| 1 | /* |
| 2 | * rewrite/rowsecurity.c |
| 3 | * Routines to support policies for row level security (aka RLS). |
| 4 | * |
| 5 | * Policies in PostgreSQL provide a mechanism to limit what records are |
| 6 | * returned to a user and what records a user is permitted to add to a table. |
| 7 | * |
| 8 | * Policies can be defined for specific roles, specific commands, or provided |
| 9 | * by an extension. Row security can also be enabled for a table without any |
| 10 | * policies being explicitly defined, in which case a default-deny policy is |
| 11 | * applied. |
| 12 | * |
| 13 | * Any part of the system which is returning records back to the user, or |
| 14 | * which is accepting records from the user to add to a table, needs to |
| 15 | * consider the policies associated with the table (if any). For normal |
| 16 | * queries, this is handled by calling get_row_security_policies() during |
| 17 | * rewrite, for each RTE in the query. This returns the expressions defined |
| 18 | * by the table's policies as a list that is prepended to the securityQuals |
| 19 | * list for the RTE. For queries which modify the table, any WITH CHECK |
| 20 | * clauses from the table's policies are also returned and prepended to the |
| 21 | * list of WithCheckOptions for the Query to check each row that is being |
| 22 | * added to the table. Other parts of the system (eg: COPY) simply construct |
| 23 | * a normal query and use that, if RLS is to be applied. |
| 24 | * |
| 25 | * The check to see if RLS should be enabled is provided through |
| 26 | * check_enable_rls(), which returns an enum (defined in rowsecurity.h) to |
| 27 | * indicate if RLS should be enabled (RLS_ENABLED), or bypassed (RLS_NONE or |
| 28 | * RLS_NONE_ENV). RLS_NONE_ENV indicates that RLS should be bypassed |
| 29 | * in the current environment, but that may change if the row_security GUC or |
| 30 | * the current role changes. |
| 31 | * |
| 32 | * Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2019, PostgreSQL Global Development Group |
| 33 | * Portions Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California |
| 34 | */ |
| 35 | #include "postgres.h" |
| 36 | |
| 37 | #include "access/htup_details.h" |
| 38 | #include "access/sysattr.h" |
| 39 | #include "access/table.h" |
| 40 | #include "catalog/pg_class.h" |
| 41 | #include "catalog/pg_inherits.h" |
| 42 | #include "catalog/pg_policy.h" |
| 43 | #include "catalog/pg_type.h" |
| 44 | #include "miscadmin.h" |
| 45 | #include "nodes/makefuncs.h" |
| 46 | #include "nodes/nodeFuncs.h" |
| 47 | #include "nodes/pg_list.h" |
| 48 | #include "nodes/plannodes.h" |
| 49 | #include "parser/parsetree.h" |
| 50 | #include "rewrite/rewriteDefine.h" |
| 51 | #include "rewrite/rewriteHandler.h" |
| 52 | #include "rewrite/rewriteManip.h" |
| 53 | #include "rewrite/rowsecurity.h" |
| 54 | #include "utils/acl.h" |
| 55 | #include "utils/lsyscache.h" |
| 56 | #include "utils/rel.h" |
| 57 | #include "utils/rls.h" |
| 58 | #include "utils/syscache.h" |
| 59 | #include "tcop/utility.h" |
| 60 | |
| 61 | static void get_policies_for_relation(Relation relation, |
| 62 | CmdType cmd, Oid user_id, |
| 63 | List **permissive_policies, |
| 64 | List **restrictive_policies); |
| 65 | |
| 66 | static List *sort_policies_by_name(List *policies); |
| 67 | |
| 68 | static int row_security_policy_cmp(const void *a, const void *b); |
| 69 | |
| 70 | static void add_security_quals(int rt_index, |
| 71 | List *permissive_policies, |
| 72 | List *restrictive_policies, |
| 73 | List **securityQuals, |
| 74 | bool *hasSubLinks); |
| 75 | |
| 76 | static void add_with_check_options(Relation rel, |
| 77 | int rt_index, |
| 78 | WCOKind kind, |
| 79 | List *permissive_policies, |
| 80 | List *restrictive_policies, |
| 81 | List **withCheckOptions, |
| 82 | bool *hasSubLinks, |
| 83 | bool force_using); |
| 84 | |
| 85 | static bool check_role_for_policy(ArrayType *policy_roles, Oid user_id); |
| 86 | |
| 87 | /* |
