE_SUBQUERY); |
| 1293 | |
| 1294 | /* Mark the path with the correct row estimate */ |
| 1295 | if (param_info) |
| 1296 | path->path.rows = param_info->ppi_rows; |
| 1297 | else |
| 1298 | path->path.rows = baserel->rows; |
| 1299 | |
| 1300 | /* |
| 1301 | * Cost of path is cost of evaluating the subplan, plus cost of evaluating |
| 1302 | * any restriction clauses and tlist that will be attached to the |
| 1303 | * SubqueryScan node, plus cpu_tuple_cost to account for selection and |
| 1304 | * projection overhead. |
| 1305 | */ |
| 1306 | path->path.startup_cost = path->subpath->startup_cost; |
| 1307 | path->path.total_cost = path->subpath->total_cost; |
| 1308 | |
| 1309 | get_restriction_qual_cost(root, baserel, param_info, &qpqual_cost); |
| 1310 | |
| 1311 | startup_cost = qpqual_cost.startup; |
| 1312 | cpu_per_tuple = cpu_tuple_cost + qpqual_cost.per_tuple; |
| 1313 | run_cost = cpu_per_tuple * baserel->tuples; |
| 1314 | |
| 1315 | /* tlist eval costs are paid per output row, not per tuple scanned */ |
| 1316 | startup_cost += path->path.pathtarget->cost.startup; |
| 1317 | run_cost += path->path.pathtarget->cost.per_tuple * path->path.rows; |
| 1318 | |
| 1319 | path->path.startup_cost += startup_cost; |
| 1320 | path->path.total_cost += startup_cost + run_cost; |
| 1321 | } |
| 1322 | |
| 1323 | /* |
| 1324 | * cost_functionscan |
| 1325 | * Determines and returns the cost of scanning a function RTE. |
| 1326 | * |
| 1327 | * 'baserel' is the relation to be scanned |
| 1328 | * 'param_info' is the ParamPathInfo if this is a parameterized path, else NULL |
| 1329 | */ |
| 1330 | void |
| 1331 | cost_functionscan(Path *path, PlannerInfo *root, |
| 1332 | RelOptInfo *baserel, ParamPathInfo *param_info) |
| 1333 | { |
| 1334 | Cost startup_cost = 0; |
| 1335 | Cost run_cost = 0; |
| 1336 | QualCost qpqual_cost; |
| 1337 | Cost cpu_per_tuple; |
| 1338 | RangeTblEntry *rte; |
| 1339 | QualCost exprcost; |
| 1340 | |
| 1341 | /* Should only be applied to base relations that are functions */ |
| 1342 | Assert(baserel->relid > 0); |
| 1343 | rte = planner_rt_fetch(baserel->relid, root); |
| 1344 | Assert(rte->rtekind == RTE_FUNCTION); |
| 1345 | |
| 1346 | /* Mark the path with the correct row estimate */ |
| 1347 | if (param_info) |
| 1348 | path->rows = param_info->ppi_rows; |
| 1349 | else |
| 1350 | path->rows = baserel->rows; |
| 1351 | |
| 1352 | /* |
| 1353 | * Estimate costs of executing the function expression(s). |
| 1354 | * |
| 1355 | * Currently, nodeFunctionscan.c always executes the functions to |
| 1356 | * completion before returning any rows, and caches the results in a |
| 1357 | * tuplestore. So the function eval cost is all startup cost, and per-row |
| 1358 | * costs are minimal. |
| 1359 | * |
| 1360 | * XXX in principle we ought to charge tuplestore spill costs if the |
| 1361 | * number of rows is large. However, given how phony our rowcount |
| 1362 | * estimates for functions tend to be, there's not a lot of point in that |
| 1363 | * refinement right now. |
| 1364 | */ |
| 1365 | cost_qual_eval_node(&exprcost, (Node *) rte->functions, root); |
| 1366 | |
| 1367 | startup_cost += exprcost.startup + exprcost.per_tuple; |
| 1368 | |
| 1369 | /* Add scanning CPU costs */ |
| 1370 | get_restriction_qual_cost(root, baserel, param_info, &qpqual_cost); |
| 1371 | |
| 1372 | startup_cost += qpqual_cost.startup; |
| 1373 | cpu_per_tuple = cpu_tuple_cost + qpqual_cost.per_tuple; |
| 1374 | run_cost += cpu_per_tuple * baserel->tuples; |
| 1375 | |
| 1376 | /* tlist eval costs are paid per output row, not per tuple scanned */ |
| 1377 | startup_cost += path->pathtarget->cost.startup; |
| 1378 | run_cost += path->pathtarget->cost.per_tuple * path->rows; |
| 1379 | |
| 1380 | path->startup_cost = startup_cost; |
| 1381 | path->total_cost = startup_cost + run_cost; |
| 1382 | } |
| 1383 | |
| 1384 | /* |
| 1385 | * cost_tablefuncscan |
| 1386 | * Determines and returns the cost of scanning a table function. |
| 1387 | * |
| 1388 | * 'baserel' is the relation to be scanned |
| 1389 | * 'param_info' is the ParamPathInfo if this is a parameterized path, else NULL |
| 1390 | */ |
| 1391 | void |
| 1392 | cost_tablefuncscan(Path *path, PlannerInfo *root, |
| 1393 | RelOptInfo *baserel, ParamPathInfo *param_info) |
| 1394 | { |
| 1395 | Cost startup_cost = 0; |
| 1396 | Cost run_cost = 0; |
| 1397 | QualCost qpqual_cost; |
| 1398 | Cost cpu_per_tuple; |
| 1399 | RangeTblEntry *rte; |
| 1400 | QualCost exprcost; |
| 1401 | |
| 1402 | /* Should only be applied to base relations that are functions */ |
| 1403 | Assert(baserel->relid > 0); |
| 1404 | rte = planner_rt_fetch(baserel->relid, root); |
| 1405 | Assert(rte->rtekind == RTE_TABLEFUNC); |
| 1406 | |
| 1407 | /* Mark the path with the correct row estimate */ |
| 1408 | if (param_info) |
| 1409 | path->rows = param_info->ppi_rows; |
| 1410 | else |
| 1411 | path->rows = baserel->rows; |
| 1412 | |
| 1413 | /* |
| 1414 | * Estimate costs of executing the table func expression(s). |
| 1415 | * |
| 1416 | * XXX in principle we ought to charge tuplestore spill costs if the |
| 1417 | * number of rows is large. However, given how phony our rowcount |
| 1418 | * estimates for tablefuncs tend to be, there's not a lot of point in that |
| 1419 | * refinement right now. |
| 1420 | */ |
| 1421 | cost_qual_eval_node(&exprcost, (Node *) rte->tablefunc, root); |
| 1422 | |
| 1423 | startup_cost += exprcost.startup + exprcost.per_tuple; |
| 1424 | |
| 1425 | /* Add scanning CPU costs */ |
| 1426 | get_restriction_qual_cost(root, baserel, param_info, &qpqual_cost); |
| 1427 | |
| 1428 | startup_cost += qpqual_cost.startup; |
| 1429 | cpu_per_tuple = cpu_tuple_cost + qpqual_cost.per_tuple; |
| 1430 | run_cost += cpu_per_tuple * baserel->tuples; |
| 1431 | |
| 1432 | /* tlist eval costs are paid per output row, not per tuple scanned */ |
| 1433 | startup_cost += path->pathtarget->cost.startup; |
| 1434 | run_cost += path->pathtarget->cost.per_tuple * path->rows; |
| 1435 | |
| 1436 | path->startup_cost = startup_cost; |
| 1437 | path->total_cost = startup_cost + run_cost; |
| 1438 | } |
| 1439 | |
| 1440 | /* |
| 1441 | * cost_valuesscan |
| 1442 | * Determines and returns the cost of scanning a VALUES RTE. |
| 1443 | * |
| 1444 | * 'baserel' is the relation to be scanned |
| 1445 | * 'param_info' is the ParamPathInfo if this is a parameterized path, else NULL |
| 1446 | */ |
| 1447 | void |
| 1448 | cost_valuesscan(Path *path, PlannerInfo *root, |
| 1449 | RelOptInfo *baserel, ParamPathInfo *param_info) |
| 1450 | { |
| 1451 | Cost startup_cost = 0; |
| 1452 | Cost run_cost = 0; |
| 1453 | QualCost qpqual_cost; |
| 1454 | Cost cpu_per_tuple; |
| 1455 | |
| 1456 | /* Should only be applied to base relations that are values lists */ |
| 1457 | Assert(baserel->relid > 0); |
| 1458 | Assert(baserel->rtekind == RTE_VALUES); |
| 1459 | |
| 1460 | /* Mark the path with the correct row estimate */ |
| 1461 | if (param_info) |
| 1462 | path->rows = param_info->ppi_rows; |
| 1463 | else |
| 1464 | path->rows = baserel->rows; |
| 1465 | |
| 1466 | /* |
| 1467 | * For now, estimate list evaluation cost at one operator eval per list |
| 1468 | * (probably pretty bogus, but is it worth being smarter?) |
| 1469 | */ |
| 1470 | cpu_per_tuple = cpu_operator_cost; |
| 1471 | |
| 1472 | /* Add scanning CPU costs */ |
| 1473 | get_restriction_qual_cost(root, baserel, param_info, &qpqual_cost); |
| 1474 | |
| 1475 | startup_cost += qpqual_cost.startup; |
| 1476 | cpu_per_tuple += cpu_tuple_cost + qpqual_cost.per_tuple; |
| 1477 | run_cost += cpu_per_tuple * baserel->tuples; |
| 1478 | |
| 1479 | /* tlist eval costs are paid per output row, not per tuple scanned */ |
| 1480 | startup_cost += path->pathtarget->cost.startup; |
| 1481 | run_cost += path->pathtarget->cost.per_tuple * path->rows; |
| 1482 | |
| 1483 | path->startup_cost = startup_cost; |
| 1484 | path->total_cost = startup_cost + run_cost; |
| 1485 | } |
| 1486 | |
| 1487 | /* |
| 1488 | * cost_ctescan |
| 1489 | * Determines and returns the cost of scanning a CTE RTE. |
| 1490 | * |
| 1491 | * Note: this is used for both self-reference and regular CTEs; the |
| 1492 | * possible cost differences are below the threshold of what we could |
| 1493 | * estimate accurately anyway. Note that the costs of evaluating the |
| 1494 | * referenced CTE query are added into the final plan as initplan costs, |
| 1495 | * and should NOT be counted here. |
| 1496 | */ |
| 1497 | void |
| 1498 | cost_ctescan(Path *path, PlannerInfo *root, |
| 1499 | RelOptInfo *baserel, ParamPathInfo *param_info) |
| 1500 | { |
| 1501 | Cost startup_cost = 0; |
| 1502 | Cost run_cost = 0; |
| 1503 | QualCost qpqual_cost; |
| 1504 | Cost cpu_per_tuple; |
| 1505 | |
| 1506 | /* Should only be applied to base relations that are CTEs */ |
| 1507 | Assert(baserel->relid > 0); |
| 1508 | Assert(baserel->rtekind == RTE_CTE); |
| 1509 | |
| 1510 | /* Mark the path with the correct row estimate */ |
| 1511 | if (param_info) |
| 1512 | path->rows = param_info->ppi_rows; |
| 1513 | else |
| 1514 | path->rows = baserel->rows; |
| 1515 | |
| 1516 | /* Charge one CPU tuple cost per row for tuplestore manipulation */ |
| 1517 | cpu_per_tuple = cpu_tuple_cost; |
| 1518 | |
| 1519 | /* Add scanning CPU costs */ |
| 1520 | get_restriction_qual_cost(root, baserel, param_info, &qpqual_cost); |
| 1521 | |
| 1522 | startup_cost += qpqual_cost.startup; |
| 1523 | cpu_per_tuple += cpu_tuple_cost + qpqual_cost.per_tuple; |
| 1524 | run_cost += cpu_per_tuple * baserel->tuples; |
| 1525 | |
| 1526 | /* tlist eval costs are paid per output row, not per tuple scanned */ |
| 1527 | startup_cost += path->pathtarget->cost.startup; |
| 1528 | run_cost += path->pathtarget->cost.per_tuple * path->rows; |
| 1529 | |
| 1530 | path->startup_cost = startup_cost; |
| 1531 | path->total_cost = startup_cost + run_cost; |
| 1532 | } |
| 1533 | |
| 1534 | /* |
| 1535 | * cost_namedtuplestorescan |
| 1536 | * Determines and returns the cost of scanning a named tuplestore. |
| 1537 | */ |
| 1538 | void |
| 1539 | cost_namedtuplestorescan(Path *path, PlannerInfo *root, |
| 1540 | RelOptInfo *baserel, ParamPathInfo *param_info) |
| 1541 | { |
| 1542 | Cost startup_cost = 0; |
| 1543 | Cost run_cost = 0; |
| 1544 | QualCost qpqual_cost; |
| 1545 | Cost cpu_per_tuple; |
| 1546 | |
| 1547 | /* Should only be applied to base relations that are Tuplestores */ |
| 1548 | Assert(baserel->relid > 0); |
| 1549 | Assert(baserel->rtekind == RTE_NAMEDTUPLESTORE); |
| 1550 | |
| 1551 | /* Mark the path with the correct row estimate */ |
| 1552 | if (param_info) |
| 1553 | path->rows = param_info->ppi_rows; |
| 1554 | else |
| 1555 | path->rows = baserel->rows; |
| 1556 | |
| 1557 | /* Charge one CPU tuple cost per row for tuplestore manipulation */ |
| 1558 | cpu_per_tuple = cpu_tuple_cost; |
| 1559 | |
| 1560 | /* Add scanning CPU costs */ |
| 1561 | get_restriction_qual_cost(root, baserel, param_info, &qpqual_cost); |
| 1562 | |
| 1563 | startup_cost += qpqual_cost.startup; |
| 1564 | cpu_per_tuple += cpu_tuple_cost + qpqual_cost.per_tuple; |
| 1565 | run_cost += cpu_per_tuple * baserel->tuples; |
| 1566 | |
| 1567 | path->startup_cost = startup_cost; |
| 1568 | path->total_cost = startup_cost + run_cost; |
| 1569 | } |
| 1570 | |
| 1571 | /* |
| 1572 | * cost_resultscan |
| 1573 | * Determines and returns the cost of scanning an RTE_RESULT relation. |
| 1574 | */ |
| 1575 | void |
| 1576 | cost_resultscan(Path *path, PlannerInfo *root, |
| 1577 | RelOptInfo *baserel, ParamPathInfo *param_info) |
| 1578 | { |
| 1579 | Cost startup_cost = 0; |
| 1580 | Cost run_cost = 0; |
| 1581 | QualCost qpqual_cost; |
| 1582 | Cost cpu_per_tuple; |
| 1583 | |
| 1584 | /* Should only be applied to RTE_RESULT base relations */ |
| 1585 | Assert(baserel->relid > 0); |
| 1586 | Assert(baserel->rtekind == RTE_RESULT); |
| 1587 | |
| 1588 | /* Mark the path with the correct row estimate */ |
| 1589 | if (param_info) |
| 1590 | path->rows = param_info->ppi_rows; |
| 1591 | else |
| 1592 | path->rows = baserel->rows; |
| 1593 | |
| 1594 | /* We charge qual cost plus cpu_tuple_cost */ |
| 1595 | get_restriction_qual_cost(root, baserel, param_info, &qpqual_cost); |
| 1596 | |
| 1597 | startup_cost += qpqual_cost.startup; |
| 1598 | cpu_per_tuple = cpu_tuple_cost + qpqual_cost.per_tuple; |
| 1599 | run_cost += cpu_per_tuple * baserel->tuples; |
| 1600 | |
| 1601 | path->startup_cost = startup_cost; |
| 1602 | path->total_cost = startup_cost + run_cost; |
| 1603 | } |
| 1604 | |
| 1605 | /* |
| 1606 | * cost_recursive_union |
| 1607 | * Determines and returns the cost of performing a recursive union, |
| 1608 | * and also the estimated output size. |
| 1609 | * |
| 1610 | * We are given Paths for the nonrecursive and recursive terms. |
| 1611 | */ |
| 1612 | void |
| 1613 | cost_recursive_union(Path *runion, Path *nrterm, Path *rterm) |
| 1614 | { |
| 1615 | Cost startup_cost; |
| 1616 | Cost total_cost; |
| 1617 | double total_rows; |
| 1618 | |
| 1619 | /* We probably have decent estimates for the non-recursive term */ |
| 1620 | startup_cost = nrterm->startup_cost; |
| 1621 | total_cost = nrterm->total_cost; |
| 1622 | total_rows = nrterm->rows; |
| 1623 | |
| 1624 | /* |
| 1625 | * We arbitrarily assume that about 10 recursive iterations will be |
| 1626 | * needed, and that we've managed to get a good fix on the cost and output |
| 1627 | * size of each one of them. These are mighty shaky assumptions but it's |
| 1628 | * hard to see how to do better. |
| 1629 | */ |
| 1630 | total_cost += 10 * rterm->total_cost; |
| 1631 | total_rows += 10 * rterm->rows; |
| 1632 | |
| 1633 | /* |
| 1634 | * Also charge cpu_tuple_cost per row to account for the costs of |
| 1635 | * manipulating the tuplestores. (We don't worry about possible |
| 1636 | * spill-to-disk costs.) |
| 1637 | */ |
| 1638 | total_cost += cpu_tuple_cost * total_rows; |
| 1639 | |
| 1640 | runion->startup_cost = startup_cost; |
| 1641 | runion->total_cost = total_cost; |
| 1642 | runion->rows = total_rows; |
| 1643 | runion->pathtarget->width = Max(nrterm->pathtarget->width, |
| 1644 | rterm->pathtarget->width); |
| 1645 | } |
| 1646 | |
| 1647 | /* |
| 1648 | * cost_sort |
| 1649 | * Determines and returns the cost of sorting a relation, including |
| 1650 | * the cost of reading the input data. |
| 1651 | * |
| 1652 | * If the total volume of data to sort is less than sort_mem, we will do |
| 1653 | * an in-memory sort, which requires no I/O and about t*log2(t) tuple |
| 1654 | * comparisons for t tuples. |
| 1655 | * |
| 1656 | * If the total volume exceeds sort_mem, we switch to a tape-style merge |
| 1657 | * algorithm. There will still be about t*log2(t) tuple comparisons in |
| 1658 | * total, but we will also need to write and read each tuple once per |
| 1659 | * merge pass. We expect about ceil(logM(r)) merge passes where r is the |
| 1660 | * number of initial runs formed and M is the merge order used by tuplesort.c. |
| 1661 | * Since the average initial run should be about sort_mem, we have |
| 1662 | * disk traffic = 2 * relsize * ceil(logM(p / sort_mem)) |
| 1663 | * cpu = comparison_cost * t * log2(t) |
| 1664 | * |
| 1665 | * If the sort is bounded (i.e., only the first k result tuples are needed) |
| 1666 | * and k tuples can fit into sort_mem, we use a heap method that keeps only |
| 1667 | * k tuples in the heap; this will require about t*log2(k) tuple comparisons. |
| 1668 | * |
| 1669 | * The disk traffic is assumed to be 3/4ths sequential and 1/4th random |
| 1670 | * accesses (XXX can't we refine that guess?) |
| 1671 | * |
| 1672 | * By default, we charge two operator evals per tuple comparison, which should |
| 1673 | * be in the right ballpark in most cases. The caller can tweak this by |
| 1674 | * specifying nonzero comparison_cost; typically that's used for any extra |
| 1675 | * work that has to be done to prepare the inputs to the comparison operators. |
| 1676 | * |
| 1677 | * 'pathkeys' is a list of sort keys |
| 1678 | * 'input_cost' is the total cost for reading the input data |
| 1679 | * 'tuples' is the number of tuples in the relation |
| 1680 | * 'width' is the average tuple width in bytes |
| 1681 | * 'comparison_cost' is the extra cost per comparison, if any |
| 1682 | * 'sort_mem' is the number of kilobytes of work memory allowed for the sort |
| 1683 | * 'limit_tuples' is the bound on the number of output tuples; -1 if no bound |
| 1684 | * |
| 1685 | * NOTE: some callers currently pass NIL for pathkeys because they |
| 1686 | * can't conveniently supply the sort keys. Since this routine doesn't |
| 1687 | * currently do anything with pathkeys anyway, that doesn't matter... |
| 1688 | * but if it ever does, it should react gracefully to lack of key data. |
| 1689 | * (Actually, the thing we'd most likely be interested in is just the number |
| 1690 | * of sort keys, which all callers *could* supply.) |
| 1691 | */ |
| 1692 | void |
| 1693 | cost_sort(Path *path, PlannerInfo *root, |
| 1694 | List *pathkeys, Cost input_cost, double tuples, int width, |
| 1695 | Cost comparison_cost, int sort_mem, |
| 1696 | double limit_tuples) |
| 1697 | { |
| 1698 | Cost startup_cost = input_cost; |
| 1699 | Cost run_cost = 0; |
| 1700 | double input_bytes = relation_byte_size(tuples, width); |
| 1701 | double output_bytes; |
| 1702 | double output_tuples; |
| 1703 | long sort_mem_bytes = sort_mem * 1024L; |
| 1704 | |
| 1705 | if (!enable_sort) |
| 1706 | startup_cost += disable_cost; |
| 1707 | |
| 1708 | path->rows = tuples; |
| 1709 | |
| 1710 | /* |
| 1711 | * We want to be sure the cost of a sort is never estimated as zero, even |
| 1712 | * if passed-in tuple count is zero. Besides, mustn't do log(0)... |
| 1713 | */ |
| 1714 | if (tuples < 2.0) |
| 1715 | tuples = 2.0; |
| 1716 | |
| 1717 | /* Include the default cost-per-comparison */ |
| 1718 | comparison_cost += 2.0 * cpu_operator_cost; |
| 1719 | |
| 1720 | /* Do we have a useful LIMIT? */ |
| 1721 | if (limit_tuples > 0 && limit_tuples < tuples) |
| 1722 | { |
| 1723 | output_tuples = limit_tuples; |
| 1724 | output_bytes = relation_byte_size(output_tuples, width); |
| 1725 | } |
| 1726 | else |
| 1727 | { |
| 1728 | output_tuples = tuples; |
| 1729 | output_bytes = input_bytes; |
| 1730 | } |
| 1731 | |
| 1732 | if (output_bytes > sort_mem_bytes) |
| 1733 | { |
| 1734 | /* |
| 1735 | * We'll have to use a disk-based sort of all the tuples |
| 1736 | */ |
| 1737 | double npages = ceil(input_bytes / BLCKSZ); |
| 1738 | double nruns = input_bytes / sort_mem_bytes; |
| 1739 | double mergeorder = tuplesort_merge_order(sort_mem_bytes); |
| 1740 | double log_runs; |
| 1741 | double npageaccesses; |
| 1742 | |
| 1743 | /* |
| 1744 | * CPU costs |
| 1745 | * |
| 1746 | * Assume about N log2 N comparisons |
| 1747 | */ |
| 1748 | startup_cost += comparison_cost * tuples * LOG2(tuples); |
| 1749 | |
| 1750 | /* Disk costs */ |
| 1751 | |
| 1752 | /* Compute logM(r) as log(r) / log(M) */ |
| 1753 | if (nruns > mergeorder) |
| 1754 | log_runs = ceil(log(nruns) / log(mergeorder)); |
| 1755 | else |
| 1756 | log_runs = 1.0; |
| 1757 | npageaccesses = 2.0 * npages * log_runs; |
| 1758 | /* Assume 3/4ths of accesses are sequential, 1/4th are not */ |
| 1759 | startup_cost += npageaccesses * |
| 1760 | (seq_page_cost * 0.75 + random_page_cost * 0.25); |
| 1761 | } |
| 1762 | else if (tuples > 2 * output_tuples || input_bytes > sort_mem_bytes) |
| 1763 | { |
| 1764 | /* |
| 1765 | * We'll use a bounded heap-sort keeping just K tuples in memory, for |
| 1766 | * a total number of tuple comparisons of N log2 K; but the constant |
| 1767 | * factor is a bit higher than for quicksort. Tweak it so that the |
| 1768 | * cost curve is continuous at the crossover point. |
| 1769 | */ |
| 1770 | startup_cost += comparison_cost * tuples * LOG2(2.0 * output_tuples); |
| 1771 | } |
| 1772 | else |
| 1773 | { |
| 1774 | /* We'll use plain quicksort on all the input tuples */ |
| 1775 | startup_cost += comparison_cost * tuples * LOG2(tuples); |
| 1776 | } |
| 1777 | |
| 1778 | /* |
| 1779 | * Also charge a small amount (arbitrarily set equal to operator cost) per |
| 1780 | * extracted tuple. We don't charge cpu_tuple_cost because a Sort node |
| 1781 | * doesn't do qual-checking or projection, so it has less overhead than |
| 1782 | * most plan nodes. Note it's correct to use tuples not output_tuples |
| 1783 | * here --- the upper LIMIT will pro-rate the run cost so we'd be double |
| 1784 | * counting the LIMIT otherwise. |
| 1785 | */ |
| 1786 | run_cost += cpu_operator_cost * tuples; |
| 1787 | |
| 1788 | path->startup_cost = startup_cost; |
| 1789 | path->total_cost = startup_cost + run_cost; |
| 1790 | } |
| 1791 | |
| 1792 | /* |
| 1793 | * append_nonpartial_cost |
| 1794 | * Estimate the cost of the non-partial paths in a Parallel Append. |
| 1795 | * The non-partial paths are assumed to be the first "numpaths" paths |
| 1796 | * from the subpaths list, and to be in order of decreasing cost. |
| 1797 | */ |
| 1798 | static Cost |
| 1799 | append_nonpartial_cost(List *subpaths, int numpaths, int parallel_workers) |
| 1800 | { |
| 1801 | Cost *costarr; |
| 1802 | int arrlen; |
| 1803 | ListCell *l; |
| 1804 | ListCell *cell; |
| 1805 | int i; |
| 1806 | int path_index; |
| 1807 | int min_index; |
| 1808 | int max_index; |
| 1809 | |
| 1810 | if (numpaths == 0) |
| 1811 | return 0; |
| 1812 | |
| 1813 | /* |
| 1814 | * Array length is number of workers or number of relevants paths, |
| 1815 | * whichever is less. |
| 1816 | */ |
| 1817 | arrlen = Min(parallel_workers, numpaths); |
| 1818 | costarr = (Cost *) palloc(sizeof(Cost) * arrlen); |
| 1819 | |
| 1820 | /* The first few paths will each be claimed by a different worker. */ |
| 1821 | path_index = 0; |
| 1822 | foreach(cell, subpaths) |
| 1823 | { |
| 1824 | Path *subpath = (Path *) lfirst(cell); |
| 1825 | |
| 1826 | if (path_index == arrlen) |
| 1827 | break; |
| 1828 | costarr[path_index++] = subpath->total_cost; |
| 1829 | } |
| 1830 | |
| 1831 | /* |
| 1832 | * Since subpaths are sorted by decreasing cost, the last one will have |
| 1833 | * the minimum cost. |
| 1834 | */ |
| 1835 | min_index = arrlen - 1; |
| 1836 | |
| 1837 | /* |
| 1838 | * For each of the remaining subpaths, add its cost to the array element |
| 1839 | * with minimum cost. |
| 1840 | */ |
| 1841 | for_each_cell(l, cell) |
| 1842 | { |
| 1843 | Path *subpath = (Path *) lfirst(l); |
| 1844 | int i; |
| 1845 | |
| 1846 | /* Consider only the non-partial paths */ |
| 1847 | if (path_index++ == numpaths) |