| 88 | * hooks to allow extensions to add their own security policies |
| 89 | * |
| 90 | * row_security_policy_hook_permissive can be used to add policies which |
| 91 | * are combined with the other permissive policies, using OR. |
| 92 | * |
| 93 | * row_security_policy_hook_restrictive can be used to add policies which |
| 94 | * are enforced, regardless of other policies (they are combined using AND). |
| 95 | */ |
| 96 | row_security_policy_hook_type row_security_policy_hook_permissive = NULL; |
| 97 | row_security_policy_hook_type row_security_policy_hook_restrictive = NULL; |
| 98 | |
| 99 | /* |
| 100 | * Get any row security quals and WithCheckOption checks that should be |
| 101 | * applied to the specified RTE. |
| 102 | * |
| 103 | * In addition, hasRowSecurity is set to true if row level security is enabled |
| 104 | * (even if this RTE doesn't have any row security quals), and hasSubLinks is |
| 105 | * set to true if any of the quals returned contain sublinks. |
| 106 | */ |
| 107 | void |
| 108 | get_row_security_policies(Query *root, RangeTblEntry *rte, int rt_index, |
| 109 | List **securityQuals, List **withCheckOptions, |
| 110 | bool *hasRowSecurity, bool *hasSubLinks) |
| 111 | { |
| 112 | Oid user_id; |
| 113 | int rls_status; |
| 114 | Relation rel; |
| 115 | CmdType commandType; |
| 116 | List *permissive_policies; |
| 117 | List *restrictive_policies; |
| 118 | |
| 119 | /* Defaults for the return values */ |
| 120 | *securityQuals = NIL; |
| 121 | *withCheckOptions = NIL; |
| 122 | *hasRowSecurity = false; |
| 123 | *hasSubLinks = false; |
| 124 | |
| 125 | /* If this is not a normal relation, just return immediately */ |
| 126 | if (rte->relkind != RELKIND_RELATION && |
| 127 | rte->relkind != RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE) |
| 128 | return; |
| 129 | |
| 130 | /* Switch to checkAsUser if it's set */ |
| 131 | user_id = rte->checkAsUser ? rte->checkAsUser : GetUserId(); |
| 132 | |
| 133 | /* Determine the state of RLS for this, pass checkAsUser explicitly */ |
| 134 | rls_status = check_enable_rls(rte->relid, rte->checkAsUser, false); |
| 135 | |
| 136 | /* If there is no RLS on this table at all, nothing to do */ |
| 137 | if (rls_status == RLS_NONE) |
| 138 | return; |
| 139 | |
| 140 | /* |
| 141 | * RLS_NONE_ENV means we are not doing any RLS now, but that may change |
| 142 | * with changes to the environment, so we mark it as hasRowSecurity to |
| 143 | * force a re-plan when the environment changes. |
| 144 | */ |
| 145 | if (rls_status == RLS_NONE_ENV) |
| 146 | { |
| 147 | /* |
| 148 | * Indicate that this query may involve RLS and must therefore be |
| 149 | * replanned if the environment changes (GUCs, role), but we are not |
| 150 | * adding anything here. |
| 151 | */ |
| 152 | *hasRowSecurity = true; |
| 153 | |
| 154 | return; |
| 155 | } |
| 156 | |
| 157 | /* |
| 158 | * RLS is enabled for this relation. |
| 159 | * |
| 160 | * Get the security policies that should be applied, based on the command |
| 161 | * type. Note that if this isn't the target relation, we actually want |
| 162 | * the relation's SELECT policies, regardless of the query command type, |
| 163 | * for example in UPDATE t1 ... FROM t2 we need to apply t1's UPDATE |
| 164 | * policies and t2's SELECT policies. |
| 165 | */ |
| 166 | rel = table_open(rte->relid, NoLock); |
| 167 | |
| 168 | commandType = rt_index == root->resultRelation ? |
| 169 | root->commandType : CMD_SELECT; |
| 170 | |
| 171 | /* |
| 172 | * In some cases, we need to apply USING policies (which control the |
| 173 | * visibility of records) associated with multiple command types (see |
| 174 | * specific cases below). |
| 175 | * |
| 176 | * When considering the order in which to apply these USING policies, we |
| 177 | * prefer to apply higher privileged policies, those which allow the user |
| 178 | * to lock records (UPDATE and DELETE), first, followed by policies which |
| 179 | * don't (SELECT). |
| 180 | * |
| 181 | * Note that the optimizer is free to push down and reorder quals which |
| 182 | * use leakproof functions. |
| 183 | * |
| 184 | * In all cases, if there are no policy clauses allowing access to rows in |
| 185 | * the table for the specific type of operation, then a single |
| 186 | * always-false clause (a default-deny policy) will be added (see |
| 187 | * add_security_quals). |
| 188 | */ |
| 189 | |
| 190 | /* |
| 191 | * For a SELECT, if UPDATE privileges are required (eg: the user has |
| 192 | * specified FOR [KEY] UPDATE/SHARE), then add the UPDATE USING quals |
| 193 | * first. |
| 194 | * |
| 195 | * This way, we filter out any records from the SELECT FOR SHARE/UPDATE |
| 196 | * which the user does not have access to via the UPDATE USING policies, |
| 197 | * similar to how we require normal UPDATE rights for these queries. |
| 198 | */ |
| 199 | if (commandType == CMD_SELECT && rte->requiredPerms & ACL_UPDATE) |
| 200 | { |
| 201 | List *update_permissive_policies; |
| 202 | List *update_restrictive_policies; |
| 203 | |
| 204 | get_policies_for_relation(rel, CMD_UPDATE, user_id, |
| 205 | &update_permissive_policies, |
| 206 | &update_restrictive_policies); |
| 207 | |
| 208 | add_security_quals(rt_index, |
| 209 | update_permissive_policies, |
| 210 | update_restrictive_policies, |
| 211 | securityQuals, |
| 212 | hasSubLinks); |
| 213 | } |
| 214 | |
| 215 | /* |
| 216 | * For SELECT, UPDATE and DELETE, add security quals to enforce the USING |
| 217 | * policies. These security quals control access to existing table rows. |
| 218 | * Restrictive policies are combined together using AND, and permissive |
| 219 | * policies are combined together using OR. |
| 220 | */ |
| 221 | |
| 222 | get_policies_for_relation(rel, commandType, user_id, &permissive_policies, |
| 223 | &restrictive_policies); |
| 224 | |
| 225 | if (commandType == CMD_SELECT || |
| 226 | commandType == CMD_UPDATE || |
| 227 | commandType == CMD_DELETE) |
| 228 | add_security_quals(rt_index, |
| 229 | permissive_policies, |
| 230 | restrictive_policies, |
| 231 | securityQuals, |
| 232 | hasSubLinks); |
| 233 | |
| 234 | /* |
| 235 | * Similar to above, during an UPDATE or DELETE, if SELECT rights are also |
| 236 | * required (eg: when a RETURNING clause exists, or the user has provided |
| 237 | * a WHERE clause which involves columns from the relation), we collect up |
| 238 | * CMD_SELECT policies and add them via add_security_quals first. |
| 239 | * |
| 240 | * This way, we filter out any records which are not visible through an |
| 241 | * ALL or SELECT USING policy. |
| 242 | */ |
| 243 | if ((commandType == CMD_UPDATE || commandType == CMD_DELETE) && |
| 244 | rte->requiredPerms & ACL_SELECT) |
| 245 | { |
| 246 | List *select_permissive_policies; |
| 247 | List *select_restrictive_policies; |
| 248 | |
| 249 | get_policies_for_relation(rel, CMD_SELECT, user_id, |
| 250 | &select_permissive_policies, |
| 251 | &select_restrictive_policies); |
| 252 | |
| 253 | add_security_quals(rt_index, |
| 254 | select_permissive_policies, |
| 255 | select_restrictive_policies, |
| 256 | securityQuals, |
| 257 | hasSubLinks); |
| 258 | } |
| 259 | |
| 260 | /* |
| 261 | * For INSERT and UPDATE, add withCheckOptions to verify that any new |
| 262 | * records added are consistent with the security policies. This will use |
| 263 | * each policy's WITH CHECK clause, or its USING clause if no explicit |
| 264 | * WITH CHECK clause is defined. |
| 265 | */ |
| 266 | if (commandType == CMD_INSERT || commandType == CMD_UPDATE) |
| 267 | { |
| 268 | /* This should be the target relation */ |
| 269 | Assert(rt_index == root->resultRelation); |
| 270 | |
| 271 | add_with_check_options(rel, rt_index, |
| 272 | commandType == CMD_INSERT ? |
| 273 | WCO_RLS_INSERT_CHECK : WCO_RLS_UPDATE_CHECK, |
| 274 | permissive_policies, |
| 275 | restrictive_policies, |
| 276 | withCheckOptions, |
| 277 | hasSubLinks, |
| 278 | false); |