| 1848 | break; |
| 1849 | |
| 1850 | costarr[min_index] += subpath->total_cost; |
| 1851 | |
| 1852 | /* Update the new min cost array index */ |
| 1853 | for (min_index = i = 0; i < arrlen; i++) |
| 1854 | { |
| 1855 | if (costarr[i] < costarr[min_index]) |
| 1856 | min_index = i; |
| 1857 | } |
| 1858 | } |
| 1859 | |
| 1860 | /* Return the highest cost from the array */ |
| 1861 | for (max_index = i = 0; i < arrlen; i++) |
| 1862 | { |
| 1863 | if (costarr[i] > costarr[max_index]) |
| 1864 | max_index = i; |
| 1865 | } |
| 1866 | |
| 1867 | return costarr[max_index]; |
| 1868 | } |
| 1869 | |
| 1870 | /* |
| 1871 | * cost_append |
| 1872 | * Determines and returns the cost of an Append node. |
| 1873 | */ |
| 1874 | void |
| 1875 | cost_append(AppendPath *apath) |
| 1876 | { |
| 1877 | ListCell *l; |
| 1878 | |
| 1879 | apath->path.startup_cost = 0; |
| 1880 | apath->path.total_cost = 0; |
| 1881 | apath->path.rows = 0; |
| 1882 | |
| 1883 | if (apath->subpaths == NIL) |
| 1884 | return; |
| 1885 | |
| 1886 | if (!apath->path.parallel_aware) |
| 1887 | { |
| 1888 | List *pathkeys = apath->path.pathkeys; |
| 1889 | |
| 1890 | if (pathkeys == NIL) |
| 1891 | { |
| 1892 | Path *subpath = (Path *) linitial(apath->subpaths); |
| 1893 | |
| 1894 | /* |
| 1895 | * For an unordered, non-parallel-aware Append we take the startup |
| 1896 | * cost as the startup cost of the first subpath. |
| 1897 | */ |
| 1898 | apath->path.startup_cost = subpath->startup_cost; |
| 1899 | |
| 1900 | /* Compute rows and costs as sums of subplan rows and costs. */ |
| 1901 | foreach(l, apath->subpaths) |
| 1902 | { |
| 1903 | Path *subpath = (Path *) lfirst(l); |
| 1904 | |
| 1905 | apath->path.rows += subpath->rows; |
| 1906 | apath->path.total_cost += subpath->total_cost; |
| 1907 | } |
| 1908 | } |
| 1909 | else |
| 1910 | { |
| 1911 | /* |
| 1912 | * For an ordered, non-parallel-aware Append we take the startup |
| 1913 | * cost as the sum of the subpath startup costs. This ensures |
| 1914 | * that we don't underestimate the startup cost when a query's |
| 1915 | * LIMIT is such that several of the children have to be run to |
| 1916 | * satisfy it. This might be overkill --- another plausible hack |
| 1917 | * would be to take the Append's startup cost as the maximum of |
| 1918 | * the child startup costs. But we don't want to risk believing |
| 1919 | * that an ORDER BY LIMIT query can be satisfied at small cost |
| 1920 | * when the first child has small startup cost but later ones |
| 1921 | * don't. (If we had the ability to deal with nonlinear cost |
| 1922 | * interpolation for partial retrievals, we would not need to be |
| 1923 | * so conservative about this.) |
| 1924 | * |
| 1925 | * This case is also different from the above in that we have to |
| 1926 | * account for possibly injecting sorts into subpaths that aren't |
| 1927 | * natively ordered. |
| 1928 | */ |
| 1929 | foreach(l, apath->subpaths) |
| 1930 | { |
| 1931 | Path *subpath = (Path *) lfirst(l); |
| 1932 | Path sort_path; /* dummy for result of cost_sort */ |
| 1933 | |
| 1934 | if (!pathkeys_contained_in(pathkeys, subpath->pathkeys)) |
| 1935 | { |
| 1936 | /* |
| 1937 | * We'll need to insert a Sort node, so include costs for |
| 1938 | * that. We can use the parent's LIMIT if any, since we |
| 1939 | * certainly won't pull more than that many tuples from |
| 1940 | * any child. |
| 1941 | */ |
| 1942 | cost_sort(&sort_path, |
| 1943 | NULL, /* doesn't currently need root */ |
| 1944 | pathkeys, |
| 1945 | subpath->total_cost, |
| 1946 | subpath->rows, |
| 1947 | subpath->pathtarget->width, |
| 1948 | 0.0, |
| 1949 | work_mem, |
| 1950 | apath->limit_tuples); |
| 1951 | subpath = &sort_path; |
| 1952 | } |
| 1953 | |
| 1954 | apath->path.rows += subpath->rows; |
| 1955 | apath->path.startup_cost += subpath->startup_cost; |
| 1956 | apath->path.total_cost += subpath->total_cost; |
| 1957 | } |
| 1958 | } |
| 1959 | } |
| 1960 | else /* parallel-aware */ |
| 1961 | { |
| 1962 | int i = 0; |
| 1963 | double parallel_divisor = get_parallel_divisor(&apath->path); |
| 1964 | |
| 1965 | /* Parallel-aware Append never produces ordered output. */ |
| 1966 | Assert(apath->path.pathkeys == NIL); |
| 1967 | |
| 1968 | /* Calculate startup cost. */ |
| 1969 | foreach(l, apath->subpaths) |
| 1970 | { |
| 1971 | Path *subpath = (Path *) lfirst(l); |
| 1972 | |
| 1973 | /* |
| 1974 | * Append will start returning tuples when the child node having |
| 1975 | * lowest startup cost is done setting up. We consider only the |
| 1976 | * first few subplans that immediately get a worker assigned. |
| 1977 | */ |
| 1978 | if (i == 0) |
| 1979 | apath->path.startup_cost = subpath->startup_cost; |
| 1980 | else if (i < apath->path.parallel_workers) |
| 1981 | apath->path.startup_cost = Min(apath->path.startup_cost, |
| 1982 | subpath->startup_cost); |
| 1983 | |
| 1984 | /* |
| 1985 | * Apply parallel divisor to subpaths. Scale the number of rows |
| 1986 | * for each partial subpath based on the ratio of the parallel |
| 1987 | * divisor originally used for the subpath to the one we adopted. |
| 1988 | * Also add the cost of partial paths to the total cost, but |
| 1989 | * ignore non-partial paths for now. |
| 1990 | */ |
| 1991 | if (i < apath->first_partial_path) |
| 1992 | apath->path.rows += subpath->rows / parallel_divisor; |
| 1993 | else |
| 1994 | { |
| 1995 | double subpath_parallel_divisor; |
| 1996 | |
| 1997 | subpath_parallel_divisor = get_parallel_divisor(subpath); |
| 1998 | apath->path.rows += subpath->rows * (subpath_parallel_divisor / |
| 1999 | parallel_divisor); |
| 2000 | apath->path.total_cost += subpath->total_cost; |
| 2001 | } |
| 2002 | |
| 2003 | apath->path.rows = clamp_row_est(apath->path.rows); |
| 2004 | |
| 2005 | i++; |
| 2006 | } |
| 2007 | |
| 2008 | /* Add cost for non-partial subpaths. */ |
| 2009 | apath->path.total_cost += |
| 2010 | append_nonpartial_cost(apath->subpaths, |
| 2011 | apath->first_partial_path, |
| 2012 | apath->path.parallel_workers); |
| 2013 | } |
| 2014 | |
| 2015 | /* |
| 2016 | * Although Append does not do any selection or projection, it's not free; |
| 2017 | * add a small per-tuple overhead. |
| 2018 | */ |
| 2019 | apath->path.total_cost += |
| 2020 | cpu_tuple_cost * APPEND_CPU_COST_MULTIPLIER * apath->path.rows; |
| 2021 | } |
| 2022 | |
| 2023 | /* |
| 2024 | * cost_merge_append |
| 2025 | * Determines and returns the cost of a MergeAppend node. |
| 2026 | * |
| 2027 | * MergeAppend merges several pre-sorted input streams, using a heap that |
| 2028 | * at any given instant holds the next tuple from each stream. If there |
| 2029 | * are N streams, we need about N*log2(N) tuple comparisons to construct |
| 2030 | * the heap at startup, and then for each output tuple, about log2(N) |
| 2031 | * comparisons to replace the top entry. |
| 2032 | * |
| 2033 | * (The effective value of N will drop once some of the input streams are |
| 2034 | * exhausted, but it seems unlikely to be worth trying to account for that.) |
| 2035 | * |
| 2036 | * The heap is never spilled to disk, since we assume N is not very large. |
| 2037 | * So this is much simpler than cost_sort. |
| 2038 | * |
| 2039 | * As in cost_sort, we charge two operator evals per tuple comparison. |
| 2040 | * |
| 2041 | * 'pathkeys' is a list of sort keys |
| 2042 | * 'n_streams' is the number of input streams |
| 2043 | * 'input_startup_cost' is the sum of the input streams' startup costs |
| 2044 | * 'input_total_cost' is the sum of the input streams' total costs |
| 2045 | * 'tuples' is the number of tuples in all the streams |
| 2046 | */ |
| 2047 | void |
| 2048 | cost_merge_append(Path *path, PlannerInfo *root, |
| 2049 | List *pathkeys, int n_streams, |
| 2050 | Cost input_startup_cost, Cost input_total_cost, |
| 2051 | double tuples) |
| 2052 | { |
| 2053 | Cost startup_cost = 0; |
| 2054 | Cost run_cost = 0; |
| 2055 | Cost comparison_cost; |
| 2056 | double N; |
| 2057 | double logN; |
| 2058 | |
| 2059 | /* |
| 2060 | * Avoid log(0)... |
| 2061 | */ |
| 2062 | N = (n_streams < 2) ? 2.0 : (double) n_streams; |
| 2063 | logN = LOG2(N); |
| 2064 | |
| 2065 | /* Assumed cost per tuple comparison */ |
| 2066 | comparison_cost = 2.0 * cpu_operator_cost; |
| 2067 | |
| 2068 | /* Heap creation cost */ |
| 2069 | startup_cost += comparison_cost * N * logN; |
| 2070 | |
| 2071 | /* Per-tuple heap maintenance cost */ |
| 2072 | run_cost += tuples * comparison_cost * logN; |
| 2073 | |
| 2074 | /* |
| 2075 | * Although MergeAppend does not do any selection or projection, it's not |
| 2076 | * free; add a small per-tuple overhead. |
| 2077 | */ |
| 2078 | run_cost += cpu_tuple_cost * APPEND_CPU_COST_MULTIPLIER * tuples; |
| 2079 | |
| 2080 | path->startup_cost = startup_cost + input_startup_cost; |
| 2081 | path->total_cost = startup_cost + run_cost + input_total_cost; |
| 2082 | } |
| 2083 | |
| 2084 | /* |
| 2085 | * cost_material |
| 2086 | * Determines and returns the cost of materializing a relation, including |
| 2087 | * the cost of reading the input data. |
| 2088 | * |
| 2089 | * If the total volume of data to materialize exceeds work_mem, we will need |
| 2090 | * to write it to disk, so the cost is much higher in that case. |
| 2091 | * |
| 2092 | * Note that here we are estimating the costs for the first scan of the |
| 2093 | * relation, so the materialization is all overhead --- any savings will |
| 2094 | * occur only on rescan, which is estimated in cost_rescan. |
| 2095 | */ |
| 2096 | void |
| 2097 | cost_material(Path *path, |
| 2098 | Cost input_startup_cost, Cost input_total_cost, |
| 2099 | double tuples, int width) |
| 2100 | { |
| 2101 | Cost startup_cost = input_startup_cost; |
| 2102 | Cost run_cost = input_total_cost - input_startup_cost; |
| 2103 | double nbytes = relation_byte_size(tuples, width); |
| 2104 | long work_mem_bytes = work_mem * 1024L; |
| 2105 | |
| 2106 | path->rows = tuples; |
| 2107 | |
| 2108 | /* |
| 2109 | * Whether spilling or not, charge 2x cpu_operator_cost per tuple to |
| 2110 | * reflect bookkeeping overhead. (This rate must be more than what |
| 2111 | * cost_rescan charges for materialize, ie, cpu_operator_cost per tuple; |
| 2112 | * if it is exactly the same then there will be a cost tie between |
| 2113 | * nestloop with A outer, materialized B inner and nestloop with B outer, |
| 2114 | * materialized A inner. The extra cost ensures we'll prefer |
| 2115 | * materializing the smaller rel.) Note that this is normally a good deal |
| 2116 | * less than cpu_tuple_cost; which is OK because a Material plan node |
| 2117 | * doesn't do qual-checking or projection, so it's got less overhead than |
| 2118 | * most plan nodes. |
| 2119 | */ |
| 2120 | run_cost += 2 * cpu_operator_cost * tuples; |
| 2121 | |
| 2122 | /* |
| 2123 | * If we will spill to disk, charge at the rate of seq_page_cost per page. |
| 2124 | * This cost is assumed to be evenly spread through the plan run phase, |
| 2125 | * which isn't exactly accurate but our cost model doesn't allow for |
| 2126 | * nonuniform costs within the run phase. |
| 2127 | */ |
| 2128 | if (nbytes > work_mem_bytes) |
| 2129 | { |
| 2130 | double npages = ceil(nbytes / BLCKSZ); |
| 2131 | |
| 2132 | run_cost += seq_page_cost * npages; |
| 2133 | } |
| 2134 | |
| 2135 | path->startup_cost = startup_cost; |
| 2136 | path->total_cost = startup_cost + run_cost; |
| 2137 | } |
| 2138 | |
| 2139 | /* |
| 2140 | * cost_agg |
| 2141 | * Determines and returns the cost of performing an Agg plan node, |
| 2142 | * including the cost of its input. |
| 2143 | * |
| 2144 | * aggcosts can be NULL when there are no actual aggregate functions (i.e., |
| 2145 | * we are using a hashed Agg node just to do grouping). |
| 2146 | * |
| 2147 | * Note: when aggstrategy == AGG_SORTED, caller must ensure that input costs |
| 2148 | * are for appropriately-sorted input. |
| 2149 | */ |
| 2150 | void |
| 2151 | cost_agg(Path *path, PlannerInfo *root, |
| 2152 | AggStrategy aggstrategy, const AggClauseCosts *aggcosts, |
| 2153 | int numGroupCols, double numGroups, |
| 2154 | List *quals, |
| 2155 | Cost input_startup_cost, Cost input_total_cost, |
| 2156 | double input_tuples) |
| 2157 | { |
| 2158 | double output_tuples; |
| 2159 | Cost startup_cost; |
| 2160 | Cost total_cost; |
| 2161 | AggClauseCosts dummy_aggcosts; |
| 2162 | |
| 2163 | /* Use all-zero per-aggregate costs if NULL is passed */ |
| 2164 | if (aggcosts == NULL) |
| 2165 | { |
| 2166 | Assert(aggstrategy == AGG_HASHED); |
| 2167 | MemSet(&dummy_aggcosts, 0, sizeof(AggClauseCosts)); |
| 2168 | aggcosts = &dummy_aggcosts; |
| 2169 | } |
| 2170 | |
| 2171 | /* |
| 2172 | * The transCost.per_tuple component of aggcosts should be charged once |
| 2173 | * per input tuple, corresponding to the costs of evaluating the aggregate |
| 2174 | * transfns and their input expressions. The finalCost.per_tuple component |
| 2175 | * is charged once per output tuple, corresponding to the costs of |
| 2176 | * evaluating the finalfns. Startup costs are of course charged but once. |
| 2177 | * |
| 2178 | * If we are grouping, we charge an additional cpu_operator_cost per |
| 2179 | * grouping column per input tuple for grouping comparisons. |
| 2180 | * |
| 2181 | * We will produce a single output tuple if not grouping, and a tuple per |
| 2182 | * group otherwise. We charge cpu_tuple_cost for each output tuple. |
| 2183 | * |
| 2184 | * Note: in this cost model, AGG_SORTED and AGG_HASHED have exactly the |
| 2185 | * same total CPU cost, but AGG_SORTED has lower startup cost. If the |
| 2186 | * input path is already sorted appropriately, AGG_SORTED should be |
| 2187 | * preferred (since it has no risk of memory overflow). This will happen |
| 2188 | * as long as the computed total costs are indeed exactly equal --- but if |
| 2189 | * there's roundoff error we might do the wrong thing. So be sure that |
| 2190 | * the computations below form the same intermediate values in the same |
| 2191 | * order. |
| 2192 | */ |
| 2193 | if (aggstrategy == AGG_PLAIN) |
| 2194 | { |
| 2195 | startup_cost = input_total_cost; |
| 2196 | startup_cost += aggcosts->transCost.startup; |
| 2197 | startup_cost += aggcosts->transCost.per_tuple * input_tuples; |
| 2198 | startup_cost += aggcosts->finalCost.startup; |
| 2199 | startup_cost += aggcosts->finalCost.per_tuple; |
| 2200 | /* we aren't grouping */ |
| 2201 | total_cost = startup_cost + cpu_tuple_cost; |
| 2202 | output_tuples = 1; |
| 2203 | } |
| 2204 | else if (aggstrategy == AGG_SORTED || aggstrategy == AGG_MIXED) |
| 2205 | { |
| 2206 | /* Here we are able to deliver output on-the-fly */ |
| 2207 | startup_cost = input_startup_cost; |
| 2208 | total_cost = input_total_cost; |
| 2209 | if (aggstrategy == AGG_MIXED && !enable_hashagg) |
| 2210 | { |
| 2211 | startup_cost += disable_cost; |
| 2212 | total_cost += disable_cost; |
| 2213 | } |
| 2214 | /* calcs phrased this way to match HASHED case, see note above */ |
| 2215 | total_cost += aggcosts->transCost.startup; |
| 2216 | total_cost += aggcosts->transCost.per_tuple * input_tuples; |
| 2217 | total_cost += (cpu_operator_cost * numGroupCols) * input_tuples; |
| 2218 | total_cost += aggcosts->finalCost.startup; |
| 2219 | total_cost += aggcosts->finalCost.per_tuple * numGroups; |
| 2220 | total_cost += cpu_tuple_cost * numGroups; |
| 2221 | output_tuples = numGroups; |
| 2222 | } |
| 2223 | else |
| 2224 | { |
| 2225 | /* must be AGG_HASHED */ |
| 2226 | startup_cost = input_total_cost; |
| 2227 | if (!enable_hashagg) |
| 2228 | startup_cost += disable_cost; |
| 2229 | startup_cost += aggcosts->transCost.startup; |
| 2230 | startup_cost += aggcosts->transCost.per_tuple * input_tuples; |
| 2231 | startup_cost += (cpu_operator_cost * numGroupCols) * input_tuples; |
| 2232 | startup_cost += aggcosts->finalCost.startup; |
| 2233 | total_cost = startup_cost; |
| 2234 | total_cost += aggcosts->finalCost.per_tuple * numGroups; |
| 2235 | total_cost += cpu_tuple_cost * numGroups; |
| 2236 | output_tuples = numGroups; |
| 2237 | } |
| 2238 | |
| 2239 | /* |
| 2240 | * If there are quals (HAVING quals), account for their cost and |
| 2241 | * selectivity. |
| 2242 | */ |
| 2243 | if (quals) |
| 2244 | { |
| 2245 | QualCost qual_cost; |
| 2246 | |
| 2247 | cost_qual_eval(&qual_cost, quals, root); |
| 2248 | startup_cost += qual_cost.startup; |
| 2249 | total_cost += qual_cost.startup + output_tuples * qual_cost.per_tuple; |
| 2250 | |
| 2251 | output_tuples = clamp_row_est(output_tuples * |
| 2252 | clauselist_selectivity(root, |
| 2253 | quals, |
| 2254 | 0, |
| 2255 | JOIN_INNER, |
| 2256 | NULL)); |
| 2257 | } |
| 2258 | |
| 2259 | path->rows = output_tuples; |
| 2260 | path->startup_cost = startup_cost; |
| 2261 | path->total_cost = total_cost; |
| 2262 | } |
| 2263 | |
| 2264 | /* |
| 2265 | * cost_windowagg |
| 2266 | * Determines and returns the cost of performing a WindowAgg plan node, |
| 2267 | * including the cost of its input. |
| 2268 | * |
| 2269 | * Input is assumed already properly sorted. |
| 2270 | */ |
| 2271 | void |
| 2272 | cost_windowagg(Path *path, PlannerInfo *root, |
| 2273 | List *windowFuncs, int numPartCols, int numOrderCols, |
| 2274 | Cost input_startup_cost, Cost input_total_cost, |
| 2275 | double input_tuples) |
| 2276 | { |
| 2277 | Cost startup_cost; |
| 2278 | Cost total_cost; |
| 2279 | ListCell *lc; |
| 2280 | |
| 2281 | startup_cost = input_startup_cost; |
| 2282 | total_cost = input_total_cost; |
| 2283 | |
| 2284 | /* |
| 2285 | * Window functions are assumed to cost their stated execution cost, plus |
| 2286 | * the cost of evaluating their input expressions, per tuple. Since they |
| 2287 | * may in fact evaluate their inputs at multiple rows during each cycle, |
| 2288 | * this could be a drastic underestimate; but without a way to know how |
| 2289 | * many rows the window function will fetch, it's hard to do better. In |
| 2290 | * any case, it's a good estimate for all the built-in window functions, |
| 2291 | * so we'll just do this for now. |
| 2292 | */ |
| 2293 | foreach(lc, windowFuncs) |
| 2294 | { |
| 2295 | WindowFunc *wfunc = lfirst_node(WindowFunc, lc); |
| 2296 | Cost wfunccost; |
| 2297 | QualCost argcosts; |
| 2298 | |
| 2299 | argcosts.startup = argcosts.per_tuple = 0; |
| 2300 | add_function_cost(root, wfunc->winfnoid, (Node *) wfunc, |
| 2301 | &argcosts); |
| 2302 | startup_cost += argcosts.startup; |
| 2303 | wfunccost = argcosts.per_tuple; |
| 2304 | |
| 2305 | /* also add the input expressions' cost to per-input-row costs */ |
| 2306 | cost_qual_eval_node(&argcosts, (Node *) wfunc->args, root); |
| 2307 | startup_cost += argcosts.startup; |
| 2308 | wfunccost += argcosts.per_tuple; |
| 2309 | |
| 2310 | /* |
| 2311 | * Add the filter's cost to per-input-row costs. XXX We should reduce |
| 2312 | * input expression costs according to filter selectivity. |
| 2313 | */ |
| 2314 | cost_qual_eval_node(&argcosts, (Node *) wfunc->aggfilter, root); |
| 2315 | startup_cost += argcosts.startup; |
| 2316 | wfunccost += argcosts.per_tuple; |
| 2317 | |
| 2318 | total_cost += wfunccost * input_tuples; |
| 2319 | } |
| 2320 | |
| 2321 | /* |
| 2322 | * We also charge cpu_operator_cost per grouping column per tuple for |
| 2323 | * grouping comparisons, plus cpu_tuple_cost per tuple for general |
| 2324 | * overhead. |
| 2325 | * |
| 2326 | * XXX this neglects costs of spooling the data to disk when it overflows |
| 2327 | * work_mem. Sooner or later that should get accounted for. |
| 2328 | */ |
| 2329 | total_cost += cpu_operator_cost * (numPartCols + numOrderCols) * input_tuples; |
| 2330 | total_cost += cpu_tuple_cost * input_tuples; |
| 2331 | |
| 2332 | path->rows = input_tuples; |
| 2333 | path->startup_cost = startup_cost; |
| 2334 | path->total_cost = total_cost; |
| 2335 | } |
| 2336 | |
| 2337 | /* |
| 2338 | * cost_group |
| 2339 | * Determines and returns the cost of performing a Group plan node, |
| 2340 | * including the cost of its input. |
| 2341 | * |
| 2342 | * Note: caller must ensure that input costs are for appropriately-sorted |
| 2343 | * input. |
| 2344 | */ |
| 2345 | void |
| 2346 | cost_group(Path *path, PlannerInfo *root, |
| 2347 | int numGroupCols, double numGroups, |
| 2348 | List *quals, |
| 2349 | Cost input_startup_cost, Cost input_total_cost, |
| 2350 | double input_tuples) |
| 2351 | { |
| 2352 | double output_tuples; |
| 2353 | Cost startup_cost; |
| 2354 | Cost total_cost; |
| 2355 | |
| 2356 | output_tuples = numGroups; |
| 2357 | startup_cost = input_startup_cost; |
| 2358 | total_cost = input_total_cost; |
| 2359 | |
| 2360 | /* |
| 2361 | * Charge one cpu_operator_cost per comparison per input tuple. We assume |
| 2362 | * all columns get compared at most of the tuples. |
| 2363 | */ |
| 2364 | total_cost += cpu_operator_cost * input_tuples * numGroupCols; |
| 2365 | |
| 2366 | /* |
| 2367 | * If there are quals (HAVING quals), account for their cost and |
| 2368 | * selectivity. |
| 2369 | */ |
| 2370 | if (quals) |
| 2371 | { |
| 2372 | QualCost qual_cost; |
| 2373 | |
| 2374 | cost_qual_eval(&qual_cost, quals, root); |
| 2375 | startup_cost += qual_cost.startup; |
| 2376 | total_cost += qual_cost.startup + output_tuples * qual_cost.per_tuple; |
| 2377 | |
| 2378 | output_tuples = clamp_row_est(output_tuples * |
| 2379 | clauselist_selectivity(root, |
| 2380 | quals, |
| 2381 | 0, |
| 2382 | JOIN_INNER, |
| 2383 | NULL)); |
| 2384 | } |
| 2385 | |
| 2386 | path->rows = output_tuples; |
| 2387 | path->startup_cost = startup_cost; |
| 2388 | path->total_cost = total_cost; |
| 2389 | } |
| 2390 | |
| 2391 | /* |
| 2392 | * initial_cost_nestloop |
| 2393 | * Preliminary estimate of the cost of a nestloop join path. |
| 2394 | * |
| 2395 | * This must quickly produce lower-bound estimates of the path's startup and |
| 2396 | * total costs. If we are unable to eliminate the proposed path from |
| 2397 | * consideration using the lower bounds, final_cost_nestloop will be called |
| 2398 | * to obtain the final estimates. |
| 2399 | * |
| 2400 | * The exact division of labor between this function and final_cost_nestloop |
| 2401 | * is private to them, and represents a tradeoff between speed of the initial |
| 2402 | * estimate and getting a tight lower bound. We choose to not examine the |
| 2403 | * join quals here, since that's by far the most expensive part of the |
| 2404 | * calculations. The end result is that CPU-cost considerations must be |
| 2405 | * left for the second phase; and for SEMI/ANTI joins, we must also postpone |