| 279 | |
| 280 | /* |
| 281 | * Get and add ALL/SELECT policies, if SELECT rights are required for |
| 282 | * this relation (eg: when RETURNING is used). These are added as WCO |
| 283 | * policies rather than security quals to ensure that an error is |
| 284 | * raised if a policy is violated; otherwise, we might end up silently |
| 285 | * dropping rows to be added. |
| 286 | */ |
| 287 | if (rte->requiredPerms & ACL_SELECT) |
| 288 | { |
| 289 | List *select_permissive_policies = NIL; |
| 290 | List *select_restrictive_policies = NIL; |
| 291 | |
| 292 | get_policies_for_relation(rel, CMD_SELECT, user_id, |
| 293 | &select_permissive_policies, |
| 294 | &select_restrictive_policies); |
| 295 | add_with_check_options(rel, rt_index, |
| 296 | commandType == CMD_INSERT ? |
| 297 | WCO_RLS_INSERT_CHECK : WCO_RLS_UPDATE_CHECK, |
| 298 | select_permissive_policies, |
| 299 | select_restrictive_policies, |
| 300 | withCheckOptions, |
| 301 | hasSubLinks, |
| 302 | true); |
| 303 | } |
| 304 | |
| 305 | /* |
| 306 | * For INSERT ... ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE we need additional policy |
| 307 | * checks for the UPDATE which may be applied to the same RTE. |
| 308 | */ |
| 309 | if (commandType == CMD_INSERT && |
| 310 | root->onConflict && root->onConflict->action == ONCONFLICT_UPDATE) |
| 311 | { |
| 312 | List *conflict_permissive_policies; |
| 313 | List *conflict_restrictive_policies; |
| 314 | List *conflict_select_permissive_policies = NIL; |
| 315 | List *conflict_select_restrictive_policies = NIL; |
| 316 | |
| 317 | /* Get the policies that apply to the auxiliary UPDATE */ |
| 318 | get_policies_for_relation(rel, CMD_UPDATE, user_id, |
| 319 | &conflict_permissive_policies, |
| 320 | &conflict_restrictive_policies); |
| 321 | |
| 322 | /* |
| 323 | * Enforce the USING clauses of the UPDATE policies using WCOs |
| 324 | * rather than security quals. This ensures that an error is |
| 325 | * raised if the conflicting row cannot be updated due to RLS, |
| 326 | * rather than the change being silently dropped. |
| 327 | */ |
| 328 | add_with_check_options(rel, rt_index, |
| 329 | WCO_RLS_CONFLICT_CHECK, |
| 330 | conflict_permissive_policies, |
| 331 | conflict_restrictive_policies, |
| 332 | withCheckOptions, |
| 333 | hasSubLinks, |
| 334 | true); |
| 335 | |
| 336 | /* |
| 337 | * Get and add ALL/SELECT policies, as WCO_RLS_CONFLICT_CHECK WCOs |
| 338 | * to ensure they are considered when taking the UPDATE path of an |
| 339 | * INSERT .. ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE, if SELECT rights are required |
| 340 | * for this relation, also as WCO policies, again, to avoid |
| 341 | * silently dropping data. See above. |
| 342 | */ |
| 343 | if (rte->requiredPerms & ACL_SELECT) |
| 344 | { |
| 345 | get_policies_for_relation(rel, CMD_SELECT, user_id, |
| 346 | &conflict_select_permissive_policies, |
| 347 | &conflict_select_restrictive_policies); |
| 348 | add_with_check_options(rel, rt_index, |
| 349 | WCO_RLS_CONFLICT_CHECK, |
| 350 | conflict_select_permissive_policies, |
| 351 | conflict_select_restrictive_policies, |
| 352 | withCheckOptions, |
| 353 | hasSubLinks, |
| 354 | true); |
| 355 | } |
| 356 | |
| 357 | /* Enforce the WITH CHECK clauses of the UPDATE policies */ |
| 358 | add_with_check_options(rel, rt_index, |
| 359 | WCO_RLS_UPDATE_CHECK, |
| 360 | conflict_permissive_policies, |
| 361 | conflict_restrictive_policies, |
| 362 | withCheckOptions, |
| 363 | hasSubLinks, |
| 364 | false); |
| 365 | |
| 366 | /* |
| 367 | * Add ALL/SELECT policies as WCO_RLS_UPDATE_CHECK WCOs, to ensure |
| 368 | * that the final updated row is visible when taking the UPDATE |
| 369 | * path of an INSERT .. ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE, if SELECT rights |
| 370 | * are required for this relation. |
| 371 | */ |
| 372 | if (rte->requiredPerms & ACL_SELECT) |
| 373 | add_with_check_options(rel, rt_index, |
| 374 | WCO_RLS_UPDATE_CHECK, |
| 375 | conflict_select_permissive_policies, |
| 376 | conflict_select_restrictive_policies, |
| 377 | withCheckOptions, |
| 378 | hasSubLinks, |
| 379 | true); |
| 380 | } |
| 381 | } |
| 382 | |
| 383 | table_close(rel, NoLock); |
| 384 | |
| 385 | /* |
| 386 | * Copy checkAsUser to the row security quals and WithCheckOption checks, |
| 387 | * in case they contain any subqueries referring to other relations. |
| 388 | */ |
| 389 | setRuleCheckAsUser((Node *) *securityQuals, rte->checkAsUser); |
| 390 | setRuleCheckAsUser((Node *) *withCheckOptions, rte->checkAsUser); |
| 391 | |
| 392 | /* |
| 393 | * Mark this query as having row security, so plancache can invalidate it |
| 394 | * when necessary (eg: role changes) |
| 395 | */ |
| 396 | *hasRowSecurity = true; |
| 397 | |
| 398 | return; |
| 399 | } |
| 400 | |
| 401 | /* |
| 402 | * get_policies_for_relation |
| 403 | * |
| 404 | * Returns lists of permissive and restrictive policies to be applied to the |
| 405 | * specified relation, based on the command type and role. |
| 406 | * |
| 407 | * This includes any policies added by extensions. |
| 408 | */ |
| 409 | static void |
| 410 | get_policies_for_relation(Relation relation, CmdType cmd, Oid user_id, |
| 411 | List **permissive_policies, |
| 412 | List **restrictive_policies) |
| 413 | { |
| 414 | ListCell *item; |
| 415 | |
| 416 | *permissive_policies = NIL; |
| 417 | *restrictive_policies = NIL; |
| 418 | |
| 419 | /* First find all internal policies for the relation. */ |
| 420 | foreach(item, relation->rd_rsdesc->policies) |
| 421 | { |
| 422 | bool cmd_matches = false; |
| 423 | RowSecurityPolicy *policy = (RowSecurityPolicy *) lfirst(item); |
| 424 | |
| 425 | /* Always add ALL policies, if they exist. */ |
| 426 | if (policy->polcmd == '*') |
| 427 | cmd_matches = true; |
| 428 | else |
| 429 | { |
| 430 | /* Check whether the policy applies to the specified command type */ |
| 431 | switch (cmd) |
| 432 | { |
| 433 | case CMD_SELECT: |
| 434 | if (policy->polcmd == ACL_SELECT_CHR) |
| 435 | cmd_matches = true; |
| 436 | break; |
| 437 | case CMD_INSERT: |
| 438 | if (policy->polcmd == ACL_INSERT_CHR) |
| 439 | cmd_matches = true; |
| 440 | break; |
| 441 | case CMD_UPDATE: |
| 442 | if (policy->polcmd == ACL_UPDATE_CHR) |
| 443 | cmd_matches = true; |
| 444 | break; |
| 445 | case CMD_DELETE: |
| 446 | if (policy->polcmd == ACL_DELETE_CHR) |
| 447 | cmd_matches = true; |
| 448 | break; |
| 449 | default: |
| 450 | elog(ERROR, "unrecognized policy command type %d" , |
| 451 | (int) cmd); |
| 452 | break; |
| 453 | } |
| 454 | } |
| 455 | |
| 456 | /* |
| 457 | * Add this policy to the relevant list of policies if it applies to |
| 458 | * the specified role. |
| 459 | */ |
| 460 | if (cmd_matches && check_role_for_policy(policy->roles, user_id)) |
| 461 | { |
| 462 | if (policy->permissive) |
| 463 | *permissive_policies = lappend(*permissive_policies, policy); |
| 464 | else |
| 465 | *restrictive_policies = lappend(*restrictive_policies, policy); |
| 466 | } |
| 467 | } |
| 468 | |
| 469 | /* |
| 470 | * We sort restrictive policies by name so that any WCOs they generate are |
| 471 | * checked in a well-defined order. |
| 472 | */ |
| 473 | *restrictive_policies = sort_policies_by_name(*restrictive_policies); |
| 474 | |
| 475 | /* |
| 476 | * Then add any permissive or restrictive policies defined by extensions. |
| 477 | * These are simply appended to the lists of internal policies, if they |
| 478 | * apply to the specified role. |
| 479 | */ |
| 480 | if (row_security_policy_hook_restrictive) |
| 481 | { |
| 482 | List *hook_policies = |
| 483 | (*row_security_policy_hook_restrictive) (cmd, relation); |
| 484 | |
| 485 | /* |
| 486 | * As with built-in restrictive policies, we sort any hook-provided |
| 487 | * restrictive policies by name also. Note that we also intentionally |
| 488 | * always check all built-in restrictive policies, in name order, |