| 2406 | * incorporation of the inner path's run cost. |
| 2407 | * |
| 2408 | * 'workspace' is to be filled with startup_cost, total_cost, and perhaps |
| 2409 | * other data to be used by final_cost_nestloop |
| 2410 | * 'jointype' is the type of join to be performed |
| 2411 | * 'outer_path' is the outer input to the join |
| 2412 | * 'inner_path' is the inner input to the join |
| 2413 | * 'extra' contains miscellaneous information about the join |
| 2414 | */ |
| 2415 | void |
| 2416 | initial_cost_nestloop(PlannerInfo *root, JoinCostWorkspace *workspace, |
| 2417 | JoinType jointype, |
| 2418 | Path *outer_path, Path *inner_path, |
| 2419 | JoinPathExtraData *) |
| 2420 | { |
| 2421 | Cost startup_cost = 0; |
| 2422 | Cost run_cost = 0; |
| 2423 | double outer_path_rows = outer_path->rows; |
| 2424 | Cost inner_rescan_start_cost; |
| 2425 | Cost inner_rescan_total_cost; |
| 2426 | Cost inner_run_cost; |
| 2427 | Cost inner_rescan_run_cost; |
| 2428 | |
| 2429 | /* estimate costs to rescan the inner relation */ |
| 2430 | cost_rescan(root, inner_path, |
| 2431 | &inner_rescan_start_cost, |
| 2432 | &inner_rescan_total_cost); |
| 2433 | |
| 2434 | /* cost of source data */ |
| 2435 | |
| 2436 | /* |
| 2437 | * NOTE: clearly, we must pay both outer and inner paths' startup_cost |
| 2438 | * before we can start returning tuples, so the join's startup cost is |
| 2439 | * their sum. We'll also pay the inner path's rescan startup cost |
| 2440 | * multiple times. |
| 2441 | */ |
| 2442 | startup_cost += outer_path->startup_cost + inner_path->startup_cost; |
| 2443 | run_cost += outer_path->total_cost - outer_path->startup_cost; |
| 2444 | if (outer_path_rows > 1) |
| 2445 | run_cost += (outer_path_rows - 1) * inner_rescan_start_cost; |
| 2446 | |
| 2447 | inner_run_cost = inner_path->total_cost - inner_path->startup_cost; |
| 2448 | inner_rescan_run_cost = inner_rescan_total_cost - inner_rescan_start_cost; |
| 2449 | |
| 2450 | if (jointype == JOIN_SEMI || jointype == JOIN_ANTI || |
| 2451 | extra->inner_unique) |
| 2452 | { |
| 2453 | /* |
| 2454 | * With a SEMI or ANTI join, or if the innerrel is known unique, the |
| 2455 | * executor will stop after the first match. |
| 2456 | * |
| 2457 | * Getting decent estimates requires inspection of the join quals, |
| 2458 | * which we choose to postpone to final_cost_nestloop. |
| 2459 | */ |
| 2460 | |
| 2461 | /* Save private data for final_cost_nestloop */ |
| 2462 | workspace->inner_run_cost = inner_run_cost; |
| 2463 | workspace->inner_rescan_run_cost = inner_rescan_run_cost; |
| 2464 | } |
| 2465 | else |
| 2466 | { |
| 2467 | /* Normal case; we'll scan whole input rel for each outer row */ |
| 2468 | run_cost += inner_run_cost; |
| 2469 | if (outer_path_rows > 1) |
| 2470 | run_cost += (outer_path_rows - 1) * inner_rescan_run_cost; |
| 2471 | } |
| 2472 | |
| 2473 | /* CPU costs left for later */ |
| 2474 | |
| 2475 | /* Public result fields */ |
| 2476 | workspace->startup_cost = startup_cost; |
| 2477 | workspace->total_cost = startup_cost + run_cost; |
| 2478 | /* Save private data for final_cost_nestloop */ |
| 2479 | workspace->run_cost = run_cost; |
| 2480 | } |
| 2481 | |
| 2482 | /* |
| 2483 | * final_cost_nestloop |
| 2484 | * Final estimate of the cost and result size of a nestloop join path. |
| 2485 | * |
| 2486 | * 'path' is already filled in except for the rows and cost fields |
| 2487 | * 'workspace' is the result from initial_cost_nestloop |
| 2488 | * 'extra' contains miscellaneous information about the join |
| 2489 | */ |
| 2490 | void |
| 2491 | final_cost_nestloop(PlannerInfo *root, NestPath *path, |
| 2492 | JoinCostWorkspace *workspace, |
| 2493 | JoinPathExtraData *) |
| 2494 | { |
| 2495 | Path *outer_path = path->outerjoinpath; |
| 2496 | Path *inner_path = path->innerjoinpath; |
| 2497 | double outer_path_rows = outer_path->rows; |
| 2498 | double inner_path_rows = inner_path->rows; |
| 2499 | Cost startup_cost = workspace->startup_cost; |
| 2500 | Cost run_cost = workspace->run_cost; |
| 2501 | Cost cpu_per_tuple; |
| 2502 | QualCost restrict_qual_cost; |
| 2503 | double ntuples; |
| 2504 | |
| 2505 | /* Protect some assumptions below that rowcounts aren't zero or NaN */ |
| 2506 | if (outer_path_rows <= 0 || isnan(outer_path_rows)) |
| 2507 | outer_path_rows = 1; |
| 2508 | if (inner_path_rows <= 0 || isnan(inner_path_rows)) |
| 2509 | inner_path_rows = 1; |
| 2510 | |
| 2511 | /* Mark the path with the correct row estimate */ |
| 2512 | if (path->path.param_info) |
| 2513 | path->path.rows = path->path.param_info->ppi_rows; |
| 2514 | else |
| 2515 | path->path.rows = path->path.parent->rows; |
| 2516 | |
| 2517 | /* For partial paths, scale row estimate. */ |
| 2518 | if (path->path.parallel_workers > 0) |
| 2519 | { |
| 2520 | double parallel_divisor = get_parallel_divisor(&path->path); |
| 2521 | |
| 2522 | path->path.rows = |
| 2523 | clamp_row_est(path->path.rows / parallel_divisor); |
| 2524 | } |
| 2525 | |
| 2526 | /* |
| 2527 | * We could include disable_cost in the preliminary estimate, but that |
| 2528 | * would amount to optimizing for the case where the join method is |
| 2529 | * disabled, which doesn't seem like the way to bet. |
| 2530 | */ |
| 2531 | if (!enable_nestloop) |
| 2532 | startup_cost += disable_cost; |
| 2533 | |
| 2534 | /* cost of inner-relation source data (we already dealt with outer rel) */ |
| 2535 | |
| 2536 | if (path->jointype == JOIN_SEMI || path->jointype == JOIN_ANTI || |
| 2537 | extra->inner_unique) |
| 2538 | { |
| 2539 | /* |
| 2540 | * With a SEMI or ANTI join, or if the innerrel is known unique, the |
| 2541 | * executor will stop after the first match. |
| 2542 | */ |
| 2543 | Cost inner_run_cost = workspace->inner_run_cost; |
| 2544 | Cost inner_rescan_run_cost = workspace->inner_rescan_run_cost; |
| 2545 | double outer_matched_rows; |
| 2546 | double outer_unmatched_rows; |
| 2547 | Selectivity inner_scan_frac; |
| 2548 | |
| 2549 | /* |
| 2550 | * For an outer-rel row that has at least one match, we can expect the |
| 2551 | * inner scan to stop after a fraction 1/(match_count+1) of the inner |
| 2552 | * rows, if the matches are evenly distributed. Since they probably |
| 2553 | * aren't quite evenly distributed, we apply a fuzz factor of 2.0 to |
| 2554 | * that fraction. (If we used a larger fuzz factor, we'd have to |
| 2555 | * clamp inner_scan_frac to at most 1.0; but since match_count is at |
| 2556 | * least 1, no such clamp is needed now.) |
| 2557 | */ |
| 2558 | outer_matched_rows = rint(outer_path_rows * extra->semifactors.outer_match_frac); |
| 2559 | outer_unmatched_rows = outer_path_rows - outer_matched_rows; |
| 2560 | inner_scan_frac = 2.0 / (extra->semifactors.match_count + 1.0); |
| 2561 | |
| 2562 | /* |
| 2563 | * Compute number of tuples processed (not number emitted!). First, |
| 2564 | * account for successfully-matched outer rows. |
| 2565 | */ |
| 2566 | ntuples = outer_matched_rows * inner_path_rows * inner_scan_frac; |
| 2567 | |
| 2568 | /* |
| 2569 | * Now we need to estimate the actual costs of scanning the inner |
| 2570 | * relation, which may be quite a bit less than N times inner_run_cost |
| 2571 | * due to early scan stops. We consider two cases. If the inner path |
| 2572 | * is an indexscan using all the joinquals as indexquals, then an |
| 2573 | * unmatched outer row results in an indexscan returning no rows, |
| 2574 | * which is probably quite cheap. Otherwise, the executor will have |
| 2575 | * to scan the whole inner rel for an unmatched row; not so cheap. |
| 2576 | */ |
| 2577 | if (has_indexed_join_quals(path)) |
| 2578 | { |
| 2579 | /* |
| 2580 | * Successfully-matched outer rows will only require scanning |
| 2581 | * inner_scan_frac of the inner relation. In this case, we don't |
| 2582 | * need to charge the full inner_run_cost even when that's more |
| 2583 | * than inner_rescan_run_cost, because we can assume that none of |
| 2584 | * the inner scans ever scan the whole inner relation. So it's |
| 2585 | * okay to assume that all the inner scan executions can be |
| 2586 | * fractions of the full cost, even if materialization is reducing |
| 2587 | * the rescan cost. At this writing, it's impossible to get here |
| 2588 | * for a materialized inner scan, so inner_run_cost and |
| 2589 | * inner_rescan_run_cost will be the same anyway; but just in |
| 2590 | * case, use inner_run_cost for the first matched tuple and |
| 2591 | * inner_rescan_run_cost for additional ones. |
| 2592 | */ |
| 2593 | run_cost += inner_run_cost * inner_scan_frac; |
| 2594 | if (outer_matched_rows > 1) |
| 2595 | run_cost += (outer_matched_rows - 1) * inner_rescan_run_cost * inner_scan_frac; |
| 2596 | |
| 2597 | /* |
| 2598 | * Add the cost of inner-scan executions for unmatched outer rows. |
| 2599 | * We estimate this as the same cost as returning the first tuple |
| 2600 | * of a nonempty scan. We consider that these are all rescans, |
| 2601 | * since we used inner_run_cost once already. |
| 2602 | */ |
| 2603 | run_cost += outer_unmatched_rows * |
| 2604 | inner_rescan_run_cost / inner_path_rows; |
| 2605 | |
| 2606 | /* |
| 2607 | * We won't be evaluating any quals at all for unmatched rows, so |
| 2608 | * don't add them to ntuples. |
| 2609 | */ |
| 2610 | } |
| 2611 | else |
| 2612 | { |
| 2613 | /* |
| 2614 | * Here, a complicating factor is that rescans may be cheaper than |
| 2615 | * first scans. If we never scan all the way to the end of the |
| 2616 | * inner rel, it might be (depending on the plan type) that we'd |
| 2617 | * never pay the whole inner first-scan run cost. However it is |
| 2618 | * difficult to estimate whether that will happen (and it could |
| 2619 | * not happen if there are any unmatched outer rows!), so be |
| 2620 | * conservative and always charge the whole first-scan cost once. |
| 2621 | * We consider this charge to correspond to the first unmatched |
| 2622 | * outer row, unless there isn't one in our estimate, in which |
| 2623 | * case blame it on the first matched row. |
| 2624 | */ |
| 2625 | |
| 2626 | /* First, count all unmatched join tuples as being processed */ |
| 2627 | ntuples += outer_unmatched_rows * inner_path_rows; |
| 2628 | |
| 2629 | /* Now add the forced full scan, and decrement appropriate count */ |
| 2630 | run_cost += inner_run_cost; |
| 2631 | if (outer_unmatched_rows >= 1) |
| 2632 | outer_unmatched_rows -= 1; |
| 2633 | else |
| 2634 | outer_matched_rows -= 1; |
| 2635 | |
| 2636 | /* Add inner run cost for additional outer tuples having matches */ |
| 2637 | if (outer_matched_rows > 0) |
| 2638 | run_cost += outer_matched_rows * inner_rescan_run_cost * inner_scan_frac; |
| 2639 | |
| 2640 | /* Add inner run cost for additional unmatched outer tuples */ |
| 2641 | if (outer_unmatched_rows > 0) |
| 2642 | run_cost += outer_unmatched_rows * inner_rescan_run_cost; |
| 2643 | } |
| 2644 | } |
| 2645 | else |
| 2646 | { |
| 2647 | /* Normal-case source costs were included in preliminary estimate */ |
| 2648 | |
| 2649 | /* Compute number of tuples processed (not number emitted!) */ |
| 2650 | ntuples = outer_path_rows * inner_path_rows; |
| 2651 | } |
| 2652 | |
| 2653 | /* CPU costs */ |
| 2654 | cost_qual_eval(&restrict_qual_cost, path->joinrestrictinfo, root); |
| 2655 | startup_cost += restrict_qual_cost.startup; |
| 2656 | cpu_per_tuple = cpu_tuple_cost + restrict_qual_cost.per_tuple; |
| 2657 | run_cost += cpu_per_tuple * ntuples; |
| 2658 | |
| 2659 | /* tlist eval costs are paid per output row, not per tuple scanned */ |
| 2660 | startup_cost += path->path.pathtarget->cost.startup; |
| 2661 | run_cost += path->path.pathtarget->cost.per_tuple * path->path.rows; |
| 2662 | |
| 2663 | path->path.startup_cost = startup_cost; |
| 2664 | path->path.total_cost = startup_cost + run_cost; |
| 2665 | } |
| 2666 | |
| 2667 | /* |
| 2668 | * initial_cost_mergejoin |
| 2669 | * Preliminary estimate of the cost of a mergejoin path. |
| 2670 | * |
| 2671 | * This must quickly produce lower-bound estimates of the path's startup and |
| 2672 | * total costs. If we are unable to eliminate the proposed path from |
| 2673 | * consideration using the lower bounds, final_cost_mergejoin will be called |
| 2674 | * to obtain the final estimates. |
| 2675 | * |
| 2676 | * The exact division of labor between this function and final_cost_mergejoin |
| 2677 | * is private to them, and represents a tradeoff between speed of the initial |
| 2678 | * estimate and getting a tight lower bound. We choose to not examine the |
| 2679 | * join quals here, except for obtaining the scan selectivity estimate which |
| 2680 | * is really essential (but fortunately, use of caching keeps the cost of |
| 2681 | * getting that down to something reasonable). |
| 2682 | * We also assume that cost_sort is cheap enough to use here. |
| 2683 | * |
| 2684 | * 'workspace' is to be filled with startup_cost, total_cost, and perhaps |
| 2685 | * other data to be used by final_cost_mergejoin |
| 2686 | * 'jointype' is the type of join to be performed |
| 2687 | * 'mergeclauses' is the list of joinclauses to be used as merge clauses |
| 2688 | * 'outer_path' is the outer input to the join |
| 2689 | * 'inner_path' is the inner input to the join |
| 2690 | * 'outersortkeys' is the list of sort keys for the outer path |
| 2691 | * 'innersortkeys' is the list of sort keys for the inner path |
| 2692 | * 'extra' contains miscellaneous information about the join |
| 2693 | * |
| 2694 | * Note: outersortkeys and innersortkeys should be NIL if no explicit |
| 2695 | * sort is needed because the respective source path is already ordered. |
| 2696 | */ |
| 2697 | void |
| 2698 | initial_cost_mergejoin(PlannerInfo *root, JoinCostWorkspace *workspace, |
| 2699 | JoinType jointype, |
| 2700 | List *mergeclauses, |
| 2701 | Path *outer_path, Path *inner_path, |
| 2702 | List *outersortkeys, List *innersortkeys, |
| 2703 | JoinPathExtraData *) |
| 2704 | { |
| 2705 | Cost startup_cost = 0; |
| 2706 | Cost run_cost = 0; |
| 2707 | double outer_path_rows = outer_path->rows; |
| 2708 | double inner_path_rows = inner_path->rows; |
| 2709 | Cost inner_run_cost; |
| 2710 | double outer_rows, |
| 2711 | inner_rows, |
| 2712 | outer_skip_rows, |
| 2713 | inner_skip_rows; |
| 2714 | Selectivity outerstartsel, |
| 2715 | outerendsel, |
| 2716 | innerstartsel, |
| 2717 | innerendsel; |
| 2718 | Path sort_path; /* dummy for result of cost_sort */ |
| 2719 | |
| 2720 | /* Protect some assumptions below that rowcounts aren't zero or NaN */ |
| 2721 | if (outer_path_rows <= 0 || isnan(outer_path_rows)) |
| 2722 | outer_path_rows = 1; |
| 2723 | if (inner_path_rows <= 0 || isnan(inner_path_rows)) |
| 2724 | inner_path_rows = 1; |
| 2725 | |
| 2726 | /* |
| 2727 | * A merge join will stop as soon as it exhausts either input stream |
| 2728 | * (unless it's an outer join, in which case the outer side has to be |
| 2729 | * scanned all the way anyway). Estimate fraction of the left and right |
| 2730 | * inputs that will actually need to be scanned. Likewise, we can |
| 2731 | * estimate the number of rows that will be skipped before the first join |
| 2732 | * pair is found, which should be factored into startup cost. We use only |
| 2733 | * the first (most significant) merge clause for this purpose. Since |
| 2734 | * mergejoinscansel() is a fairly expensive computation, we cache the |
| 2735 | * results in the merge clause RestrictInfo. |
| 2736 | */ |
| 2737 | if (mergeclauses && jointype != JOIN_FULL) |
| 2738 | { |
| 2739 | RestrictInfo *firstclause = (RestrictInfo *) linitial(mergeclauses); |
| 2740 | List *opathkeys; |
| 2741 | List *ipathkeys; |
| 2742 | PathKey *opathkey; |
| 2743 | PathKey *ipathkey; |
| 2744 | MergeScanSelCache *cache; |
| 2745 | |
| 2746 | /* Get the input pathkeys to determine the sort-order details */ |
| 2747 | opathkeys = outersortkeys ? outersortkeys : outer_path->pathkeys; |
| 2748 | ipathkeys = innersortkeys ? innersortkeys : inner_path->pathkeys; |
| 2749 | Assert(opathkeys); |
| 2750 | Assert(ipathkeys); |
| 2751 | opathkey = (PathKey *) linitial(opathkeys); |
| 2752 | ipathkey = (PathKey *) linitial(ipathkeys); |
| 2753 | /* debugging check */ |
| 2754 | if (opathkey->pk_opfamily != ipathkey->pk_opfamily || |
| 2755 | opathkey->pk_eclass->ec_collation != ipathkey->pk_eclass->ec_collation || |
| 2756 | opathkey->pk_strategy != ipathkey->pk_strategy || |
| 2757 | opathkey->pk_nulls_first != ipathkey->pk_nulls_first) |
| 2758 | elog(ERROR, "left and right pathkeys do not match in mergejoin" ); |
| 2759 | |
| 2760 | /* Get the selectivity with caching */ |
| 2761 | cache = cached_scansel(root, firstclause, opathkey); |
| 2762 | |
| 2763 | if (bms_is_subset(firstclause->left_relids, |
| 2764 | outer_path->parent->relids)) |
| 2765 | { |
| 2766 | /* left side of clause is outer */ |
| 2767 | outerstartsel = cache->leftstartsel; |
| 2768 | outerendsel = cache->leftendsel; |
| 2769 | innerstartsel = cache->rightstartsel; |
| 2770 | innerendsel = cache->rightendsel; |
| 2771 | } |
| 2772 | else |
| 2773 | { |
| 2774 | /* left side of clause is inner */ |
| 2775 | outerstartsel = cache->rightstartsel; |
| 2776 | outerendsel = cache->rightendsel; |
| 2777 | innerstartsel = cache->leftstartsel; |
| 2778 | innerendsel = cache->leftendsel; |
| 2779 | } |
| 2780 | if (jointype == JOIN_LEFT || |
| 2781 | jointype == JOIN_ANTI) |
| 2782 | { |
| 2783 | outerstartsel = 0.0; |
| 2784 | outerendsel = 1.0; |
| 2785 | } |
| 2786 | else if (jointype == JOIN_RIGHT) |
| 2787 | { |
| 2788 | innerstartsel = 0.0; |
| 2789 | innerendsel = 1.0; |
| 2790 | } |
| 2791 | } |
| 2792 | else |
| 2793 | { |
| 2794 | /* cope with clauseless or full mergejoin */ |
| 2795 | outerstartsel = innerstartsel = 0.0; |
| 2796 | outerendsel = innerendsel = 1.0; |
| 2797 | } |
| 2798 | |
| 2799 | /* |
| 2800 | * Convert selectivities to row counts. We force outer_rows and |
| 2801 | * inner_rows to be at least 1, but the skip_rows estimates can be zero. |
| 2802 | */ |
| 2803 | outer_skip_rows = rint(outer_path_rows * outerstartsel); |
| 2804 | inner_skip_rows = rint(inner_path_rows * innerstartsel); |
| 2805 | outer_rows = clamp_row_est(outer_path_rows * outerendsel); |
| 2806 | inner_rows = clamp_row_est(inner_path_rows * innerendsel); |
| 2807 | |
| 2808 | Assert(outer_skip_rows <= outer_rows); |
| 2809 | Assert(inner_skip_rows <= inner_rows); |
| 2810 | |
| 2811 | /* |
| 2812 | * Readjust scan selectivities to account for above rounding. This is |
| 2813 | * normally an insignificant effect, but when there are only a few rows in |
| 2814 | * the inputs, failing to do this makes for a large percentage error. |
| 2815 | */ |
| 2816 | outerstartsel = outer_skip_rows / outer_path_rows; |
| 2817 | innerstartsel = inner_skip_rows / inner_path_rows; |
| 2818 | outerendsel = outer_rows / outer_path_rows; |
| 2819 | innerendsel = inner_rows / inner_path_rows; |
| 2820 | |
| 2821 | Assert(outerstartsel <= outerendsel); |
| 2822 | Assert(innerstartsel <= innerendsel); |
| 2823 | |
| 2824 | /* cost of source data */ |
| 2825 | |
| 2826 | if (outersortkeys) /* do we need to sort outer? */ |
| 2827 | { |
| 2828 | cost_sort(&sort_path, |
| 2829 | root, |
| 2830 | outersortkeys, |
| 2831 | outer_path->total_cost, |
| 2832 | outer_path_rows, |
| 2833 | outer_path->pathtarget->width, |
| 2834 | 0.0, |
| 2835 | work_mem, |
| 2836 | -1.0); |
| 2837 | startup_cost += sort_path.startup_cost; |
| 2838 | startup_cost += (sort_path.total_cost - sort_path.startup_cost) |
| 2839 | * outerstartsel; |
| 2840 | run_cost += (sort_path.total_cost - sort_path.startup_cost) |
| 2841 | * (outerendsel - outerstartsel); |
| 2842 | } |
| 2843 | else |
| 2844 | { |
| 2845 | startup_cost += outer_path->startup_cost; |
| 2846 | startup_cost += (outer_path->total_cost - outer_path->startup_cost) |
| 2847 | * outerstartsel; |
| 2848 | run_cost += (outer_path->total_cost - outer_path->startup_cost) |
| 2849 | * (outerendsel - outerstartsel); |
| 2850 | } |
| 2851 | |
| 2852 | if (innersortkeys) /* do we need to sort inner? */ |
| 2853 | { |
| 2854 | cost_sort(&sort_path, |
| 2855 | root, |
| 2856 | innersortkeys, |
| 2857 | inner_path->total_cost, |
| 2858 | inner_path_rows, |
| 2859 | inner_path->pathtarget->width, |
| 2860 | 0.0, |
| 2861 | work_mem, |
| 2862 | -1.0); |
| 2863 | startup_cost += sort_path.startup_cost; |
| 2864 | startup_cost += (sort_path.total_cost - sort_path.startup_cost) |
| 2865 | * innerstartsel; |
| 2866 | inner_run_cost = (sort_path.total_cost - sort_path.startup_cost) |
| 2867 | * (innerendsel - innerstartsel); |
| 2868 | } |
| 2869 | else |
| 2870 | { |
| 2871 | startup_cost += inner_path->startup_cost; |
| 2872 | startup_cost += (inner_path->total_cost - inner_path->startup_cost) |
| 2873 | * innerstartsel; |
| 2874 | inner_run_cost = (inner_path->total_cost - inner_path->startup_cost) |
| 2875 | * (innerendsel - innerstartsel); |
| 2876 | } |
| 2877 | |
| 2878 | /* |
| 2879 | * We can't yet determine whether rescanning occurs, or whether |
| 2880 | * materialization of the inner input should be done. The minimum |
| 2881 | * possible inner input cost, regardless of rescan and materialization |
| 2882 | * considerations, is inner_run_cost. We include that in |
| 2883 | * workspace->total_cost, but not yet in run_cost. |
| 2884 | */ |
| 2885 | |
| 2886 | /* CPU costs left for later */ |
| 2887 | |
| 2888 | /* Public result fields */ |
| 2889 | workspace->startup_cost = startup_cost; |
| 2890 | workspace->total_cost = startup_cost + run_cost + inner_run_cost; |
| 2891 | /* Save private data for final_cost_mergejoin */ |
| 2892 | workspace->run_cost = run_cost; |
| 2893 | workspace->inner_run_cost = inner_run_cost; |
| 2894 | workspace->outer_rows = outer_rows; |
| 2895 | workspace->inner_rows = inner_rows; |
| 2896 | workspace->outer_skip_rows = outer_skip_rows; |
| 2897 | workspace->inner_skip_rows = inner_skip_rows; |
| 2898 | } |
| 2899 | |
| 2900 | /* |
| 2901 | * final_cost_mergejoin |
| 2902 | * Final estimate of the cost and result size of a mergejoin path. |
| 2903 | * |
| 2904 | * Unlike other costsize functions, this routine makes two actual decisions: |
| 2905 | * whether the executor will need to do mark/restore, and whether we should |
| 2906 | * materialize the inner path. It would be logically cleaner to build |
| 2907 | * separate paths testing these alternatives, but that would require repeating |
| 2908 | * most of the cost calculations, which are not all that cheap. Since the |
| 2909 | * choice will not affect output pathkeys or startup cost, only total cost, |
| 2910 | * there is no possibility of wanting to keep more than one path. So it seems |
| 2911 | * best to make the decisions here and record them in the path's |
| 2912 | * skip_mark_restore and materialize_inner fields. |
| 2913 | * |
| 2914 | * Mark/restore overhead is usually required, but can be skipped if we know |
| 2915 | * that the executor need find only one match per outer tuple, and that the |
| 2916 | * mergeclauses are sufficient to identify a match. |
| 2917 | * |
| 2918 | * We materialize the inner path if we need mark/restore and either the inner |
| 2919 | * path can't support mark/restore, or it's cheaper to use an interposed |
| 2920 | * Material node to handle mark/restore. |
| 2921 | * |
| 2922 | * 'path' is already filled in except for the rows and cost fields and |
| 2923 | * skip_mark_restore and materialize_inner |
| 2924 | * 'workspace' is the result from initial_cost_mergejoin |
| 2925 | * 'extra' contains miscellaneous information about the join |
| 2926 | */ |
| 2927 | void |
| 2928 | final_cost_mergejoin(PlannerInfo *root, MergePath *path, |
| 2929 | JoinCostWorkspace *workspace, |
| 2930 | JoinPathExtraData *) |
| 2931 | { |
| 2932 | Path *outer_path = path->jpath.outerjoinpath; |
| 2933 | Path *inner_path = path->jpath.innerjoinpath; |
| 2934 | double inner_path_rows = inner_path->rows; |
| 2935 | List *mergeclauses = path->path_mergeclauses; |
| 2936 | List *innersortkeys = path->innersortkeys; |
| 2937 | Cost startup_cost = workspace->startup_cost; |
| 2938 | Cost run_cost = workspace->run_cost; |
| 2939 | Cost inner_run_cost = workspace->inner_run_cost; |
| 2940 | double outer_rows = workspace->outer_rows; |
| 2941 | double inner_rows = workspace->inner_rows; |
| 2942 | double outer_skip_rows = workspace->outer_skip_rows; |
| 2943 | double inner_skip_rows = workspace->inner_skip_rows; |
| 2944 | Cost cpu_per_tuple, |
| 2945 | bare_inner_cost, |
| 2946 | mat_inner_cost; |
| 2947 | QualCost merge_qual_cost; |
| 2948 | QualCost qp_qual_cost; |
| 2949 | double mergejointuples, |
| 2950 | rescannedtuples; |
| 2951 | double rescanratio; |
| 2952 | |
| 2953 | /* Protect some assumptions below that rowcounts aren't zero or NaN */ |
| 2954 | if (inner_path_rows <= 0 || isnan(inner_path_rows)) |
| 2955 | inner_path_rows = 1; |
| 2956 | |
| 2957 | /* Mark the path with the correct row estimate */ |
| 2958 | if (path->jpath.path.param_info) |
| 2959 | path->jpath.path.rows = path->jpath.path.param_info->ppi_rows; |
| 2960 | else |
| 2961 | path->jpath.path.rows = path->jpath.path.parent->rows; |
| 2962 | |
| 2963 | /* For partial paths, scale row estimate. */ |
| 2964 | if (path->jpath.path.parallel_workers > 0) |
| 2965 | { |
| 2966 | double parallel_divisor = get_parallel_divisor(&path->jpath.path); |
| 2967 | |
| 2968 | path->jpath.path.rows = |
| 2969 | clamp_row_est(path->jpath.path.rows / parallel_divisor); |
| 2970 | } |
| 2971 | |
| 2972 | /* |
| 2973 | * We could include disable_cost in the preliminary estimate, but that |
| 2974 | * would amount to optimizing for the case where the join method is |
| 2975 | * disabled, which doesn't seem like the way to bet. |
| 2976 | */ |
| 2977 | if (!enable_mergejoin) |
| 2978 | startup_cost += disable_cost; |
| 2979 | |
| 2980 | /* |
| 2981 | * Compute cost of the mergequals and qpquals (other restriction clauses) |
| 2982 | * separately. |
| 2983 | */ |
| 2984 | cost_qual_eval(&merge_qual_cost, mergeclauses, root); |
| 2985 | cost_qual_eval(&qp_qual_cost, path->jpath.joinrestrictinfo, root); |
| 2986 | qp_qual_cost.startup -= merge_qual_cost.startup; |
| 2987 | qp_qual_cost.per_tuple -= merge_qual_cost.per_tuple; |
| 2988 | |
| 2989 | /* |
| 2990 | * With a SEMI or ANTI join, or if the innerrel is known unique, the |
| 2991 | * executor will stop scanning for matches after the first match. When |
| 2992 | * all the joinclauses are merge clauses, this means we don't ever need to |
| 2993 | * back up the merge, and so we can skip mark/restore overhead. |
| 2994 | */ |
| 2995 | if ((path->jpath.jointype == JOIN_SEMI || |
| 2996 | path->jpath.jointype == JOIN_ANTI || |
| 2997 | extra->inner_unique) && |
| 2998 | (list_length(path->jpath.joinrestrictinfo) == |
| 2999 | list_length(path->path_mergeclauses))) |
| 3000 | path->skip_mark_restore = true; |
| 3001 | else |
| 3002 | path->skip_mark_restore = false; |
| 3003 | |
| 3004 | /* |
| 3005 | * Get approx # tuples passing the mergequals. We use approx_tuple_count |
| 3006 | * here because we need an estimate done with JOIN_INNER semantics. |
| 3007 | */ |
| 3008 | mergejointuples = approx_tuple_count(root, &path->jpath, mergeclauses); |
| 3009 | |
| 3010 | /* |
| 3011 | * When there are equal merge keys in the outer relation, the mergejoin |
| 3012 | * must rescan any matching tuples in the inner relation. This means |
| 3013 | * re-fetching inner tuples; we have to estimate how often that happens. |
| 3014 | * |
| 3015 | * For regular inner and outer joins, the number of re-fetches can be |
| 3016 | * estimated approximately as size of merge join output minus size of |
| 3017 | * inner relation. Assume that the distinct key values are 1, 2, ..., and |
| 3018 | * denote the number of values of each key in the outer relation as m1, |
| 3019 | * m2, ...; in the inner relation, n1, n2, ... Then we have |
| 3020 | * |
| 3021 | * size of join = m1 * n1 + m2 * n2 + ... |
| 3022 | * |
| 3023 | * number of rescanned tuples = (m1 - 1) * n1 + (m2 - 1) * n2 + ... = m1 * |
| 3024 | * n1 + m2 * n2 + ... - (n1 + n2 + ...) = size of join - size of inner |
| 3025 | * relation |
| 3026 | * |
| 3027 | * This equation works correctly for outer tuples having no inner match |
| 3028 | * (nk = 0), but not for inner tuples having no outer match (mk = 0); we |
| 3029 | * are effectively subtracting those from the number of rescanned tuples, |
| 3030 | * when we should not. Can we do better without expensive selectivity |
| 3031 | * computations? |
| 3032 | * |
| 3033 | * The whole issue is moot if we are working from a unique-ified outer |
| 3034 | * input, or if we know we don't need to mark/restore at all. |
| 3035 | */ |
| 3036 | if (IsA(outer_path, UniquePath) ||path->skip_mark_restore) |
| 3037 | rescannedtuples = 0; |
| 3038 | else |
| 3039 | { |
| 3040 | rescannedtuples = mergejointuples - inner_path_rows; |
| 3041 | /* Must clamp because of possible underestimate */ |
| 3042 | if (rescannedtuples < 0) |
| 3043 | rescannedtuples = 0; |
| 3044 | } |
| 3045 | |
| 3046 | /* |
| 3047 | * We'll inflate various costs this much to account for rescanning. Note |
| 3048 | * that this is to be multiplied by something involving inner_rows, or |
| 3049 | * another number related to the portion of the inner rel we'll scan. |
| 3050 | */ |
| 3051 | rescanratio = 1.0 + (rescannedtuples / inner_rows); |
| 3052 | |
| 3053 | /* |
| 3054 | * Decide whether we want to materialize the inner input to shield it from |
| 3055 | * mark/restore and performing re-fetches. Our cost model for regular |
| 3056 | * re-fetches is that a re-fetch costs the same as an original fetch, |
| 3057 | * which is probably an overestimate; but on the other hand we ignore the |
| 3058 | * bookkeeping costs of mark/restore. Not clear if it's worth developing |
| 3059 | * a more refined model. So we just need to inflate the inner run cost by |
| 3060 | * rescanratio. |
| 3061 | */ |
| 3062 | bare_inner_cost = inner_run_cost * rescanratio; |
| 3063 | |
| 3064 | /* |
| 3065 | * When we interpose a Material node the re-fetch cost is assumed to be |
| 3066 | * just cpu_operator_cost per tuple, independently of the underlying |
| 3067 | * plan's cost; and we charge an extra cpu_operator_cost per original |
| 3068 | * fetch as well. Note that we're assuming the materialize node will |
| 3069 | * never spill to disk, since it only has to remember tuples back to the |
| 3070 | * last mark. (If there are a huge number of duplicates, our other cost |
| 3071 | * factors will make the path so expensive that it probably won't get |
| 3072 | * chosen anyway.) So we don't use cost_rescan here. |
| 3073 | * |
| 3074 | * Note: keep this estimate in sync with create_mergejoin_plan's labeling |
| 3075 | * of the generated Material node. |
| 3076 | */ |
| 3077 | mat_inner_cost = inner_run_cost + |
| 3078 | cpu_operator_cost * inner_rows * rescanratio; |
| 3079 | |
| 3080 | /* |
| 3081 | * If we don't need mark/restore at all, we don't need materialization. |
| 3082 | */ |
| 3083 | if (path->skip_mark_restore) |
| 3084 | path->materialize_inner = false; |
| 3085 | |
| 3086 | /* |
| 3087 | * Prefer materializing if it looks cheaper, unless the user has asked to |
| 3088 | * suppress materialization. |
| 3089 | */ |
| 3090 | else if (enable_material && mat_inner_cost < bare_inner_cost) |
| 3091 | path->materialize_inner = true; |
| 3092 | |
| 3093 | /* |
| 3094 | * Even if materializing doesn't look cheaper, we *must* do it if the |
| 3095 | * inner path is to be used directly (without sorting) and it doesn't |
| 3096 | * support mark/restore. |
| 3097 | * |
| 3098 | * Since the inner side must be ordered, and only Sorts and IndexScans can |
| 3099 | * create order to begin with, and they both support mark/restore, you |
| 3100 | * might think there's no problem --- but you'd be wrong. Nestloop and |
| 3101 | * merge joins can *preserve* the order of their inputs, so they can be |
| 3102 | * selected as the input of a mergejoin, and they don't support |
| 3103 | * mark/restore at present. |
| 3104 | * |
| 3105 | * We don't test the value of enable_material here, because |
| 3106 | * materialization is required for correctness in this case, and turning |
| 3107 | * it off does not entitle us to deliver an invalid plan. |
| 3108 | */ |
| 3109 | else if (innersortkeys == NIL && |
| 3110 | !ExecSupportsMarkRestore(inner_path)) |
| 3111 | path->materialize_inner = true; |
| 3112 | |
| 3113 | /* |
| 3114 | * Also, force materializing if the inner path is to be sorted and the |
| 3115 | * sort is expected to spill to disk. This is because the final merge |
| 3116 | * pass can be done on-the-fly if it doesn't have to support mark/restore. |
| 3117 | * We don't try to adjust the cost estimates for this consideration, |
| 3118 | * though. |
| 3119 | * |
| 3120 | * Since materialization is a performance optimization in this case, |
| 3121 | * rather than necessary for correctness, we skip it if enable_material is |
| 3122 | * off. |
| 3123 | */ |
| 3124 | else if (enable_material && innersortkeys != NIL && |
| 3125 | relation_byte_size(inner_path_rows, |
| 3126 | inner_path->pathtarget->width) > |
| 3127 | (work_mem * 1024L)) |
| 3128 | path->materialize_inner = true; |
| 3129 | else |
| 3130 | path->materialize_inner = false; |
| 3131 | |
| 3132 | /* Charge the right incremental cost for the chosen case */ |
| 3133 | if (path->materialize_inner) |
| 3134 | run_cost += mat_inner_cost; |
| 3135 | else |
| 3136 | run_cost += bare_inner_cost; |
| 3137 | |
| 3138 | /* CPU costs */ |
| 3139 | |
| 3140 | /* |
| 3141 | * The number of tuple comparisons needed is approximately number of outer |
| 3142 | * rows plus number of inner rows plus number of rescanned tuples (can we |
| 3143 | * refine this?). At each one, we need to evaluate the mergejoin quals. |
| 3144 | */ |
| 3145 | startup_cost += merge_qual_cost.startup; |
| 3146 | startup_cost += merge_qual_cost.per_tuple * |
| 3147 | (outer_skip_rows + inner_skip_rows * rescanratio); |
| 3148 | run_cost += merge_qual_cost.per_tuple * |
| 3149 | ((outer_rows - outer_skip_rows) + |
| 3150 | (inner_rows - inner_skip_rows) * rescanratio); |
| 3151 | |
| 3152 | /* |
| 3153 | * For each tuple that gets through the mergejoin proper, we charge |
| 3154 | * cpu_tuple_cost plus the cost of evaluating additional restriction |
| 3155 | * clauses that are to be applied at the join. (This is pessimistic since |
| 3156 | * not all of the quals may get evaluated at each tuple.) |
| 3157 | * |
| 3158 | * Note: we could adjust for SEMI/ANTI joins skipping some qual |
| 3159 | * evaluations here, but it's probably not worth the trouble. |
| 3160 | */ |
| 3161 | startup_cost += qp_qual_cost.startup; |
| 3162 | cpu_per_tuple = cpu_tuple_cost + qp_qual_cost.per_tuple; |
| 3163 | run_cost += cpu_per_tuple * mergejointuples; |
| 3164 | |
| 3165 | /* tlist eval costs are paid per output row, not per tuple scanned */ |
| 3166 | startup_cost += path->jpath.path.pathtarget->cost.startup; |
| 3167 | run_cost += path->jpath.path.pathtarget->cost.per_tuple * path->jpath.path.rows; |
| 3168 | |
| 3169 | path->jpath.path.startup_cost = startup_cost; |
| 3170 | path->jpath.path.total_cost = startup_cost + run_cost; |
| 3171 | } |
| 3172 | |
| 3173 | /* |
| 3174 | * run mergejoinscansel() with caching |
| 3175 | */ |
| 3176 | static MergeScanSelCache * |
| 3177 | cached_scansel(PlannerInfo *root, RestrictInfo *rinfo, PathKey *pathkey) |
| 3178 | { |
| 3179 | MergeScanSelCache *cache; |
| 3180 | ListCell *lc; |
| 3181 | Selectivity leftstartsel, |
| 3182 | leftendsel, |
| 3183 | rightstartsel, |
| 3184 | rightendsel; |
| 3185 | MemoryContext oldcontext; |
| 3186 | |
| 3187 | /* Do we have this result already? */ |
| 3188 | foreach(lc, rinfo->scansel_cache) |
| 3189 | { |
| 3190 | cache = (MergeScanSelCache *) lfirst(lc); |
| 3191 | if (cache->opfamily == pathkey->pk_opfamily && |
| 3192 | cache->collation == pathkey->pk_eclass->ec_collation && |
| 3193 | cache->strategy == pathkey->pk_strategy && |
| 3194 | cache->nulls_first == pathkey->pk_nulls_first) |
| 3195 | return cache; |
| 3196 | } |
| 3197 | |
| 3198 | /* Nope, do the computation */ |
| 3199 | mergejoinscansel(root, |
| 3200 | (Node *) rinfo->clause, |
| 3201 | pathkey->pk_opfamily, |
| 3202 | pathkey->pk_strategy, |
| 3203 | pathkey->pk_nulls_first, |
| 3204 | &leftstartsel, |
| 3205 | &leftendsel, |
| 3206 | &rightstartsel, |
| 3207 | &rightendsel); |
| 3208 | |
| 3209 | /* Cache the result in suitably long-lived workspace */ |
| 3210 | oldcontext = MemoryContextSwitchTo(root->planner_cxt); |
| 3211 | |
| 3212 | cache = (MergeScanSelCache *) palloc(sizeof(MergeScanSelCache)); |
| 3213 | cache->opfamily = pathkey->pk_opfamily; |
| 3214 | cache->collation = pathkey->pk_eclass->ec_collation; |
| 3215 | cache->strategy = pathkey->pk_strategy; |
| 3216 | cache->nulls_first = pathkey->pk_nulls_first; |
| 3217 | cache->leftstartsel = leftstartsel; |
| 3218 | cache->leftendsel = leftendsel; |
| 3219 | cache->rightstartsel = rightstartsel; |
| 3220 | cache->rightendsel = rightendsel; |
| 3221 | |
| 3222 | rinfo->scansel_cache = lappend(rinfo->scansel_cache, cache); |
| 3223 | |
| 3224 | MemoryContextSwitchTo(oldcontext); |
| 3225 | |
| 3226 | return cache; |
| 3227 | } |
| 3228 | |
| 3229 | /* |
| 3230 | * initial_cost_hashjoin |
| 3231 | * Preliminary estimate of the cost of a hashjoin path. |
| 3232 | * |
| 3233 | * This must quickly produce lower-bound estimates of the path's startup and |
| 3234 | * total costs. If we are unable to eliminate the proposed path from |
| 3235 | * consideration using the lower bounds, final_cost_hashjoin will be called |
| 3236 | * to obtain the final estimates. |
| 3237 | * |
| 3238 | * The exact division of labor between this function and final_cost_hashjoin |
| 3239 | * is private to them, and represents a tradeoff between speed of the initial |
| 3240 | * estimate and getting a tight lower bound. We choose to not examine the |
| 3241 | * join quals here (other than by counting the number of hash clauses), |
| 3242 | * so we can't do much with CPU costs. We do assume that |
| 3243 | * ExecChooseHashTableSize is cheap enough to use here. |
| 3244 | * |
| 3245 | * 'workspace' is to be filled with startup_cost, total_cost, and perhaps |
| 3246 | * other data to be used by final_cost_hashjoin |
| 3247 | * 'jointype' is the type of join to be performed |
| 3248 | * 'hashclauses' is the list of joinclauses to be used as hash clauses |
| 3249 | * 'outer_path' is the outer input to the join |
| 3250 | * 'inner_path' is the inner input to the join |
| 3251 | * 'extra' contains miscellaneous information about the join |
| 3252 | * 'parallel_hash' indicates that inner_path is partial and that a shared |
| 3253 | * hash table will be built in parallel |
| 3254 | */ |
| 3255 | void |
| 3256 | initial_cost_hashjoin(PlannerInfo *root, JoinCostWorkspace *workspace, |
| 3257 | JoinType jointype, |
| 3258 | List *hashclauses, |
| 3259 | Path *outer_path, Path *inner_path, |
| 3260 | JoinPathExtraData *, |
| 3261 | bool parallel_hash) |
| 3262 | { |
| 3263 | Cost startup_cost = 0; |
| 3264 | Cost run_cost = 0; |
| 3265 | double outer_path_rows = outer_path->rows; |
| 3266 | double inner_path_rows = inner_path->rows; |
| 3267 | double inner_path_rows_total = inner_path_rows; |
| 3268 | int num_hashclauses = list_length(hashclauses); |
| 3269 | int numbuckets; |
| 3270 | int numbatches; |
| 3271 | int num_skew_mcvs; |
| 3272 | size_t space_allowed; /* unused */ |
| 3273 | |
| 3274 | /* cost of source data */ |
| 3275 | startup_cost += outer_path->startup_cost; |
| 3276 | run_cost += outer_path->total_cost - outer_path->startup_cost; |
| 3277 | startup_cost += inner_path->total_cost; |
| 3278 | |
| 3279 | /* |
| 3280 | * Cost of computing hash function: must do it once per input tuple. We |
| 3281 | * charge one cpu_operator_cost for each column's hash function. Also, |
| 3282 | * tack on one cpu_tuple_cost per inner row, to model the costs of |
| 3283 | * inserting the row into the hashtable. |
| 3284 | * |
| 3285 | * XXX when a hashclause is more complex than a single operator, we really |
| 3286 | * should charge the extra eval costs of the left or right side, as |
| 3287 | * appropriate, here. This seems more work than it's worth at the moment. |
| 3288 | */ |
| 3289 | startup_cost += (cpu_operator_cost * num_hashclauses + cpu_tuple_cost) |
| 3290 | * inner_path_rows; |
| 3291 | run_cost += cpu_operator_cost * num_hashclauses * outer_path_rows; |
| 3292 | |
| 3293 | /* |
| 3294 | * If this is a parallel hash build, then the value we have for |
| 3295 | * inner_rows_total currently refers only to the rows returned by each |
| 3296 | * participant. For shared hash table size estimation, we need the total |
| 3297 | * number, so we need to undo the division. |
| 3298 | */ |
| 3299 | if (parallel_hash) |
| 3300 | inner_path_rows_total *= get_parallel_divisor(inner_path); |
| 3301 | |
| 3302 | /* |
| 3303 | * Get hash table size that executor would use for inner relation. |
| 3304 | * |
| 3305 | * XXX for the moment, always assume that skew optimization will be |
| 3306 | * performed. As long as SKEW_WORK_MEM_PERCENT is small, it's not worth |
| 3307 | * trying to determine that for sure. |
| 3308 | * |
| 3309 | * XXX at some point it might be interesting to try to account for skew |
| 3310 | * optimization in the cost estimate, but for now, we don't. |
| 3311 | */ |
| 3312 | ExecChooseHashTableSize(inner_path_rows_total, |
| 3313 | inner_path->pathtarget->width, |
| 3314 | true, /* useskew */ |
| 3315 | parallel_hash, /* try_combined_work_mem */ |
| 3316 | outer_path->parallel_workers, |
| 3317 | &space_allowed, |
| 3318 | &numbuckets, |
| 3319 | &numbatches, |
| 3320 | &num_skew_mcvs); |
| 3321 | |
| 3322 | /* |
| 3323 | * If inner relation is too big then we will need to "batch" the join, |
| 3324 | * which implies writing and reading most of the tuples to disk an extra |
| 3325 | * time. Charge seq_page_cost per page, since the I/O should be nice and |
| 3326 | * sequential. Writing the inner rel counts as startup cost, all the rest |
| 3327 | * as run cost. |
| 3328 | */ |
| 3329 | if (numbatches > 1) |
| 3330 | { |
| 3331 | double outerpages = page_size(outer_path_rows, |
| 3332 | outer_path->pathtarget->width); |
| 3333 | double innerpages = page_size(inner_path_rows, |
| 3334 | inner_path->pathtarget->width); |
| 3335 | |
| 3336 | startup_cost += seq_page_cost * innerpages; |
| 3337 | run_cost += seq_page_cost * (innerpages + 2 * outerpages); |
| 3338 | } |
| 3339 | |
| 3340 | /* CPU costs left for later */ |
| 3341 | |
| 3342 | /* Public result fields */ |
| 3343 | workspace->startup_cost = startup_cost; |
| 3344 | workspace->total_cost = startup_cost + run_cost; |
| 3345 | /* Save private data for final_cost_hashjoin */ |
| 3346 | workspace->run_cost = run_cost; |
| 3347 | workspace->numbuckets = numbuckets; |
| 3348 | workspace->numbatches = numbatches; |
| 3349 | workspace->inner_rows_total = inner_path_rows_total; |
| 3350 | } |
| 3351 | |
| 3352 | /* |
| 3353 | * final_cost_hashjoin |
| 3354 | * Final estimate of the cost and result size of a hashjoin path. |
| 3355 | * |
| 3356 | * Note: the numbatches estimate is also saved into 'path' for use later |
| 3357 | * |
| 3358 | * 'path' is already filled in except for the rows and cost fields and |
| 3359 | * num_batches |
| 3360 | * 'workspace' is the result from initial_cost_hashjoin |
| 3361 | * 'extra' contains miscellaneous information about the join |
| 3362 | */ |
| 3363 | void |
| 3364 | final_cost_hashjoin(PlannerInfo *root, HashPath *path, |
| 3365 | JoinCostWorkspace *workspace, |
| 3366 | JoinPathExtraData *) |
| 3367 | { |
| 3368 | Path *outer_path = path->jpath.outerjoinpath; |
| 3369 | Path *inner_path = path->jpath.innerjoinpath; |
| 3370 | double outer_path_rows = outer_path->rows; |
| 3371 | double inner_path_rows = inner_path->rows; |
| 3372 | double inner_path_rows_total = workspace->inner_rows_total; |
| 3373 | List *hashclauses = path->path_hashclauses; |
| 3374 | Cost startup_cost = workspace->startup_cost; |
| 3375 | Cost run_cost = workspace->run_cost; |
| 3376 | int numbuckets = workspace->numbuckets; |
| 3377 | int numbatches = workspace->numbatches; |
| 3378 | Cost cpu_per_tuple; |
| 3379 | QualCost hash_qual_cost; |
| 3380 | QualCost qp_qual_cost; |
| 3381 | double hashjointuples; |
| 3382 | double virtualbuckets; |
| 3383 | Selectivity innerbucketsize; |
| 3384 | Selectivity innermcvfreq; |
| 3385 | ListCell *hcl; |
| 3386 | |
| 3387 | /* Mark the path with the correct row estimate */ |
| 3388 | if (path->jpath.path.param_info) |
| 3389 | path->jpath.path.rows = path->jpath.path.param_info->ppi_rows; |
| 3390 | else |
| 3391 | path->jpath.path.rows = path->jpath.path.parent->rows; |
| 3392 | |
| 3393 | /* For partial paths, scale row estimate. */ |
| 3394 | if (path->jpath.path.parallel_workers > 0) |
| 3395 | { |
| 3396 | double parallel_divisor = get_parallel_divisor(&path->jpath.path); |
| 3397 | |
| 3398 | path->jpath.path.rows = |
| 3399 | clamp_row_est(path->jpath.path.rows / parallel_divisor); |
| 3400 | } |
| 3401 | |
| 3402 | /* |