| 489 | * before checking restrictive policies added by hooks, in name order. |
| 490 | */ |
| 491 | hook_policies = sort_policies_by_name(hook_policies); |
| 492 | |
| 493 | foreach(item, hook_policies) |
| 494 | { |
| 495 | RowSecurityPolicy *policy = (RowSecurityPolicy *) lfirst(item); |
| 496 | |
| 497 | if (check_role_for_policy(policy->roles, user_id)) |
| 498 | *restrictive_policies = lappend(*restrictive_policies, policy); |
| 499 | } |
| 500 | } |
| 501 | |
| 502 | if (row_security_policy_hook_permissive) |
| 503 | { |
| 504 | List *hook_policies = |
| 505 | (*row_security_policy_hook_permissive) (cmd, relation); |
| 506 | |
| 507 | foreach(item, hook_policies) |
| 508 | { |
| 509 | RowSecurityPolicy *policy = (RowSecurityPolicy *) lfirst(item); |
| 510 | |
| 511 | if (check_role_for_policy(policy->roles, user_id)) |
| 512 | *permissive_policies = lappend(*permissive_policies, policy); |
| 513 | } |
| 514 | } |
| 515 | } |
| 516 | |
| 517 | /* |
| 518 | * sort_policies_by_name |
| 519 | * |
| 520 | * This is only used for restrictive policies, ensuring that any |
| 521 | * WithCheckOptions they generate are applied in a well-defined order. |
| 522 | * This is not necessary for permissive policies, since they are all combined |
| 523 | * together using OR into a single WithCheckOption check. |
| 524 | */ |
| 525 | static List * |
| 526 | sort_policies_by_name(List *policies) |
| 527 | { |
| 528 | int npol = list_length(policies); |
| 529 | RowSecurityPolicy *pols; |
| 530 | ListCell *item; |
| 531 | int ii = 0; |
| 532 | |
| 533 | if (npol <= 1) |
| 534 | return policies; |
| 535 | |
| 536 | pols = (RowSecurityPolicy *) palloc(sizeof(RowSecurityPolicy) * npol); |
| 537 | |
| 538 | foreach(item, policies) |
| 539 | { |
| 540 | RowSecurityPolicy *policy = (RowSecurityPolicy *) lfirst(item); |
| 541 | |
| 542 | pols[ii++] = *policy; |
| 543 | } |
| 544 | |
| 545 | qsort(pols, npol, sizeof(RowSecurityPolicy), row_security_policy_cmp); |
| 546 | |
| 547 | policies = NIL; |
| 548 | for (ii = 0; ii < npol; ii++) |
| 549 | policies = lappend(policies, &pols[ii]); |
| 550 | |
| 551 | return policies; |
| 552 | } |
| 553 | |
| 554 | /* |
| 555 | * qsort comparator to sort RowSecurityPolicy entries by name |
| 556 | */ |
| 557 | static int |
| 558 | row_security_policy_cmp(const void *a, const void *b) |
| 559 | { |
| 560 | const RowSecurityPolicy *pa = (const RowSecurityPolicy *) a; |
| 561 | const RowSecurityPolicy *pb = (const RowSecurityPolicy *) b; |
| 562 | |
| 563 | /* Guard against NULL policy names from extensions */ |
| 564 | if (pa->policy_name == NULL) |
| 565 | return pb->policy_name == NULL ? 0 : 1; |
| 566 | if (pb->policy_name == NULL) |
| 567 | return -1; |
| 568 | |
| 569 | return strcmp(pa->policy_name, pb->policy_name); |
| 570 | } |
| 571 | |
| 572 | /* |
| 573 | * add_security_quals |
| 574 | * |
| 575 | * Add security quals to enforce the specified RLS policies, restricting |
| 576 | * access to existing data in a table. If there are no policies controlling |
| 577 | * access to the table, then all access is prohibited --- i.e., an implicit |
| 578 | * default-deny policy is used. |
| 579 | * |
| 580 | * New security quals are added to securityQuals, and hasSubLinks is set to |
| 581 | * true if any of the quals added contain sublink subqueries. |
| 582 | */ |
| 583 | static void |
| 584 | add_security_quals(int rt_index, |
| 585 | List *permissive_policies, |
| 586 | List *restrictive_policies, |
| 587 | List **securityQuals, |
| 588 | bool *hasSubLinks) |
| 589 | { |
| 590 | ListCell *item; |
| 591 | List *permissive_quals = NIL; |
| 592 | Expr *rowsec_expr; |
| 593 | |
| 594 | /* |
| 595 | * First collect up the permissive quals. If we do not find any |
| 596 | * permissive policies then no rows are visible (this is handled below). |
| 597 | */ |
| 598 | foreach(item, permissive_policies) |
| 599 | { |
| 600 | RowSecurityPolicy *policy = (RowSecurityPolicy *) lfirst(item); |
| 601 | |
| 602 | if (policy->qual != NULL) |