| 3403 | * We could include disable_cost in the preliminary estimate, but that |
| 3404 | * would amount to optimizing for the case where the join method is |
| 3405 | * disabled, which doesn't seem like the way to bet. |
| 3406 | */ |
| 3407 | if (!enable_hashjoin) |
| 3408 | startup_cost += disable_cost; |
| 3409 | |
| 3410 | /* mark the path with estimated # of batches */ |
| 3411 | path->num_batches = numbatches; |
| 3412 | |
| 3413 | /* store the total number of tuples (sum of partial row estimates) */ |
| 3414 | path->inner_rows_total = inner_path_rows_total; |
| 3415 | |
| 3416 | /* and compute the number of "virtual" buckets in the whole join */ |
| 3417 | virtualbuckets = (double) numbuckets * (double) numbatches; |
| 3418 | |
| 3419 | /* |
| 3420 | * Determine bucketsize fraction and MCV frequency for the inner relation. |
| 3421 | * We use the smallest bucketsize or MCV frequency estimated for any |
| 3422 | * individual hashclause; this is undoubtedly conservative. |
| 3423 | * |
| 3424 | * BUT: if inner relation has been unique-ified, we can assume it's good |
| 3425 | * for hashing. This is important both because it's the right answer, and |
| 3426 | * because we avoid contaminating the cache with a value that's wrong for |
| 3427 | * non-unique-ified paths. |
| 3428 | */ |
| 3429 | if (IsA(inner_path, UniquePath)) |
| 3430 | { |
| 3431 | innerbucketsize = 1.0 / virtualbuckets; |
| 3432 | innermcvfreq = 0.0; |
| 3433 | } |
| 3434 | else |
| 3435 | { |
| 3436 | innerbucketsize = 1.0; |
| 3437 | innermcvfreq = 1.0; |
| 3438 | foreach(hcl, hashclauses) |
| 3439 | { |
| 3440 | RestrictInfo *restrictinfo = lfirst_node(RestrictInfo, hcl); |
| 3441 | Selectivity thisbucketsize; |
| 3442 | Selectivity thismcvfreq; |
| 3443 | |
| 3444 | /* |
| 3445 | * First we have to figure out which side of the hashjoin clause |
| 3446 | * is the inner side. |
| 3447 | * |
| 3448 | * Since we tend to visit the same clauses over and over when |
| 3449 | * planning a large query, we cache the bucket stats estimates in |
| 3450 | * the RestrictInfo node to avoid repeated lookups of statistics. |
| 3451 | */ |
| 3452 | if (bms_is_subset(restrictinfo->right_relids, |
| 3453 | inner_path->parent->relids)) |
| 3454 | { |
| 3455 | /* righthand side is inner */ |
| 3456 | thisbucketsize = restrictinfo->right_bucketsize; |
| 3457 | if (thisbucketsize < 0) |
| 3458 | { |
| 3459 | /* not cached yet */ |
| 3460 | estimate_hash_bucket_stats(root, |
| 3461 | get_rightop(restrictinfo->clause), |
| 3462 | virtualbuckets, |
| 3463 | &restrictinfo->right_mcvfreq, |
| 3464 | &restrictinfo->right_bucketsize); |
| 3465 | thisbucketsize = restrictinfo->right_bucketsize; |
| 3466 | } |
| 3467 | thismcvfreq = restrictinfo->right_mcvfreq; |
| 3468 | } |
| 3469 | else |
| 3470 | { |
| 3471 | Assert(bms_is_subset(restrictinfo->left_relids, |
| 3472 | inner_path->parent->relids)); |
| 3473 | /* lefthand side is inner */ |
| 3474 | thisbucketsize = restrictinfo->left_bucketsize; |
| 3475 | if (thisbucketsize < 0) |
| 3476 | { |
| 3477 | /* not cached yet */ |
| 3478 | estimate_hash_bucket_stats(root, |
| 3479 | get_leftop(restrictinfo->clause), |
| 3480 | virtualbuckets, |
| 3481 | &restrictinfo->left_mcvfreq, |
| 3482 | &restrictinfo->left_bucketsize); |
| 3483 | thisbucketsize = restrictinfo->left_bucketsize; |
| 3484 | } |
| 3485 | thismcvfreq = restrictinfo->left_mcvfreq; |
| 3486 | } |
| 3487 | |
| 3488 | if (innerbucketsize > thisbucketsize) |
| 3489 | innerbucketsize = thisbucketsize; |
| 3490 | if (innermcvfreq > thismcvfreq) |
| 3491 | innermcvfreq = thismcvfreq; |
| 3492 | } |
| 3493 | } |
| 3494 | |
| 3495 | /* |
| 3496 | * If the bucket holding the inner MCV would exceed work_mem, we don't |
| 3497 | * want to hash unless there is really no other alternative, so apply |
| 3498 | * disable_cost. (The executor normally copes with excessive memory usage |
| 3499 | * by splitting batches, but obviously it cannot separate equal values |
| 3500 | * that way, so it will be unable to drive the batch size below work_mem |
| 3501 | * when this is true.) |
| 3502 | */ |
| 3503 | if (relation_byte_size(clamp_row_est(inner_path_rows * innermcvfreq), |
| 3504 | inner_path->pathtarget->width) > |
| 3505 | (work_mem * 1024L)) |
| 3506 | startup_cost += disable_cost; |
| 3507 | |
| 3508 | /* |
| 3509 | * Compute cost of the hashquals and qpquals (other restriction clauses) |
| 3510 | * separately. |
| 3511 | */ |
| 3512 | cost_qual_eval(&hash_qual_cost, hashclauses, root); |
| 3513 | cost_qual_eval(&qp_qual_cost, path->jpath.joinrestrictinfo, root); |
| 3514 | qp_qual_cost.startup -= hash_qual_cost.startup; |
| 3515 | qp_qual_cost.per_tuple -= hash_qual_cost.per_tuple; |
| 3516 | |
| 3517 | /* CPU costs */ |
| 3518 | |
| 3519 | if (path->jpath.jointype == JOIN_SEMI || |
| 3520 | path->jpath.jointype == JOIN_ANTI || |
| 3521 | extra->inner_unique) |
| 3522 | { |
| 3523 | double outer_matched_rows; |
| 3524 | Selectivity inner_scan_frac; |
| 3525 | |
| 3526 | /* |
| 3527 | * With a SEMI or ANTI join, or if the innerrel is known unique, the |
| 3528 | * executor will stop after the first match. |
| 3529 | * |
| 3530 | * For an outer-rel row that has at least one match, we can expect the |
| 3531 | * bucket scan to stop after a fraction 1/(match_count+1) of the |
| 3532 | * bucket's rows, if the matches are evenly distributed. Since they |
| 3533 | * probably aren't quite evenly distributed, we apply a fuzz factor of |
| 3534 | * 2.0 to that fraction. (If we used a larger fuzz factor, we'd have |
| 3535 | * to clamp inner_scan_frac to at most 1.0; but since match_count is |
| 3536 | * at least 1, no such clamp is needed now.) |
| 3537 | */ |
| 3538 | outer_matched_rows = rint(outer_path_rows * extra->semifactors.outer_match_frac); |
| 3539 | inner_scan_frac = 2.0 / (extra->semifactors.match_count + 1.0); |
| 3540 | |
| 3541 | startup_cost += hash_qual_cost.startup; |
| 3542 | run_cost += hash_qual_cost.per_tuple * outer_matched_rows * |
| 3543 | clamp_row_est(inner_path_rows * innerbucketsize * inner_scan_frac) * 0.5; |
| 3544 | |
| 3545 | /* |
| 3546 | * For unmatched outer-rel rows, the picture is quite a lot different. |
| 3547 | * In the first place, there is no reason to assume that these rows |
| 3548 | * preferentially hit heavily-populated buckets; instead assume they |
| 3549 | * are uncorrelated with the inner distribution and so they see an |
| 3550 | * average bucket size of inner_path_rows / virtualbuckets. In the |
| 3551 | * second place, it seems likely that they will have few if any exact |
| 3552 | * hash-code matches and so very few of the tuples in the bucket will |
| 3553 | * actually require eval of the hash quals. We don't have any good |
| 3554 | * way to estimate how many will, but for the moment assume that the |
| 3555 | * effective cost per bucket entry is one-tenth what it is for |
| 3556 | * matchable tuples. |
| 3557 | */ |
| 3558 | run_cost += hash_qual_cost.per_tuple * |
| 3559 | (outer_path_rows - outer_matched_rows) * |
| 3560 | clamp_row_est(inner_path_rows / virtualbuckets) * 0.05; |
| 3561 | |
| 3562 | /* Get # of tuples that will pass the basic join */ |
| 3563 | if (path->jpath.jointype == JOIN_ANTI) |
| 3564 | hashjointuples = outer_path_rows - outer_matched_rows; |
| 3565 | else |
| 3566 | hashjointuples = outer_matched_rows; |
| 3567 | } |
| 3568 | else |
| 3569 | { |
| 3570 | /* |
| 3571 | * The number of tuple comparisons needed is the number of outer |
| 3572 | * tuples times the typical number of tuples in a hash bucket, which |
| 3573 | * is the inner relation size times its bucketsize fraction. At each |
| 3574 | * one, we need to evaluate the hashjoin quals. But actually, |
| 3575 | * charging the full qual eval cost at each tuple is pessimistic, |
| 3576 | * since we don't evaluate the quals unless the hash values match |
| 3577 | * exactly. For lack of a better idea, halve the cost estimate to |
| 3578 | * allow for that. |
| 3579 | */ |
| 3580 | startup_cost += hash_qual_cost.startup; |
| 3581 | run_cost += hash_qual_cost.per_tuple * outer_path_rows * |
| 3582 | clamp_row_est(inner_path_rows * innerbucketsize) * 0.5; |
| 3583 | |
| 3584 | /* |
| 3585 | * Get approx # tuples passing the hashquals. We use |
| 3586 | * approx_tuple_count here because we need an estimate done with |
| 3587 | * JOIN_INNER semantics. |
| 3588 | */ |
| 3589 | hashjointuples = approx_tuple_count(root, &path->jpath, hashclauses); |
| 3590 | } |
| 3591 | |
| 3592 | /* |
| 3593 | * For each tuple that gets through the hashjoin proper, we charge |
| 3594 | * cpu_tuple_cost plus the cost of evaluating additional restriction |
| 3595 | * clauses that are to be applied at the join. (This is pessimistic since |
| 3596 | * not all of the quals may get evaluated at each tuple.) |
| 3597 | */ |
| 3598 | startup_cost += qp_qual_cost.startup; |
| 3599 | cpu_per_tuple = cpu_tuple_cost + qp_qual_cost.per_tuple; |
| 3600 | run_cost += cpu_per_tuple * hashjointuples; |
| 3601 | |
| 3602 | /* tlist eval costs are paid per output row, not per tuple scanned */ |
| 3603 | startup_cost += path->jpath.path.pathtarget->cost.startup; |
| 3604 | run_cost += path->jpath.path.pathtarget->cost.per_tuple * path->jpath.path.rows; |
| 3605 | |
| 3606 | path->jpath.path.startup_cost = startup_cost; |
| 3607 | path->jpath.path.total_cost = startup_cost + run_cost; |
| 3608 | } |
| 3609 | |
| 3610 | |
| 3611 | /* |
| 3612 | * cost_subplan |
| 3613 | * Figure the costs for a SubPlan (or initplan). |
| 3614 | * |
| 3615 | * Note: we could dig the subplan's Plan out of the root list, but in practice |
| 3616 | * all callers have it handy already, so we make them pass it. |
| 3617 | */ |
| 3618 | void |
| 3619 | cost_subplan(PlannerInfo *root, SubPlan *subplan, Plan *plan) |
| 3620 | { |
| 3621 | QualCost sp_cost; |
| 3622 | |
| 3623 | /* Figure any cost for evaluating the testexpr */ |
| 3624 | cost_qual_eval(&sp_cost, |
| 3625 | make_ands_implicit((Expr *) subplan->testexpr), |
| 3626 | root); |
| 3627 | |
| 3628 | if (subplan->useHashTable) |
| 3629 | { |
| 3630 | /* |
| 3631 | * If we are using a hash table for the subquery outputs, then the |
| 3632 | * cost of evaluating the query is a one-time cost. We charge one |
| 3633 | * cpu_operator_cost per tuple for the work of loading the hashtable, |
| 3634 | * too. |
| 3635 | */ |
| 3636 | sp_cost.startup += plan->total_cost + |
| 3637 | cpu_operator_cost * plan->plan_rows; |
| 3638 | |
| 3639 | /* |
| 3640 | * The per-tuple costs include the cost of evaluating the lefthand |
| 3641 | * expressions, plus the cost of probing the hashtable. We already |
| 3642 | * accounted for the lefthand expressions as part of the testexpr, and |
| 3643 | * will also have counted one cpu_operator_cost for each comparison |
| 3644 | * operator. That is probably too low for the probing cost, but it's |
| 3645 | * hard to make a better estimate, so live with it for now. |
| 3646 | */ |
| 3647 | } |
| 3648 | else |
| 3649 | { |
| 3650 | /* |
| 3651 | * Otherwise we will be rescanning the subplan output on each |
| 3652 | * evaluation. We need to estimate how much of the output we will |
| 3653 | * actually need to scan. NOTE: this logic should agree with the |
| 3654 | * tuple_fraction estimates used by make_subplan() in |
| 3655 | * plan/subselect.c. |
| 3656 | */ |
| 3657 | Cost plan_run_cost = plan->total_cost - plan->startup_cost; |
| 3658 | |
| 3659 | if (subplan->subLinkType == EXISTS_SUBLINK) |
| 3660 | { |
| 3661 | /* we only need to fetch 1 tuple; clamp to avoid zero divide */ |
| 3662 | sp_cost.per_tuple += plan_run_cost / clamp_row_est(plan->plan_rows); |
| 3663 | } |
| 3664 | else if (subplan->subLinkType == ALL_SUBLINK || |
| 3665 | subplan->subLinkType == ANY_SUBLINK) |
| 3666 | { |
| 3667 | /* assume we need 50% of the tuples */ |
| 3668 | sp_cost.per_tuple += 0.50 * plan_run_cost; |
| 3669 | /* also charge a cpu_operator_cost per row examined */ |
| 3670 | sp_cost.per_tuple += 0.50 * plan->plan_rows * cpu_operator_cost; |
| 3671 | } |
| 3672 | else |
| 3673 | { |
| 3674 | /* assume we need all tuples */ |
| 3675 | sp_cost.per_tuple += plan_run_cost; |
| 3676 | } |
| 3677 | |
| 3678 | /* |
| 3679 | * Also account for subplan's startup cost. If the subplan is |
| 3680 | * uncorrelated or undirect correlated, AND its topmost node is one |
| 3681 | * that materializes its output, assume that we'll only need to pay |
| 3682 | * its startup cost once; otherwise assume we pay the startup cost |
| 3683 | * every time. |
| 3684 | */ |
| 3685 | if (subplan->parParam == NIL && |
| 3686 | ExecMaterializesOutput(nodeTag(plan))) |
| 3687 | sp_cost.startup += plan->startup_cost; |
| 3688 | else |
| 3689 | sp_cost.per_tuple += plan->startup_cost; |
| 3690 | } |
| 3691 | |
| 3692 | subplan->startup_cost = sp_cost.startup; |
| 3693 | subplan->per_call_cost = sp_cost.per_tuple; |
| 3694 | } |
| 3695 | |
| 3696 | |
| 3697 | /* |
| 3698 | * cost_rescan |
| 3699 | * Given a finished Path, estimate the costs of rescanning it after |
| 3700 | * having done so the first time. For some Path types a rescan is |
| 3701 | * cheaper than an original scan (if no parameters change), and this |
| 3702 | * function embodies knowledge about that. The default is to return |
| 3703 | * the same costs stored in the Path. (Note that the cost estimates |
| 3704 | * actually stored in Paths are always for first scans.) |
| 3705 | * |
| 3706 | * This function is not currently intended to model effects such as rescans |
| 3707 | * being cheaper due to disk block caching; what we are concerned with is |
| 3708 | * plan types wherein the executor caches results explicitly, or doesn't |
| 3709 | * redo startup calculations, etc. |
| 3710 | */ |
| 3711 | static void |
| 3712 | cost_rescan(PlannerInfo *root, Path *path, |
| 3713 | Cost *rescan_startup_cost, /* output parameters */ |
| 3714 | Cost *rescan_total_cost) |
| 3715 | { |
| 3716 | switch (path->pathtype) |
| 3717 | { |
| 3718 | case T_FunctionScan: |
| 3719 | |
| 3720 | /* |
| 3721 | * Currently, nodeFunctionscan.c always executes the function to |
| 3722 | * completion before returning any rows, and caches the results in |
| 3723 | * a tuplestore. So the function eval cost is all startup cost |
| 3724 | * and isn't paid over again on rescans. However, all run costs |
| 3725 | * will be paid over again. |
| 3726 | */ |
| 3727 | *rescan_startup_cost = 0; |
| 3728 | *rescan_total_cost = path->total_cost - path->startup_cost; |
| 3729 | break; |
| 3730 | case T_HashJoin: |
| 3731 | |
| 3732 | /* |
| 3733 | * If it's a single-batch join, we don't need to rebuild the hash |
| 3734 | * table during a rescan. |
| 3735 | */ |
| 3736 | if (((HashPath *) path)->num_batches == 1) |
| 3737 | { |
| 3738 | /* Startup cost is exactly the cost of hash table building */ |
| 3739 | *rescan_startup_cost = 0; |
| 3740 | *rescan_total_cost = path->total_cost - path->startup_cost; |
| 3741 | } |
| 3742 | else |
| 3743 | { |
| 3744 | /* Otherwise, no special treatment */ |
| 3745 | *rescan_startup_cost = path->startup_cost; |
| 3746 | *rescan_total_cost = path->total_cost; |
| 3747 | } |
| 3748 | break; |
| 3749 | case T_CteScan: |
| 3750 | case T_WorkTableScan: |
| 3751 | { |
| 3752 | /* |
| 3753 | * These plan types materialize their final result in a |
| 3754 | * tuplestore or tuplesort object. So the rescan cost is only |
| 3755 | * cpu_tuple_cost per tuple, unless the result is large enough |
| 3756 | * to spill to disk. |
| 3757 | */ |
| 3758 | Cost run_cost = cpu_tuple_cost * path->rows; |
| 3759 | double nbytes = relation_byte_size(path->rows, |
| 3760 | path->pathtarget->width); |
| 3761 | long work_mem_bytes = work_mem * 1024L; |
| 3762 | |
| 3763 | if (nbytes > work_mem_bytes) |
| 3764 | { |
| 3765 | /* It will spill, so account for re-read cost */ |
| 3766 | double npages = ceil(nbytes / BLCKSZ); |
| 3767 | |
| 3768 | run_cost += seq_page_cost * npages; |
| 3769 | } |
| 3770 | *rescan_startup_cost = 0; |
| 3771 | *rescan_total_cost = run_cost; |
| 3772 | } |
| 3773 | break; |
| 3774 | case T_Material: |
| 3775 | case T_Sort: |
| 3776 | { |
| 3777 | /* |
| 3778 | * These plan types not only materialize their results, but do |
| 3779 | * not implement qual filtering or projection. So they are |
| 3780 | * even cheaper to rescan than the ones above. We charge only |
| 3781 | * cpu_operator_cost per tuple. (Note: keep that in sync with |
| 3782 | * the run_cost charge in cost_sort, and also see comments in |
| 3783 | * cost_material before you change it.) |
| 3784 | */ |
| 3785 | Cost run_cost = cpu_operator_cost * path->rows; |
| 3786 | double nbytes = relation_byte_size(path->rows, |
| 3787 | path->pathtarget->width); |
| 3788 | long work_mem_bytes = work_mem * 1024L; |
| 3789 | |
| 3790 | if (nbytes > work_mem_bytes) |
| 3791 | { |
| 3792 | /* It will spill, so account for re-read cost */ |
| 3793 | double npages = ceil(nbytes / BLCKSZ); |
| 3794 | |
| 3795 | run_cost += seq_page_cost * npages; |
| 3796 | } |
| 3797 | *rescan_startup_cost = 0; |
| 3798 | *rescan_total_cost = run_cost; |
| 3799 | } |
| 3800 | break; |
| 3801 | default: |
| 3802 | *rescan_startup_cost = path->startup_cost; |
| 3803 | *rescan_total_cost = path->total_cost; |
| 3804 | break; |
| 3805 | } |
| 3806 | } |
| 3807 | |
| 3808 | |
| 3809 | /* |
| 3810 | * cost_qual_eval |
| 3811 | * Estimate the CPU costs of evaluating a WHERE clause. |
| 3812 | * The input can be either an implicitly-ANDed list of boolean |
| 3813 | * expressions, or a list of RestrictInfo nodes. (The latter is |
| 3814 | * preferred since it allows caching of the results.) |
| 3815 | * The result includes both a one-time (startup) component, |
| 3816 | * and a per-evaluation component. |
| 3817 | */ |
| 3818 | void |
| 3819 | cost_qual_eval(QualCost *cost, List *quals, PlannerInfo *root) |
| 3820 | { |
| 3821 | cost_qual_eval_context context; |
| 3822 | ListCell *l; |
| 3823 | |
| 3824 | context.root = root; |
| 3825 | context.total.startup = 0; |
| 3826 | context.total.per_tuple = 0; |
| 3827 | |
| 3828 | /* We don't charge any cost for the implicit ANDing at top level ... */ |
| 3829 | |
| 3830 | foreach(l, quals) |
| 3831 | { |
| 3832 | Node *qual = (Node *) lfirst(l); |
| 3833 | |
| 3834 | cost_qual_eval_walker(qual, &context); |
| 3835 | } |
| 3836 | |
| 3837 | *cost = context.total; |
| 3838 | } |
| 3839 | |
| 3840 | /* |
| 3841 | * cost_qual_eval_node |
| 3842 | * As above, for a single RestrictInfo or expression. |
| 3843 | */ |
| 3844 | void |
| 3845 | cost_qual_eval_node(QualCost *cost, Node *qual, PlannerInfo *root) |
| 3846 | { |
| 3847 | cost_qual_eval_context context; |
| 3848 | |
| 3849 | context.root = root; |
| 3850 | context.total.startup = 0; |
| 3851 | context.total.per_tuple = 0; |
| 3852 | |
| 3853 | cost_qual_eval_walker(qual, &context); |
| 3854 | |
| 3855 | *cost = context.total; |
| 3856 | } |
| 3857 | |
| 3858 | static bool |
| 3859 | cost_qual_eval_walker(Node *node, cost_qual_eval_context *context) |
| 3860 | { |
| 3861 | if (node == NULL) |
| 3862 | return false; |
| 3863 | |
| 3864 | /* |
| 3865 | * RestrictInfo nodes contain an eval_cost field reserved for this |
| 3866 | * routine's use, so that it's not necessary to evaluate the qual clause's |
| 3867 | * cost more than once. If the clause's cost hasn't been computed yet, |
| 3868 | * the field's startup value will contain -1. |
| 3869 | */ |
| 3870 | if (IsA(node, RestrictInfo)) |
| 3871 | { |
| 3872 | RestrictInfo *rinfo = (RestrictInfo *) node; |
| 3873 | |
| 3874 | if (rinfo->eval_cost.startup < 0) |
| 3875 | { |
| 3876 | cost_qual_eval_context locContext; |
| 3877 | |
| 3878 | locContext.root = context->root; |
| 3879 | locContext.total.startup = 0; |
| 3880 | locContext.total.per_tuple = 0; |
| 3881 | |
| 3882 | /* |
| 3883 | * For an OR clause, recurse into the marked-up tree so that we |
| 3884 | * set the eval_cost for contained RestrictInfos too. |
| 3885 | */ |
| 3886 | if (rinfo->orclause) |
| 3887 | cost_qual_eval_walker((Node *) rinfo->orclause, &locContext); |
| 3888 | else |
| 3889 | cost_qual_eval_walker((Node *) rinfo->clause, &locContext); |
| 3890 | |
| 3891 | /* |
| 3892 | * If the RestrictInfo is marked pseudoconstant, it will be tested |
| 3893 | * only once, so treat its cost as all startup cost. |
| 3894 | */ |
| 3895 | if (rinfo->pseudoconstant) |
| 3896 | { |
| 3897 | /* count one execution during startup */ |
| 3898 | locContext.total.startup += locContext.total.per_tuple; |
| 3899 | locContext.total.per_tuple = 0; |
| 3900 | } |
| 3901 | rinfo->eval_cost = locContext.total; |
| 3902 | } |
| 3903 | context->total.startup += rinfo->eval_cost.startup; |
| 3904 | context->total.per_tuple += rinfo->eval_cost.per_tuple; |
| 3905 | /* do NOT recurse into children */ |
| 3906 | return false; |
| 3907 | } |
| 3908 | |
| 3909 | /* |
| 3910 | * For each operator or function node in the given tree, we charge the |
| 3911 | * estimated execution cost given by pg_proc.procost (remember to multiply |
| 3912 | * this by cpu_operator_cost). |
| 3913 | * |
| 3914 | * Vars and Consts are charged zero, and so are boolean operators (AND, |
| 3915 | * OR, NOT). Simplistic, but a lot better than no model at all. |
| 3916 | * |
| 3917 | * Should we try to account for the possibility of short-circuit |
| 3918 | * evaluation of AND/OR? Probably *not*, because that would make the |
| 3919 | * results depend on the clause ordering, and we are not in any position |
| 3920 | * to expect that the current ordering of the clauses is the one that's |
| 3921 | * going to end up being used. The above per-RestrictInfo caching would |
| 3922 | * not mix well with trying to re-order clauses anyway. |
| 3923 | * |
| 3924 | * Another issue that is entirely ignored here is that if a set-returning |
| 3925 | * function is below top level in the tree, the functions/operators above |
| 3926 | * it will need to be evaluated multiple times. In practical use, such |
| 3927 | * cases arise so seldom as to not be worth the added complexity needed; |
| 3928 | * moreover, since our rowcount estimates for functions tend to be pretty |
| 3929 | * phony, the results would also be pretty phony. |
| 3930 | */ |
| 3931 | if (IsA(node, FuncExpr)) |
| 3932 | { |
| 3933 | add_function_cost(context->root, ((FuncExpr *) node)->funcid, node, |
| 3934 | &context->total); |
| 3935 | } |
| 3936 | else if (IsA(node, OpExpr) || |
| 3937 | IsA(node, DistinctExpr) || |
| 3938 | IsA(node, NullIfExpr)) |
| 3939 | { |
| 3940 | /* rely on struct equivalence to treat these all alike */ |
| 3941 | set_opfuncid((OpExpr *) node); |