| 603 | { |
| 604 | permissive_quals = lappend(permissive_quals, |
| 605 | copyObject(policy->qual)); |
| 606 | *hasSubLinks |= policy->hassublinks; |
| 607 | } |
| 608 | } |
| 609 | |
| 610 | /* |
| 611 | * We must have permissive quals, always, or no rows are visible. |
| 612 | * |
| 613 | * If we do not, then we simply return a single 'false' qual which results |
| 614 | * in no rows being visible. |
| 615 | */ |
| 616 | if (permissive_quals != NIL) |
| 617 | { |
| 618 | /* |
| 619 | * We now know that permissive policies exist, so we can now add |
| 620 | * security quals based on the USING clauses from the restrictive |
| 621 | * policies. Since these need to be combined together using AND, we |
| 622 | * can just add them one at a time. |
| 623 | */ |
| 624 | foreach(item, restrictive_policies) |
| 625 | { |
| 626 | RowSecurityPolicy *policy = (RowSecurityPolicy *) lfirst(item); |
| 627 | Expr *qual; |
| 628 | |
| 629 | if (policy->qual != NULL) |
| 630 | { |
| 631 | qual = copyObject(policy->qual); |
| 632 | ChangeVarNodes((Node *) qual, 1, rt_index, 0); |
| 633 | |
| 634 | *securityQuals = list_append_unique(*securityQuals, qual); |
| 635 | *hasSubLinks |= policy->hassublinks; |
| 636 | } |
| 637 | } |
| 638 | |
| 639 | /* |
| 640 | * Then add a single security qual combining together the USING |
| 641 | * clauses from all the permissive policies using OR. |
| 642 | */ |
| 643 | if (list_length(permissive_quals) == 1) |
| 644 | rowsec_expr = (Expr *) linitial(permissive_quals); |
| 645 | else |
| 646 | rowsec_expr = makeBoolExpr(OR_EXPR, permissive_quals, -1); |
| 647 | |
| 648 | ChangeVarNodes((Node *) rowsec_expr, 1, rt_index, 0); |
| 649 | *securityQuals = list_append_unique(*securityQuals, rowsec_expr); |
| 650 | } |
| 651 | else |
| 652 | |
| 653 | /* |
| 654 | * A permissive policy must exist for rows to be visible at all. |
| 655 | * Therefore, if there were no permissive policies found, return a |
| 656 | * single always-false clause. |
| 657 | */ |
| 658 | *securityQuals = lappend(*securityQuals, |
| 659 | makeConst(BOOLOID, -1, InvalidOid, |
| 660 | sizeof(bool), BoolGetDatum(false), |
| 661 | false, true)); |
| 662 | } |
| 663 | |
| 664 | /* |
| 665 | * add_with_check_options |
| 666 | * |
| 667 | * Add WithCheckOptions of the specified kind to check that new records |
| 668 | * added by an INSERT or UPDATE are consistent with the specified RLS |
| 669 | * policies. Normally new data must satisfy the WITH CHECK clauses from the |
| 670 | * policies. If a policy has no explicit WITH CHECK clause, its USING clause |
| 671 | * is used instead. In the special case of an UPDATE arising from an |
| 672 | * INSERT ... ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE, existing records are first checked using |
| 673 | * a WCO_RLS_CONFLICT_CHECK WithCheckOption, which always uses the USING |
| 674 | * clauses from RLS policies. |
| 675 | * |
| 676 | * New WCOs are added to withCheckOptions, and hasSubLinks is set to true if |
| 677 | * any of the check clauses added contain sublink subqueries. |
| 678 | */ |
| 679 | static void |
| 680 | add_with_check_options(Relation rel, |
| 681 | int rt_index, |
| 682 | WCOKind kind, |
| 683 | List *permissive_policies, |
| 684 | List *restrictive_policies, |
| 685 | List **withCheckOptions, |
| 686 | bool *hasSubLinks, |
| 687 | bool force_using) |
| 688 | { |
| 689 | ListCell *item; |
| 690 | List *permissive_quals = NIL; |
| 691 | |
| 692 | #define QUAL_FOR_WCO(policy) \ |
| 693 | ( !force_using && \ |
| 694 | (policy)->with_check_qual != NULL ? \ |
| 695 | (policy)->with_check_qual : (policy)->qual ) |
| 696 | |
| 697 | /* |
| 698 | * First collect up the permissive policy clauses, similar to |
| 699 | * add_security_quals. |
| 700 | */ |
| 701 | foreach(item, permissive_policies) |
| 702 | { |
| 703 | RowSecurityPolicy *policy = (RowSecurityPolicy *) lfirst(item); |
| 704 | Expr *qual = QUAL_FOR_WCO(policy); |
| 705 | |
| 706 | if (qual != NULL) |