| 3942 | add_function_cost(context->root, ((OpExpr *) node)->opfuncid, node, |
| 3943 | &context->total); |
| 3944 | } |
| 3945 | else if (IsA(node, ScalarArrayOpExpr)) |
| 3946 | { |
| 3947 | /* |
| 3948 | * Estimate that the operator will be applied to about half of the |
| 3949 | * array elements before the answer is determined. |
| 3950 | */ |
| 3951 | ScalarArrayOpExpr *saop = (ScalarArrayOpExpr *) node; |
| 3952 | Node *arraynode = (Node *) lsecond(saop->args); |
| 3953 | QualCost sacosts; |
| 3954 | |
| 3955 | set_sa_opfuncid(saop); |
| 3956 | sacosts.startup = sacosts.per_tuple = 0; |
| 3957 | add_function_cost(context->root, saop->opfuncid, NULL, |
| 3958 | &sacosts); |
| 3959 | context->total.startup += sacosts.startup; |
| 3960 | context->total.per_tuple += sacosts.per_tuple * |
| 3961 | estimate_array_length(arraynode) * 0.5; |
| 3962 | } |
| 3963 | else if (IsA(node, Aggref) || |
| 3964 | IsA(node, WindowFunc)) |
| 3965 | { |
| 3966 | /* |
| 3967 | * Aggref and WindowFunc nodes are (and should be) treated like Vars, |
| 3968 | * ie, zero execution cost in the current model, because they behave |
| 3969 | * essentially like Vars at execution. We disregard the costs of |
| 3970 | * their input expressions for the same reason. The actual execution |
| 3971 | * costs of the aggregate/window functions and their arguments have to |
| 3972 | * be factored into plan-node-specific costing of the Agg or WindowAgg |
| 3973 | * plan node. |
| 3974 | */ |
| 3975 | return false; /* don't recurse into children */ |
| 3976 | } |
| 3977 | else if (IsA(node, CoerceViaIO)) |
| 3978 | { |
| 3979 | CoerceViaIO *iocoerce = (CoerceViaIO *) node; |
| 3980 | Oid iofunc; |
| 3981 | Oid typioparam; |
| 3982 | bool typisvarlena; |
| 3983 | |
| 3984 | /* check the result type's input function */ |
| 3985 | getTypeInputInfo(iocoerce->resulttype, |
| 3986 | &iofunc, &typioparam); |
| 3987 | add_function_cost(context->root, iofunc, NULL, |
| 3988 | &context->total); |
| 3989 | /* check the input type's output function */ |
| 3990 | getTypeOutputInfo(exprType((Node *) iocoerce->arg), |
| 3991 | &iofunc, &typisvarlena); |
| 3992 | add_function_cost(context->root, iofunc, NULL, |
| 3993 | &context->total); |
| 3994 | } |
| 3995 | else if (IsA(node, ArrayCoerceExpr)) |
| 3996 | { |
| 3997 | ArrayCoerceExpr *acoerce = (ArrayCoerceExpr *) node; |
| 3998 | QualCost perelemcost; |
| 3999 | |
| 4000 | cost_qual_eval_node(&perelemcost, (Node *) acoerce->elemexpr, |
| 4001 | context->root); |
| 4002 | context->total.startup += perelemcost.startup; |
| 4003 | if (perelemcost.per_tuple > 0) |
| 4004 | context->total.per_tuple += perelemcost.per_tuple * |
| 4005 | estimate_array_length((Node *) acoerce->arg); |
| 4006 | } |
| 4007 | else if (IsA(node, RowCompareExpr)) |
| 4008 | { |
| 4009 | /* Conservatively assume we will check all the columns */ |
| 4010 | RowCompareExpr *rcexpr = (RowCompareExpr *) node; |
| 4011 | ListCell *lc; |
| 4012 | |
| 4013 | foreach(lc, rcexpr->opnos) |
| 4014 | { |
| 4015 | Oid opid = lfirst_oid(lc); |
| 4016 | |
| 4017 | add_function_cost(context->root, get_opcode(opid), NULL, |
| 4018 | &context->total); |
| 4019 | } |
| 4020 | } |
| 4021 | else if (IsA(node, MinMaxExpr) || |
| 4022 | IsA(node, SQLValueFunction) || |
| 4023 | IsA(node, XmlExpr) || |
| 4024 | IsA(node, CoerceToDomain) || |
| 4025 | IsA(node, NextValueExpr)) |
| 4026 | { |
| 4027 | /* Treat all these as having cost 1 */ |
| 4028 | context->total.per_tuple += cpu_operator_cost; |
| 4029 | } |
| 4030 | else if (IsA(node, CurrentOfExpr)) |
| 4031 | { |
| 4032 | /* Report high cost to prevent selection of anything but TID scan */ |
| 4033 | context->total.startup += disable_cost; |
| 4034 | } |
| 4035 | else if (IsA(node, SubLink)) |
| 4036 | { |
| 4037 | /* This routine should not be applied to un-planned expressions */ |
| 4038 | elog(ERROR, "cannot handle unplanned sub-select" ); |
| 4039 | } |
| 4040 | else if (IsA(node, SubPlan)) |
| 4041 | { |
| 4042 | /* |
| 4043 | * A subplan node in an expression typically indicates that the |
| 4044 | * subplan will be executed on each evaluation, so charge accordingly. |
| 4045 | * (Sub-selects that can be executed as InitPlans have already been |
| 4046 | * removed from the expression.) |
| 4047 | */ |
| 4048 | SubPlan *subplan = (SubPlan *) node; |
| 4049 | |
| 4050 | context->total.startup += subplan->startup_cost; |
| 4051 | context->total.per_tuple += subplan->per_call_cost; |
| 4052 | |
| 4053 | /* |
| 4054 | * We don't want to recurse into the testexpr, because it was already |
| 4055 | * counted in the SubPlan node's costs. So we're done. |
| 4056 | */ |
| 4057 | return false; |
| 4058 | } |
| 4059 | else if (IsA(node, AlternativeSubPlan)) |
| 4060 | { |
| 4061 | /* |
| 4062 | * Arbitrarily use the first alternative plan for costing. (We should |
| 4063 | * certainly only include one alternative, and we don't yet have |
| 4064 | * enough information to know which one the executor is most likely to |
| 4065 | * use.) |
| 4066 | */ |
| 4067 | AlternativeSubPlan *asplan = (AlternativeSubPlan *) node; |
| 4068 | |
| 4069 | return cost_qual_eval_walker((Node *) linitial(asplan->subplans), |
| 4070 | context); |
| 4071 | } |
| 4072 | else if (IsA(node, PlaceHolderVar)) |
| 4073 | { |
| 4074 | /* |
| 4075 | * A PlaceHolderVar should be given cost zero when considering general |
| 4076 | * expression evaluation costs. The expense of doing the contained |
| 4077 | * expression is charged as part of the tlist eval costs of the scan |
| 4078 | * or join where the PHV is first computed (see set_rel_width and |
| 4079 | * add_placeholders_to_joinrel). If we charged it again here, we'd be |
| 4080 | * double-counting the cost for each level of plan that the PHV |
| 4081 | * bubbles up through. Hence, return without recursing into the |
| 4082 | * phexpr. |
| 4083 | */ |
| 4084 | return false; |
| 4085 | } |
| 4086 | |
| 4087 | /* recurse into children */ |
| 4088 | return expression_tree_walker(node, cost_qual_eval_walker, |
| 4089 | (void *) context); |
| 4090 | } |
| 4091 | |
| 4092 | /* |
| 4093 | * get_restriction_qual_cost |
| 4094 | * Compute evaluation costs of a baserel's restriction quals, plus any |
| 4095 | * movable join quals that have been pushed down to the scan. |
| 4096 | * Results are returned into *qpqual_cost. |
| 4097 | * |
| 4098 | * This is a convenience subroutine that works for seqscans and other cases |
| 4099 | * where all the given quals will be evaluated the hard way. It's not useful |
| 4100 | * for cost_index(), for example, where the index machinery takes care of |
| 4101 | * some of the quals. We assume baserestrictcost was previously set by |
| 4102 | * set_baserel_size_estimates(). |
| 4103 | */ |
| 4104 | static void |
| 4105 | get_restriction_qual_cost(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *baserel, |
| 4106 | ParamPathInfo *param_info, |
| 4107 | QualCost *qpqual_cost) |
| 4108 | { |
| 4109 | if (param_info) |
| 4110 | { |
| 4111 | /* Include costs of pushed-down clauses */ |
| 4112 | cost_qual_eval(qpqual_cost, param_info->ppi_clauses, root); |
| 4113 | |
| 4114 | qpqual_cost->startup += baserel->baserestrictcost.startup; |
| 4115 | qpqual_cost->per_tuple += baserel->baserestrictcost.per_tuple; |
| 4116 | } |
| 4117 | else |
| 4118 | *qpqual_cost = baserel->baserestrictcost; |
| 4119 | } |
| 4120 | |
| 4121 | |
| 4122 | /* |
| 4123 | * compute_semi_anti_join_factors |
| 4124 | * Estimate how much of the inner input a SEMI, ANTI, or inner_unique join |
| 4125 | * can be expected to scan. |
| 4126 | * |
| 4127 | * In a hash or nestloop SEMI/ANTI join, the executor will stop scanning |
| 4128 | * inner rows as soon as it finds a match to the current outer row. |
| 4129 | * The same happens if we have detected the inner rel is unique. |
| 4130 | * We should therefore adjust some of the cost components for this effect. |
| 4131 | * This function computes some estimates needed for these adjustments. |
| 4132 | * These estimates will be the same regardless of the particular paths used |
| 4133 | * for the outer and inner relation, so we compute these once and then pass |
| 4134 | * them to all the join cost estimation functions. |
| 4135 | * |
| 4136 | * Input parameters: |
| 4137 | * joinrel: join relation under consideration |
| 4138 | * outerrel: outer relation under consideration |
| 4139 | * innerrel: inner relation under consideration |
| 4140 | * jointype: if not JOIN_SEMI or JOIN_ANTI, we assume it's inner_unique |
| 4141 | * sjinfo: SpecialJoinInfo relevant to this join |
| 4142 | * restrictlist: join quals |
| 4143 | * Output parameters: |
| 4144 | * *semifactors is filled in (see pathnodes.h for field definitions) |
| 4145 | */ |
| 4146 | void |
| 4147 | compute_semi_anti_join_factors(PlannerInfo *root, |
| 4148 | RelOptInfo *joinrel, |
| 4149 | RelOptInfo *outerrel, |
| 4150 | RelOptInfo *innerrel, |
| 4151 | JoinType jointype, |
| 4152 | SpecialJoinInfo *sjinfo, |
| 4153 | List *restrictlist, |
| 4154 | SemiAntiJoinFactors *semifactors) |
| 4155 | { |
| 4156 | Selectivity jselec; |
| 4157 | Selectivity nselec; |
| 4158 | Selectivity avgmatch; |
| 4159 | SpecialJoinInfo norm_sjinfo; |
| 4160 | List *joinquals; |
| 4161 | ListCell *l; |
| 4162 | |
| 4163 | /* |
| 4164 | * In an ANTI join, we must ignore clauses that are "pushed down", since |
| 4165 | * those won't affect the match logic. In a SEMI join, we do not |
| 4166 | * distinguish joinquals from "pushed down" quals, so just use the whole |
| 4167 | * restrictinfo list. For other outer join types, we should consider only |
| 4168 | * non-pushed-down quals, so that this devolves to an IS_OUTER_JOIN check. |
| 4169 | */ |
| 4170 | if (IS_OUTER_JOIN(jointype)) |
| 4171 | { |
| 4172 | joinquals = NIL; |
| 4173 | foreach(l, restrictlist) |
| 4174 | { |
| 4175 | RestrictInfo *rinfo = lfirst_node(RestrictInfo, l); |
| 4176 | |
| 4177 | if (!RINFO_IS_PUSHED_DOWN(rinfo, joinrel->relids)) |
| 4178 | joinquals = lappend(joinquals, rinfo); |
| 4179 | } |
| 4180 | } |
| 4181 | else |
| 4182 | joinquals = restrictlist; |
| 4183 | |
| 4184 | /* |
| 4185 | * Get the JOIN_SEMI or JOIN_ANTI selectivity of the join clauses. |
| 4186 | */ |
| 4187 | jselec = clauselist_selectivity(root, |
| 4188 | joinquals, |
| 4189 | 0, |
| 4190 | (jointype == JOIN_ANTI) ? JOIN_ANTI : JOIN_SEMI, |
| 4191 | sjinfo); |
| 4192 | |
| 4193 | /* |
| 4194 | * Also get the normal inner-join selectivity of the join clauses. |
| 4195 | */ |
| 4196 | norm_sjinfo.type = T_SpecialJoinInfo; |
| 4197 | norm_sjinfo.min_lefthand = outerrel->relids; |
| 4198 | norm_sjinfo.min_righthand = innerrel->relids; |
| 4199 | norm_sjinfo.syn_lefthand = outerrel->relids; |
| 4200 | norm_sjinfo.syn_righthand = innerrel->relids; |
| 4201 | norm_sjinfo.jointype = JOIN_INNER; |
| 4202 | /* we don't bother trying to make the remaining fields valid */ |
| 4203 | norm_sjinfo.lhs_strict = false; |
| 4204 | norm_sjinfo.delay_upper_joins = false; |
| 4205 | norm_sjinfo.semi_can_btree = false; |
| 4206 | norm_sjinfo.semi_can_hash = false; |
| 4207 | norm_sjinfo.semi_operators = NIL; |
| 4208 | norm_sjinfo.semi_rhs_exprs = NIL; |
| 4209 | |
| 4210 | nselec = clauselist_selectivity(root, |
| 4211 | joinquals, |
| 4212 | 0, |
| 4213 | JOIN_INNER, |
| 4214 | &norm_sjinfo); |
| 4215 | |
| 4216 | /* Avoid leaking a lot of ListCells */ |
| 4217 | if (IS_OUTER_JOIN(jointype)) |
| 4218 | list_free(joinquals); |
| 4219 | |
| 4220 | /* |
| 4221 | * jselec can be interpreted as the fraction of outer-rel rows that have |
| 4222 | * any matches (this is true for both SEMI and ANTI cases). And nselec is |
| 4223 | * the fraction of the Cartesian product that matches. So, the average |
| 4224 | * number of matches for each outer-rel row that has at least one match is |
| 4225 | * nselec * inner_rows / jselec. |
| 4226 | * |
| 4227 | * Note: it is correct to use the inner rel's "rows" count here, even |
| 4228 | * though we might later be considering a parameterized inner path with |
| 4229 | * fewer rows. This is because we have included all the join clauses in |
| 4230 | * the selectivity estimate. |
| 4231 | */ |
| 4232 | if (jselec > 0) /* protect against zero divide */ |
| 4233 | { |
| 4234 | avgmatch = nselec * innerrel->rows / jselec; |
| 4235 | /* Clamp to sane range */ |
| 4236 | avgmatch = Max(1.0, avgmatch); |
| 4237 | } |
| 4238 | else |
| 4239 | avgmatch = 1.0; |
| 4240 | |
| 4241 | semifactors->outer_match_frac = jselec; |
| 4242 | semifactors->match_count = avgmatch; |
| 4243 | } |
| 4244 | |
| 4245 | /* |
| 4246 | * has_indexed_join_quals |
| 4247 | * Check whether all the joinquals of a nestloop join are used as |
| 4248 | * inner index quals. |
| 4249 | * |
| 4250 | * If the inner path of a SEMI/ANTI join is an indexscan (including bitmap |
| 4251 | * indexscan) that uses all the joinquals as indexquals, we can assume that an |
| 4252 | * unmatched outer tuple is cheap to process, whereas otherwise it's probably |
| 4253 | * expensive. |
| 4254 | */ |
| 4255 | static bool |
| 4256 | has_indexed_join_quals(NestPath *joinpath) |
| 4257 | { |
| 4258 | Relids joinrelids = joinpath->path.parent->relids; |
| 4259 | Path *innerpath = joinpath->innerjoinpath; |
| 4260 | List *indexclauses; |
| 4261 | bool found_one; |
| 4262 | ListCell *lc; |
| 4263 | |
| 4264 | /* If join still has quals to evaluate, it's not fast */ |
| 4265 | if (joinpath->joinrestrictinfo != NIL) |
| 4266 | return false; |
| 4267 | /* Nor if the inner path isn't parameterized at all */ |
| 4268 | if (innerpath->param_info == NULL) |
| 4269 | return false; |
| 4270 | |
| 4271 | /* Find the indexclauses list for the inner scan */ |
| 4272 | switch (innerpath->pathtype) |
| 4273 | { |
| 4274 | case T_IndexScan: |
| 4275 | case T_IndexOnlyScan: |
| 4276 | indexclauses = ((IndexPath *) innerpath)->indexclauses; |
| 4277 | break; |
| 4278 | case T_BitmapHeapScan: |
| 4279 | { |
| 4280 | /* Accept only a simple bitmap scan, not AND/OR cases */ |
| 4281 | Path *bmqual = ((BitmapHeapPath *) innerpath)->bitmapqual; |
| 4282 | |
| 4283 | if (IsA(bmqual, IndexPath)) |
| 4284 | indexclauses = ((IndexPath *) bmqual)->indexclauses; |
| 4285 | else |
| 4286 | return false; |
| 4287 | break; |
| 4288 | } |
| 4289 | default: |
| 4290 | |
| 4291 | /* |
| 4292 | * If it's not a simple indexscan, it probably doesn't run quickly |
| 4293 | * for zero rows out, even if it's a parameterized path using all |
| 4294 | * the joinquals. |
| 4295 | */ |
| 4296 | return false; |
| 4297 | } |
| 4298 | |
| 4299 | /* |
| 4300 | * Examine the inner path's param clauses. Any that are from the outer |
| 4301 | * path must be found in the indexclauses list, either exactly or in an |
| 4302 | * equivalent form generated by equivclass.c. Also, we must find at least |
| 4303 | * one such clause, else it's a clauseless join which isn't fast. |
| 4304 | */ |
| 4305 | found_one = false; |
| 4306 | foreach(lc, innerpath->param_info->ppi_clauses) |
| 4307 | { |
| 4308 | RestrictInfo *rinfo = (RestrictInfo *) lfirst(lc); |
| 4309 | |
| 4310 | if (join_clause_is_movable_into(rinfo, |
| 4311 | innerpath->parent->relids, |
| 4312 | joinrelids)) |
| 4313 | { |
| 4314 | if (!is_redundant_with_indexclauses(rinfo, indexclauses)) |
| 4315 | return false; |
| 4316 | found_one = true; |
| 4317 | } |
| 4318 | } |
| 4319 | return found_one; |
| 4320 | } |
| 4321 | |
| 4322 | |
| 4323 | /* |
| 4324 | * approx_tuple_count |
| 4325 | * Quick-and-dirty estimation of the number of join rows passing |
| 4326 | * a set of qual conditions. |
| 4327 | * |
| 4328 | * The quals can be either an implicitly-ANDed list of boolean expressions, |
| 4329 | * or a list of RestrictInfo nodes (typically the latter). |
| 4330 | * |
| 4331 | * We intentionally compute the selectivity under JOIN_INNER rules, even |
| 4332 | * if it's some type of outer join. This is appropriate because we are |
| 4333 | * trying to figure out how many tuples pass the initial merge or hash |
| 4334 | * join step. |
| 4335 | * |
| 4336 | * This is quick-and-dirty because we bypass clauselist_selectivity, and |
| 4337 | * simply multiply the independent clause selectivities together. Now |
| 4338 | * clauselist_selectivity often can't do any better than that anyhow, but |
| 4339 | * for some situations (such as range constraints) it is smarter. However, |
| 4340 | * we can't effectively cache the results of clauselist_selectivity, whereas |
| 4341 | * the individual clause selectivities can be and are cached. |
| 4342 | * |
| 4343 | * Since we are only using the results to estimate how many potential |
| 4344 | * output tuples are generated and passed through qpqual checking, it |
| 4345 | * seems OK to live with the approximation. |
| 4346 | */ |
| 4347 | static double |
| 4348 | approx_tuple_count(PlannerInfo *root, JoinPath *path, List *quals) |
| 4349 | { |
| 4350 | double tuples; |
| 4351 | double outer_tuples = path->outerjoinpath->rows; |
| 4352 | double inner_tuples = path->innerjoinpath->rows; |
| 4353 | SpecialJoinInfo sjinfo; |
| 4354 | Selectivity selec = 1.0; |
| 4355 | ListCell *l; |
| 4356 | |
| 4357 | /* |
| 4358 | * Make up a SpecialJoinInfo for JOIN_INNER semantics. |
| 4359 | */ |
| 4360 | sjinfo.type = T_SpecialJoinInfo; |
| 4361 | sjinfo.min_lefthand = path->outerjoinpath->parent->relids; |
| 4362 | sjinfo.min_righthand = path->innerjoinpath->parent->relids; |
| 4363 | sjinfo.syn_lefthand = path->outerjoinpath->parent->relids; |
| 4364 | sjinfo.syn_righthand = path->innerjoinpath->parent->relids; |
| 4365 | sjinfo.jointype = JOIN_INNER; |
| 4366 | /* we don't bother trying to make the remaining fields valid */ |
| 4367 | sjinfo.lhs_strict = false; |
| 4368 | sjinfo.delay_upper_joins = false; |
| 4369 | sjinfo.semi_can_btree = false; |
| 4370 | sjinfo.semi_can_hash = false; |
| 4371 | sjinfo.semi_operators = NIL; |
| 4372 | sjinfo.semi_rhs_exprs = NIL; |
| 4373 | |
| 4374 | /* Get the approximate selectivity */ |
| 4375 | foreach(l, quals) |
| 4376 | { |
| 4377 | Node *qual = (Node *) lfirst(l); |
| 4378 | |
| 4379 | /* Note that clause_selectivity will be able to cache its result */ |
| 4380 | selec *= clause_selectivity(root, qual, 0, JOIN_INNER, &sjinfo); |
| 4381 | } |
| 4382 | |
| 4383 | /* Apply it to the input relation sizes */ |
| 4384 | tuples = selec * outer_tuples * inner_tuples; |
| 4385 | |
| 4386 | return clamp_row_est(tuples); |
| 4387 | } |
| 4388 | |
| 4389 | |
| 4390 | /* |
| 4391 | * set_baserel_size_estimates |
| 4392 | * Set the size estimates for the given base relation. |
| 4393 | * |
| 4394 | * The rel's targetlist and restrictinfo list must have been constructed |
| 4395 | * already, and rel->tuples must be set. |
| 4396 | * |
| 4397 | * We set the following fields of the rel node: |
| 4398 | * rows: the estimated number of output tuples (after applying |
| 4399 | * restriction clauses). |
| 4400 | * width: the estimated average output tuple width in bytes. |
| 4401 | * baserestrictcost: estimated cost of evaluating baserestrictinfo clauses. |
| 4402 | */ |
| 4403 | void |
| 4404 | set_baserel_size_estimates(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel) |
| 4405 | { |
| 4406 | double nrows; |
| 4407 | |
| 4408 | /* Should only be applied to base relations */ |
| 4409 | Assert(rel->relid > 0); |
| 4410 | |
| 4411 | nrows = rel->tuples * |
| 4412 | clauselist_selectivity(root, |
| 4413 | rel->baserestrictinfo, |
| 4414 | 0, |
| 4415 | JOIN_INNER, |
| 4416 | NULL); |
| 4417 | |
| 4418 | rel->rows = clamp_row_est(nrows); |
| 4419 | |
| 4420 | cost_qual_eval(&rel->baserestrictcost, rel->baserestrictinfo, root); |
| 4421 | |
| 4422 | set_rel_width(root, rel); |
| 4423 | } |
| 4424 | |
| 4425 | /* |
| 4426 | * get_parameterized_baserel_size |
| 4427 | * Make a size estimate for a parameterized scan of a base relation. |
| 4428 | * |
| 4429 | * 'param_clauses' lists the additional join clauses to be used. |
| 4430 | * |
| 4431 | * set_baserel_size_estimates must have been applied already. |
| 4432 | */ |
| 4433 | double |
| 4434 | get_parameterized_baserel_size(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel, |
| 4435 | List *param_clauses) |
| 4436 | { |
| 4437 | List *allclauses; |
| 4438 | double nrows; |
| 4439 | |
| 4440 | /* |
| 4441 | * Estimate the number of rows returned by the parameterized scan, knowing |
| 4442 | * that it will apply all the extra join clauses as well as the rel's own |
| 4443 | * restriction clauses. Note that we force the clauses to be treated as |
| 4444 | * non-join clauses during selectivity estimation. |
| 4445 | */ |
| 4446 | allclauses = list_concat(list_copy(param_clauses), |
| 4447 | rel->baserestrictinfo); |
| 4448 | nrows = rel->tuples * |
| 4449 | clauselist_selectivity(root, |
| 4450 | allclauses, |
| 4451 | rel->relid, /* do not use 0! */ |
| 4452 | JOIN_INNER, |
| 4453 | NULL); |
| 4454 | nrows = clamp_row_est(nrows); |
| 4455 | /* For safety, make sure result is not more than the base estimate */ |
| 4456 | if (nrows > rel->rows) |
| 4457 | nrows = rel->rows; |
| 4458 | return nrows; |
| 4459 | } |
| 4460 | |
| 4461 | /* |
| 4462 | * set_joinrel_size_estimates |
| 4463 | * Set the size estimates for the given join relation. |
| 4464 | * |
| 4465 | * The rel's targetlist must have been constructed already, and a |
| 4466 | * restriction clause list that matches the given component rels must |
| 4467 | * be provided. |
| 4468 | * |
| 4469 | * Since there is more than one way to make a joinrel for more than two |
| 4470 | * base relations, the results we get here could depend on which component |
| 4471 | * rel pair is provided. In theory we should get the same answers no matter |
| 4472 | * which pair is provided; in practice, since the selectivity estimation |
| 4473 | * routines don't handle all cases equally well, we might not. But there's |
| 4474 | * not much to be done about it. (Would it make sense to repeat the |
| 4475 | * calculations for each pair of input rels that's encountered, and somehow |
| 4476 | * average the results? Probably way more trouble than it's worth, and |
| 4477 | * anyway we must keep the rowcount estimate the same for all paths for the |
| 4478 | * joinrel.) |
| 4479 | * |
| 4480 | * We set only the rows field here. The reltarget field was already set by |
| 4481 | * build_joinrel_tlist, and baserestrictcost is not used for join rels. |
| 4482 | */ |
| 4483 | void |
| 4484 | set_joinrel_size_estimates(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel, |
| 4485 | RelOptInfo *outer_rel, |
| 4486 | RelOptInfo *inner_rel, |
| 4487 | SpecialJoinInfo *sjinfo, |
| 4488 | List *restrictlist) |
| 4489 | { |
| 4490 | rel->rows = calc_joinrel_size_estimate(root, |
| 4491 | rel, |
| 4492 | outer_rel, |
| 4493 | inner_rel, |
| 4494 | outer_rel->rows, |
| 4495 | inner_rel->rows, |
| 4496 | sjinfo, |
| 4497 | restrictlist); |
| 4498 | } |
| 4499 | |
| 4500 | /* |
| 4501 | * get_parameterized_joinrel_size |
| 4502 | * Make a size estimate for a parameterized scan of a join relation. |
| 4503 | * |
| 4504 | * 'rel' is the joinrel under consideration. |
| 4505 | * 'outer_path', 'inner_path' are (probably also parameterized) Paths that |
| 4506 | * produce the relations being joined. |
| 4507 | * 'sjinfo' is any SpecialJoinInfo relevant to this join. |
| 4508 | * 'restrict_clauses' lists the join clauses that need to be applied at the |
| 4509 | * join node (including any movable clauses that were moved down to this join, |
| 4510 | * and not including any movable clauses that were pushed down into the |
| 4511 | * child paths). |
| 4512 | * |
| 4513 | * set_joinrel_size_estimates must have been applied already. |
| 4514 | */ |
| 4515 | double |
| 4516 | get_parameterized_joinrel_size(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel, |
| 4517 | Path *outer_path, |
| 4518 | Path *inner_path, |
| 4519 | SpecialJoinInfo *sjinfo, |
| 4520 | List *restrict_clauses) |
| 4521 | { |
| 4522 | double nrows; |
| 4523 | |
| 4524 | /* |
| 4525 | * Estimate the number of rows returned by the parameterized join as the |
| 4526 | * sizes of the input paths times the selectivity of the clauses that have |
| 4527 | * ended up at this join node. |
| 4528 | * |
| 4529 | * As with set_joinrel_size_estimates, the rowcount estimate could depend |
| 4530 | * on the pair of input paths provided, though ideally we'd get the same |
| 4531 | * estimate for any pair with the same parameterization. |
| 4532 | */ |
| 4533 | nrows = calc_joinrel_size_estimate(root, |
| 4534 | rel, |
| 4535 | outer_path->parent, |
| 4536 | inner_path->parent, |
| 4537 | outer_path->rows, |
| 4538 | inner_path->rows, |
| 4539 | sjinfo, |
| 4540 | restrict_clauses); |
| 4541 | /* For safety, make sure result is not more than the base estimate */ |
| 4542 | if (nrows > rel->rows) |
| 4543 | nrows = rel->rows; |
| 4544 | return nrows; |
| 4545 | } |
| 4546 | |
| 4547 | /* |
| 4548 | * calc_joinrel_size_estimate |
| 4549 | * Workhorse for set_joinrel_size_estimates and |
| 4550 | * get_parameterized_joinrel_size. |
| 4551 | * |
| 4552 | * outer_rel/inner_rel are the relations being joined, but they should be |
| 4553 | * assumed to have sizes outer_rows/inner_rows; those numbers might be less |
| 4554 | * than what rel->rows says, when we are considering parameterized paths. |
| 4555 | */ |
| 4556 | static double |
| 4557 | calc_joinrel_size_estimate(PlannerInfo *root, |
| 4558 | RelOptInfo *joinrel, |
| 4559 | RelOptInfo *outer_rel, |
| 4560 | RelOptInfo *inner_rel, |
| 4561 | double outer_rows, |
| 4562 | double inner_rows, |
| 4563 | SpecialJoinInfo *sjinfo, |
| 4564 | List *restrictlist_in) |
| 4565 | { |
| 4566 | /* This apparently-useless variable dodges a compiler bug in VS2013: */ |
| 4567 | List *restrictlist = restrictlist_in; |
| 4568 | JoinType jointype = sjinfo->jointype; |
| 4569 | Selectivity fkselec; |
| 4570 | Selectivity jselec; |
| 4571 | Selectivity pselec; |
| 4572 | double nrows; |
| 4573 | |
| 4574 | /* |
| 4575 | * Compute joinclause selectivity. Note that we are only considering |
| 4576 | * clauses that become restriction clauses at this join level; we are not |
| 4577 | * double-counting them because they were not considered in estimating the |
| 4578 | * sizes of the component rels. |
| 4579 | * |
| 4580 | * First, see whether any of the joinclauses can be matched to known FK |
| 4581 | * constraints. If so, drop those clauses from the restrictlist, and |
| 4582 | * instead estimate their selectivity using FK semantics. (We do this |
| 4583 | * without regard to whether said clauses are local or "pushed down". |
| 4584 | * Probably, an FK-matching clause could never be seen as pushed down at |
| 4585 | * an outer join, since it would be strict and hence would be grounds for |
| 4586 | * join strength reduction.) fkselec gets the net selectivity for |
| 4587 | * FK-matching clauses, or 1.0 if there are none. |
| 4588 | */ |
| 4589 | fkselec = get_foreign_key_join_selectivity(root, |
| 4590 | outer_rel->relids, |
| 4591 | inner_rel->relids, |
| 4592 | sjinfo, |
| 4593 | &restrictlist); |
| 4594 | |
| 4595 | /* |
| 4596 | * For an outer join, we have to distinguish the selectivity of the join's |
| 4597 | * own clauses (JOIN/ON conditions) from any clauses that were "pushed |
| 4598 | * down". For inner joins we just count them all as joinclauses. |
| 4599 | */ |
| 4600 | if (IS_OUTER_JOIN(jointype)) |
| 4601 | { |
| 4602 | List *joinquals = NIL; |
| 4603 | List *pushedquals = NIL; |
| 4604 | ListCell *l; |
| 4605 | |
| 4606 | /* Grovel through the clauses to separate into two lists */ |
| 4607 | foreach(l, restrictlist) |
| 4608 | { |
| 4609 | RestrictInfo *rinfo = lfirst_node(RestrictInfo, l); |
| 4610 | |
| 4611 | if (RINFO_IS_PUSHED_DOWN(rinfo, joinrel->relids)) |
| 4612 | pushedquals = lappend(pushedquals, rinfo); |
| 4613 | else |
| 4614 | joinquals = lappend(joinquals, rinfo); |
| 4615 | } |
| 4616 | |
| 4617 | /* Get the separate selectivities */ |
| 4618 | jselec = clauselist_selectivity(root, |
| 4619 | joinquals, |
| 4620 | 0, |
| 4621 | jointype, |
| 4622 | sjinfo); |
| 4623 | pselec = clauselist_selectivity(root, |
| 4624 | pushedquals, |
| 4625 | 0, |
| 4626 | jointype, |
| 4627 | sjinfo); |
| 4628 | |
| 4629 | /* Avoid leaking a lot of ListCells */ |
| 4630 | list_free(joinquals); |
| 4631 | list_free(pushedquals); |
| 4632 | } |
| 4633 | else |
| 4634 | { |
| 4635 | jselec = clauselist_selectivity(root, |
| 4636 | restrictlist, |
| 4637 | 0, |
| 4638 | jointype, |
| 4639 | sjinfo); |
| 4640 | pselec = 0.0; /* not used, keep compiler quiet */ |
| 4641 | } |
| 4642 | |
| 4643 | /* |
| 4644 | * Basically, we multiply size of Cartesian product by selectivity. |
| 4645 | * |
| 4646 | * If we are doing an outer join, take that into account: the joinqual |
| 4647 | * selectivity has to be clamped using the knowledge that the output must |
| 4648 | * be at least as large as the non-nullable input. However, any |
| 4649 | * pushed-down quals are applied after the outer join, so their |
| 4650 | * selectivity applies fully. |
| 4651 | * |
| 4652 | * For JOIN_SEMI and JOIN_ANTI, the selectivity is defined as the fraction |
| 4653 | * of LHS rows that have matches, and we apply that straightforwardly. |
| 4654 | */ |
| 4655 | switch (jointype) |
| 4656 | { |
| 4657 | case JOIN_INNER: |
| 4658 | nrows = outer_rows * inner_rows * fkselec * jselec; |
| 4659 | /* pselec not used */ |
| 4660 | break; |
| 4661 | case JOIN_LEFT: |
| 4662 | nrows = outer_rows * inner_rows * fkselec * jselec; |
| 4663 | if (nrows < outer_rows) |
| 4664 | nrows = outer_rows; |
| 4665 | nrows *= pselec; |
| 4666 | break; |
| 4667 | case JOIN_FULL: |
| 4668 | nrows = outer_rows * inner_rows * fkselec * jselec; |
| 4669 | if (nrows < outer_rows) |
| 4670 | nrows = outer_rows; |
| 4671 | if (nrows < inner_rows) |
| 4672 | nrows = inner_rows; |
| 4673 | nrows *= pselec; |
| 4674 | break; |
| 4675 | case JOIN_SEMI: |
| 4676 | nrows = outer_rows * fkselec * jselec; |
| 4677 | /* pselec not used */ |
| 4678 | break; |
| 4679 | case JOIN_ANTI: |
| 4680 | nrows = outer_rows * (1.0 - fkselec * jselec); |
| 4681 | nrows *= pselec; |
| 4682 | break; |
| 4683 | default: |
| 4684 | /* other values not expected here */ |
| 4685 | elog(ERROR, "unrecognized join type: %d" , (int) jointype); |
| 4686 | nrows = 0; /* keep compiler quiet */ |
| 4687 | break; |
| 4688 | } |
| 4689 | |
| 4690 | return clamp_row_est(nrows); |
| 4691 | } |
| 4692 | |
| 4693 | /* |
| 4694 | * get_foreign_key_join_selectivity |
| 4695 | * Estimate join selectivity for foreign-key-related clauses. |
| 4696 | * |
| 4697 | * Remove any clauses that can be matched to FK constraints from *restrictlist, |
| 4698 | * and return a substitute estimate of their selectivity. 1.0 is returned |
| 4699 | * when there are no such clauses. |
| 4700 | * |
| 4701 | * The reason for treating such clauses specially is that we can get better |
| 4702 | * estimates this way than by relying on clauselist_selectivity(), especially |
| 4703 | * for multi-column FKs where that function's assumption that the clauses are |
| 4704 | * independent falls down badly. But even with single-column FKs, we may be |
| 4705 | * able to get a better answer when the pg_statistic stats are missing or out |
| 4706 | * of date. |
| 4707 | */ |
| 4708 | static Selectivity |
| 4709 | get_foreign_key_join_selectivity(PlannerInfo *root, |
| 4710 | Relids outer_relids, |
| 4711 | Relids inner_relids, |
| 4712 | SpecialJoinInfo *sjinfo, |
| 4713 | List **restrictlist) |
| 4714 | { |
| 4715 | Selectivity fkselec = 1.0; |
| 4716 | JoinType jointype = sjinfo->jointype; |
| 4717 | List *worklist = *restrictlist; |
| 4718 | ListCell *lc; |
| 4719 | |
| 4720 | /* Consider each FK constraint that is known to match the query */ |
| 4721 | foreach(lc, root->fkey_list) |
| 4722 | { |
| 4723 | ForeignKeyOptInfo *fkinfo = (ForeignKeyOptInfo *) lfirst(lc); |
| 4724 | bool ref_is_outer; |
| 4725 | List *removedlist; |
| 4726 | ListCell *cell; |
| 4727 | ListCell *prev; |
| 4728 | ListCell *next; |
| 4729 | |
| 4730 | /* |
| 4731 | * This FK is not relevant unless it connects a baserel on one side of |
| 4732 | * this join to a baserel on the other side. |
| 4733 | */ |
| 4734 | if (bms_is_member(fkinfo->con_relid, outer_relids) && |
| 4735 | bms_is_member(fkinfo->ref_relid, inner_relids)) |
| 4736 | ref_is_outer = false; |
| 4737 | else if (bms_is_member(fkinfo->ref_relid, outer_relids) && |
| 4738 | bms_is_member(fkinfo->con_relid, inner_relids)) |
| 4739 | ref_is_outer = true; |
| 4740 | else |
| 4741 | continue; |
| 4742 | |
| 4743 | /* |
| 4744 | * If we're dealing with a semi/anti join, and the FK's referenced |
| 4745 | * relation is on the outside, then knowledge of the FK doesn't help |
| 4746 | * us figure out what we need to know (which is the fraction of outer |
| 4747 | * rows that have matches). On the other hand, if the referenced rel |
| 4748 | * is on the inside, then all outer rows must have matches in the |
| 4749 | * referenced table (ignoring nulls). But any restriction or join |
| 4750 | * clauses that filter that table will reduce the fraction of matches. |
| 4751 | * We can account for restriction clauses, but it's too hard to guess |
| 4752 | * how many table rows would get through a join that's inside the RHS. |
| 4753 | * Hence, if either case applies, punt and ignore the FK. |
| 4754 | */ |
| 4755 | if ((jointype == JOIN_SEMI || jointype == JOIN_ANTI) && |
| 4756 | (ref_is_outer || bms_membership(inner_relids) != BMS_SINGLETON)) |
| 4757 | continue; |
| 4758 | |
| 4759 | /* |
| 4760 | * Modify the restrictlist by removing clauses that match the FK (and |
| 4761 | * putting them into removedlist instead). It seems unsafe to modify |
| 4762 | * the originally-passed List structure, so we make a shallow copy the |
| 4763 | * first time through. |
| 4764 | */ |
| 4765 | if (worklist == *restrictlist) |
| 4766 | worklist = list_copy(worklist); |
| 4767 | |
| 4768 | removedlist = NIL; |
| 4769 | prev = NULL; |
| 4770 | for (cell = list_head(worklist); cell; cell = next) |
| 4771 | { |
| 4772 | RestrictInfo *rinfo = (RestrictInfo *) lfirst(cell); |
| 4773 | bool remove_it = false; |
| 4774 | int i; |
| 4775 | |
| 4776 | next = lnext(cell); |
| 4777 | /* Drop this clause if it matches any column of the FK */ |
| 4778 | for (i = 0; i < fkinfo->nkeys; i++) |
| 4779 | { |
| 4780 | if (rinfo->parent_ec) |
| 4781 | { |
| 4782 | /* |
| 4783 | * EC-derived clauses can only match by EC. It is okay to |
| 4784 | * consider any clause derived from the same EC as |
| 4785 | * matching the FK: even if equivclass.c chose to generate |
| 4786 | * a clause equating some other pair of Vars, it could |
| 4787 | * have generated one equating the FK's Vars. So for |
| 4788 | * purposes of estimation, we can act as though it did so. |
| 4789 | * |
| 4790 | * Note: checking parent_ec is a bit of a cheat because |
| 4791 | * there are EC-derived clauses that don't have parent_ec |
| 4792 | * set; but such clauses must compare expressions that |
| 4793 | * aren't just Vars, so they cannot match the FK anyway. |
| 4794 | */ |
| 4795 | if (fkinfo->eclass[i] == rinfo->parent_ec) |
| 4796 | { |
| 4797 | remove_it = true; |
| 4798 | break; |
| 4799 | } |
| 4800 | } |
| 4801 | else |
| 4802 | { |
| 4803 | /* |
| 4804 | * Otherwise, see if rinfo was previously matched to FK as |
| 4805 | * a "loose" clause. |
| 4806 | */ |
| 4807 | if (list_member_ptr(fkinfo->rinfos[i], rinfo)) |
| 4808 | { |
| 4809 | remove_it = true; |
| 4810 | break; |
| 4811 | } |
| 4812 | } |
| 4813 | } |
| 4814 | if (remove_it) |
| 4815 | { |
| 4816 | worklist = list_delete_cell(worklist, cell, prev); |
| 4817 | removedlist = lappend(removedlist, rinfo); |
| 4818 | } |
| 4819 | else |
| 4820 | prev = cell; |
| 4821 | } |
| 4822 | |
| 4823 | /* |
| 4824 | * If we failed to remove all the matching clauses we expected to |
| 4825 | * find, chicken out and ignore this FK; applying its selectivity |
| 4826 | * might result in double-counting. Put any clauses we did manage to |
| 4827 | * remove back into the worklist. |
| 4828 | * |
| 4829 | * Since the matching clauses are known not outerjoin-delayed, they |
| 4830 | * should certainly have appeared in the initial joinclause list. If |
| 4831 | * we didn't find them, they must have been matched to, and removed |
| 4832 | * by, some other FK in a previous iteration of this loop. (A likely |
| 4833 | * case is that two FKs are matched to the same EC; there will be only |
| 4834 | * one EC-derived clause in the initial list, so the first FK will |
| 4835 | * consume it.) Applying both FKs' selectivity independently risks |
| 4836 | * underestimating the join size; in particular, this would undo one |
| 4837 | * of the main things that ECs were invented for, namely to avoid |
| 4838 | * double-counting the selectivity of redundant equality conditions. |
| 4839 | * Later we might think of a reasonable way to combine the estimates, |
| 4840 | * but for now, just punt, since this is a fairly uncommon situation. |
| 4841 | */ |
| 4842 | if (list_length(removedlist) != |
| 4843 | (fkinfo->nmatched_ec + fkinfo->nmatched_ri)) |
| 4844 | { |
| 4845 | worklist = list_concat(worklist, removedlist); |
| 4846 | continue; |
| 4847 | } |
| 4848 | |
| 4849 | /* |
| 4850 | * Finally we get to the payoff: estimate selectivity using the |
| 4851 | * knowledge that each referencing row will match exactly one row in |
| 4852 | * the referenced table. |
| 4853 | * |
| 4854 | * XXX that's not true in the presence of nulls in the referencing |
| 4855 | * column(s), so in principle we should derate the estimate for those. |
| 4856 | * However (1) if there are any strict restriction clauses for the |
| 4857 | * referencing column(s) elsewhere in the query, derating here would |
| 4858 | * be double-counting the null fraction, and (2) it's not very clear |
| 4859 | * how to combine null fractions for multiple referencing columns. So |
| 4860 | * we do nothing for now about correcting for nulls. |
| 4861 | * |
| 4862 | * XXX another point here is that if either side of an FK constraint |
| 4863 | * is an inheritance parent, we estimate as though the constraint |
| 4864 | * covers all its children as well. This is not an unreasonable |
| 4865 | * assumption for a referencing table, ie the user probably applied |
| 4866 | * identical constraints to all child tables (though perhaps we ought |
| 4867 | * to check that). But it's not possible to have done that for a |
| 4868 | * referenced table. Fortunately, precisely because that doesn't |
| 4869 | * work, it is uncommon in practice to have an FK referencing a parent |
| 4870 | * table. So, at least for now, disregard inheritance here. |
| 4871 | */ |
| 4872 | if (jointype == JOIN_SEMI || jointype == JOIN_ANTI) |
| 4873 | { |
| 4874 | /* |
| 4875 | * For JOIN_SEMI and JOIN_ANTI, we only get here when the FK's |
| 4876 | * referenced table is exactly the inside of the join. The join |
| 4877 | * selectivity is defined as the fraction of LHS rows that have |
| 4878 | * matches. The FK implies that every LHS row has a match *in the |
| 4879 | * referenced table*; but any restriction clauses on it will |
| 4880 | * reduce the number of matches. Hence we take the join |
| 4881 | * selectivity as equal to the selectivity of the table's |
| 4882 | * restriction clauses, which is rows / tuples; but we must guard |
| 4883 | * against tuples == 0. |
| 4884 | */ |
| 4885 | RelOptInfo *ref_rel = find_base_rel(root, fkinfo->ref_relid); |
| 4886 | double ref_tuples = Max(ref_rel->tuples, 1.0); |
| 4887 | |
| 4888 | fkselec *= ref_rel->rows / ref_tuples; |
| 4889 | } |
| 4890 | else |
| 4891 | { |
| 4892 | /* |
| 4893 | * Otherwise, selectivity is exactly 1/referenced-table-size; but |
| 4894 | * guard against tuples == 0. Note we should use the raw table |
| 4895 | * tuple count, not any estimate of its filtered or joined size. |
| 4896 | */ |
| 4897 | RelOptInfo *ref_rel = find_base_rel(root, fkinfo->ref_relid); |
| 4898 | double ref_tuples = Max(ref_rel->tuples, 1.0); |
| 4899 | |
| 4900 | fkselec *= 1.0 / ref_tuples; |
| 4901 | } |
| 4902 | } |
| 4903 | |
| 4904 | *restrictlist = worklist; |
| 4905 | return fkselec; |
| 4906 | } |
| 4907 | |
| 4908 | /* |
| 4909 | * set_subquery_size_estimates |
| 4910 | * Set the size estimates for a base relation that is a subquery. |
| 4911 | * |
| 4912 | * The rel's targetlist and restrictinfo list must have been constructed |
| 4913 | * already, and the Paths for the subquery must have been completed. |
| 4914 | * We look at the subquery's PlannerInfo to extract data. |
| 4915 | * |
| 4916 | * We set the same fields as set_baserel_size_estimates. |
| 4917 | */ |
| 4918 | void |
| 4919 | set_subquery_size_estimates(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel) |
| 4920 | { |
| 4921 | PlannerInfo *subroot = rel->subroot; |
| 4922 | RelOptInfo *sub_final_rel; |
| 4923 | ListCell *lc; |
| 4924 | |
| 4925 | /* Should only be applied to base relations that are subqueries */ |
| 4926 | Assert(rel->relid > 0); |
| 4927 | Assert(planner_rt_fetch(rel->relid, root)->rtekind == RTE_SUBQUERY); |
| 4928 | |
| 4929 | /* |
| 4930 | * Copy raw number of output rows from subquery. All of its paths should |
| 4931 | * have the same output rowcount, so just look at cheapest-total. |
| 4932 | */ |
| 4933 | sub_final_rel = fetch_upper_rel(subroot, UPPERREL_FINAL, NULL); |
| 4934 | rel->tuples = sub_final_rel->cheapest_total_path->rows; |
| 4935 | |
| 4936 | /* |
| 4937 | * Compute per-output-column width estimates by examining the subquery's |
| 4938 | * targetlist. For any output that is a plain Var, get the width estimate |
| 4939 | * that was made while planning the subquery. Otherwise, we leave it to |
| 4940 | * set_rel_width to fill in a datatype-based default estimate. |
| 4941 | */ |
| 4942 | foreach(lc, subroot->parse->targetList) |
| 4943 | { |
| 4944 | TargetEntry *te = lfirst_node(TargetEntry, lc); |
| 4945 | Node *texpr = (Node *) te->expr; |
| 4946 | int32 item_width = 0; |
| 4947 | |
| 4948 | /* junk columns aren't visible to upper query */ |
| 4949 | if (te->resjunk) |
| 4950 | continue; |
| 4951 | |
| 4952 | /* |
| 4953 | * The subquery could be an expansion of a view that's had columns |
| 4954 | * added to it since the current query was parsed, so that there are |
| 4955 | * non-junk tlist columns in it that don't correspond to any column |
| 4956 | * visible at our query level. Ignore such columns. |
| 4957 | */ |
| 4958 | if (te->resno < rel->min_attr || te->resno > rel->max_attr) |
| 4959 | continue; |
| 4960 | |
| 4961 | /* |
| 4962 | * XXX This currently doesn't work for subqueries containing set |
| 4963 | * operations, because the Vars in their tlists are bogus references |
| 4964 | * to the first leaf subquery, which wouldn't give the right answer |
| 4965 | * even if we could still get to its PlannerInfo. |
| 4966 | * |
| 4967 | * Also, the subquery could be an appendrel for which all branches are |
| 4968 | * known empty due to constraint exclusion, in which case |
| 4969 | * set_append_rel_pathlist will have left the attr_widths set to zero. |
| 4970 | * |
| 4971 | * In either case, we just leave the width estimate zero until |
| 4972 | * set_rel_width fixes it. |
| 4973 | */ |
| 4974 | if (IsA(texpr, Var) && |
| 4975 | subroot->parse->setOperations == NULL) |
| 4976 | { |
| 4977 | Var *var = (Var *) texpr; |
| 4978 | RelOptInfo *subrel = find_base_rel(subroot, var->varno); |
| 4979 | |
| 4980 | item_width = subrel->attr_widths[var->varattno - subrel->min_attr]; |
| 4981 | } |
| 4982 | rel->attr_widths[te->resno - rel->min_attr] = item_width; |
| 4983 | } |
| 4984 | |
| 4985 | /* Now estimate number of output rows, etc */ |
| 4986 | set_baserel_size_estimates(root, rel); |
| 4987 | } |
| 4988 | |
| 4989 | /* |
| 4990 | * set_function_size_estimates |
| 4991 | * Set the size estimates for a base relation that is a function call. |
| 4992 | * |
| 4993 | * The rel's targetlist and restrictinfo list must have been constructed |
| 4994 | * already. |
| 4995 | * |
| 4996 | * We set the same fields as set_baserel_size_estimates. |
| 4997 | */ |
| 4998 | void |
| 4999 | set_function_size_estimates(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel) |
| 5000 | { |
| 5001 | RangeTblEntry *rte; |
| 5002 | ListCell *lc; |
| 5003 | |
| 5004 | /* Should only be applied to base relations that are functions */ |
| 5005 | Assert(rel->relid > 0); |
| 5006 | rte = planner_rt_fetch(rel->relid, root); |
| 5007 | Assert(rte->rtekind == RTE_FUNCTION); |
| 5008 | |
| 5009 | /* |
| 5010 | * Estimate number of rows the functions will return. The rowcount of the |
| 5011 | * node is that of the largest function result. |
| 5012 | */ |
| 5013 | rel->tuples = 0; |
| 5014 | foreach(lc, rte->functions) |
| 5015 | { |
| 5016 | RangeTblFunction *rtfunc = (RangeTblFunction *) lfirst(lc); |
| 5017 | double ntup = expression_returns_set_rows(root, rtfunc->funcexpr); |
| 5018 | |
| 5019 | if (ntup > rel->tuples) |
| 5020 | rel->tuples = ntup; |
| 5021 | } |
| 5022 | |
| 5023 | /* Now estimate number of output rows, etc */ |
| 5024 | set_baserel_size_estimates(root, rel); |
| 5025 | } |
| 5026 | |
| 5027 | /* |
| 5028 | * set_function_size_estimates |