| 707 | { |
| 708 | permissive_quals = lappend(permissive_quals, copyObject(qual)); |
| 709 | *hasSubLinks |= policy->hassublinks; |
| 710 | } |
| 711 | } |
| 712 | |
| 713 | /* |
| 714 | * There must be at least one permissive qual found or no rows are allowed |
| 715 | * to be added. This is the same as in add_security_quals. |
| 716 | * |
| 717 | * If there are no permissive_quals then we fall through and return a |
| 718 | * single 'false' WCO, preventing all new rows. |
| 719 | */ |
| 720 | if (permissive_quals != NIL) |
| 721 | { |
| 722 | /* |
| 723 | * Add a single WithCheckOption for all the permissive policy clauses, |
| 724 | * combining them together using OR. This check has no policy name, |
| 725 | * since if the check fails it means that no policy granted permission |
| 726 | * to perform the update, rather than any particular policy being |
| 727 | * violated. |
| 728 | */ |
| 729 | WithCheckOption *wco; |
| 730 | |
| 731 | wco = makeNode(WithCheckOption); |
| 732 | wco->kind = kind; |
| 733 | wco->relname = pstrdup(RelationGetRelationName(rel)); |
| 734 | wco->polname = NULL; |
| 735 | wco->cascaded = false; |
| 736 | |
| 737 | if (list_length(permissive_quals) == 1) |
| 738 | wco->qual = (Node *) linitial(permissive_quals); |
| 739 | else |
| 740 | wco->qual = (Node *) makeBoolExpr(OR_EXPR, permissive_quals, -1); |
| 741 | |
| 742 | ChangeVarNodes(wco->qual, 1, rt_index, 0); |
| 743 | |
| 744 | *withCheckOptions = list_append_unique(*withCheckOptions, wco); |
| 745 | |
| 746 | /* |
| 747 | * Now add WithCheckOptions for each of the restrictive policy clauses |
| 748 | * (which will be combined together using AND). We use a separate |
| 749 | * WithCheckOption for each restrictive policy to allow the policy |
| 750 | * name to be included in error reports if the policy is violated. |
| 751 | */ |
| 752 | foreach(item, restrictive_policies) |
| 753 | { |
| 754 | RowSecurityPolicy *policy = (RowSecurityPolicy *) lfirst(item); |
| 755 | Expr *qual = QUAL_FOR_WCO(policy); |
| 756 | WithCheckOption *wco; |
| 757 | |
| 758 | if (qual != NULL) |
| 759 | { |
| 760 | qual = copyObject(qual); |
| 761 | ChangeVarNodes((Node *) qual, 1, rt_index, 0); |
| 762 | |
| 763 | wco = makeNode(WithCheckOption); |
| 764 | wco->kind = kind; |
| 765 | wco->relname = pstrdup(RelationGetRelationName(rel)); |
| 766 | wco->polname = pstrdup(policy->policy_name); |
| 767 | wco->qual = (Node *) qual; |
| 768 | wco->cascaded = false; |
| 769 | |
| 770 | *withCheckOptions = list_append_unique(*withCheckOptions, wco); |
| 771 | *hasSubLinks |= policy->hassublinks; |
| 772 | } |
| 773 | } |
| 774 | } |
| 775 | else |
| 776 | { |
| 777 | /* |
| 778 | * If there were no policy clauses to check new data, add a single |
| 779 | * always-false WCO (a default-deny policy). |
| 780 | */ |
| 781 | WithCheckOption *wco; |
| 782 | |
| 783 | wco = makeNode(WithCheckOption); |
| 784 | wco->kind = kind; |
| 785 | wco->relname = pstrdup(RelationGetRelationName(rel)); |
| 786 | wco->polname = NULL; |
| 787 | wco->qual = (Node *) makeConst(BOOLOID, -1, InvalidOid, |
| 788 | sizeof(bool), BoolGetDatum(false), |
| 789 | false, true); |
| 790 | wco->cascaded = false; |
| 791 | |
| 792 | *withCheckOptions = lappend(*withCheckOptions, wco); |
| 793 | } |
| 794 | } |
| 795 | |
| 796 | /* |
| 797 | * check_role_for_policy - |
| 798 | * determines if the policy should be applied for the current role |
| 799 | */ |
| 800 | static bool |
| 801 | check_role_for_policy(ArrayType *policy_roles, Oid user_id) |
| 802 | { |
| 803 | int i; |
| 804 | Oid *roles = (Oid *) ARR_DATA_PTR(policy_roles); |
| 805 | |
| 806 | /* Quick fall-thru for policies applied to all roles */ |
| 807 | if (roles[0] == ACL_ID_PUBLIC) |
| 808 | return true; |
| 809 | |
| 810 | for (i = 0; i < ARR_DIMS(policy_roles)[0]; i++) |
| 811 | { |
| 812 | if (has_privs_of_role(user_id, roles[i])) |
| 813 | return true; |
| 814 | } |
| 815 | |
| 816 | return false; |
| 817 | } |
| 818 | |