| 5029 | * Set the size estimates for a base relation that is a function call. |
| 5030 | * |
| 5031 | * The rel's targetlist and restrictinfo list must have been constructed |
| 5032 | * already. |
| 5033 | * |
| 5034 | * We set the same fields as set_tablefunc_size_estimates. |
| 5035 | */ |
| 5036 | void |
| 5037 | set_tablefunc_size_estimates(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel) |
| 5038 | { |
| 5039 | /* Should only be applied to base relations that are functions */ |
| 5040 | Assert(rel->relid > 0); |
| 5041 | Assert(planner_rt_fetch(rel->relid, root)->rtekind == RTE_TABLEFUNC); |
| 5042 | |
| 5043 | rel->tuples = 100; |
| 5044 | |
| 5045 | /* Now estimate number of output rows, etc */ |
| 5046 | set_baserel_size_estimates(root, rel); |
| 5047 | } |
| 5048 | |
| 5049 | /* |
| 5050 | * set_values_size_estimates |
| 5051 | * Set the size estimates for a base relation that is a values list. |
| 5052 | * |
| 5053 | * The rel's targetlist and restrictinfo list must have been constructed |
| 5054 | * already. |
| 5055 | * |
| 5056 | * We set the same fields as set_baserel_size_estimates. |
| 5057 | */ |
| 5058 | void |
| 5059 | set_values_size_estimates(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel) |
| 5060 | { |
| 5061 | RangeTblEntry *rte; |
| 5062 | |
| 5063 | /* Should only be applied to base relations that are values lists */ |
| 5064 | Assert(rel->relid > 0); |
| 5065 | rte = planner_rt_fetch(rel->relid, root); |
| 5066 | Assert(rte->rtekind == RTE_VALUES); |
| 5067 | |
| 5068 | /* |
| 5069 | * Estimate number of rows the values list will return. We know this |
| 5070 | * precisely based on the list length (well, barring set-returning |
| 5071 | * functions in list items, but that's a refinement not catered for |
| 5072 | * anywhere else either). |
| 5073 | */ |
| 5074 | rel->tuples = list_length(rte->values_lists); |
| 5075 | |
| 5076 | /* Now estimate number of output rows, etc */ |
| 5077 | set_baserel_size_estimates(root, rel); |
| 5078 | } |
| 5079 | |
| 5080 | /* |
| 5081 | * set_cte_size_estimates |
| 5082 | * Set the size estimates for a base relation that is a CTE reference. |
| 5083 | * |
| 5084 | * The rel's targetlist and restrictinfo list must have been constructed |
| 5085 | * already, and we need an estimate of the number of rows returned by the CTE |
| 5086 | * (if a regular CTE) or the non-recursive term (if a self-reference). |
| 5087 | * |
| 5088 | * We set the same fields as set_baserel_size_estimates. |
| 5089 | */ |
| 5090 | void |
| 5091 | set_cte_size_estimates(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel, double cte_rows) |
| 5092 | { |
| 5093 | RangeTblEntry *rte; |
| 5094 | |
| 5095 | /* Should only be applied to base relations that are CTE references */ |
| 5096 | Assert(rel->relid > 0); |
| 5097 | rte = planner_rt_fetch(rel->relid, root); |
| 5098 | Assert(rte->rtekind == RTE_CTE); |
| 5099 | |
| 5100 | if (rte->self_reference) |
| 5101 | { |
| 5102 | /* |
| 5103 | * In a self-reference, arbitrarily assume the average worktable size |
| 5104 | * is about 10 times the nonrecursive term's size. |
| 5105 | */ |
| 5106 | rel->tuples = 10 * cte_rows; |
| 5107 | } |
| 5108 | else |
| 5109 | { |
| 5110 | /* Otherwise just believe the CTE's rowcount estimate */ |
| 5111 | rel->tuples = cte_rows; |
| 5112 | } |
| 5113 | |
| 5114 | /* Now estimate number of output rows, etc */ |
| 5115 | set_baserel_size_estimates(root, rel); |
| 5116 | } |
| 5117 | |
| 5118 | /* |
| 5119 | * set_namedtuplestore_size_estimates |
| 5120 | * Set the size estimates for a base relation that is a tuplestore reference. |
| 5121 | * |
| 5122 | * The rel's targetlist and restrictinfo list must have been constructed |
| 5123 | * already. |
| 5124 | * |
| 5125 | * We set the same fields as set_baserel_size_estimates. |
| 5126 | */ |
| 5127 | void |
| 5128 | set_namedtuplestore_size_estimates(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel) |
| 5129 | { |
| 5130 | RangeTblEntry *rte; |
| 5131 | |
| 5132 | /* Should only be applied to base relations that are tuplestore references */ |
| 5133 | Assert(rel->relid > 0); |
| 5134 | rte = planner_rt_fetch(rel->relid, root); |
| 5135 | Assert(rte->rtekind == RTE_NAMEDTUPLESTORE); |
| 5136 | |
| 5137 | /* |
| 5138 | * Use the estimate provided by the code which is generating the named |
| 5139 | * tuplestore. In some cases, the actual number might be available; in |
| 5140 | * others the same plan will be re-used, so a "typical" value might be |
| 5141 | * estimated and used. |
| 5142 | */ |
| 5143 | rel->tuples = rte->enrtuples; |
| 5144 | if (rel->tuples < 0) |
| 5145 | rel->tuples = 1000; |
| 5146 | |
| 5147 | /* Now estimate number of output rows, etc */ |
| 5148 | set_baserel_size_estimates(root, rel); |
| 5149 | } |
| 5150 | |
| 5151 | /* |
| 5152 | * set_result_size_estimates |
| 5153 | * Set the size estimates for an RTE_RESULT base relation |
| 5154 | * |
| 5155 | * The rel's targetlist and restrictinfo list must have been constructed |
| 5156 | * already. |
| 5157 | * |
| 5158 | * We set the same fields as set_baserel_size_estimates. |
| 5159 | */ |
| 5160 | void |
| 5161 | set_result_size_estimates(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel) |
| 5162 | { |
| 5163 | /* Should only be applied to RTE_RESULT base relations */ |
| 5164 | Assert(rel->relid > 0); |
| 5165 | Assert(planner_rt_fetch(rel->relid, root)->rtekind == RTE_RESULT); |
| 5166 | |
| 5167 | /* RTE_RESULT always generates a single row, natively */ |
| 5168 | rel->tuples = 1; |
| 5169 | |
| 5170 | /* Now estimate number of output rows, etc */ |
| 5171 | set_baserel_size_estimates(root, rel); |
| 5172 | } |
| 5173 | |
| 5174 | /* |
| 5175 | * set_foreign_size_estimates |
| 5176 | * Set the size estimates for a base relation that is a foreign table. |
| 5177 | * |
| 5178 | * There is not a whole lot that we can do here; the foreign-data wrapper |
| 5179 | * is responsible for producing useful estimates. We can do a decent job |
| 5180 | * of estimating baserestrictcost, so we set that, and we also set up width |
| 5181 | * using what will be purely datatype-driven estimates from the targetlist. |
| 5182 | * There is no way to do anything sane with the rows value, so we just put |
| 5183 | * a default estimate and hope that the wrapper can improve on it. The |
| 5184 | * wrapper's GetForeignRelSize function will be called momentarily. |
| 5185 | * |
| 5186 | * The rel's targetlist and restrictinfo list must have been constructed |
| 5187 | * already. |
| 5188 | */ |
| 5189 | void |
| 5190 | set_foreign_size_estimates(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel) |
| 5191 | { |
| 5192 | /* Should only be applied to base relations */ |
| 5193 | Assert(rel->relid > 0); |
| 5194 | |
| 5195 | rel->rows = 1000; /* entirely bogus default estimate */ |
| 5196 | |
| 5197 | cost_qual_eval(&rel->baserestrictcost, rel->baserestrictinfo, root); |
| 5198 | |
| 5199 | set_rel_width(root, rel); |
| 5200 | } |
| 5201 | |
| 5202 | |
| 5203 | /* |
| 5204 | * set_rel_width |
| 5205 | * Set the estimated output width of a base relation. |
| 5206 | * |
| 5207 | * The estimated output width is the sum of the per-attribute width estimates |
| 5208 | * for the actually-referenced columns, plus any PHVs or other expressions |
| 5209 | * that have to be calculated at this relation. This is the amount of data |
| 5210 | * we'd need to pass upwards in case of a sort, hash, etc. |
| 5211 | * |
| 5212 | * This function also sets reltarget->cost, so it's a bit misnamed now. |
| 5213 | * |
| 5214 | * NB: this works best on plain relations because it prefers to look at |
| 5215 | * real Vars. For subqueries, set_subquery_size_estimates will already have |
| 5216 | * copied up whatever per-column estimates were made within the subquery, |
| 5217 | * and for other types of rels there isn't much we can do anyway. We fall |
| 5218 | * back on (fairly stupid) datatype-based width estimates if we can't get |
| 5219 | * any better number. |
| 5220 | * |
| 5221 | * The per-attribute width estimates are cached for possible re-use while |
| 5222 | * building join relations or post-scan/join pathtargets. |
| 5223 | */ |
| 5224 | static void |
| 5225 | set_rel_width(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel) |
| 5226 | { |
| 5227 | Oid reloid = planner_rt_fetch(rel->relid, root)->relid; |
| 5228 | int32 tuple_width = 0; |
| 5229 | bool have_wholerow_var = false; |
| 5230 | ListCell *lc; |
| 5231 | |
| 5232 | /* Vars are assumed to have cost zero, but other exprs do not */ |
| 5233 | rel->reltarget->cost.startup = 0; |
| 5234 | rel->reltarget->cost.per_tuple = 0; |
| 5235 | |
| 5236 | foreach(lc, rel->reltarget->exprs) |
| 5237 | { |
| 5238 | Node *node = (Node *) lfirst(lc); |
| 5239 | |
| 5240 | /* |
| 5241 | * Ordinarily, a Var in a rel's targetlist must belong to that rel; |
| 5242 | * but there are corner cases involving LATERAL references where that |
| 5243 | * isn't so. If the Var has the wrong varno, fall through to the |
| 5244 | * generic case (it doesn't seem worth the trouble to be any smarter). |
| 5245 | */ |
| 5246 | if (IsA(node, Var) && |
| 5247 | ((Var *) node)->varno == rel->relid) |
| 5248 | { |
| 5249 | Var *var = (Var *) node; |
| 5250 | int ndx; |
| 5251 | int32 item_width; |
| 5252 | |
| 5253 | Assert(var->varattno >= rel->min_attr); |
| 5254 | Assert(var->varattno <= rel->max_attr); |
| 5255 | |
| 5256 | ndx = var->varattno - rel->min_attr; |
| 5257 | |
| 5258 | /* |
| 5259 | * If it's a whole-row Var, we'll deal with it below after we have |
| 5260 | * already cached as many attr widths as possible. |
| 5261 | */ |
| 5262 | if (var->varattno == 0) |
| 5263 | { |
| 5264 | have_wholerow_var = true; |
| 5265 | continue; |
| 5266 | } |
| 5267 | |
| 5268 | /* |
| 5269 | * The width may have been cached already (especially if it's a |
| 5270 | * subquery), so don't duplicate effort. |
| 5271 | */ |
| 5272 | if (rel->attr_widths[ndx] > 0) |
| 5273 | { |
| 5274 | tuple_width += rel->attr_widths[ndx]; |
| 5275 | continue; |
| 5276 | } |
| 5277 | |
| 5278 | /* Try to get column width from statistics */ |
| 5279 | if (reloid != InvalidOid && var->varattno > 0) |
| 5280 | { |
| 5281 | item_width = get_attavgwidth(reloid, var->varattno); |
| 5282 | if (item_width > 0) |
| 5283 | { |
| 5284 | rel->attr_widths[ndx] = item_width; |
| 5285 | tuple_width += item_width; |
| 5286 | continue; |
| 5287 | } |
| 5288 | } |
| 5289 | |
| 5290 | /* |
| 5291 | * Not a plain relation, or can't find statistics for it. Estimate |
| 5292 | * using just the type info. |
| 5293 | */ |
| 5294 | item_width = get_typavgwidth(var->vartype, var->vartypmod); |
| 5295 | Assert(item_width > 0); |
| 5296 | rel->attr_widths[ndx] = item_width; |
| 5297 | tuple_width += item_width; |
| 5298 | } |
| 5299 | else if (IsA(node, PlaceHolderVar)) |
| 5300 | { |
| 5301 | /* |
| 5302 | * We will need to evaluate the PHV's contained expression while |
| 5303 | * scanning this rel, so be sure to include it in reltarget->cost. |
| 5304 | */ |
| 5305 | PlaceHolderVar *phv = (PlaceHolderVar *) node; |
| 5306 | PlaceHolderInfo *phinfo = find_placeholder_info(root, phv, false); |
| 5307 | QualCost cost; |
| 5308 | |
| 5309 | tuple_width += phinfo->ph_width; |
| 5310 | cost_qual_eval_node(&cost, (Node *) phv->phexpr, root); |
| 5311 | rel->reltarget->cost.startup += cost.startup; |
| 5312 | rel->reltarget->cost.per_tuple += cost.per_tuple; |
| 5313 | } |
| 5314 | else |
| 5315 | { |
| 5316 | /* |
| 5317 | * We could be looking at an expression pulled up from a subquery, |
| 5318 | * or a ROW() representing a whole-row child Var, etc. Do what we |
| 5319 | * can using the expression type information. |
| 5320 | */ |
| 5321 | int32 item_width; |
| 5322 | QualCost cost; |
| 5323 | |
| 5324 | item_width = get_typavgwidth(exprType(node), exprTypmod(node)); |
| 5325 | Assert(item_width > 0); |
| 5326 | tuple_width += item_width; |
| 5327 | /* Not entirely clear if we need to account for cost, but do so */ |
| 5328 | cost_qual_eval_node(&cost, node, root); |
| 5329 | rel->reltarget->cost.startup += cost.startup; |
| 5330 | rel->reltarget->cost.per_tuple += cost.per_tuple; |
| 5331 | } |
| 5332 | } |
| 5333 | |
| 5334 | /* |
| 5335 | * If we have a whole-row reference, estimate its width as the sum of |
| 5336 | * per-column widths plus heap tuple header overhead. |
| 5337 | */ |
| 5338 | if (have_wholerow_var) |
| 5339 | { |
| 5340 | int32 wholerow_width = MAXALIGN(SizeofHeapTupleHeader); |
| 5341 | |
| 5342 | if (reloid != InvalidOid) |
| 5343 | { |
| 5344 | /* Real relation, so estimate true tuple width */ |
| 5345 | wholerow_width += get_relation_data_width(reloid, |
| 5346 | rel->attr_widths - rel->min_attr); |
| 5347 | } |
| 5348 | else |
| 5349 | { |
| 5350 | /* Do what we can with info for a phony rel */ |
| 5351 | AttrNumber i; |
| 5352 | |
| 5353 | for (i = 1; i <= rel->max_attr; i++) |
| 5354 | wholerow_width += rel->attr_widths[i - rel->min_attr]; |
| 5355 | } |
| 5356 | |
| 5357 | rel->attr_widths[0 - rel->min_attr] = wholerow_width; |
| 5358 | |
| 5359 | /* |
| 5360 | * Include the whole-row Var as part of the output tuple. Yes, that |
| 5361 | * really is what happens at runtime. |
| 5362 | */ |
| 5363 | tuple_width += wholerow_width; |
| 5364 | } |
| 5365 | |
| 5366 | Assert(tuple_width >= 0); |
| 5367 | rel->reltarget->width = tuple_width; |
| 5368 | } |
| 5369 | |
| 5370 | /* |
| 5371 | * set_pathtarget_cost_width |
| 5372 | * Set the estimated eval cost and output width of a PathTarget tlist. |
| 5373 | * |
| 5374 | * As a notational convenience, returns the same PathTarget pointer passed in. |
| 5375 | * |
| 5376 | * Most, though not quite all, uses of this function occur after we've run |
| 5377 | * set_rel_width() for base relations; so we can usually obtain cached width |
| 5378 | * estimates for Vars. If we can't, fall back on datatype-based width |
| 5379 | * estimates. Present early-planning uses of PathTargets don't need accurate |
| 5380 | * widths badly enough to justify going to the catalogs for better data. |
| 5381 | */ |
| 5382 | PathTarget * |
| 5383 | set_pathtarget_cost_width(PlannerInfo *root, PathTarget *target) |
| 5384 | { |
| 5385 | int32 tuple_width = 0; |
| 5386 | ListCell *lc; |
| 5387 | |
| 5388 | /* Vars are assumed to have cost zero, but other exprs do not */ |
| 5389 | target->cost.startup = 0; |
| 5390 | target->cost.per_tuple = 0; |
| 5391 | |
| 5392 | foreach(lc, target->exprs) |
| 5393 | { |
| 5394 | Node *node = (Node *) lfirst(lc); |
| 5395 | |
| 5396 | if (IsA(node, Var)) |
| 5397 | { |
| 5398 | Var *var = (Var *) node; |
| 5399 | int32 item_width; |
| 5400 | |
| 5401 | /* We should not see any upper-level Vars here */ |
| 5402 | Assert(var->varlevelsup == 0); |
| 5403 | |
| 5404 | /* Try to get data from RelOptInfo cache */ |
| 5405 | if (var->varno < root->simple_rel_array_size) |
| 5406 | { |
| 5407 | RelOptInfo *rel = root->simple_rel_array[var->varno]; |
| 5408 | |
| 5409 | if (rel != NULL && |
| 5410 | var->varattno >= rel->min_attr && |
| 5411 | var->varattno <= rel->max_attr) |
| 5412 | { |
| 5413 | int ndx = var->varattno - rel->min_attr; |
| 5414 | |
| 5415 | if (rel->attr_widths[ndx] > 0) |
| 5416 | { |
| 5417 | tuple_width += rel->attr_widths[ndx]; |
| 5418 | continue; |
| 5419 | } |
| 5420 | } |
| 5421 | } |
| 5422 | |
| 5423 | /* |
| 5424 | * No cached data available, so estimate using just the type info. |
| 5425 | */ |
| 5426 | item_width = get_typavgwidth(var->vartype, var->vartypmod); |
| 5427 | Assert(item_width > 0); |
| 5428 | tuple_width += item_width; |
| 5429 | } |
| 5430 | else |
| 5431 | { |
| 5432 | /* |
| 5433 | * Handle general expressions using type info. |
| 5434 | */ |
| 5435 | int32 item_width; |
| 5436 | QualCost cost; |
| 5437 | |
| 5438 | item_width = get_typavgwidth(exprType(node), exprTypmod(node)); |
| 5439 | Assert(item_width > 0); |
| 5440 | tuple_width += item_width; |
| 5441 | |
| 5442 | /* Account for cost, too */ |
| 5443 | cost_qual_eval_node(&cost, node, root); |
| 5444 | target->cost.startup += cost.startup; |
| 5445 | target->cost.per_tuple += cost.per_tuple; |
| 5446 | } |
| 5447 | } |
| 5448 | |
| 5449 | Assert(tuple_width >= 0); |
| 5450 | target->width = tuple_width; |
| 5451 | |
| 5452 | return target; |
| 5453 | } |
| 5454 | |
| 5455 | /* |
| 5456 | * relation_byte_size |
| 5457 | * Estimate the storage space in bytes for a given number of tuples |
| 5458 | * of a given width (size in bytes). |
| 5459 | */ |
| 5460 | static double |
| 5461 | relation_byte_size(double tuples, int width) |
| 5462 | { |
| 5463 | return tuples * (MAXALIGN(width) + MAXALIGN(SizeofHeapTupleHeader)); |
| 5464 | } |
| 5465 | |
| 5466 | /* |
| 5467 | * page_size |
| 5468 | * Returns an estimate of the number of pages covered by a given |
| 5469 | * number of tuples of a given width (size in bytes). |
| 5470 | */ |
| 5471 | static double |
| 5472 | page_size(double tuples, int width) |
| 5473 | { |
| 5474 | return ceil(relation_byte_size(tuples, width) / BLCKSZ); |
| 5475 | } |
| 5476 | |
| 5477 | /* |
| 5478 | * Estimate the fraction of the work that each worker will do given the |
| 5479 | * number of workers budgeted for the path. |
| 5480 | */ |
| 5481 | static double |
| 5482 | get_parallel_divisor(Path *path) |
| 5483 | { |
| 5484 | double parallel_divisor = path->parallel_workers; |
| 5485 | |
| 5486 | /* |
| 5487 | * Early experience with parallel query suggests that when there is only |
| 5488 | * one worker, the leader often makes a very substantial contribution to |
| 5489 | * executing the parallel portion of the plan, but as more workers are |
| 5490 | * added, it does less and less, because it's busy reading tuples from the |
| 5491 | * workers and doing whatever non-parallel post-processing is needed. By |
| 5492 | * the time we reach 4 workers, the leader no longer makes a meaningful |
| 5493 | * contribution. Thus, for now, estimate that the leader spends 30% of |
| 5494 | * its time servicing each worker, and the remainder executing the |
| 5495 | * parallel plan. |
| 5496 | */ |
| 5497 | if (parallel_leader_participation) |
| 5498 | { |
| 5499 | double leader_contribution; |
| 5500 | |
| 5501 | leader_contribution = 1.0 - (0.3 * path->parallel_workers); |
| 5502 | if (leader_contribution > 0) |
| 5503 | parallel_divisor += leader_contribution; |
| 5504 | } |
| 5505 | |
| 5506 | return parallel_divisor; |
| 5507 | } |
| 5508 | |
| 5509 | /* |
| 5510 | * compute_bitmap_pages |
| 5511 | * |
| 5512 | * compute number of pages fetched from heap in bitmap heap scan. |
| 5513 | */ |
| 5514 | double |
| 5515 | compute_bitmap_pages(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *baserel, Path *bitmapqual, |
| 5516 | int loop_count, Cost *cost, double *tuple) |
| 5517 | { |
| 5518 | Cost indexTotalCost; |
| 5519 | Selectivity indexSelectivity; |
| 5520 | double T; |
| 5521 | double pages_fetched; |
| 5522 | double tuples_fetched; |
| 5523 | double heap_pages; |
| 5524 | long maxentries; |
| 5525 | |
| 5526 | /* |
| 5527 | * Fetch total cost of obtaining the bitmap, as well as its total |
| 5528 | * selectivity. |
| 5529 | */ |
| 5530 | cost_bitmap_tree_node(bitmapqual, &indexTotalCost, &indexSelectivity); |
| 5531 | |
| 5532 | /* |
| 5533 | * Estimate number of main-table pages fetched. |
| 5534 | */ |
| 5535 | tuples_fetched = clamp_row_est(indexSelectivity * baserel->tuples); |
| 5536 | |
| 5537 | T = (baserel->pages > 1) ? (double) baserel->pages : 1.0; |
| 5538 | |
| 5539 | /* |
| 5540 | * For a single scan, the number of heap pages that need to be fetched is |
| 5541 | * the same as the Mackert and Lohman formula for the case T <= b (ie, no |
| 5542 | * re-reads needed). |
| 5543 | */ |
| 5544 | pages_fetched = (2.0 * T * tuples_fetched) / (2.0 * T + tuples_fetched); |
| 5545 | |
| 5546 | /* |
| 5547 | * Calculate the number of pages fetched from the heap. Then based on |
| 5548 | * current work_mem estimate get the estimated maxentries in the bitmap. |
| 5549 | * (Note that we always do this calculation based on the number of pages |
| 5550 | * that would be fetched in a single iteration, even if loop_count > 1. |
| 5551 | * That's correct, because only that number of entries will be stored in |
| 5552 | * the bitmap at one time.) |
| 5553 | */ |
| 5554 | heap_pages = Min(pages_fetched, baserel->pages); |
| 5555 | maxentries = tbm_calculate_entries(work_mem * 1024L); |
| 5556 | |
| 5557 | if (loop_count > 1) |
| 5558 | { |
| 5559 | /* |
| 5560 | * For repeated bitmap scans, scale up the number of tuples fetched in |
| 5561 | * the Mackert and Lohman formula by the number of scans, so that we |
| 5562 | * estimate the number of pages fetched by all the scans. Then |
| 5563 | * pro-rate for one scan. |
| 5564 | */ |
| 5565 | pages_fetched = index_pages_fetched(tuples_fetched * loop_count, |
| 5566 | baserel->pages, |
| 5567 | get_indexpath_pages(bitmapqual), |
| 5568 | root); |
| 5569 | pages_fetched /= loop_count; |
| 5570 | } |
| 5571 | |
| 5572 | if (pages_fetched >= T) |
| 5573 | pages_fetched = T; |
| 5574 | else |
| 5575 | pages_fetched = ceil(pages_fetched); |
| 5576 | |
| 5577 | if (maxentries < heap_pages) |
| 5578 | { |
| 5579 | double exact_pages; |
| 5580 | double lossy_pages; |
| 5581 | |
| 5582 | /* |
| 5583 | * Crude approximation of the number of lossy pages. Because of the |
| 5584 | * way tbm_lossify() is coded, the number of lossy pages increases |
| 5585 | * very sharply as soon as we run short of memory; this formula has |
| 5586 | * that property and seems to perform adequately in testing, but it's |
| 5587 | * possible we could do better somehow. |
| 5588 | */ |
| 5589 | lossy_pages = Max(0, heap_pages - maxentries / 2); |
| 5590 | exact_pages = heap_pages - lossy_pages; |
| 5591 | |
| 5592 | /* |
| 5593 | * If there are lossy pages then recompute the number of tuples |
| 5594 | * processed by the bitmap heap node. We assume here that the chance |
| 5595 | * of a given tuple coming from an exact page is the same as the |
| 5596 | * chance that a given page is exact. This might not be true, but |
| 5597 | * it's not clear how we can do any better. |
| 5598 | */ |
| 5599 | if (lossy_pages > 0) |
| 5600 | tuples_fetched = |
| 5601 | clamp_row_est(indexSelectivity * |
| 5602 | (exact_pages / heap_pages) * baserel->tuples + |
| 5603 | (lossy_pages / heap_pages) * baserel->tuples); |
| 5604 | } |
| 5605 | |
| 5606 | if (cost) |
| 5607 | *cost = indexTotalCost; |
| 5608 | if (tuple) |
| 5609 | *tuple = tuples_fetched; |
| 5610 | |
| 5611 | return pages_fetched; |
| 5612 | } |
| 5613 | |